Home Invites Blogs Careers Chat Events Forums Groups Members News Photos Polls Singles Videos
Home > Blogs > Post Content

Keep the Internet open-A Message "Color Of Change" (440 hits)

Dear friends,

The Internet has made amazing things possible, like freeing the Jena 6 and electing President Obama. None of it could have happened without an "open" Internet: one where Internet service providers are not allowed to interfere with what is seen and by whom.

Now, Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon -- the most powerful broadband providers -- are trying to fundamentally change the way the Internet works. They're seeking to make even bigger profits by acting as gatekeepers over what we see and do online. If they succeed, the Internet would be more like radio and television: a few major corporations would control which voices are heard most easily, and it would be much harder for grassroots groups, individuals, and small businesses to compete with large corporations and well-funded special interests.

The FCC wants to do the right thing and keep the Internet open, but the big providers have been attacking their efforts, with help from Black leaders who have financial ties to the industry. And a recent court ruling just made the FCC's job even tougher.[1] If the FCC is to preserve an open Internet, they will have to boldly assert their authority and press even harder. It's why they need to hear directly from everyday people about the importance of an open Internet, now.

Will you join me in sending a message to the Federal Communications Commission supporting their effort to preserve an open Internet? It takes only a moment:

http://colorofchange.org/opennet/?id=2062-...

The FCC is working to create rules that would protect "net neutrality," the principle that protects an open and free Internet and which has guided the Internet's operation since it began. It guarantees that information you put online is treated the same as anyone else's information in terms of its basic ability to travel across the Internet. Your own personal website or blog can compete on equal footing with the biggest companies. It's the reason the Internet is so diverse -- and so powerful. Anyone with a good idea can find their audience online, whether or not there's money to promote the idea or money to be made from it.

AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon are spending millions of dollars lobbying to create a new system where they can charge large fees to speed up some data while leaving those who can't afford to pay in the slow lane.[2] Such a system could end the Internet as we know it -- giving wealthier voices on the Internet a much bigger megaphone than poorer voices, and stunting the Internet's amazing equalizing potential.

Buying the support of Black organizations?

President Obama strongly supports net neutrality, and so do most members of the FCC. With so much at stake for Black communities, you would expect Black leaders and civic organizations to line up in support of an open Internet.

But instead, a group of Black civic organizations is challenging the adoption of net neutrality rules. Some of the groups are nothing more than front groups for the phone and cable companies. Others, however, are major civil rights groups -- and all of them have significant financial ties to the nation's biggest Internet service providers. For example, AT&T donated half a million dollars last year to the NAACP, and led a drive to raise $5 million more[3], and boasts of donating nearly $3 million over the last ten years to a number of Black-led organizations.[4] Verizon, meanwhile, recently gave The National Urban League and the National Council of La Raza a $2.2 million grant.[5] Comcast is one of the National Urban League's "national partners" (Comcast Executive Vice President David Cohen now sits on the NUL's Board of Trustees)[6], and the NUL's 2008 annual report notes that Comcast donated over $1 million that year.[7] Many of these groups have now filed letters with the FCC opposing or cautioning against net neutrality,[8,9,10,11] and the Internet service providers are using the groups' support to promote their agenda in Washington.[12,13]

The main argument put forth by these groups is that net neutrality rules would widen the digital divide. They say that unless we allow Internet service providers to make bigger profits by acting as gatekeepers online, they won't expand Internet access in under-served communities. It's a bogus, trickle-down argument that has been thoroughly debunked.[14, 15] Expanding access to high speed Internet is an extremely important goal. But Internet service providers are already making huge profits,[16, 17] and if they believed that investing in low-income communities made good business sense, they would already be doing it. Allowing them to make more money by acting as toll-takers on the Internet won't change that. When these civil rights groups have been asked to back up their arguments, none have been able to do so without appealing to discredited, industry-funded studies.[18] Nevertheless, the FCC has taken notice of what these civil rights gro ups are saying about net neutrality, and is wary of going against them for fear of being perceived as insensitive to minority concerns.[19]

Now it's up to you

The FCC wants to do the right thing and implement net neutrality rules. FCC commissioners know, as we do, that the anti-net neutrality arguments coming from civil rights groups are bogus. But they don't want to appear to be on the wrong side of Black interests.[20]

We need to demonstrate that there's support among Black folks and everyone else for protecting an open Internet. Please join me in telling the FCC that we support net neutrality.

You can add your voice here:

http://colorofchange.org/opennet/?id=2062-...

Thanks.

posted by Anita http://www.girlfriends.connectplatform.com
Posted By: anita moore
Sunday, December 5th 2010 at 2:51PM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
Thanks, Anita!!!

And I would just like to point out that your very real concerns about internet access are not limited to African-American interests. All of us will be impacted.




Sunday, December 5th 2010 at 5:59PM
Richard Kigel
Brotha Richard, I'm concerned about things for all people. I'm by no means a racist. If I was I would have to hate my own grandfather, who raised me and was bi-racial. I just happen to be an African-American who loves her blackness and her black people, and if Im not concerned for my own people, than who will be. SMILE! Have a Great Evening!
Sunday, December 5th 2010 at 9:48PM
anita moore
well its beautiful to see a sister looking out for all the masses and the love for the people /
keep up the good work my SISTER !
thanks for the blogs ,,keep them coming !!
Sunday, December 5th 2010 at 10:14PM
DAVID JOHNSON
Dear Anita:

Please don't feel that I even thought your statement was racist in any way shape or form. No way. I am sorry you took it that way. I have read enough of your comments to know you are a decent fair minded person. I do pick up that you are concerned for ALL people. That comes through loud and clear. I have a deep respect for you because I think you are open minded about people.

I was just pointing out that you mentioned that you expressed your concerns about how this would effect the black community--and with good reason. I can't dispute you on that!

I think David just nailed it when he said: "Well its beautiful to see a sister looking out for all the masses and the love for the people."

And I totally agree with him when he said: "keep up the good work my SISTER!"


Sunday, December 5th 2010 at 10:39PM
Richard Kigel
Here's a story on this. I'm not so sure "the FCC wants to do the right thing".

http://blackinamerica.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi...

Sunday, December 5th 2010 at 11:22PM
Steve Williams
Thanks Brotha David, I appreciate that. I try.
@Brotha Richard, I hope I did not offend you. That was not my intent. I try hard not to bruise feelings because I believe whatever you send into the universe comes back to you. I just wanted to state my feelings so everyone, not you, because we don’t exchange conversation that often would understand where I’m coming from. I’m just very passionate about certain topics as you can see, and am trying to be heard and get my point across. You know how you men like to take over! LOL.
@Sista Irma, Thanks for the comments. I’m glad I have you in my corner. SMILE! Now this is an awesome Sister! I have adopted your smile. It conveys my feelings explicitly. Thank You!
@Brother Steve, I went to the blog. I’m not sure I understand the statements. I don’t see a problem with companies charging for the broadband use. They do it already, but to touch something that has been in place forever in the name of financial gain would be a crime. I can see dedicated bandwidths charging, but being that I know little to nothing about computers, I don’t know what this information means for the average person. Maybe you can enlighten me. You do it so well!
Everybody have a good and blessed day!
Monday, December 6th 2010 at 8:32AM
anita moore
Sister Anita, the Internet can only be neutral/free if is accessible to all, and right now this is not the case. Low income communities already are denied the benefits of the Internet, and usage based fees will only exacerbate the situation. That's the bottom line.
Friday, December 10th 2010 at 1:22PM
Steve Williams
I understand what you're saying Brotha Steve, but low income communities are not denied access or benefits to computers. They just may not have access to computers themselves. I do wish these companies didn't charge so much for dedicated access, but they have that right. They are a company with a product, and myself being the consumer has the right to say yes or no to said product. But yes I think the internet should be completely free. I have no argument with that whatsoever. Its no different from TV.
Friday, December 10th 2010 at 8:29PM
anita moore
Sister Anita, low income communities all have phone, electric, water, etc. But they don't all have broadband access (same for rural communities). Broadband should be deployed everywhere, just like any other utility. Whether one can pay for a given utility is a different matter, but the utility itself should be available.

http://www.broadband.gov/plan/

Saturday, December 11th 2010 at 6:56AM
Steve Williams
3. Creating incentives for universal availability and adoption of broadband. Three elements must be in place to ensure all Americans have the opportunity to reap the benefits of broadband. All Americans should have access to broadband service with sufficient capabilities, all should be able to afford broadband and all should have the opportunity to develop digital literacy skills to take advantage of broadband. Recommendations to promote universal broadband deployment and adoption include the following:

* Ensure universal access to broadband network services.
o Create the Connect America Fund (CAF) to support the provision of affordable broadband and voice with at least 4 Mbps actual download speeds and shift up to $15.5 billion over the next decade from the existing Universal Service Fund (USF) program to support broadband. If Congress wishes to accelerate the deployment of broadband to unserved areas and otherwise smooth the transition of the Fund, it could make available public funds of a few billion dollars per year over two to three years.
o Create a Mobility Fund to provide targeted funding to ensure no states are lagging significantly behind the national average for 3G wireless coverage. Such 3G coverage is widely expected to be the basis for the future footprint of 4G mobile broadband networks.
o Transition the “legacy” High-Cost component of the USF over the next 10 years and shift all resources to the new funds. The $4.6 billion per year High Cost component of the USF was designed to support primarily voice services. It will be replaced over time by the CAF.
o Reform intercarrier compensation, which provides implicit subsidies to telephone companies by eliminating per-minute charges over the next 10 years and enabling adequate cost recovery through the CAF.
o Design the new Connect America Fund and Mobility Fund in a tax-efficient manner to minimize the size of the broadband availability gap and thereby reduce contributions borne by consumers.
o Broaden the USF contribution base to ensure USF remains sustainable over time.
* Create mechanisms to ensure affordability to low-income Americans.
* Expand the Lifeline and Link-Up programs by allowing subsidies provided to low-income Americans to be used for broadband.
o Consider licensing a block of spectrum with a condition to offer free or low-cost service that would create affordable alternatives for consumers, reducing the burden on USF.
* Ensure every American has the opportunity to become digitally literate.
o Launch a National Digital Literacy Corps to organize and train youth and adults to teach digital literacy skills and enable private sector programs addressed at breaking adoption barriers.

Saturday, December 11th 2010 at 7:10AM
Steve Williams
Brotha Steve, I don’t know where you’re talking about, but any community I know of has access to the internet. A lot of people just don’t have computers and yes everyone should have access to the internet. I never said they shouldn’t have access to the internet. But broadband just like anything else is slow going into low income communities as is everything else. It’s a fact of life, doesn’t mean we have to be happy about it. Examples: I remember having to wait in snow season getting our streets cleaned, we were the last, so stuck in our areas until streets got cleaned, garbage pick-up, fresh meat & vegetables stores, libraries etc. I could go on and on.
Saturday, December 11th 2010 at 9:33AM
anita moore
Steve is, in my opinion, posting comments and thought that is in Line with the Governance of President Baraka Hussein Obama.

others that object to his intelligence and scholarship, should at least go back to Our Presidents Inaguaral Speech, where he asked ALL Americans to get rid of OLD and Childish thinking of the Past.

Come on Patriots -- lets change and follow the likes of Steve and the Greatest American Governance of All time in Commander in Chief Obama.


Saturday, December 11th 2010 at 12:09PM
powell robert
fOR EVERY "CAUSE" there is an "effect" (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
My two cents worth on something I saw today on The Ed Show@msnbc...(he now has Rev. Al Sharpton on regularly to keep us up dated on their efforts to help the FCC wipe out racisest and hate speech on the radio ...it seem now that Rush Limbaugh has chosen to picked a personal fight against a female family member of Rep. clyburn of south carolina D. in the House who is herself a member of the FCC's board along with all of ihs continued racist comments...Rev. Sharpton and his groups have now writtien up a partition sent to have Congress take actions against Rush Limgaugh in the name of teh public who actually OWNS our public air wavesradio channels as so many different peoples own these radio stations not willing to obey the rules of our public air waves on all speechis not covered under the first amendment.. (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
...AND, THIS COULD VERY WELL CAUSE MORE HACKERS AND MAYE LESS SALES OF COMPUTERS AND THOSE CELL PHONES, MAYBE AS PARENTS CAN ONLY AFFORD SO MUCH EXTRA MONEY THESE DAYS...just thinking. (smile)

@Anita...the "just thinking" is taken from my site son Mozell's blog titles series.lol (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Anita, "I" am proud and honored that you have chosen to pass on a 'smile' to the next person. (smile)...

WE ARE A-L-L GOD'S CHILDREN...(S-M-I-L-E)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
@Steven unlike the Bush administration, this one has an on the spot Civil Rights division taht is right on time. (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
@Rich and may I add she is opend minded to a perfect fault. lol (smile)

@Anita thanks for your blogs...all of them. (smile) ...and I will go to the link your provided right now...
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
Texas Prisons Have Stopped Serving Weekend Lunches
Congregation Members Sue Eddie Long Over Failed Investment Scheme
State for Sale-How GOP's took North Carolina
Racist Comments Almost Shut Down Reddit Website
Obama Supporters To Stage Protest Outside The ‘Smiley & West Radio Station’
Web Site Tackles Black Unemployment‏
Michael Colyar from “Barbershop” Writes About Being Kicked Off a United Airlines Flight
Blacks should stop supporting those who disrespect them or are we just playing dumb and blind?
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home

(Advertise Here)
Who's Online
>> more | invite 
Black America Resources
100 Black Men of America
www.100blackmen.org

Black America's Political Action Committee (BAMPAC)
www.bampac.org

Black America Study
www.blackamericastudy.com

Black America Web
www.blackamericaweb.com

CNN Black In America Special
www.cnn.com/blackinamerica

NUL State of Black America Report
www.nul.org

Most Popular Bloggers
agnes levine has logged 24937 blog subscribers!
reginald culpepper has logged 11958 blog subscribers!
miisrael bride has logged 8141 blog subscribers!
tanisha grant has logged 5210 blog subscribers!
rickey johnson has logged 4385 blog subscribers!
>> more | add 
Latest Jobs
Analyst, Service Desk with Front Range Community College in Longmont, CO.
Director of Health Services with Lawrence Academy in Groton, MA.
Professional Counselor- Apply by 2/2/2026 with State of Connecticut, Executive Branch in Montville, CT.
Environmental Trainee - 260115-0196ES-001 - Apply by 2/4/26 with State of Connecticut, Executive Branch in Hartford, CT, CT.
Customs and Border Protection Officer Recruitment Webinar – February 11th with U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Buffalo, NY.
>> more | add