Home > Blogs > Post Content
|
|
The rebellious son of the Honorable Elijah Muhammad has been dead now for 3 years. His leadership position in the American Muslim community led to dividing the American brotherhood of Islam into 2 major camps; those that wanted to abandon the teachings of Messenger Elijah Muhammad and those that continue to embrace the teachings. Since then there has been other splinter groups but by and large these are the two major groups. With the master hypocrite now gone, there exists opportunity for these two groups to merge as one recognizing that some differances will take more time to reconcile. Now with the work of little Abraham, Father of a new World....a divine glue may be poured out with can unify American muslims on the basis of nationhood in the future.
Posted By: jamal Abraham
Saturday, June 4th 2011 at 1:15PM
You can also
click
here to view all posts by this author...
|
 |
Hello Jamal,
Firstly, why do you feel Imam Wallace D. Muhammad was a hypocrite? Imam Wallace D. Muhammad differed with his father that Mr. Master Fard Muhammad, a human being could be God. Why should he be a hypocrite?
Secondly, it was Minister Louis Farrakhan that divided the NOI when he left the leadership of Wallace D. Muhammad, am I right.
You are irrational in your thinking and that is because your mind has been damaged. You are not able to see straight, mentally speaking.
What say you?
Saturday, June 4th 2011 at 2:00PM
Harry Watley
|
|
|
Harry...lets deal with the facts....Start with Dr. Martin Luther King jr..famous civil rights leader...did his son go AGAINST him or did he try to continue the legacy of his father ? Look at Jesse Jackson, another great civil rights leader...his son Jesse Jackson, Jr...embraces his father and now a congressman continues to fight for civil rights. Show me anywhere that these sons of their great fathers publically opposed their father. But in the case of Wallace...an obvious hypocrite that outwardly and publically opposed his father. Lets further examine the son of Jesse Jackson. On March 11, 1965, father and son--now so close that they share an almost physical connection--began their life together hundreds of miles apart. Jesse Sr. had left the family home in Greenville, South Carolina, to join Martin Luther King, Jr. on his famous voting rights march to Selma, Alabama. While he was gone, his wife Jacqueline gave birth to their second child and first son. She named the boy after his father. Jesse, whom everyone from kin to constituents calls simply "Junior," learned later that his father had wanted to call him "Selma" in honor of the historic events that had taken place during his birth and to spare him the difficulties of being his namesake. They are a team and show solidarity every time you see them together.
Further, you are wrong about Min Louis Farrakhan...he was not key to the division of the Nation of Islam but rather Wallace who was at the core...because it was the Wallace that filled the head of Farrakhan as to the division in his fathers leadership.
Saturday, June 4th 2011 at 2:55PM
jamal Abraham
|
 |
Harry,
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad taught that the hypocrites are the Anti-christ (the enemies of God). Wallace Muhammad has consistently been opposed to his father Elijah Muhammad's teachings. Minister Farrakhan didn't divide the NOI, WALLACE did.
And Harry, I'm surprised you didn't know that, because every Muslim from Elijah Muhammad's time (or non-Muslim who knows of his teaching) does. Wallace D. Muhammad and his band of hypocrites were, and still remain the enemies of the Holy and Righteous Nation of Islam.
Min. Farrakhan repeated this time and time again in a few of his lectures and actually explained how Wallace destroyed the Nation's property, how Wallace stole Nation's monies well over $1,000, and how Wallace hated his father and how Wallace called the leader, teacher, and guide that Elijah Muhammad taught us about (Master Fard Muhammad) a ***ot!
When Elijah Muhammad left us in 1975, Wallace, with his heart hardened against wrong, with the intent to destroy Nation's property, tear it down, and lead members astray. Farrakhan, on the other hand, saw what was happening and decided to rectify this by taking a mosque in Chicago and renaming it Mosque Maryam, after the Arabic name for Mary (the mother of Jesus), to refute the belief that Muslims do not believe in Jesus.
Also, unbeknownst to many NOI followers, Wallace was the originator of the "Elijah Muhammad impregnating his teenage secretaries" slanderous rumor (according to Malcolm X) that is still in the media today, and even Malcolm himself shared on a tape prior to his assassination that he regretted believing the rumors Wallace was putting out there!!! And after Wallace's allegations of his father's polygamy, Wallace turned out be a polygamist himself!
Saturday, June 4th 2011 at 3:28PM
Siebra Muhammad
|
|
|
Hello Siebra,
Are you saying to me that Elijah did not father children with his secretaries who were unmarried young Black women?
Since Mr. Farrakhan was part of Wallace leadership for three years and left with disgruntled Blacks that it was Wallace that splinted the Nation of Islam? How are you rationalizing things?
In other words, since Mr. Farrakhan was part of the whole (NOI) that was under the leadership of Wallace and Farrakhan left the organization and because you favor Mr. Farrakhan and Jamal want the teaching of the Elijah to continue in you all warped and unjust minds you want to blame fracturing the organization on Wallace, am I right.
Well, to be a good leader as well as a devoted follower you must be honest and upright in all your dealings. I find you all to be crooked and liars.
So, are you saying that Elijah did not father children with his secretaries? Are you saying that Mr. Farrakhan was not under the leadership of Wallace for three years after the passing of the Elijah?
What say you?
Saturday, June 4th 2011 at 6:34PM
Harry Watley
|
|
|
This blog is about Wallace being a hypocrite is now dead. Harry speaks about the normalcy of a son turning on his father and his father had BUILT AN EMPIRE. How does a black man build an empire in oppresive America if not the will of God. What a fool. It is obvious to all with a partial brain that Messenger Elijah Muhammad was blessed they you must ask...why >? The rational answer is that he was WHO HE SAY HE WAS. Wallace on the other hand built division among American muslims.
Saturday, June 4th 2011 at 7:35PM
jamal Abraham
|
|
|
@Harry....After Wallace took over directly after the passing of Messenger Elijah Muhammad, he remained in support with his father. It was only after a few years later that he began to show is hypocrisy. That was when the masses including Min. Farrakhan broke from him....so you cannot charge Min. Farrakhan for following in the footsteps of Wallace...THAT IS FALSE...So, stop speaking of what you know nothing about, OK.
Saturday, June 4th 2011 at 7:52PM
jamal Abraham
|
|
|
Harry I will say this and shut up because like all of your other dialougues you offer nothing but HOT AIR, but let's examine the facts:
Elijah Muhammad taught and it is true that nothing, absolutely nothing happens without ALLAH’S permission. Remember the teaching that ALLAH either does it or permits it to be done. So when a person who has claimed to represent ALLAH on behalf of our people strays away, we must ask ourselves why did ALLAH do this or permit this. Let’s examine the facts. After leaving the Nation Of Islam Wallace had dedicated his life to keeping people away from the Nation Of Islam and the results of his efforts can be seen simply by looking at the number of people who are not in the Nation Of Islam yet who presume to tell others what is happening in the Nation Of Islam.
So let’s think for a moment, if what Wallace was doing with his life was in harmony with ALLAH’S will then why would he stray away from his father Elijah Muhammad's teachings? The answer is simple, what he was doing is in direct opposition to what is the will of ALLAH and by doing so he forfeited his life. The time that we live in does not permit for anyone to stand up and act like they are helping our people while at the same time they were actually robbing people of their salvation.
Wallace made himself a double hypocrite by trying to keep them away from our divine leader, divine teacher, and divine guide that taught us the truth about who we are and that is the Messenger of Allah, Elijah Muhammad. Remember the messenger’s warning (circulated in Muhammad Speaks newspaper) LEAVE MY TEACHINGS AS IT IS. Wallace was personally taught by his father who was taught by Master Fard Muhammad and Warith made attempts to challenge those teachings and that is what caused him to be a DOUBLE HYPOCRITE!
Thursday, June 9th 2011 at 1:38PM
Siebra Muhammad
|
|
|
Hello Siebra and Jamal,
Let me say this before I begin. It is very difficult dialoguing with hard headed Negroes that when I say something that cuts deep into your position that you cannot handle the first thing you all do is delete what I say, which doesn't change the truth. I want you to be aware of your mental weaknesses since you are truly looking for the truth and the Chosen One (Prophet Harry) that would permanently resolve Black America's problems.
Okay, let us deal with the facts as Jamal suggested. Wallace Muhammad is not a hypocrite because he disagreed with his father that Mr. Master Fard Muhammad was God (Allah) in the flesh. Such a disagreement does not qualify Wallace to be a hypocrite. A person disagreeing with another person does not make that person a hypocrite. Do any of you believe that this Arabian man (Mr. Master Fard Muhammad) who was himself a follower of Prophet Mohammed is Allah in the flesh?
Elijah though he meant well was so ignorant that if a Chinese man had come to him before the Arabian born Fard Muhammad with the name Master Ping Pong with the same rhetoric Elijah would have believe that the Chinese man was God as well. Elijah is excused because of his extreme ignorance. However, none of you including Mr. Farrakhan will be excuse following such ignorant teachings that a man could be God. No man could be God neither would God be a man.
Wallace felt that his father fell overboard to believe that a man could be God. In addition, the Quran that Fard introduced to Elijah said nothing about Fard Muhammad being Allah.
41 million Black Americans are mentally messed up both Christians and Muslims. Siebra your minister did not want to dialogue with me over the Internet. What should that tell you? You all need to abandon the religion of Islam since you all are not Arabian people.
In other words, Wallace politely explained the ignorance of his father. So, do you all believe that Fard Muhammad who was a foreigner to Black Americans is God (Allah)?
Also, please don't mis-understand my position either. Wallace Muhammad was also an ignorant man. He had embraced the Islamic religion not realizing that Black America's prophet must be a Black American as the Arabian prophet was an Arab man. Consequentially, Wallace was not as wise as he thought he was.
Every Friday just about I get an opportunity to cut deep into the followers of Wallace and they become angry and emotional here in the things that I say. I point-blank told them that they must give up Islam and Prophet Mohammed because I am Black America's first genuine prophet and our religion is LIFE.
Some gives me conversation while the mentally weak ones don't talk to me or avoid me altogether. Customarily when they shake my hand they don't even look at me. They think the worst of me. The Farrakhan followers think the worst of me as well as the Christians.
Now, do you all not have sense enough to understand that since Black Americans are not Arabian people the Islamic religion that belong to the Arabian people cannot help us Black Americans since we are different people? Black Americans must have our own prophet and religion from God as the Arabian people got their prophet and religion from God as well.
How could what I am saying not be logical, rational and divinely just? Why should God favor the Arabian people over us Black Americans that we should follow the Arabian people?
Why do you Negroes would not want to have your own but would rather ride on the coattail of the Arabian people? So, whether Wallace was a hypocrite or not does not really matter since all of you Muslims and Christians alike must abandon these religions for your own which is LIFE. Am I making any sense what you all? Please explain!
Tell me what you think.
Saturday, June 11th 2011 at 1:07PM
Harry Watley
|
|
|
Harry, according to you everyone in the world is ignorant but you. That should tell YOU something...could it be that YOU are the one ignorant.
Saturday, June 11th 2011 at 7:37PM
jamal Abraham
|
|
|
Now, after these 3 years and having established that Wallace was a hypocrite or like Siebra put it correctly, a double hypocrite, Islam in America can strengthen itself. Much like in the Holy Quran indicates that God produces then destroys then re-produces. This is the time for re-production of Islam in America for greatness beyond the ceiling of the first production. And as for me, I'm ready for it.
Saturday, June 11th 2011 at 9:24PM
jamal Abraham
|
|
|
Hello Jamal,
It baffles me that you could feel good about yourself saying that Mr. Wallace Muhammad is a hypocrite and when I come to his defense after a couple of exchanges between you and I you began to delete whatever else I presented.
How could you feel good about yourself that you would have to do these underhanded and dirty tactics?
What say you?
Saturday, June 18th 2011 at 2:33PM
Harry Watley
|
|
|
Harry, if you want to dialogue with me there is a minimal amount of respect that is required, that's all. It is part of the responsibility of leadership is to point out poison in the midst of his people. Wallace was poison and those that consume the poison of this hypocrite is subject to slow death.
Saturday, June 18th 2011 at 2:59PM
jamal Abraham
|
|
|
Hello Jamal,
You do not know what respect is. You believe that respect is that I must agree with you. On the other hand, if I disagree with you I must disagree very mildly. If I disagree with you and present some strong and convincing points that puts you down and your feelings are hurt you will delete me and use the excuse that I am disrespecting you when in fact your feelings are hurt. These are not the attributes of a leader. These are the attributes of a person with very low self-esteem. Your actions are the actions of a weak minded person.
Consequentially, how could you dialogue with anyone in good faith? You cannot dialogue in good faith because your feeling is what gets in the way. You don't want your feelings hurt. You don't want anyone showing you up!
Incidentally, you do not point out what is poison in the midst of our people by deleting difficult questions and points made against you. If you have any leadership about your self what you ought to do is to step up higher than your opponent and defeat the things your opponents say. Deleting what your opponents say is not intelligent especially when you have to make the excuse that you are being disrespected. Being disrespected comes along with the territory of being a leader. If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen.
I last asked you how you can say that Wallace was a hypocrite because Wallace did not believe as his father Elijah did. How in the hell do you squeeze the word hypocrite in there? Mr. Wallace has the right to believe what he thinks is right. Mr. Wallace has is own soul to account for, am I right. Mr. Elijah is not responsible for Wallace soul.
Since that was a difficult question for you to tackle what you elected to do was delete me and make the excuse that I was disrespecting you. You are a low-down grimy individual. Stand up and face me as a man as I am facing you.
You know that if you were on my blog I would be responding intelligently to you. But, by all means I would never delete anything you say or anyone else for that matter on my blogs.
What say you?
Sunday, June 19th 2011 at 9:17PM
Harry Watley
|
|
|
Harry, if you have the mind to dialogue...then name one(1) case in history where a son of a messenger or prophet went in opposition to his father and was successful. Let remember David in the Bible or Quran. David was annointed by God and he had a son Absolom. Absolom went against his father. God disapproved....so what happened to Absolom ?
Monday, June 20th 2011 at 8:22AM
jamal Abraham
|
|
|
In short, Absolom was a hypocrite....and yes, Saint...he was defiant against his father, King David.
Monday, June 20th 2011 at 10:44AM
jamal Abraham
|
|
|
Hello to All,
I do not think any of you know precisely what a hypocrite is. I have been asking for some time now that you tell me what a hypocrite is and take that definition and see if it matches Wallace's disagreement with his father that the foreigner Mr. Master Fard Muhammad is Allah.
King David's son Absalom wanted to unseat David as the king of Israel. As ugly as it may be that Absalom wanted to be King even if he had to kill his father for the throne does not make Absalom a hypocrite. It makes Absalom a ruthless and a very evil person.
You all do not know what a hypocrite is. Therefore, you are using the word hypocrite out of place.
So, I want to know why you would say Wallace was a hypocrite just because he did not believe as his father did.
Tell me what you think.
Monday, June 20th 2011 at 4:36PM
Harry Watley
|
 |
To call a 3 year old dead man, a hypocrite SHOWS a childish shamelessness............
delete all you want you noNothing.
again, a believing Muslim is taught in the Sunnah of Mohamed(as)--never to call another a hypocrite-munafiq---"because one is a munafiq"----since Imam W.D. Muhammad the Heir of Our Father Elijah Muhammad is dead-3years---that just LEAVES YOU. little or NO Islaam.....
Tuesday, June 21st 2011 at 10:17AM
powell robert
|
Blogs Home
|
|
|
