Home Invites Blogs Careers Chat Events Forums Groups Members News Photos Polls Singles Videos
Home > > Post Content

Large Slaveholders of 1860 { Now Harry I Want You To Present Documents To Support The Breding Process } (2975 hits)


LARGE SLAVEHOLDERS OF 1860

and

AFRICAN AMERICAN SURNAME MATCHES FROM 1870

by Tom Blake, 2001-2005

Introduction and purpose. When this project was begun in 2001, published information giving names of slaveholders was not readily available, and lists of the number of slaves they held were virtually non-existent. As pointed out in the updates section below, some slaveholder name index books may now be available in larger research libraries, and an 1860 slaveholder index with information on individual slave age, gender and race is now available on line to subscribers at Ancestry.com. However, it is still possible to locate an ancestor on the free U.S. census for 1860 or earlier and not realize that ancestor was also listed as a slaveholder on the slave schedules. The last U.S.census slave schedules were enumerated by County in 1860 and included 393,975 named persons holding 3,950,546 unnamed slaves, or an average of about ten slaves per holder. The actual number of slaveholders may be slightly lower because some large holders held slaves in more than one County and would have been counted in each County. Excluding slaves, the 1860 U.S. population was 27,167,529, with about 1 in 70 being a slaveholder. It is estimated by this transcriber that in 1860, slaveholders of 200 or more slaves, while constituting less than 1 % of the total number of U.S. slaveholders, or 1 out of 7,000 free persons, held 20-30% of the total number of slaves in the U.S. The transcribing of slaveholder names beginning with these largest holders, and publishing the names for free on the Internet, results in identifying the holders of the most slaves with the least amount of transcription work.

Who can make use of this site. Those who have found a free ancestor in a State and County on the 1860 free census can check this list to learn if their ancestor was one of the larger slaveholders in that County. If the ancestor is not on this list, other index search or browse methods mentioned below can be used or the 1860 slave census microfilm can be viewed to find out whether the ancestor is shown as a holder of a fewer number of slaves. Whether or not the ancestor is found to have been a slaveholder, a viewing of the slave census will provide an informed sense of the extent of slavery in the ancestral County, particularly for those who have never viewed a slave census. An ancestor not shown to hold slaves on the 1860 slave census could have held slaves on an earlier census, so those films can be checked also. In 1850, the slave census was also separate from the free census, but in earlier years it was a part of the free census.

African American descendants of persons who were enslaved in a particular County in 1860, if they have an idea of the surname of the slaveholder, can check this list for the surname. If the surname is found, they can then view the census image elsewhere for the details listed regarding the s*x, age and color of the slaves. If the surname is not on this list, some other index or the census image can be viewed elsewhere to see if there were smaller slaveholders with that surname.
The County page linked at this site also includes information on 1860 County slaveholder and slave counts, racial population changes for 1860, 1870 and 1960, surname matches for 1860 slavesholders and 1870 free colored persons, and a listing of the 1860 large slaveholders in the County, all of which may be of interest to anyone doing research in the County, regardless of whether the researcher had ancestors who held slaves or were enslaved there.
Transcribed names. In 2001, I began a process of transcribing names of some of the largest slaveholders and matching the surnames with numbers of African Americans on the 1870 census. I have compiled name lists that can be linked to through this page. The names on these lists are slaveholders who were some of the largest slaveholders in the listed County in 1860. The surname is only listed one time per County, even though in some cases, more than one large holder in the County had the same surname. For each County I have transcribed, you can find a report on slave holding statistics in 1860 with the full names of some of the largest slaveholders, and also information on African Americans on the 1870 census with the same surname as the holders. Surname matching of slaveholders with 1870 African Americans is intended merely as suggesting another possibility for further research by those seeking to make connections between slaves and holders.

Updates (May and October 2004) regarding availability of slaveholder census indexes. The late Ronald Vern Jackson authored or was lead author for 1850 and 1860 slave census indexes, published by Accelerated Indexing Systems International for all the slave States, but they do not appear to have been widely disseminated. Some of those indexes have been re-published in recent years, but again apparently without significant distribution. These indexes may be available in some larger public library genealogical collections, but they might be kept in closed stack areas rather than in the open area where the free census index books are kept. Ask your librarian. The Ancestry on line census subscription does include access to some of the AIS materials, but not all the slave census indexes are included, and the method for subscribers to access the AIS database at Ancestry is not very straightforward. In October 2004, Ancestry added for its on line subscribers a new 1860 Slave Census Index and here is a page explaining how to use this Ancestry subscriber resource.

No Further Updates Planned. The most recent surname list was added to this web site September 12, 2003. Because slaveholder census information has become more readily available elsewhere, no further updates are planned for the surname lists at this web site, nor are the lists and links at this site being supplemented, corrected, changed or otherwise modified.

There are currently 8,395 surname/County combinations and 11,020 individual slaveholder names on the large slaveholder lists, representing a total of 792,219 slaves in 158 Counties (Parishes in Louisiana) in 10 States. This total represents 49.8% (approximately one half) of the slaves that were held in these Counties, and 20.05% (1 out of every 5) slaves held in the United States in 1860. The Counties and Parishes included here had 40.27% (2 out of 5) of the slaves held in the United States in 1860, and almost one half of those were held by the slaveholders listed at this site. The Charleston County, South Carolina links below include 2,653 small slaveholders, holding 19,975 additional slaves, in addition to the 200 slaveholders who held 40 or more slaves in Charleston. These additional Charleston slaves have been included in the above slave calculations, but the additional 2,653 Charleston slaveholders have not been counted in the above figure for surname/County combinations or total number of slaveholders.
Surname Links. Here are links to my surname pages:

BIGGEST 16. A list of the 16 slaveholders who held the most slaves in any one County in 1860. (Updated October 5, 2001 and December, 2004; now includes 19 holders).

1860 SLAVES AGE 100 AND UP. Slaves age 100 and up were supposed to be named in the 1860 census, but only some of these slaves in fact had their names recorded on the census. There are reportedly 1,570 slaves in that age group, and this link leads to a table listing 1,550 such slaves found using the on line index at Ancestry as of January 12, 2005. The table includes the 14 reported slave States with slaves age 100 or more: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,Texas and Virginia.

Surname Lists. Alphabetical lists of large slaveholder surnames with County and State. If you find a name of interest, note the States and Counties, then return to this home page to link to the pages for the States and Counties to see the details.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O PQ R S T UV W XYZ

County Links Here are the links to my lists for the various Counties (called Parishes in Louisiana). The County page includes the names of the largest slaveholders in the County, with the number of slaves held and location references, as well as other information on slavery and population. The County page also includes information on the numbers of African Americans in the 1870 census who have the same surname as the large slaveholders.

ADDITIONAL NOTE REGARDING SURNAME MATCHING (added July, 2004): The surname martching information included on the County pages was obtained from the Heritage Quest CD "African Americans in the 1870 U. S. Federal Census", which is not an "every name" index. The CD seems to follow the typical pattern of indexing the name of the head of a household and of everyone else in the household who had a different surname, and maybe also including those in the household with the same surname if they were of some senior age. As a practical matter, based on comparisons of the HQ index with the total number of "colored" persons reported on the former slave states on the 1870 census, the numbers reported by the index and included in the surname matching data on the County pages can probably be multiplied by three to arrive at the total number of African Americans with the surname. After such multiplication, the reported 1870 National, State and County distribution of the surnames would remain in about the same proportion. But the proportion of 1870 African Americans with a particular surname compared to the number of 1860 slaves held by the large slaveholders with that same surname would actually be about three times higher.
Alabama Counties:

AUTAUGA Added 10-20-2001

BALDWIN Added 3-18-2003

BARBOUR Added 10-20-2001

CHOCTAW Added 3-18-2003

CLARKE Added 3-18-2003

CONECUH Added 3-18-2003

DALLAS

FRANKLIN

GREENE

LAUDERDALE (Includes link to Lauderdale County Gen Web site with complete lists of 1850 and 1860 slaveholders)

LAWRENCE

LIMESTONE Added 3-18-2003

LOWNDES Added 10-20-2001

MACON Added 10-20-2001

MADISON Added 3-18-2003

MARENGO

MONROE

MONTGOMERY

PERRY Added April 2, 2002 (Includes link to list of all Perry 1860 slaveholders and 1860 free census transcription)

PICKENS Added April 2, 2002

RUSSELL Added 10-20-2001

SUMTER Added 10-20-2001

TALLADEGA Added April 2, 2002

TUSCALOOSA Added April 2, 2002

WILCOX Added April 2, 2002

Arkansas Counties:

ARKANSAS

CHICOT

DESHA

HEMPSTEAD

JACKSON Added 5-22-2003

JEFFERSON Expanded 5-22-2003

LAFAYETTE Added 3-20-2003

MONROE Added 4-17-2003

PHILLIPS Added 3-20-2003

SEBASTIAN (First portion of full transcription by Angela Walton-Raji) Added 6-16-2003

SEBASTIAN (Remainder of full transcription) Added 6-16-2003

Florida Counties:

LEON Added 5-22-2003

MADISON Added 5-22-2003

MARION Added 5-22-2003

Georgia Counties:

BAKER Added 10-26-2001

BRYAN Added 10-26-2001

BURKE Added 10-26-2001

CAMDEN

CHATHAM

COLUMBIA Added April 17, 2002

CRAWFORD Added April 17, 2002

DECATUR Added April 17, 2002

DOUGHERTY Added April 17, 2002

EARLY Added April 17, 2002

ELBERT Added April 17, 2002

GLYNN Added April 17, 2002

GREENE Added April 17, 2002

HANCOCK Added April 17, 2002

HARRIS Added April 17, 2002

HOUSTON Added 10-26-2001

JASPER Added 10-26-2001

JEFFERSON Added 10-26-2001

JONES Added 10-26-2001

LAURENS

LEE

LIBERTY

LINCOLN Added April 3, 2003

MCINTOSH

MORGAN Added April 3, 2003

OGLETHORPE - Transcriptions by Jeanne Arguelles - Complete slaveholder index and also Full slave schedule counts

PUTNAM Added April 3, 2003

TALBOT Added April 17, 2002

THOMAS Added April 17, 2002

TROUP Added April 17, 2002

TWIGGS Added April 17, 2002

UPSON - Full transcription by David Paterson Added January 29,2005

WILKES Added April 17, 2003

Louisiana Parishes:

ASCENSION

ASSUMPTION Added 9-21-2001

AVOYELLES Added 9-21-2001

BOSSIER Added 9-26-2001

CADDO Added 9-25-2001

CARROLL Added 9-26-2001

CATAHOULA Added 9-25-2001

CONCORDIA

DESOTO

EAST BATON ROUGE Added 9-23-2001

IBERVILLE

JEFFERSON

LAFOURCHE

MADISON

MOREHOUSE

NATCHITOCHES

PLAQUEMINES

POINT COUPEE

RAPIDES Revised November 3, 2001. Includes link to full transcription by Dale Detert.

ST. BERNARD

ST. CHARLES

ST. JAMES

ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST

ST. LANDRY

ST. MARY

TENSAS

TERREBONNE

WEST BATON ROUGE Added 9-21-2001

WEST FELICIANA

Mississippi Counties:

ADAMS

AMITE

BOLIVAR

CARROLL Added 11-16-2001

CHICKASAW Added 11-16-2001

CLAIBORNE Added 11-16-2001

CLARKE Added 11-16-2001

COAHOMA Added 11-16-2001

COPIAH Added 11-16-2001 (Includes link to Linda Durr Rudd's page with full list of names of holders and number of slaves)

DESOTO Added 11-16-2001

HINDS Added 11-16-2001

HOLMES Added May 10, 2003

ISSAQUENA

JEFFERSON Added May 10, 2003

JEFFERSON (Linda Durr Rudd's page with full list of names of holders and number of slaves)

LOWNDES Added 11-16-2001

MADISON Added 11-16-2001

MARSHALL Added May 12, 2002

MONROE Added May 12, 2002

NOXUBEE Added 11-16-2001

OKTIBBEHA Added 11-16-2001

PANOLA Added 11-16-2001

SIMPSON (Linda Durr Rudd's page with full list of names of holders and number of slaves)

TALLAHATCHIE Added May 12, 2002

TUNICA Added May 12, 2002

WARREN Added May 12, 2002

WAYNE

WILKINSON

YALOBUSHA Added May 10, 2003

YAZOO

North Carolina Counties:

BERTIE Added June 30, 2003

EDGECOMBE Added June 30, 2003

FRANKLIN Added June 30, 2003

GRANVILLE-Barnetta McGhee White's site Enslaved ancestor abstracts from deed books, 1746-1864
(scroll to bottom of Barnetta's page for the abstract links).

HALIFAX Added June 30, 2003

WARREN Added June 30, 2003

South Carolina Counties:

ABBEVILLE-Sonia Walker's site with full transcription.

BARNWELL Added May 12, 2002

BEAUFORT

COLLETON

CHARLESTON - 200 largest slaveholders Added 12/2001

CHARLESTON - 2,853 slaveholders alphabetically Added 12/2001

CHARLESTON - 2,853 slaveholders in order counted Added 12/2001

CLARENDON Added 4-17-2003

DARLINGTON Added 11-19-2001

EDGEFIELD Added 11-19-2001

FAIRFIELD

GEORGETOWN

MARION Added May 12, 2002

MARLBORO Added May 12, 2002

NEWBERRY

ORANGEBURG Added May 12, 2002

RICHLAND Added 11-25-2001

SUMTER

UNION

WILLIAMSBURG

Texas Counties:

BRAZORIA Added 5-22-2003

Virginia Counties:

AMELIA Added 7-29-2003

ESs*x Added 7-29-2003

HALIFAX Added Sept.12-2003

HENRY Added Sept.12-2003

KING WILLIAM Added 7-29-2003

MECKLENBURG Added Sept.12-2003

NELSON Added 7-29-2003

NOTTOWAY Added 7-29-2003

POWHATAN Added Sept.12-2003

PRINCE GEORGE Added Sept.12-2003

More Links Here are links to some other genealogy sites of related interest:

AFRIGENEAS Everything to do with African American genealogy, including slavery.

ROOTSWEB The oldest and largest free genealogy site.

USGENWEB Genealogy sites for every State and County.

ADDITIONAL LINKS PAGE More related links of interest to African American and slavery researchers.
Posted By: Yaiqab Saint
Sunday, January 10th 2016 at 10:13PM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
Approximately 400,000 slaveowners with 10 or less slaves bred a entire population of 50 million people (America) in 1860. Florida & Texas did not have slavery between 1620-1830 because they were held by the Spanish that outlawed chattel slavery.

Texas & Florida has the largest current black population by far in the South and the USA for that matter, California, Texas, Forida, New York are the largest population states in America.

Numerically it is impossible your Old Englishmen bred himself systematically. It would suggest that the majority black population was free and native to the America landscape.

Your theory is impossible the historical records prove that you are coming out of your head.
Sunday, January 10th 2016 at 10:37PM
Yaiqab Saint
Saint, that poor man will not show up!!!


Sunday, January 10th 2016 at 11:29PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
Mr. Saint!

Are you talking about the slaves that President A. Lincoln freed when he outlawed plantation slavery, because I am talking about those same people and no other people?

So, are you talking about the same people President Lincoln freed? I am not talking about Biblical Israelite or Jewish people. If you are talking about the same people then I will proceed to prove that the breeding process was a real thing happening on all the plantations and that is what made Black Americans a NEW race of people.

Monday, January 11th 2016 at 7:46AM
Harry Watley
Harry: Don't flatter yourself because I can easily get the counts of black slaves. You are required to mathematical explain how your "DIVINE REVELATION" that the Englishman bred his slaves from the 1600's to 1860's when Lincoln put an end to chattel slavery.

For your information German, Poles, and other EDOMITE tribes held slaves as well. Particularly in North Carolina. Mecklenberg County (Charlotte) had many plantations so go get me a person from that area to validate that the current population beget from your breding theory.

You cannot defend the Piedmont Triangle( North Carolina) and the Eastern Counties due to the Eastern Counties small populations

I'm not playing with you and if you try to run I will post a blog to humiliate you!

I will go state by State to prove you WRONG. Texas & Florida is a lost cause due to the fact they were Spanish territories that abolished chattel slavery. In fact the first Underground State for Freedom was Florida & Taxes from 1700's to 1830. Chattel Slavery did not start until the 1700's by law so your theory it started in the 1600's was false, they were indenture servants, so-called black and so-called white you DIGG !

The data is available by County to shoot holes in your theory!
Monday, January 11th 2016 at 8:44AM
Yaiqab Saint
Harry your 300 years of chattel slavery is wrong too. Chattel Slavery started 1700- 1860. That is 160 years. Learn to count.During the 1600's there were no legal requirements of chattel slavery. I been to Jamestown & Colonial Williamsburg and the record is the record. The 1600's had indenture servants not "CHATTEL SLAVES" !
Monday, January 11th 2016 at 8:49AM
Yaiqab Saint
Great points...
Monday, January 11th 2016 at 10:42AM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
Deacon: Proof or No Proof he (Harry W) will continue with this charade of lies FOREVER !
Monday, January 11th 2016 at 11:00AM
Yaiqab Saint
I believe you have another good point. Let's see if will he answer you now, that he knows that you both are talking about the same people or run away like a thief in the night.

Monday, January 11th 2016 at 2:58PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
Mr. Saint,

I simply asked you are you talking about the plantation slaves that Pres. A. Lincoln freed when he outlawed plantation slavery in 1865.
I am asking this question because often times you all lump all Black people as one people when you all speak and all Black people are not the same people.
We Black Americans descendants of plantation slavery are not the same kind of Black people the Nigerian people are.

Your reply was this; “Harry: Don't flatter yourself because I can easily get the counts of black slaves. You are required to mathematical explain how your "DIVINE REVELATION" that the Englishman bred his slaves from the 1600's to 1860's when Lincoln put an end to chattel slavery.”
Nowhere in your reply do you say YES that you are talking about the plantation slaves Pres. A. Lincoln freed.

How can I properly respond to you when you might not be talking about the same Black people that I am talking about? Am I making sense?
So, please answer! Are you talking about Black Americans the descendants of plantation slaves Pres. A. Lincoln freed?

Tuesday, January 12th 2016 at 8:12AM
Harry Watley
Wow!!!


Friday, January 15th 2016 at 7:26PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
Mr. Saint,

Since Mr. Saint would not clarify what Black people he is talking about this will be my last comment.

I don’t know if Mr. Saint is talking about Ethiopian Blacks, Nigerian Blacks or my Black American people since all the people I just mentioned are all Black people, but racially different. How am I to know what Black people he is talking about if he doesn’t clarify himself and he avoids clarifying himself because he know he is wrong.

This blog of his is not credible!

There is no one smarter than I am on this site! God has it that way because I am Black America’s first genuine prophet that God will save through me!

A few years ago when I was in Brooklyn I met two Black Americans out side Woodhull Hospital campaigning for recruits. They offered me a flyer, but took it back after I clarified their misgivings that they were the Biblical Israelites since they thought they came here by boat made them the Biblical Israelites. But, when I answered back and said that it was Africans that came here by boat and that we are a NEW race of people they became arrogant and I left. As I was leaving walking up the steps to catch the J train they hollered at me that I was not our prophet!
Nevertheless the less I impart on them divine light that they would never forget and warned me not to come to their place of worship.

Friday, January 15th 2016 at 10:29PM
Harry Watley
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
I ask again why are you commenting on blogs 4 days after your last BIA login Steve W ??
Steve W explain to the members why you are posting blog responses on 6/10/16 when your last log 6/8/16.
5 Ways to Get Your Relationship in the Best Shape Ever!
Steve W it's been two days since you have not logged-into BIA AS OF 3/31/16 at 12:18 pm EST and subsidiaries??
Miss Demi When A Blog Challenge Occurs There IS NO NEED TO INFORM ME PRIVATELY ABOUT DELETING COMMENTS !
Do Native American languages share similarities with East Asian languages? Linguistically NO !
Mysteries of Ancient Sumerian Technology
The Mystery Of The Los Lunas Decalogue Stone or (10 Commandments).flv
Forward This Blog Entry!
Home

(Advertise Here)
Who's Online
>> more | invite 
Black America Resources
100 Black Men of America
www.100blackmen.org

Black America's Political Action Committee (BAMPAC)
www.bampac.org

Black America Study
www.blackamericastudy.com

Black America Web
www.blackamericaweb.com

CNN Black In America Special
www.cnn.com/blackinamerica

NUL State of Black America Report
www.nul.org

Most Popular Bloggers
reginald culpepper has logged 14295 blog subscribers!
agnes levine has logged 12460 blog subscribers!
rickey johnson has logged 10688 blog subscribers!
tanisha grant has logged 7664 blog subscribers!
miisrael bride has logged 3668 blog subscribers!
>> more | add 
Latest Jobs
Research Assistant with The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in Washington, DC.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Spring Virtual Career Expo: We Hire Heroes with U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Nationwide, US.
Factory HR Business Partners Manager with in South Boston, Virginia, VA.
Web Producer with Backroads in Berkeley, CA.
Staff Audiologist with Boys Town in Omaha, NE.
>> more | add