Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

When did the definition of Marriage change?

When did the definition of Marriage change?

· Saturday, October 11th 2008 at 5:47PM · 474 views
If the traditional definition of marriage is the state of being united to a person of the opposite s*x as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law, when was the union of two people, of the same s*x, added to this definition? It doesn't make any sense to me.

I can think of 2 people in my family involved in this kind of activity, but it's not something I condone. I was taught growing up in the "church" that marriage was a privilege a man and a woman held that cemented their promise of obligation toward each other. It's like two pieces of a puzzle that just fit. I am of that generation where everyone decided to "come out." I don't want to see all that! It's a sickness to me and I would prefer we were still in my grandparent's day where you just stayed in the closet. Way back in the darkest part of the closet. We were meant to procreate. It's the natural order of things.

That's why it's very important that a child is either raised by both parents, or surrounded by caring adults, male and female. It's not normal for a male child to be influenced by his mother alone. I was a single parent, but made sure my sons were influenced by my brothers, uncles, father and cousins. I can't teach a boy to be a man. Only a man can.

Please read more of my blogs at http://blaqsage.wordpress.com/

Share This Article

Comments (4)

Dee Gray Tuesday, October 14th 2008 at 1:29PM

The definition of marriage HAS NOT changed. People have tried to manipulate it to carnally legalize certain chosen lifestyles. I stand by the Word (the Bible) and I don't need to rehash it all over again. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Marriage accompanied by any other lifestyle as a term is oxymoronic.

Blessings...

Dee Gray Tuesday, October 14th 2008 at 6:51PM

E Private, gay people wanting to get "married" and/or other sects of religion where men want several wives are not figments of my imagination. I personally KNOW homos*xual couples who introduce themselves as 'married'..women who introduce each other as "wives" and men who introduce themselves as "husband" even when they haven't even entered into a civil "union" so puh leez.

Just to be sure I didn't make it up, let's see...here are some links to various articles talking about "gay MARRIAGE":

This RECENT ARTICLE (10/10/08) announces that gay MARRIAGE has been legalized in Connecticut:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/nyregion...

In THIS passage ALONE:

"The ruling was groundbreaking in various respects. In addition to establishing Connecticut as the third state to sanction same-s*x MARRIAGE, it was the first state high court ruling to hold that civil union statutes specifically violated the equal protection clause of a state constitution. The Massachusetts high court held in 2004 that same-s*x MARRIAGES were legal, while California’s court decision in May related to domestic partnerships and not the more broadly defined civil unions."

...your point is squashed.

Here's another one talking about gay MARRIAGE from the Financial Time Online:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c8da527e-9a17-11... ("California polls shock gay MARRIAGE supporters")

From May 2008, here's ANOTHER one:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ga... ("Gay MARRIAGE: California Supreme Court overturns ban")

Is it just me or do these ALL read in black and white, loud and clear, gay MARRIAGE????

Blessings...

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

E Private, you know I am a one to ask questions(smile)The marriage is to be between a male and a female is not only legal here in California, but it is court proof. This means it can not be taken back to court like other cases and on to the Supreme Court. It will be on the ballet on November 4 as Proposition 8(an amendment).

My questions are:1. How does discrimination fit in this being corrected like it will never come up in the future? How will a father and daughter, aunt and nephew be denied a marriage lisense, again in the future. No one can deny they are male and female. This is what bothers me as it seem that no one has thought of this as a possiable court case in this matter.

The state of California does have a place called San Francisco/ Pa, a place called South Philly and so no and so forth in America.

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

Oh, almost forgot, does this rational make Barack Obama not qualified to be the next President or do we make exceptions for some and call this "equality"? Or should I believe that I am not worthy to be called human because my mother and father never married? What do my children and grand children do because of this; should they be thrown out of the Black race?????Off of the planet, lynched,ect....

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.