The Egyptian Mystery System was the One Holy Catholic Religion of the remotest antiquity.
It was the one and only Masonic Order of Antiquity, and as such,
It built the Grand Lodge of Luxor in Egypt and encompassed the ancient world with its branch lodges.
It was the first University of history and it made knowledge a secret, so that all who desired to become Priests and Teachers had to obtain their training from the Mystery System, either locally at a branch lodge of by travelling to Egypt.
We know that Moses became an Egyptian Priest, a Hierogrammat, and that Christ after attending the lodge at Mt. Carmel went to Egypt for Final Initiation, which took place in the Great Pyramid of Cheops. Other religious leaders obtained their preparation from lodges most convenient to them.
This explains why all religions, seemingly different, have a common nucleus of similarity; belief in a God; belief in immorality and a code of ethics. Read Ancient Mysteries by C.H. Vail, p. 61; Mystical Life of Jesus by H. Spencer Lewis; Esoteric Christianity by Annie Besant, p. 107, 128–129; Philo: also read note (2) Chapter III for branch lodges of the ancient world.
There should be no misunderstanding amongst you relative to "Judaism" and/or "Judaeo-Christianity" being integral parts of "Western Civilization." This is true, even though neither of the latter two had anything to do with "Europe" in terms of their origin. The first, "Judaism," predated the original European High-Culture/Civilization called "Pyrrus" or "Helladas" in ca. 1000 B.C.; it being related to the transformation of the first Hebrew of Jewish Prophet named Abraham or Avrm. A man said to have been born in ca. 1775 B.C.; his transformation, or new birth to "Judaism," having taken place in ca. 1675 B.C. in the City of Ur, Chaldea, the same place in which he was born while a colony of Africans called "Elamites" from the Nile Valley. These dates and events equally deny any validity to the claim by Dr. Ritter mentioned above.
At this juncture it would appear that Professor James should have remained mute, and equally myself as his student and protégé of very long standing. This is providing there was no evidence to the contrary of what we have been conditioned to believe about "Western Civilization."
For example, PLATO'S Timaeus is fraught with inconsistencies and outright dishonesty, particularly the extent of his comment on Egypt and other Nile Valley high-culture from which Greece drew its fundamentals in philosophic ideology. Thus it is that Professor Kathleen Freeman felt obliged to write the following on pages 73–74 of her work—Pre-Socratic Philosophers.
That Pythagoras himself left no writings was widely believed in antiquity. Further, it was believed that one of the rules imposed on his disciples was that of secrecy, the betrayal of any of his doctrines being punished by excommunication. According to some, this secrecy was observed with marvelous strictness, and no account of Pythagorean doctrine was available till the time of Plato, when Philolaus the Pythagorean, owing to pressure of poverty, wrote an account of three books, which were bought from him at Plato's instigation by Dion of Syracuse…
Was this disciplinary conduct executed by Pythagoras not part of his African schooling in Egypt and Nubia! And, did Plato not plagiarized much of it under his own name!
We need not become perplexed by Ritter, Zeller, and all of the other early and contemporary European distorters of the teachings from the African MYSTERIES SYSTEM of the Grand Lodge of Luxor. For the evidence in the DIAGRAM OF THE LAW OF OPPOSITES before you (see the discussion of this in the next section) further personifies what Gerald Massey, on pages 13–14 of The Natural Genesis, had to say about the Greeks and their "MYSTERIES SYSTEM" they developed from their African teachers' creation. The Greeks, who even sacked the Great Library of the Grand Lodge of Luxor!
Outside of their own mysteries the Greeks stood altogether outside of the subject. They, as their writer's alleged, had inherited their mythology, and the names of their divinities, without knowing their origins or meaning. They supplied their own free versions to stories of which they never possessed the key. Whenever they met with anything they did not understand, they turned the more effectively to their own account. All that came to hand was matter for metaphysics, poetry, statue and picture. They sought to delight and charm the word with these old elements of instruction, and with happy audacity supplied the place of the lost nature of mystic meaning with the abounding grace and beauty of their art. Nothing, however, could be more fatal than to try to read the thoughts of the remoter past through their eyes, or to accept the embellishments of these beautifiers for interpretations of the ancient topology.
The human mind has long suffered an eclipse and been darkened and dwarfed in the shadow of ideas, the real meaning of which has been lost to the modern. Myths and allegories whose significance was once unfolded to initiates in the mysteries have been adopted in ignorance and reissued as real truths directly and divinely vouchsafed to mankind for the first and only time. The earlier religions had their myths interpreted. We have ours misinterpreted. …
The Greek and still more modern misinterpretations of ancient topology have made it the most terrible tyranny in the mental domain.
Homer's Iliad and Odessy are Prima facie evidence of Massey's observation, and that of many other scholars; also that "…the gods Zeus and Apollo are from Ethiopia [Afric]. …
What I have just quoted for you has an anti-climax, the writing of Zeller on page 27n of A History of Greek Philosophy; thus:
We find nothing in Herodotus as to any Egyptian origin of Greek philosophy. In regard to religion, on the other hand, he not only maintains that certain Greek cults and doctrines [especially the worship of Dionysus and the doctrine of Transmigration ii. 49, 123] were imported from Egypt to Greece, … and Diodorus asserts, the Egyptian priests related that Orpheus, Masaeus, Lycurgus, Solon had come to them; and moreover, Plato, Pythagoras and Eudoxus, Democritus and Oenopides from Chios, and that relics of these men were still in Egypt. These philosophers had borrowed from the Egyptians the doctrines, arts and institution which they transmitted to the Helenes; Pythagotas, for example, his geometry, his theory of numbers, and transmigration; Democritus, his astronomical knowledge; Lycurgus, Plato and Solon, their laws.
Zeller, like many other 'Western Scholars," cannot accept Herodotus' personal primary evidence. Why! Because it would mean that the entire basis of their claim of a "GREEK PHILOSOPHY" is baseless. Carried to its ultimate conclusion, this is also true for "JUDAISM" and "CHRISTIANITY."
We have plainly seen that "Western Scholars" have failed to understand that departmentalization, or in fact fragmentation, of educational discipline is "European"; not "African." For this reason, and many others of course, they cannot see or admit PHILOSOPHY in the religion, mathematics, science, law, engineering, etc. of Africa that produced the DIAGRAM OF THE LAW OF OPPOSITES I now place before you for you own examination of the philosophy complexities it contains. Yet in the case of Aristotle's attempt at being sarcastic about the philosophical foundation of the SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION therein, he knew from first-hand knowledge he had plagiarized the original; thus: (See the next section—PHILOSOPHIC THOUGHT PROCESS.)
Posted By: DAVID JOHNSON
Wednesday, January 22nd 2014 at 1:48AM
You can also
click
here to view all posts by this author...
