It looks like all the enslaved people crave to identify the Jew. Without enslavement there would be no Jew. Only the enslaved keep on insuring that the identity appears as legitimate.
Mr. Morris offers no evidence or proof that race is man made; all that he said is that race is man made and you are buying into it, am I right. Prove that race is man made, just don’t say that it is, prove it.
I disagree with your reason that race is man made and how I went about proving it was that I clearly showed you that there are noticeable physical differences between a Black American and a Chinese person and the differences are not man made. No one can mistaken a Chinese man for a Black American man and if you mistaken a Chinese man for a Black American man you are an ignorant stupid ass.
Jake a lot of dumb asses makes videos and posts them of youtube, am I right.
Harry, physical differences do not prove that race is a constructive word. Do you know where and with whom and why this word originated? You point to physical differences and that proves race exists? As long as you're at school anyway, you might consider a course in Logic. What race is is a WORD.
Tuesday, December 4th 2012 at 7:37PM
Steve Williams
Would you agree with the following classifications Harry? I'd like to hear especially about the Asians. Am I to understand that all these people LOOK THE SAME?
RACIAL CATEGORY (Check as many as apply)
American Indian or Alaska Native
A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
Asian
A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
Black or African American
A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.
White
A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
And why do all the categories but one, reference "original peoples"?
Tuesday, December 4th 2012 at 8:57PM
Steve Williams
Hello Steve,
You concede that there are visible physical differences between a Chinese and a Black American man, right. Well, my question to you is can you at the least describe two of these physical differences for me right now? You can pick the hair or the eyes or the general skin tone or the language, what ever, but describe two differences for me, okay.
You said you read 1, 2, and 3 of the 5 books you suggested I read, right. Since, you read these books you have extracted the proof that the people living today in the State of Israel are not the real Jewish people descended from Moses, right.
What I would like you to do Jake is lay out at the least two or three pieces of evidence that the Jewish people living in the State of Israel are fraudulent, okay. I have laid out my proof that they are the real people of Moses since they practice the Passover exactly as Moses instituted it 4000 years ago then I can compare what you have as your proof to what I have as my proof and we will see who is wrong and who is right.
But, until I get your solid and concrete proof to make the different I will remain the party that is right. Books and a stupid man’s opinion in a video are not proof. You must extract the information as your proof out of these books and the video and submit for examination.
I think that you may be confused as to what constitute proof. Therefore, you need to study the definition of PROOF!
I asked first Harry. How about you describe for me the differences between a Chinese man and an Indian man, and tell me are they of one race, as the federal government says above, i.e. Asian, or are they two different races?
Wednesday, December 5th 2012 at 7:19AM
Steve Williams
Hello Steve,
I am not playing any games with you. If we are going to dialogue it is going to be an up-right and honest dialogue or I will not respond, okay.
You did not ask a question. You made a statement and said, “Harry physical differences do not prove that race is a constructive word’, am I right. At the ending you said that race is just a word. But, words are what convey thoughts, right.
And, therefore I asked if you can point out at the least two visible differences between a Chinese and a Black American man and I suggested that maybe you can use hair or eyes. I am not interest in an argument. I am interest in proving my point. So would you answer my question?
Wrong Harry. I asked two questions prior to yours.
Would you agree with the following classifications Harry? I'd like to hear especially about the Asians. Am I to understand that all these people LOOK THE SAME?
And why do all the categories but one, reference "original peoples"?
