Home > Blogs > Post Content
|
Since I have been in the Central Valley from May last year I've been seeing firsthand what I would say are small to large field trials of Solar Radiation Management technology. The posted photo is from June 28, showing the telltale crisscrossing used to generate cloud cover. This was followed later in the day by a large storm. The thing is, a storm this late in this part of California is virtually unheard of. Although I see this activity on an almost daily basis, some events are more dramatic than others. A massive trial occurred on Jan. 10, which left me flabbergasted while driving from Sacramento to Modesto. Stupid me, I didn't have my camera. But take a look at the video, website @ http://www.srmgi.org/ and if you really want to know what's up, be sure to read their latest report (PDF).
Posted By: Steve Williams
Friday, February 3rd 2012 at 2:27PM
You can also
click
here to view all posts by this author...
|
|
|
The cloudmakers were out in force again yesterday here in Elk Grove and environs. I got plenty of pictures, just had to walk out my front door and around the block. I wish you all could see it with your own eyes, there would be no doubt (but hopefully some justified concern).
Monday, February 6th 2012 at 11:27AM
Steve Williams
|
 |
hey,
in minnesota this year we have not had any 0--20 at all and in dec 2011-feb 2012 we have had 50s, 40s and it is kind of obvious that something is not correct.
Wednesday, February 15th 2012 at 6:43AM
powell robert
|
|
|
Thanks Robert, and my son in Michigan says it's been the same there. This winter in CA has been the coldest I remember, hardly any snow in the Sierras and the ranchers don't have any grass for their cattle to graze. I've long said that spring starts around Christmas here, but this year we're still waiting for it.
Wednesday, February 15th 2012 at 7:01AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
In 2001, United States Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced legislation that would have permanently prohibited the basing of weapons in space, and he listed chemtrails as one of a number of exotic weapons that would be banned.[25] Proponents have asserted that because explicit reference to chemtrails was entered by Congressman Kucinich into the congressional record, this constitutes official government acknowledgment of their existence.[18][26] Skeptics note that the bill in question also mentions "extraterrestrial weapons" and "environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons."[27] The bill received an unfavorable evaluation from the United States Department of Defense and died in committee,[28] with no mention of chemtrails appearing in the text of any of the three subsequent failed attempts by Kucinich to enact a Space Preservation Act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_con...
Friday, February 17th 2012 at 5:57AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL WEATHER MODIFICATION BILL ON FAST TRACK
U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995, a bill that would allow experimental weather modification by artificial methods and implement a national weather modification policy, does not include agriculture or public oversight, is on the "fast track" to be passed early in 2006.
This bill is designed to implement experimental weather modification. The appointed Board of Directors established by this bill does not include any agricultural, water, EPA, or public representatives, and has no provisions for Congressional, State, County, or public oversight of their actions or expenditures.
Weather Modification may adversely impact agricultural crops and water supplies. If the weather is changed in one state, region or county it may have severe consequences in another region, state or county. And who is going to decide the type of weather modification experimentation and who it will benefit or adversely impact?
This experimental weather modification bill will impact residents across the United States not just in California. Many current and ongoing weather modification programs (47 listed by NOAA in 2005), including the one in Wyoming that is designed to increase the snowpack, may be diverting rainwater away from Oklahoma and Texas, two states that are currently fighting fires caused by a lack of rainfall. We have no idea what the unintended consequences of the Wyoming action or other experimental weather modification programs might be now or in the future.
In addition to the experimental weather modification programs listed by NOAA, there are both private and ongoing government sponsored atmospheric testing and heating programs underway in Alaska and across the United States. Alaska Senator Stevens recently received $50 million in funding for Alaska’s atmospheric heating program.
All of these unregulated, private, government, and public weather modification programs, may also have unintended synergistic effects. Senate Bill 517 does not address these issues but intends to implement more experimental weather modification programs without a national debate or public oversight.
Artificial weather modification can impact all of us by reducing water supplies, changing agricultural crop production cycles, reducing crop production, and water availability. Since most experimental weather modification programs use chemicals released into the atmosphere the public could be subjected increasingly toxic or unknown substances that could adversely impact agricultural crops and trees.
Trimethyl Aluminum (TMA) and barium are just two of the toxic chemicals used in recent atmospheric heating and testing programs according to NASA. The Alaska H.A.A.R.P. atmospheric heating program may have the capability of changing the Jet Stream which could also change our weather.
Many private weather modification companies admit that precipitation effects may be positive or negative. Fog dispersal programs, using dry ice, liquid nitrogen, liquid propane or silver iodide may improve visibility while adversely impacting Redwood Trees along the California coast by depriving them of needed water they derive from the fog.
The increasing use of varied chemicals like aluminum (coupled with increasing air pollution), can severely impact tree health by depriving trees of water and nutrients normally absorbed through their root systems.
The December 2005 Popular Science Magazine discussed a plan to use an oil slick to stop hurricanes without noting the adverse environmental impacts of the oil used to cover the ocean.
Popular Science also noted that a private company, Dyn-O-Mat, plans to purchase jets to drop thousands of pounds of a water absorbing chemical powder (unknown substance), into hurricanes to absorb moisture that may dissipate hurricanes. There is no agriculture oversight or public hearings to determine the consequences of this and other actions or to monitor or prevent adverse impacts of this chemical once it falls on the surface of the ocean or on land.
Alaska and other areas across the United States are beginning to feel the impacts of climate change. Enormous changes are being seen in the declining health of native plant and tree communities in many areas across the United States.
NASA noted in an October 2005 newsletter that increasingly persistent contrails are "…trapping warmth in the atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…" NASA goes on to note that: "…Any increase in global cloud cover will contribute to long-term changes in Earth’s climate. Likewise, any change in Earth’s climate may have effects on natural resources…"
Global dimming and the persistent contrails, that produce man-made clouds, may have serious impacts on crop production. A recent corn crop study in Illinois shows that cloud cover reduces corn crop production while direct sunlight increases production. In addition, increasing man-made clouds may reduce the effectiveness of solar panels.
Gil Smolin, an Avian Bird Flu expert, noted on the Ron Owens Show on KGO Radio (January 5, 2006), that the flu was spread more quickly in the winter when there was a "lack of sunlight". Would man-made clouds be contributing to the lack of sunlight which might cause the Avian Bird flu to spread more quickly at other times of the year? Experimental weather modification programs could also exacerbate this problem by changing climate patterns, increasing man-made cloud cover, and changing our weather and climate patterns.
Senate Bill 517 does not address any of these important issues. Its sole purpose is to establish an experimental weather modification policy without any agriculture or public oversight of private, military, and government programs. Without oversight or public hearings agriculture, our natural resources, and watersheds may be negatively impacted. And who will be responsible to determine the synergistic effects of these programs or pay for unintended disasters created by this experimentation. If these programs change growing seasons and interrupt the pollination process crop losses could be substantial exacerbating economic losses.
Please contact all of your elected local, state and federal officials to stop this bill in its present form. This bill needs to have appropriate agriculture and public oversight, with public hearings included, prior to any more experimental projects. We need a national dialogue on this subject before more experimentation takes place.
For more information please contact:
Rosalind Peterson
Post Office Box 499
Redwood Valley, California 95470
(707) 485-7520
E-Mail: info@californiaskywatch.com
Copyright © 2006 - Rosalind Peterson - All Rights Reserved
http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/rosali...
Friday, February 17th 2012 at 6:16AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
The United States House of Representatives Science & Technology Committee has agreed to work with the UK Parliament on Geoengineering Issues starting in 2009. These formal agreements, UK Parliament hearings, U.S. House Committee Hearings in 2009-2010, final reports and other information are located in this section. (Under the current definition of Geoengineering or Climate Remediation Schemes (Solar Radiation Management): These schemes are only designed to "MASK" any warming trends.)
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org...
Friday, February 17th 2012 at 6:56AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
Enlist our team of cloud seeding experts.
Whether you are looking for a small operation or a full program, Weather Modification, Inc. can ensure your cloud seeding project runs smoothly. From Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved aircraft installations, configured for aerial cloud seeding and cloud physics, to ground-based seeding equipment and training, Weather Modification, Inc., has the equipment, experience and knowledge you need.
http://weathermodification.com/
Friday, February 17th 2012 at 7:37AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
2. Precipitation Enhancement
A brilliant product of enhanced jet contrails, artificial clouds in full force can redirect and intensify storms. This is done by creating vast areas of cloud cover, which creates shade and drops the temperature in that area. As the air cools, it contracts, dropping the pressure. This allows storms to move in which otherwise would have been repelled by higher pressure. This is critical, since states that provide the most food for America have been drying out for at least half a century. In California, for example, our underground water reservoirs have dropped consistently for the past 50 years. (What happens if California, supplying so much of our country's food, lacks water to produce sufficient crops?)
http://artificialclouds.com/
(This is exactly what I saw happen 6/28/2011)
Friday, February 17th 2012 at 8:02AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
From a Hughes Aircraft patent:
The greenhouse gases are typically in the earth's stratosphere at an altitude of seven to thirteen kilometers. This suggests that the particle seeding should be done at an altitude on the order of 10 kilometers. The particles may be seeded by dispersal from seeding aircraft; one exemplary technique may be via the jet fuel as suggested by prior work regarding the metallic particles. Once the tiny particles have been dispersed into the atmosphere, the particles may remain in suspension for up to one year.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?...
Friday, February 17th 2012 at 2:40PM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch1...
Friday, February 17th 2012 at 2:55PM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
Do you know a real cloud when you see it?
Since the turn of the millenium, millions of people worldwide have noticed strange clouds created by jet aircraft that “do not look or act like normal clouds.” By 2007, Google Search appeared to provide over a million Web pages written by people watching jet “chemical trails” (still scientifically referred to as condensation trails).
Actually, the phenomenon of jet contrails spawning clouds is not new; it’s just getting much more noticeable as we continue to increase air traffic with larger, faster, higher-flying aircraft.
A large majority of Americans are apparently still unaware that artificial clouds exist, but in many areas, including California, jet clouds are more common than natural ones. If you don’t believe that, you’re not alone. That’s what this report is about: maybe we haven’t been paying enough attention.
Most people who are aware of “chemtrails” already know that
artificially-created clouds comprise much of the visible cloud cover we see regularly. Some days jet trails are invisible; some days, they fill the sky almost completely. This report illustrates:
1. How jet contrails can persist for days and form clouds that affect local and global weather;
2. How jet aircraft and their supporting machines introduce more toxic waste into the air than any other industry;
3. How jet aircraft in the stratosphere affect global weather and temperatures, and must be considered in any climate modeling study; and
4. Why the United States, as the largest consumer of petroleum fuel products, has an obligation to provide more leadership and resources toward cleaner fuel, non-combustive energy and environmental cleanup.
This is not a complete report, just an overview of my findings, which I’m presenting as simply and accurately as possible. I took all the photos (except where noted). I only call them “artificial clouds” if I personally watched them as they were formed by jets...like these. All photos are unretouched.
http://artificialclouds.com/contrails_chem...
Friday, February 17th 2012 at 3:37PM
Steve Williams
|
Blogs Home
|
|
|
