Home Invites Blogs Careers Chat Events Forums Groups Members News Photos Polls Singles Videos
Home > > Post Content

WHY DID THE LORD ALLOW MEN TO HAVE CONCUBINES AND/OR MORE THAN ONE WIFE? { CONTROVERSY Yikes } (1651 hits)


It is Obvious From the Old Testament that Some Men Had Several Wives and Sometimes Several Concubines as Well. Why?

Was a Man With Several Concubines Considered an Adulterer?

 

 

First of all let us consider concubinage.

We may start off by considering some comments from the Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible:

'Concubinage was practised in many ancient cultures, especially in Mesopotamia.....where a private citizen might have one or two concubines in addition to his primary wife.....a concubine was often a slave or part of the booty of war (Judges 5:30). A man might have a concubine simply as an economical form of marriage, since no dowry or bride-price was required. A concubine could add to a man's prestige by giving him two wives and thus an increased capacity for children. Such offspring were normally delivered onto the knees of the legal wife, thus establishing their legitimacy as family members. The concubine was also another servant to add to his work force.' (Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, 1997, Vol 1, p504).

So there we have it in a nutshell: a concubine was essentially a servant girl whose duties included s*xual services to her master. She was seen as more 'low-born' than the wife although she was still allowed certain rights within the household. It might seem odd to women of our own day why the wives did not object to this arrangement, but in fact all the evidence is that concubines were warmly welcomed by wives into the household since they mainly became the servants of the wife. The ancient world simply did not carry the modern post-Christian expectation that a man would have only one s*xual partner, neither did wives expect it of their husbands. Of course sometimes men had two or more wives (rather than concubines). Wives had greater rights but cost their husbands a lot more!

This might all seem strange today, but we sometimes don't realize how much of the 'one man-one woman' scenario developed from Christianity which was later reinforced by the 19th century Romantic movement (just think of the novels of the Bronte sisters with their passionate concern for private 'one man-one woman' love). Indeed, we still see the acceptance of plural marriage in cultures which have not been influenced by these things – including in parts of the Islamic world.

If we look at the period of the patriarchs, we immediately must note that concubinage etc is the expected 'norm' – note Scriptures such as Genesis 22:24; 35:22; 36:12, also note how concubinage was welcomed by wives who were barren: Genesis 16:1-3; 25:5-6; 1 Chronicles 1:32. If a concubine provided children for a barren wife, those children could gain an inheritance and real prestige (but they would legally be considered the wife's children – not the concubine's).

Some Bible commentators have suggested that the Lord allowed men to have more than one wife or several concubines during the period from the Great Flood until the Old Covenant in order to build up the world's population (which had obviously been decimated by the Flood), but from the time of Moses receiving the legal package on Mount Sinai, concubinage was banned. But this is totally incorrect for two reasons:

·         Firstly, we should not forget that the Old Covenant was given to Israel alone!

·         Secondly, the Old Covenant did make provision for a man having more than one wife. Please note Deuteronomy 21:15-17 !!

We must also note that Moses himself took a second wife who was an Ethiopian woman (Numbers 12:1). Moses had already married Zipporah (Exodus 2:21). Aaron and Miriam criticized their brother for taking this second wife, but they were immediately punished by the Lord for their criticism, making it plain that Moses had done no wrong in His sight (Numbers 12:1-15). Of course, it is possible that Moses' first wife had died, but the text gives no indication of this.

Later on people like David continued to have wives and concubines without receiving a single reproach from the Lord! David only received punishment when he added another man's wife (Bathsheba) to this group thereby clearly committing adultery.

Often Bible teachers in Sunday School are embarrassed about people like Abraham, Gideon and David having several wives and concubines – they simply don't know how to handle it! They usually react by calling David an adulterer who still had lessons to learn - but this is just not what the Bible teaches. The fact is: prior to the Christian New Covenant, God did allow this practise and it was not adultery! Adultery is taking another man's wife (or another woman's husband), but if a man had two wives and two concubines he was expected to be faithful to them all – it is clear from the Scriptures that this was not considered adultery, unpalatable though this may be for some!

 

 

Posted By: Yaiqab Saint
Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 10:31AM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
As promised this was a discussion I had with my wife last week and she could not get down with a joking request I made of her to "go out and get me a women that was naturally 'FLY' without any hair weaves.

She was like that ain't never going to happen.

But Rachel and Leah gave their servants or handmaidens to Jacob (Yaiqab) willingly and all four women have a total of 12 children with Yaiqab.

My wife said I don't care however babe I thought you loved the scriptures was my angle!

In this society such concept would generally be rejected without second thought, however in the Ancient World having a female "CONCUBINE" was generally accepted because it was a title or position and you were rewarded with pay.

I think a lot of men would not object to this practice if it was implemented today, however the problem is managing the rivalries between the females.

One think I now for sure my preference would be a "FLY" women without hair weaves like the attached photo!

Thoughts peeps??????

Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 11:43AM
Yaiqab Saint
Son,

All that God did was CREATE and left creation in the hands of man! So, it is not what God allows. It is what man wants and does. Jut that simple!

God re-enters creation on very rare occasions like anointing prophets when necessary!

Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 12:11PM
Harry Watley
@Harry
I have no problem with that but most women are not down for it.

Especially my wife the rivalry with another women is just to much for her to accept!
Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 12:15PM
Yaiqab Saint
It's not only the rivalry. There are already 7 billion people in this world and projected to be 9 billion by 2050. What the hell is going to happen if we keep reproducing like rabbits?!
Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 1:15PM
Steve Williams
I have this arguement before and it's amassing how today's men continue to us the bible / scriptures to justify their male chauvinistic ego, the day the table is turned I hope you all are prepared to handle it
Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 2:45PM
Sylvainy R
@ Soso

I'm concerned because your reply is so feminine and to the point that my wife never raised the issue of the Bible because that was an Ancient custom regardless of the individual's belief systems???????

You are wasting time trying to debunk the Bible just like David Johnson....... you are boring?

I'm starting to think your really a female or just a feminized SIMP !!!!
Wednesday, March 18th 2015 at 9:25PM
Yaiqab Saint
Saint,

Seemingly, the reason why your wife would have a problem from the anticipated rivalry is because she was not born and raised in a society that polygamy is the normal.

Wednesday, March 18th 2015 at 10:19PM
Harry Watley
Mr. Williams,

You said what the hell is going to happen if we keep reproducing like rabbits?! Your point is referring to good management or good steward of the earth. And, there can come a time when you have too much and this too much can hurt you.

Wednesday, March 18th 2015 at 10:24PM
Harry Watley
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
I ask again why are you commenting on blogs 4 days after your last BIA login Steve W ??
Steve W explain to the members why you are posting blog responses on 6/10/16 when your last log 6/8/16.
5 Ways to Get Your Relationship in the Best Shape Ever!
Steve W it's been two days since you have not logged-into BIA AS OF 3/31/16 at 12:18 pm EST and subsidiaries??
Miss Demi When A Blog Challenge Occurs There IS NO NEED TO INFORM ME PRIVATELY ABOUT DELETING COMMENTS !
Do Native American languages share similarities with East Asian languages? Linguistically NO !
Mysteries of Ancient Sumerian Technology
The Mystery Of The Los Lunas Decalogue Stone or (10 Commandments).flv
Forward This Blog Entry!
Home

(Advertise Here)
Who's Online
>> more | invite 
Black America Resources
100 Black Men of America
www.100blackmen.org

Black America's Political Action Committee (BAMPAC)
www.bampac.org

Black America Study
www.blackamericastudy.com

Black America Web
www.blackamericaweb.com

CNN Black In America Special
www.cnn.com/blackinamerica

NUL State of Black America Report
www.nul.org

Most Popular Bloggers
agnes levine has logged 25346 blog subscribers!
rickey johnson has logged 19112 blog subscribers!
reginald culpepper has logged 16585 blog subscribers!
tanisha grant has logged 9648 blog subscribers!
enoch mubarak has logged 1658 blog subscribers!
>> more | add 
Latest Jobs
Paid Media Fellow with Avoq in New York City, NY.
Associate, Public Affairs with Avoq in New York City or Washington DC, DC.
Communications Fellow with Avoq in New York City or Chicago, NY.
Vice President, Reputation Management with Avoq in New York City, NY.
Director, Validation with in Petersburg, Virginia, VA.
>> more | add