Home Invites Blogs Careers Chat Events Forums Groups Members News Photos Polls Singles Videos
Home > Blogs > Post Content

Will America succumb to the cancer of racism? (2903 hits)


Will America succumb to the cancer of racism?
By H. J. Harris, author of America the Racist?

The question of how the 45.7% of Americans who did not vote for President Barack Obama would respond to his presidency emerged immediately after the election.

Will these Americans who did not vote for Obama – predominantly white republicans and conservatives – acknowledge and accept the vision for change supported by the 52.9% of Americans – white, black, Latino, democrats, republicans, conservatives, liberals and others – who voted for President Barack Obama?

Or, will those Americans who did not vote for President Obama do everything possible to undermine the desire for change that the majority of Americans voted for?

The answer became clear with the emergence of raucous groups of predominantly white republican, conservative Americans opposing the health care plan – often based on inaccurate, distorted, and sometimes blatantly untrue information. It appears those who voted against the President will make as much noise as possible, create confusion, and do whatever it takes to move America backwards – to the way things used to be – the racist past of discrimination, injustice, and hatred.

The final indication of the motive and intent of those who did not support President Obama is in the controversy over President Obama speaking to America’s school children.

The push back against this speech is proof that the cancer of racism, that has sucked the life out of the American dream for over 230 years, still rages in the hearts, minds and psyche of Americans who cannot accept the desire for change nor the reality of an African American president.

This vocal minority cloaks their racism in the guise of issues. When these issues are examined under the light of truth, they are calculated deceptions feeding the cancer of racism the majority of Americans sought to cure in the Presidential election.
There was no outcry from parents threatening to remove their children from school in 1988 when President Ronald Reagan, a Republican, spoke to school children on live television.

Neither was there an outcry in 1991 when President George H. W. Bush, a Republican, spoke to school children on radio and television. Parents did not threaten to take their children out of school to keep them from hearing the President. Some Washington Democrats objected to President Bush’s speech on political grounds, but there was no national outcry among parents.

In neither case did Boards of Education throughout America meet to decide whether to show a Presidential speech. It reminds us of the 1950’s and 1960’s when certain Boards of Education disrespected the law of the land set forth in Brown v. the Board of Education. They had to be sued to admit black students. Are we going backwards?

Consider this: perhaps the real reason that certain citizens and Boards of Education are objecting to the children watching President Obama’s speech is that they don’t want their children to see the image of an educated, articulate black man in charge – in the highest office in the land. Perhaps some Americans prefer their children watch stereotypic black men in jail, on drugs, shooting, catching or hitting a ball. But, a black man as president contradicts the paradigm of slavery and racism that is woven into the fabric and consciousness of America.

Is this outcry an attempt to perpetuate negative stereotypes of black men by preventing children from seeing and hearing an educated, articulate black man as President.

When we observe the raucous health care debate, and controversy over President Obama speech to the nation’s school children, we see that the information, concepts, and historical perspective set forth in our book, America the Racist? are critical to understanding the impact of racism on the future of America. We must understand the past, to properly act in the present and build a better, more just and righteous future for our nation.

Many have said that the election of President Barack Obama signaled the end of racism in America. However, based on the absolute partisan division, rhetoric and tone of conservative media, the health care battle, and speech controversy, it is abundantly clear that racism is still seethes and festers in America.

However, after listening to President Obama’s speech to the students, I was indeed proud that a majority of our citizens, white, black, Latino and others stood up and voiced their support for the President and his inspiring message to our children.

American is at the crossroads. We can stand for the change needed to make our country live its creed - all men are created equal. Or fall again for the fear mongers’ tactics. Will we let hate lead us back to the anger, violence, and racism of our past? Is that to be our future also? Where do we go from here?

Consider this poem from “America the Racist?”

And so America!

When the rains of truth
fall upon your naked body,

and the flood of tears
of a million captive souls
comes upon your barren shores,

and the winds of justice and equality
beat upon all that you have created,

Will America stand before the eternal Judge,
as a testament to the glory of man’s humanity to man?

Or, will America fall as yet another broken promise
that hypocritical men offer up to their God,
and be plowed into the earth
as though it never was?

The answer America is not in our stars, but in ourselves

Amen!

Mr. Harris is author of “America the Racist?” available on amazon.com. Visit www.americatheracist.com for more information. Copies are available for review by email to reviewcopy@americatheracist.com
© copyright 2009, H. J. Harris, PO Box 302, Wilmington, NC 28402; 800-570-4009; Contact: harris0477@gmail.com
Posted By: Herbert Harris
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 1:14AM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
Hello Mr. Harris,

You asked the question, “Will America succumb to the cancer of racism?”

Where have you been all you life? Do you live on planet earth? Well, I have some news for you, White America has always been racist towards Black Americans and it is a normal feel to have when you internally feel threatened.

Why do you not forget about White American and contemplate on Black Americans becoming a sovereign people or have complete independence from White America on a portion of this continent that we could call our very own country with borders that we could pursue Life, Liberty, Happiness and Prosperity in our own way for ourselves?

In other words, suppose the same could happen for Black Americans as what happened for the Hebrew people in the story of Moses, would you be elated?

Tell me what you think.

What say you?

Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 2:41AM
Harry Watley
Herbert,

What I think is that politics and race are (or should be) two different things. People like me did not vote for Obama, not because he is black, but because of his views. People like me are not against health care reform because it is pushed by our black president, but because we don't see it as part of constitutional government, and we are concerned about having so much debt already.

I am not right or left, republican or democrat. I believe in the Constitution, and judge everything by that. I am happy to see a black man as president. I am not happy with many of his policies. It does not mean I am racist. In fact, were a candidate to come forth with the views of Ron Paul, black, and a woman to boot, I'd be in the front of the line at the polls.
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 9:13AM
Steve Williams
Let me ask a question as well. Are the Democrats the party of Blacks?
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 9:15AM
Steve Williams
I forgot to mention I did not vote for McCain either, again, because I do not like his views. My candidate, Ron Paul, was not on the ballot. And I don't like him because he is republican, but because I like his views. He was urged by his supporters to run independently, but did you know, there are rules for getting on the ballot that are biased towards the two party system?
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 9:35AM
Steve Williams
I refer you to the following on ballot access:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_access

Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 9:53AM
Steve Williams
From unity08.com:

Dear fellow members of Unity08,

One of our principles at the outset of this audacious project was transparency and openness. Too often in our recent political history, what you see is not what you get.

For this reason, we are writing you today to lay out the current status of Unity08 and possible paths going forward.

First, however, it's important to reflect upon what we - together - have accomplished in shaping the current political discussion and building a sense of what is possible in this crucial election year. Two of our core ideas - the importance of a centrist, bi-partisan approach to the solving of our nation's problems and the possibility of an independent, unity ticket for the presidency have already gone from far-out to mainstream.

Barack Obama, for example, has made the theme of unity and the necessity of bridging the partisan divide an absolutely central theme of his campaign. And just last week, a group of former and present national office holders - independents, Republicans and Democrats - met in Oklahoma for the sole purpose of stating their belief that at the present perilous moment, a unity government is the only hope of solving the nation's mounting problems. When you have agreement among the likes of former RNC chairman Bill Brock and Gary Hart, you're onto something.

And, of course, waiting in the wings should the divide persist, is the potential of a serious non-partisan candidacy in the person of the Mayor of New York (two of our founders Doug Bailey and Gerald Rafshoon have stepped down from the board and may have more to say about their plans in the near future).

Can Unity08 take full credit for these remarkable developments? Of course not, but through this website, your active involvement, innumerable news stories, op-eds, and public appearances by friends like Sam Waterston, we certainly have helped to bring these ideas to the forefront of the current political discussion.

So in a larger sense, we have accomplished a major portion of what we set out to do. But in the specifics and logistics, we have fallen short.

At the current moment, we don't have enough members or enough money to take the next necessary step - achieving ballot access in 50 states - to reach the goal of establishing our on-line convention and nominating a Unity ticket for president and vice president this coming fall.

The past year has taught us that it's tough to rally millions to a process as opposed to a candidate or an issue. In the past, third party movements that have broken through the monopoly of the established parties have always been based on a person (Teddy Roosevelt in 1912 or Ross Perot in the last decade) or a burning issue (slavery in the case of the insurgent Republican party in 1860). Stirring people and moving them to action about a process change - replacing the quirky primary system that tends to drive candidates to the extremes with something more inclusive and sensible - has proven to be a lot harder than we expected.

And the Federal Election Commission hasn't helped. The Commission has taken the position that we are subject to their jurisdiction (even though two United States Supreme Court decisions hold exactly opposite) and, therefore, that we are limited to $5000 contributions from individuals (even though the Democrat and Republican Parties are able to receive $25,000 from individuals). Needless to say, this position by the FEC effectively limited our fundraising potential, especially in the crucial early going when we needed substantial money fast to get on with ballot access and the publicity necessary to build our membership.

We were caught in a peculiar catch-22; we wanted to break the dependence on big money by getting lots of small contributions from millions of members, but needed some up-front big money to help generate the millions of members to make the small contributions. And the FEC (in effect, an arm of the parties) didn't let that happen. We have challenged this ruling in the federal courts, but are still awaiting a decision and time is running out.

And so reluctantly, especially given the volatility of the present situation, we're forced to scale back - not cease - our operations and suspend our ballot access project. Our website will become less interactive (it takes staff to answer hundreds of e-mails a day) and we can't in good faith make the $5 million commitment necessary to make a serious start on ballot access.

But we're not closing our doors. We believe it is important to see our case against the FEC through (both for Unity08 and any similar movement in the future) and be ready to gear up if (when) we win our case and political circumstances warrant later this spring. Unity is in the air right now, and Mayor Bloomberg seems poised to run on his own (and the fact is that two independent candidacies wouldn't work) if the parties leave the sensible center open - but all this could change in a matter of weeks.

We still believe strongly that we have the right idea, but it just might (emphasize might because who knows what can happen in the next month) not be the right time. In the meantime, a sincere, profound thanks for your help, involvement and support so far and please keep pushin' - for the simple but very powerful idea that solutions to our nation's problems are going to take ideas and hard work from all sources, and that a political system whose stock-in-trade is division may well be the biggest problem of all.

Please know that you have already made a difference and are at the forefront of a movement that may yet save the country.

Robert Bingham
Angus King
Peter Ackerman
Zach Clayton
Lindsay Ullman
Board of Directors, Unity08
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 10:41AM
Steve Williams
thanks for your interesting comments. You appear to be an independent thinker.
What part of America will white people give to black people so they
can have their own country?
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 12:35PM
Herbert Harris
I agree with the response from Harry Watley. I really don't know why Black America believes that White America will ever change and accept them as part of their Society. My question to Black America is, do you really need White America. My answer is NO, a big damn NO YOU DON'T!! But you make them feel you do and they are going to accept that until you tell them, I DON'T NEED YOU, PERIOD! The leader of White America is a black man, HA! What else do you want? He's at the head, then why is there a problem? I'll tell you why!! Because we simply just don't reach out and help each other! We refuse to see another black come on board with us. Our attitude is "I", "I", "I", the White man attitude is, "We", "We", "We,". So that's the problem. And until we begin to support our people only then will we begin to eradicate some of this racism that exists today. Remember, "there's strength in numbers", I truly believe that. All I'm saying is to 'bond' together and help each other and stop being the only one in your 'post'. I'm talking to black folks who are in a position to help others, Black entertainers, black athletes, Oprah, Tyra, black millionaires and all of you. Ask yourself are you looking out for the next brother or sister to fill your shoe? Well let me tell you, the white man is, he's looking for the next white boy or girl to fill his shoe! Are you? www.blackwomeninsports.com. need your help. Let's start there!
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 12:42PM
Jewell Fox
Thanks for the link Jewell.
Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 3:53PM
Steve Williams

We should not be interested about White America. We ought to be interested in Black Americans. Have not our ancestors and we worried over White Americans for hundred of years already that our rationale is wacky?

The way we see reality we cannot solve simple problems even though we have advance educational degrees, am I right?

So, when are you going to concern yourself about our people becoming a sovereign people or have complete independence from White America?

I told you who I am. I also told you that everything that I said is going to happen for us.

Did you read Ms. Jewell Fox post?

Tell me what you think.

Wednesday, September 9th 2009 at 6:04PM
Harry Watley
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
Will America succumb to the cancer of racism?
1,000 more copies of life-changing ebook now available
1,000 more $2.00 copies available
Birthright Sold for the Price of a Bowl of Soup
America the Racist?
America the Racist?
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home

(Advertise Here)
Who's Online
>> more | invite 
Black America Resources
100 Black Men of America
www.100blackmen.org

Black America's Political Action Committee (BAMPAC)
www.bampac.org

Black America Study
www.blackamericastudy.com

Black America Web
www.blackamericaweb.com

CNN Black In America Special
www.cnn.com/blackinamerica

NUL State of Black America Report
www.nul.org

Most Popular Bloggers
agnes levine has logged 25345 blog subscribers!
reginald culpepper has logged 12015 blog subscribers!
miisrael bride has logged 8188 blog subscribers!
tanisha grant has logged 5515 blog subscribers!
rickey johnson has logged 4605 blog subscribers!
>> more | add 
Latest Jobs
SENIOR NETWORK ENGINEER with Arizona State University in Tempe, AZ.
DOC State School Teacher - Multiple Endorsements & Facilities - State of Connecticut - Accepting applications through 1/21/26 with State of Connecticut - Department of Correction, Unified School District #1 in Various locations in CT, CT.
Advanced Manufacturing Vocational Instructor - State of Connecticut - Accepting applications through 2/2/26 with State of Connecticut - Department of Correction, Unified School District #1 in Various locations in , CT.
Hospitality Vocational Instructor - State of Connecticut (Accepting applications through 2/2/26) with State of Connecticut - Department of Correction, Unified School District #1 in Various locations in , CT.
Assistant or Associate Professor - Department of Physical Therapy (DPT), Brookdale Campus with Hunter College in New York City, NY.
>> more | add