Home Invites Blogs Careers Chat Events Forums Groups Members News Photos Polls Singles Videos
Home > Blogs > Post Content

PRESIDENT OBAMA TAKES MEASURED COURSE TO RECAPTURE THE MIDDLE, N.Y. TIMES, April 10, 2011 (587 hits)

WASHINGTON — President Obama opened the week by calling on Democrats to embrace his re-election campaign. He closed it by praising Republicans for forging a compromise to cut spending this year and avert a government shutdown.

The juxtaposition made clearer than ever the more centrist governing style Mr. Obama has adopted since his party’s big losses in November and his recapture-the-middle strategy for winning a second term.

But in agreeing Friday night to what he called the largest annual spending cut in the nation’s history, the president further decoupled himself from his party in Congress, exacerbating concerns among some Democrats about whether he is really one of them and is willing to spend political capital to defend their principles on bigger battles ahead.

The question of where Mr. Obama’s bottom line is on Democratic priorities will be that much more urgent to his party as House Republicans, energized by their success in resetting the terms of the debate in Washington, press an aggressive conservative agenda in the coming months that includes deeper spending cuts and a fundamental reshaping of the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

The president may be viewed as liberal by some of his conservative critics, but to the traditional base of the Democratic Party he is often seen as not liberal enough. As details of the budget agreement came to light on Saturday, the first criticism came from the left, with Representative Jesse L. Jackson Jr., Democrat of Illinois, accusing the president of “keeping the government open on the backs of the poor and disenfranchised.”

Even before the battle over this year’s budget, many liberals were concerned that Mr. Obama’s sponsorship of a fiscal commission that recommended changes to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid suggested a willingness on his part to go further than they would like in rethinking the social welfare system.

David Plouffe, a senior adviser to the president, dismissed the criticism and urged Democrats to “consume the details of this.”

“The easy thing to do is to go in your corner and throw political spitballs,” Mr. Plouffe said in an interview Saturday. “There are going to be plenty of times when you won’t be able to reach common ground and you have to be in pugilistic mode, but you can’t view any kind of agreement with the other side as weakness.”

The White House is hoping voters will view compromising and trying to reach consensus as signs of mature leadership in a partisan environment, not weakness — the attribute Republicans lawmakers and potential presidential candidates are most frequently trying to attach to Mr. Obama.

After Republicans found success casting Mr. Obama as a reflexive liberal intent on expanding the reach of government, the president has sought to reintroduce himself as a pragmatic leader more attuned to the political center than to the ideologies of left or right. He has talked about this brand of politics for years, but now his challenge is to employ it.

In his handling of the closing stages of the budget negotiations, he portrayed himself more as a mediator urging the two parties to do their jobs than as another Democrat at the table. As he did in December in agreeing to extend the Bush tax cuts in return for some economic stimulus measures, he proved willing to trade some of his party’s priorities in order to secure others.

Polls regularly suggest that the independent and moderate voters — particularly women — who abandoned Democrats in 2010 prefer compromise to partisan feuding, and in that sense Mr. Obama has an opportunity to win back an important segment of the coalition that sent him to the White House.

“I would not have made these cuts in better circumstances,” Mr. Obama said Saturday in his weekly radio and Internet address. “But we also prevented this important debate from being overtaken by politics and unrelated disagreements on social issues.”

The agreement the president reached with Speaker John A. Boehner and Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, represented one of the most dramatic moments of his presidency and a sharp break from the historical parallel of the 1995 showdown between President Bill Clinton and Speaker Newt Gingrich. Unlike their predecessors, Mr. Obama and Mr. Boehner decided that the peril of allowing a government shutdown — and all its accompanying political and economic fallout — was too great not to agree on middle ground.

The announcement carried all the cornerstones of a campaign theme: Mr. Obama brings people together and rises above politics at a moment when Americans face all manner of challenges. Yet the elements of the deal also underscore the tensions alive in the Obama coalition.

The president’s advisers argued that the broad coalition of supporters who gave Mr. Obama 53 percent of the popular vote and 365 electoral votes in 2008 never completely matched up with the traditional Democratic base. Heading into his re-election campaign and big legislative battles centering on the 2012 budget and the need to raise the federal debt ceiling, he is now well positioned to appeal to the political center even as his allies make the case that the current Republican Party is so extreme that liberals will ultimately get behind him as the best alternative.

Mr. Obama not only helped avoid the first government shutdown in 15 years, but also pressured Republicans to remove provisions intended to restrict financing for Planned Parenthood and to limit environmental regulations. In doing so, he assumed the role of a level-headed referee, rising above the squabbling to take ownership of a solution rather than a problem.

“He’s the undisputed grownup in the group,” said Jim Jordan, a Democratic strategist who has managed Senate and presidential campaigns across the country. “Presidents almost always compare well against Congress.”

The president is not, however, the only figure who survived a test from within his own party last week and emerged stronger.

Mr. Boehner, who faced an even bigger challenge than Mr. Obama, held his fractious Republican contingent together as an intense feud raged among social conservatives, the Tea Party movement and other elements of the party. But a fresh air of discipline coursed through the Republican conference, with few members speaking out against their speaker.

The budget showdown, which inched perilously close to an actual shutdown, drew attention to the ways the president’s leadership style had evolved from the early days when he often seemed deeply involved in legislative negotiations, focusing as much on details as on building a broad narrative case for his presidency. In this case, he increased his direct involvement in the negotiations in the final days, but for months let his advisers handle the details.

When an agreement was finally reached late Friday evening, Mr. Obama did not immediately rush to the cameras that had been waiting for hours. He did not proceed until Mr. Boehner had consulted Republican members, fearful that trumpeting the fragile deal from the White House could threaten it.

While Mr. Reid, Mr. Boehner and their allies traded incendiary charges throughout the final stages of the impasse — with each side racing to frame the debate — the president kept a distance. He prodded both sides in late-night appearances in the White House briefing room, never passing on the chance to seize the bully pulpit, but he did not publicly engage in the back-and-forth sniping that characterized the final days of the Congressional negotiations.

His message throughout the process was focused on the need to get results — an approach that seems to have induced some concern among Republicans that Mr. Obama has regained his political footing.

Karl Rove, the political strategist to President George W. Bush, reminded Republicans in his weekly newsletter of how Mr. Clinton benefited politically from the government shutdown on his watch, particularly from voters who perceived Mr. Clinton as a strong leader. He suggested that the same could happen to Mr. Obama.

“Republicans should be careful,” Mr. Rove said, “to not let him recover as he gears up for his 2012 re-election campaign.”
Posted By: Richard Kigel
Sunday, April 10th 2011 at 5:57PM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
In order for President Obama to win re-election in 2012 he needs to recapture at least all the states he won in 2008.

He needs to recapture the great middle, the white voters, the independents (translation: those people who don't follow the news or care enough to claim a party affiliation)

He can't take progressive or liberal positions--because the voters will punish him for it. That is the surest way to guarantee that he will be a one term President.

His strategy now is to occupy the center of the political spectrum and be seen as a practical problem solver. That is what most independents want.

Those of us who support the President and want him to push a more progressive agenda need to work to re-take the House of Representatives and hold the Senate. Right now, it is the Tea Party's world--we are just living in it.

They will remain in the drivers seat unless the voters put them out.




Sunday, April 10th 2011 at 6:04PM
Richard Kigel
Rich, I happen to be an Independant. I do follow the news but don't want my vote taken for granted. I like to keep my options open. I do support the president. He's in a very tight spot. Cuts, need to be made. This country is in debt , big time. We either deal with it now or our grandchildren will pay the price.
Sunday, April 10th 2011 at 8:45PM
Dorothy Johnson
Dear Dorothy:

Please accept my apology for maligning and stereotyping ALL independents.

Polling data shows that while many independent voters arfe conscientious, informed and concenred voters like you, most are what they term low information voters. These folks are usually hard workers who don't have time for much else--they don't read newspapers, magazines or follow politics. Many of them don't know much more than headlines. A good number of them rely on TV for their news.

I do admire you for keep your options open.

And I do agree with you--cutting yes. But where? Which programs?

And while it is true we have a debt problem, we DO NOT have a spending problem.

The main reason we are facing such monumental debt is due to decreased revenue. The government is taking ins much less than in years past. The reason--the Bush Tax cuts for the rich.

The solution is not that difficult--increase taxes on those wealthy ehough so that they will hardly notice.

And close the tax loopholes and gimmicks so that major corporations like GE--which made BILLIONS in profits pays ZERO in taxes.

Increased revenue is a valid way to decrease the debt.

Sunday, April 10th 2011 at 9:14PM
Richard Kigel
Actually, Rich we have both a debt issue and spending issue. Yes, we do need to increase taxes on the rich and close the loopholes. I paid IRS $3,400.00 for 2010, I am apalled GE paid 0. I used to work for them after I retired from the Army.
What program need to be cut....I would say ALL. It's amazing what people can do without when they don't have the money to pay for it.
Sunday, April 10th 2011 at 9:27PM
Dorothy Johnson
Right, Dorothy.

And it isn't only GE. So many large companies employ an army of accountants to avoid paying taxes.

Here is a part of an article that appeared in the Washington Post last year.


KEEPING TAX CUTS WILL INCREASE FEDERAL DEFICIT CBO SAYS
Washington Post, August 20, 2010

The director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said on Thursday that permanently extending tax cuts put in place under President George W. Bush would result in substantial increases in the federal deficit, placing the country in a precarious fiscal situation by 2020.

Concerns about the federal deficit have been figuring prominently in congressional debates over whether to spend more money on programs to stimulate the economy and to help the unemployed, as well as over the Bush-era tax cuts.

The CBO examined the impact if most of those cuts are extended. This scenario assumed that the breaks for higher-income taxpayers would expire.

"Under that . . . scenario, economic growth would be stronger next year; unemployment would be lower next year," CBO head Douglas Elmendorf said. But he added that "over time, that extra borrowing -- and it's a good deal of extra borrowing -- would have negative consequences on the economy."

The CBO's baseline scenario assumes that the Bush-era tax breaks will expire, as current law provides. In that case, next year's deficit would fall to $1.07 trillion, or 7 percent of the country's total economic output, or gross domestic product, according to agency estimates. By 2012, the deficit would shrink to $665 billion, or 4.2 percent of GDP.

According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, making all of the Bush tax cuts permanent would cost the federal government $680 billion in revenue over the next 10 years.



Sunday, April 10th 2011 at 10:15PM
Richard Kigel
WE THE PEOPLE...


Sunday, April 10th 2011 at 11:05PM
Richard Kigel
BACHMANN V TRUMP..."I" can not wait...

but, then which will come first, these two actulally saying they will run in 2012 or all of those recall elections...either way, "I" shall sit back relax and enjoy the show of the crazies or right-wing nuts or what every they want to be called...lol (smile)

OH,and Rich it seem that Gaddafi may be actually leaving is country as he is now talking with the African Union as I type this, this hopefully will help our president in his coinuning to say each country must determine their own destinyand not America. (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
...@Rich, now that I almost trust those on the Left to have learned a lot from how they just gave away their majority in D.C. to continue what they are doing for them to be able to live to fight another day in 2012 as a majority...

and, Rich becaue those on teh right have still not been able to move beyond taking away all things main-street, as in womean's rights and medicare and medical...more of us voters will begin to take notice of this also, I hope along with those in teh middle.(smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
...oops almost forgot about their need to take away Social security..pell grants and health care as these are their latest blinders...THE UNIONS HAVE HE REST COVERED...LOL

(smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
hI DORTHY, "I" doubt until we in this nation come to realize that wars cost money...buildong private prisons took (at least here in Ca. away the much needed public education monies) in much the same way our Federal government used social security and medical as their private piggy bank...then we will never get out of this mess we are in...every legally employed American pays into so and medical with each and every pay check along with taxes...don't they??????????????

as long as we refuse to learn / accept what ailes our country then we will never be able to find and apply a cure. (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
...mecicare ans some even pay for health care with each pay check...ever hear an of our politicians mentioning this...running on this...WHY???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?? (nup)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Here is one I bet MOST OF US have not heard anyone WE voted for bring up...LETS JUST STOP RAISING THE PRICES OF SAID PROGRAMS...ANYONE SEEN HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS RAISE MORE AND MORE OR ABOUT THE INSURANCE COMPANIES IN CA. BEING SUED...

PELL GRANTS AS RELATED TO THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM HERE IN CA.'S 9 INSTUTIONS...BEFORE SOME EVEN GET THE PELL GRANTS THE PRICE OF THE TUTITION IT IS SUPPOSE TO HELP COVER HAS BEEN RAISED YET ONCE AGAIN THEREFORE WHAT GOOD IS THE PELL GRANT SERVING FOR THE STUDENT WH OSTILL CAN NOT USE IT TO ATTEND SCHOOL!!! (NUP) ...

WE AS VOTERS MUST BEGIN TO HELP OUR PRESIDENT DO WHAT THE UNIONS ARE NOW DOING...TAKING OUR GOVERNMENT BACK AND MAKING IT WORK FOR US AND NOT AGAINST US AT LONG LAST...

YES WE CAN...YES WE MUST, BECAUSE WE ARE ACTUALLY THE GOVERNMENT!!! (SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
...OH, THE STUDENTS i AM REFERING TO WERE LOCKED OUT OF THE UCs last fall when the prices of tutition went up and once again out of the reach of too many...but, we do have private prisons that have catered foods...oh and, prisons so over crowded until now theyplan to send prisnors to county jails and jus tlet as many criminals out as they can before the public catches on as to what is goin gon...or teh mass mdeia states to talk about th ehigh crime rates in our state out of control like it is now not already out of control wilththese illegals killing on mass over drugs...no not in Mexico...but right here in and all over our state.(nup)

So sorry Rich my brother, I am just so upset at how we are so totally dependant on the opinions of the mass media for what is goin gon in our country...and, the last place we should be demeoning on for any onfo is a politician...
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
SERENA WILLIAMS WINS QATAR OPEN TO RETAKE NUMBER ONE RANK
ROSA PARKS FEATURED ON NEW POSTAGE STAMP
THE REAL STORY OF THE MOST “LIKED” PHOTO OF ALL TIME
WILL WHITE VOTERS DOOM OBAMA?
MEET ROCHELLE BALLANTYNE, 17, FROM BROOKLYN, ON THE ROAD TO BECOMING BLACK FIRST FEMALE CHESS MASTER
FREDERICK DOUGLASS STATUE COMES TO U.S. CAPITOL
S.N.L. ELECTS A NEW PRESIDENT: JAY PHAROAH TAKES OVER ROLE OF IMPERSONATING OBAMA
SERENA, FACING DEFEAT, PULLS OUT STUNNING VICTORY FOR HER FOURTH U.S. OPEN CHAMPIONSHIP
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home

(Advertise Here)
Who's Online
>> more | invite 
Black America Resources
100 Black Men of America
www.100blackmen.org

Black America's Political Action Committee (BAMPAC)
www.bampac.org

Black America Study
www.blackamericastudy.com

Black America Web
www.blackamericaweb.com

CNN Black In America Special
www.cnn.com/blackinamerica

NUL State of Black America Report
www.nul.org

Most Popular Bloggers
agnes levine has logged 24426 blog subscribers!
reginald culpepper has logged 12051 blog subscribers!
miisrael bride has logged 8216 blog subscribers!
tanisha grant has logged 5633 blog subscribers!
rickey johnson has logged 4788 blog subscribers!
>> more | add 
Latest Jobs
NETWORK ENGINEER with Arizona State University in Tempe, AZ.
SENIOR NETWORK ENGINEER with Arizona State University in Tempe, AZ.
DOC State School Teacher - Multiple Endorsements & Facilities - State of Connecticut - Accepting applications through 1/21/26 with State of Connecticut - Department of Correction, Unified School District #1 in Various locations in CT, CT.
Advanced Manufacturing Vocational Instructor - State of Connecticut - Accepting applications through 2/2/26 with State of Connecticut - Department of Correction, Unified School District #1 in Various locations in , CT.
Hospitality Vocational Instructor - State of Connecticut (Accepting applications through 2/2/26) with State of Connecticut - Department of Correction, Unified School District #1 in Various locations in , CT.
>> more | add