Home > Blogs > Post Content
|
I have been told that the physical strength of Man is superior to Woman, and proof of male superiority. I have responded that Woman possesses strength that is superior to Man. I have been called out on this and told to offer proof. I have proof to offer but thought it appropriate to give my Sisters a shot at it first. This is not about male vs. female superiority, but rather about the relative strengths of Man and Woman and how they complement each other.
Posted By: Steve Williams
Sunday, November 1st 2009 at 5:31PM
You can also
click
here to view all posts by this author...
|
 |
A woman's strength isn't always physical, although men are often stronger because their physical make up is more muscle and women has more body fat content. Therefore, in other matters women show stronger advantages in other ways. I personally feel a woman is strong in giving birth, and in dealings with very difficult siutations. It does even out I agree with Mozell on that.
Sunday, November 1st 2009 at 6:27PM
MIISRAEL Bride
|
 |
Hello Steve, The suggestion I gave you to take a survey from women whether they felt that a man is superior to them, you have approached it wrong. What you are surveying is not the strength of a woman or the physical strength of a man either. What you want it to find out from a woman is whether she felt that a man is innately superior to a woman. The key word is innate or inborn, since that covers everything, mentally, psychologically and mentally. Do you understand what I am saying? What say you?
Sunday, November 1st 2009 at 11:44PM
Harry Watley
|
 |
/* My opinion has been posted to Brother Harry's article/blog entitled "My Opinion about Caucasian People." Brother Harry, A survey is interesting...from a woman's point of view as we, I believe, have made ours. Go with it Brother Steve! I can dig where you're coming from. Peace and Love, Y'all. SANKOFA, Greg. */
Monday, November 2nd 2009 at 2:16AM
Gregory V. Boulware, Esq.
|
 |
Hello to all, It does not seem to me that any of you understands that there is an order to everything. I believe that you all are ignorant to that fact. A relationship between a man and a woman has to have an order. To be equal to each other when they are different from each other is naturally out of order. You should first ask yourself pertinent questions such as, what sort of relationship is a man and a woman? Are they different persons from each other? What are their aims or intended accomplishments by being together and if they are together who would take the lead? We know that by virtue of common sense, to Captain cannot run one ship. Most of us are not rationally thinking people. Tell me what you think.
Monday, November 2nd 2009 at 6:37PM
Harry Watley
|
 |
Sister Miisrael: "I personally feel a woman is strong in giving birth, and in dealings with very difficult situations." If I may add my thought. The Strength of Woman is Caring.
Monday, November 2nd 2009 at 7:11PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
...""I personally feel a woman is strong in giving birth,"... I absolutely agree with you Brother Steve, because before I read any comments to this blog, I'd already written the following... I think a woman carrying another Human Being inside her body for 9 months is scientific proof enough and the ability to push out this human being from her body enduring agonizing pain...
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 11:05AM
Jen Fad
|
 |
Sister Jen, beautifully put. And that is just the beginning, yes? Women care for their babies, their men, each other, themselves, the world. Often without the help of a partner who should be there.
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 12:19PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Great Blog and reading, I didnt want to respond on the subject of Man Strength vs Woman Strength but my Friend and Yours wrote me.............. Siebra Muhammad wrote (Tue Nov 3rd, 2009 at 11:37AM): HAHAHAHAHA...Just look at you trembling like a tree leaf. I am injecting YOU with a dose of YOUR own medicine and YOU can't handle it. It's plain and simple, means instant invitation to your just reward. It's not a threat, it's a promise. Never think you can fight; but I will do them all a favor in putting my size 9 shoe up your ass..........!!! Now I am old, fat and simple-minded but NO Woman of any SIZE has ever put up her foot toward me, without my quickness and strength repelling the Feminine CutiePie. I follow the Martial Art fashioned by Our Leader President Baraka Hussein Obama in his Fight with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 1:38PM
robert powell
|
 |
Hello to all, By my suggestion, the question Steve was to ask is whether a woman feels that a man is innately superior to her. Steve presented the question wrongly. Steve’s blog was never supposed to be about who is stronger. The discussion that is going on now is moot. For instance, a man could say I am stronger because I have more muscle mass. Then, a woman could say she is stronger because she gives birth to another human being and this senseless discussion has no end, value or significance. The question is whether a man is innately superior to a woman from a woman’s point of view. Okay.
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 1:47PM
Harry Watley
|
 |
Hello Harry, The questions are related, and the answer to yours has been answered. In the negative. But if you wish to promote this view, don't be surprised if it interferes with your PROPHETIC MISSION. Few will mistake a troglodyte for a prophet. If you think that I posted this blog at your suggestion, you are wrong. It is not the survey you suggested, and that is why it was not phrased to your approval.
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 4:29PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
And Harry, all you have done so far is complain that I did not post my blog to your liking. How about you produce your evidence now, that a man is innately superior to a woman.
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 4:44PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Hello Steve, Steve the initial dialogue was whether a man was innately superior to a woman. You and others did not think so. I then suggested to you that you post a blog soliciting the BIA females to weigh in. However, when I read the blog you posted was about surveying the strength of a woman, which is something different from what you are agreed to do. Now, you are saying that the questions of physical strength and innate superiority are related. I am absolutely baffled because only a damn fool could come to such a conclusion. Physical strength and innate superiority are entirely two different things. In addition, my task of being Black America’s first genuine prophet has nothing to do with neither the physical strength of a woman nor the innate superiority of a man over a woman. So, you go right ahead and do your thing, because I know you are not going to give me any credit for anything or do anything right if I suggested it. So, it is not big deal. What say you?
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 5:53PM
Harry Watley
|
 |
Hello Harry, "What you want it to find out from a woman is whether she felt that a man is innately superior to a woman. The key word is innate or inborn, since that covers everything, mentally, psychologically and mentally." I have already found out from many women.
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 6:53PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
I have given you credit Harry. You have a selective memory.
Tuesday, November 3rd 2009 at 7:20PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Wanna knock me off the board Robert? Keep trying... ROTFLMAO!!!
Wednesday, November 4th 2009 at 10:42AM
Siebra Muhammad
|
 |
Again Harry, I suggest you learn the art of diplomacy. Unless you see yourself rather as a POLICEMAN. Your words Harry: "The issue is while they exist together man is superior to woman in this earthly atmosphere where strength and stealth are qualities of superiority that women do not possess. In addition, the mating position that she is bearing the man is an implied superiority position."
Wednesday, November 4th 2009 at 5:19PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Hello Steve, Yes, I stand by my words. I said strength and stealth. Do you know what those two words mean as well as suggest and implies? For instance, how many times have you been in a situation or know of one that a man and a woman is in very dangerous and frightening situation that she innately would not seek the comfort and protection of that man psychologically, naturally and physically? You tell me.
Thursday, November 5th 2009 at 1:40AM
Harry Watley
|
 |
Hello Harry, And I have been in a situation where a woman fearlessly stepped between me and a male attacker. Now I immediately pulled her out of harm's way, but that does not change the fact of what she did.
Thursday, November 5th 2009 at 5:17AM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Hello Steve, You said this, “And I have been in a situation where a woman fearlessly stepped between me and a male attacker“. I will take your word for it, but the likelihood of this happening is slim to none unless it was for this purpose. When something as you described happens more than likely she is stepping in not really to defend you but to protect you from the attacker by trying to defuse the confrontation. However, what is more important is the second part of your comment, which is this, “Now I immediately pulled her out of harm's way,” This comment lends itself to what I have been saying that a man is innately superior to a woman. Your innate instinct of superiority kicked in when you said that you immediately pulled her out of harm’s way. Lastly, you said this, “but that does not change the fact of what she did“. Steve, the focus is mainly on the man as the innate superior gender. Therefore, it is not a matter of what she did that counts it is a matter of what you did that counts. Remember I said that a man is innately superior to a woman. Therefore, it is not what she did but it is what you did. In all other circumstances, she openly seeks the security of a man. The Creator made her in that nature. You seem to have problems reading and understanding creation. On the other hand, largely Black women’s innate feminine chemistry balance has been severely damaged from the tragedies of slavery that she has endured. She fights, hates and disrespects her mate and equally reciprocates. Black Americans are a severely mentally damaged race of people. I told you before and I will tell you again White America’s greatest immoral sin is the enslavement of Black Americans. Black Americans were born into slavery. We were never ever real people even up to today. The damages that were done only God and our sovereignty or complete independence on a portion of this continent could make Black Americans real human beings. What happened to the Hebrew people is very similar but not as severe as what happened to Black Americans. Nevertheless, it took 40 years in the desert and the Promised Land to restore the Hebrew people back to normal human beings. Therefore, how is it so difficult for you to understand the things that I am saying about Black Americans salvation? Steve, you do not understand because you are not Black Americans’ anointed one. I am Black America’s anointed one and our sovereignty is going to happen just as I say. What say you?
Thursday, November 5th 2009 at 10:32AM
Harry Watley
|
 |
The mental part comes through observation. Harry is too busy talking.
Friday, November 6th 2009 at 4:59AM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Hello Steve, Steve you still do not understand. I just do not know how to explain it to you. The question is whether the male gender is innately superior to the female gender across the board. I would suppose that since it is your understanding that there are no innate differences between the male and female gender that would lean towards the goodly positive superiority of the male, then I would certainly say that God was a damn fool to create the man first. I say that because I know that there is wisdom in the order of creation. For instance, if God had created man before water, vegetation and animals, man would not have had anything to eat. So, the order in which things were created has inherent wisdom. Some people just do not have the intelligence to see anything beyond their nose. What say you?
Friday, November 6th 2009 at 5:48AM
Harry Watley
|
 |
Hello Harry, Evolution was the means of creation. Therefore, the s*xes are equal as they evolved together.
Friday, November 6th 2009 at 4:15PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Hello Steve, Evolution means to change. However, before the object could undergo any changes it must be created first. Consequentially, creation precedes evolution. Now, by virtue of common sense or rational deduction the only entity that can create is God, Creator or the Intelligent Designer. Now, go back to your drawing board and see if you could trump what I just explained. Lastly, you said this, “Evolution was the means of creation.” This comment is backwards. Creation comes first in evolution come second. For example, the Kiwi bird lost its ability to fly by spending more of its time on the ground. Through time nature by evolution, cause this bird to change giving the species other advantages that works better on the ground rather than in the air. Understand where I am coming from Steve? Stave, God created man to innately be superior to woman. Woman compliments man. Man does not complement woman. Man complements God. It is man that is the good steward of the earth. In other words, it is man whom God left in charge and to care for the Earth. I have only a 68 IQ barely passed the threshold of retardation. In some states I would be considered retarded. On the other hand, your IQ I take for granted that it is much higher than mines. Consequentially, the things I say should not be hard for you to understand, am I right. What say you?
Friday, November 6th 2009 at 6:16PM
Harry Watley
|
 |
Hello Harry, I meant to say Creation IS occurring through Evolution.
Friday, November 6th 2009 at 6:43PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Hello Steve, You said this, “I meant to say Creation IS occurring through Evolution.” Steve, creation is creation. Evolution is evolution. The concept of each is entirely different from each other. Evolution means a changing of what has already been created. What I am saying should not be difficult for you to walk through. Please use your rationale. What say you?
Friday, November 6th 2009 at 11:52PM
Harry Watley
|
 |
OK ! You have summoned Mother Goddess, so I might as well give my spin on this dialog! Brother Steve, I'm taking this back to it's oringinal context and will answer it from a "Goddess" perspective. Hopefully it will bring clarity. I will post it in my latest blog but will also acknowledge that you were the inspiration behind me posting it. I will call it..... "Message from the Ancestors,Hymm to ISIS" Doc
Monday, November 9th 2009 at 12:33PM
Min.Dr.LaDonna Blaylock D.D.
|
 |
Mother Goddess, now we're talking!
Monday, November 9th 2009 at 1:46PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Bless you my brother Steve, because you are a better person then me.LOL
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
 |
Let's not even go there about the mother and her child, grandchild!!!!!I doubt if natural instinctive adrenelinecan even be defined!!!!But, this is all about being physical...now the mental part do not even try to measure this in the female species.LOL
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
 |
Steve, why are you trying to get through to a 'closed' mind?!? Patience, kindness nor understanding is enough If someone is only willing to see/believe themselves in all things even truth as they see it with such limited vision, reality then it is almost useless to try and offer anykinds of enlightment. Enlightment is the greatest threat to a small mind as it is the direct way of/for gaining an 'opened' mind.(smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
 |
Steve, I will reserve what I have to say on this matter until after men start going through giving birth.(smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
 |
I still will go with only a female can give birth, way back when. This is dispite that not only it is ASSUMED that GOD is a male and males wrote the Bible, because female did not have the will, powers to be educated and even left out of the Bible as say a main player in mankind?????!!!? But, this is neither here nor there when it comes to an opened mind... the male and the female have their own spicific contributiions for the continuation of man kind. for example, I am a female and I have more physical strenth that a very young male or if I am a body builder or pro boxer,ect.LOL ....thanks for the post Steve as it is food for thought...and a lot of fun... Me, "I" still believe in a thing called EQUALITY and there be no limits to education...(smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
 |
Mother Goddess, I am smiling from ear to ear...Steve this is an example of your definition or creating/envolving and in plain old English : learning how to listen to what others have to say and even respecting their legal and civil rights rights to say it.(smile) and, again brother Steve, thanks for the post.....
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
Blogs Home
|
|
|