March 5, 2019
At the Scottish Inn (717) 774-5990, located at: 300 Commerce Drive, in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, surveillance is being used by police and other law enforcement to target Americans. It is proclaimed that devices are being used in the war on drugs, but in truth, the devices are being used against everyone. If you are a person of color and is complaining about illegal surveillance Pennsylvania has a history of employing informants, who are also people of color, to combat allegations against their many illegal activities. This satisfies that any targets under police scrutiny isn't being targeted becauise of their race. The Black Illuminati are the ones who should be given thanks for this. However, caucasians are easily to manipulate because all one has to do is say that it is being used for racist purposes against people of color and over 50% will agree to its use, des[pite the fact that the use of certain devies will be used against them as well. Mind control and controlled movements in Pennsylvania, is a very real thing. Even Hindu Indians running motels in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey have embraced this scenario. If blacks, latinos, or caucasians, staying at Hindu ran and owned motels were to get into a disagreement with motel management, it has been recordd that the Guests would be told to go back to their rooms. Not take a walk and cool down! Nor leave until they can get a grip on their atitudes. Just go to your rooms! Is this a function within jails and prisons which is being imposed on all Americans? And why are prison tactics being used on the general public?
It has even been revealed by many is Mt. Laurel, NJ, that motels are the new prisons outside of solitary confinement. When Guests move out of motels, other Guests will expect them to leave things behind for their raiding. Even the drug movements at the motels have codes. At the Scottish Inn, police use Stingrays, even though they may deny it, to take charge of motels. It is no coincidence if your cell phone immediately stopped working. And when this happens, you can bet that police are working with motel management and informants at the motels to cover all surveillance and allegations. It isn't odd to witness a drug dealer secretly speaking with police about someone else, which is one reason the State of Pennsylvania, is legalizing marijuana. Most informants for police, all across the U.S., engage in some sort of drug activity and they have to change laws and policies to fit their needs. For many, its important to legalize marijuana because it not only sells on the stock market, but it also renders its users open catalysts for mind control programming. They think cannabis will render society even stupider and more docile. Studies have found that "people who smoked cannabis four or more days a week over many years ended up in a lower social class than their parents. It also found that regular and persistent users ended up with lower-paying, less skilled and less prestigious jobs than those who were not regular cannabis smokers." But how can they ignore all the literature to the contrary? Mushrooms and hashish have been used to communicate with higher powers for millennia. Legalization is a Trojan Horse; cannabis with a side of cancer. Legalize the weed, get everyone using it. Then, slowly introduce the chemical ladened, tobacco-adulterated version of marijuana of which Phillip Morris and others have been holding in patent for years (legalization was temporarily pushed when all the big tobacco lawsuits were flying in the 80's) as the only "safe" marijuana; especially after some "disease" infiltrates the crops that do not use "Monsanto Marijuana Brand seed-n-feed."
Nothing is done without calculation and these guys seem to love to gamble on the future. Not only that, but people who use cannabis have a natural disdain towards authority, thus actually assisting Soros and others like him accomplish their mission of disrupt all governments and destroy all nations because the free-loving cannabis-heads will be too docile to think in any other term because everyone should join in the pot circle otherwise it would be a "downer, man." Where else do you think they get their "foot soldiers?" From those who already are tuned out; why not just tune 'em all out? The Black Illuminati has embraced this for the black communities across America. The same goes within latino communities. John Hickenlooper, who was also the former Colorado Governor, and who was also deep within the Bildeberg Group meetings, was a force behind the legalization of marijuana in Colorado. This monster is also contemplating running for President of the U.S. in 2020. KLearn about the Bildeberg Group! Anyway, with all of the units working together to create a race of idiots in order to enslave them, the powers that be, much like what is going on at the Scottish Inn motel in New Cumberland, must embrace the race of Millenials. The Millenials will lie and will use their deceptive intelligence in a way that most born before them are not aware. The Millenials can also easily be manipulated to do anything by police, Politicians, et cetera. Many Millenials love to join in on conspiracies against other Americans because they have no connection to their ancestral heritages. The connection was intentionally cut off buy courts and others, just so, during this time, they will play major roles in the end games for the New World Order.
Thus, police can do anything they want to whomever because there will always be those that will support and lie for them. Thus, its of no surprise that the killing of Stephon Clark in Sacramento, Ca., resulted in the officers not being charged. Between Millenial snitches and other snitches, combined with surveillance technology, situations and scenarios can be changed at any given moment to satisfy those predators who kill without purpose! At the Scottish Inn in New Cumberland, Pa., Fairview Police feel that they are beyond the law because they can get away with anything. They have blacks to cover blacks complaining about discrimination of sorts. They have latinos to cover latinos complaining about discrimination of sorts. And they have caucasians to target other caucasians.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzSgLpNrr2... Pennsylvania government officials say StingRays and devices like it have never been authorized for use in Pennsylvania, even if some security agencies have already used them. The controversial cellphone-surveillance technology allows police departments and other authorities to spy on the cellphone activity of a wide variety of citizens. How these devices work, where they come from, and how they are being used is a story of its own. In simple terms, when you make a call on a mobile phone there is a radio transmitter and receiver inside that tries to connect to a cellular network or tower: you can actually see that radio connection by checking the bars on your phone, which measures signal strength. Your phone's radio will try to connect to the nearest and strongest radio signal from a base station or tower so that the call you are making can travel across the cellular network (like those offered by Rogers, Bell and Telus) all the way to the person you're calling. The same holds true if you are texting, sending a Snap or a tweet: radios in your phone connect to other radios to transmit calls, text or data from the Internet. Your cellular can't always figure out exactly where you are, but it has a rough idea based on the tower you are connecting to, and perhaps can triangulate a little closer based on the strength of other nearby tower signals. Once the cellphone company locates your general area, a StingRay or device like it can narrow that down to the street, or the building or even the room where your phone is.
Cell phones have a number of unique digital identifiers that are constantly blasting out so that networks (cellular or wi-fi) can decide whether your device is allowed to transmit data on that network. Among them are the International Mobile Subscriber Number (IMSI) and the Electronic Serial Number (ESM). In 1996, a German company called Rohde & Schwarz starting selling something it called an IMSI catcher, to track those unique phone IDs. There are now several companies that sell them (often for tens of thousands of dollars each) to law enforcement and security organizations around the world. At its core, an IMSI catcher like the StingRay is just another radio transmitter that pretends to be a base station or tower like the ones Rogers and Bell operate, except that it's not going to route your calls through to your friends. Instead, it can identify and track your phone, as well as actually block you from making calls or in some circumstances, on some devices, can even record the calls themselves. Like the cell towers, these devices have limited range, so you have to be near an IMSI catcher to show up on its system. The closer you get, the stronger the signal, which is how it can pinpoint your location. But it's also indiscriminate: It tracks everyone in the area, in the hopes it will find a target it actually wants. Federal prison authorities in Canada are dealing with the consequences of that. They are facing a criminal investigation and lawsuit after using a surveillance device inside a jail. For a device that started selling in 1996, there was surprisingly little public mention of it in the U.S. for more than a decade after documents suggest they were in use. (A Stanford student newspaper noted the existence of the tech in 2006.) In 2010, former Reuters reporter Jim Finkle attended the DefCon hacker conference and wrote about security consultant Chris Paget's construction of an IMSI catcher that cost about $1,500, saying "law enforcement has long had access to expensive cell-phone tapping equipment."
In 2011, convicted felon Daniel Rigmaiden, who was serving a prison sentence for filing more than 2,500 fraudulent tax refunds, sent an eye-opening 200-page report on the secretive tool to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). As he described on the WNYC radio show Note To Self, Rigmaiden had been living off the grid in the California forests when he was arrested, and suspected an unknown device had been used to track him down via his cellular-connected Internet air card. His case was the subject of several stories, and lawmakers and journalists began asking questions about the purchase of these devices, which often come with strict non-disclosure agreements that bar purchasers from discussing their use even in sworn testimony in court. In 2014, Rigmaiden was released from prison after a years-long effort – involving 1,130 court motions filed – in which he charged that the federal government had concealed their use of the IMSI catcher during his trial. Google Trends show an increased volume of searches for IMSI catchers around the time of Rigmaiden's release. The ACLU has compiled a map that shows 61 local or state police departments in 23 states that are known to use IMSI catchers, and there are reports of Russian and Chinese authorities using the devices. As reporters Colin Freeze and Matthew Braga wrote in The Globe and Mail this week, Canadians are finally getting some answers about how the technology has been used here. The first trademark for the "StingRay" brand of IMSI catcher was filed in 2001 by Harris Corporation. It's a non-descript rectangular box with a variety of input and output ports, and looks like a box you'd slide into a server room rack or a control booth at a radio or TV station. That same year, Harris also filed trademarks on an array of complimentary devices like the Amberjack (a mobile range-boosting antenna), Kingfish (a more portable, cheaper StingRay) and Triggerfish (a device designed to record the conversations of nearby cell-phone users). Because the StingRay brand name has been identified in several freedom of information requests and lawsuits by civil society organizations in the U.S. (including the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Electronic Privacy Information Center) it has stuck as a catch-all term to describe an array of devices, sometimes from different manufacturers. For instance, the so-called DRTBOX is an IMSI catcher used by the U.S. Marshals Service, made by Boeing subsidiary Digital Receiver Technology Inc. The FBI, which has spent millions of dollars to acquire these technologies, often refers to them in internal documents as "digital analyzers" or "cell-site simulators."
However, the FLIR Ranger® R20SS is a ground and coastal surveillance radar specifically designed to detect and track personnel and vehicles within a 20-km range. With its solid-state electronic scanning capability and fast 2-Hz refresh rate, the Ranger R20SS delivers best-in-class target detection and acquisition performance. Because it operates in the X-band, R20SS is minimally affected by adverse weather or precipitation. It scans a +/-90° area twice per second with low false alarm rate. Advanced tracking algorithms enable fast detection and track initiation, resulting in high accuracy with a low false alarm rate. The policy accustoms people to the interference of police in their personal lives, which is the hallmark of dictatorship. Having an argument is now a crime. "The walls are thin," one couple said. They were arrested after a neighbor heard voices raised. A witness vouched they didn't touch each other but the cops have no discretion. People lose respect for the law. "It's supposed to be a free country but it doesn't seem free anymore," a man told me. The policy is a grotesque boondoggle for police, therapists, prisons, courts, and lawyers. It swells the ranks of the bureaucracy which has an economic stake in the elite's new world order. Most people call the police to help defuse a tense situation only to be arrested, fingerprinted and jailed. They miss work and lose jobs. The zero-tolerance policy makes a mockery of the principles of justice. A real crime (i.e. injury) must take place before someone is arrested and jailed. There should be a presumption of innocence. There should be evidence and not just one person's word. Domestic violence was not a problem before feminists and their elite sponsors invented it. It isn't a problem today. For example, according to the 1999 Canadian General Social Survey, only 7% of people married or common law experienced "some type of violence" within the previous five years. These are almost evenly divided between men and women.
The rate of spousal homicide for wives is 7 per million in Canada. In the U.S., the murder rate for wives/girlfriends is between 1 and 4 /1000th of one percent depending on race. Something fundamental has gone awry when half the police force is dedicated to marital spats. Heteros*xuals should wake up and smell the coffee. We have been under sustained attack for over 40 years. It is no accident that the roles of wife and mother have become stigmatized and men have been demonized. It's no accident that, as with people who have a terminal disease, we hear little discussion of our collective future. Society is victim to an insidious campaign of elite social engineering and political persecution. It's time we told our Lucifer-loving financial elite, "Enough." Even the Green New Deal, which was, respectively, put forth by a female, is a dangerous compilation. What is most disconcerting is that time and time again the data is run over and over and each time the planet seems to be cooling as a result of geoenegineering processes that have actually changed the speed of the jet stream. The jet stream is a river of fast-moving air high up in the atmosphere approximately 30,000 – 35,000 feet that steers storms, and can have a huge influence on our local weather patterns. The jet stream typically reaches its highest speeds during the wintertime, when temperature and pressure differences across the mid-latitudes are at their greatest. In the summer, there is also a greater amount of rising air convection, which leads to thunderstorms which can disrupt the jet stream. In the cold months, the jet stream usually maxes out around 184 mph or 160 knots. However, there have been weather balloon tests that have at times clocked the jet stream this winter as moving exceptionally fast at a whopping 231 mph or 200 knots. This means if you are flying east your plane will go faster – if you are flying west you can see a delay of 30 minutes or more. In the winter time that jet stream is always faster but these winds are unprecedented. It looks as if major earth changes are unfolding, and the speed at which they are unfolding, are unprecedented in the history of our planet. As the former equilibrium of the biosphere is lost, chain reactions and feedback loops are accelerating.
If there is any anthropogenic hand causing the weather to get colder it is because we are seeing governments and militaries contracting geoengineers that are playing God with weather and climate. Engineering operations are now being carried out in bigger frequency and Stratospheric aerial injections are now common place, replacing the idea of chemtrails which have already been condemned by climate alarmists as a hoax. However, the chemtrails are not and never were hoaxes to begin with. Willful blindness and denial still rule the day even though climate engineering operations can constantly be seen in skies all over the world. The operations are certainly creating a winter whiplash effect where the winter has been extended all over the country and the continued geoengineering of the arctic is creating problems for the lower latitudes. If there is a silver lining to the ever-worsening destructive weather, it is the fact that people are finally beginning to wake up to the geoengineering issue because of it. The consensus of scientists who allegedly support the idea that the planet is heating up is diminishing and the truth is becoming a painful wake up call to the deception that has created the push for planet cooling. It is becoming clear that not only do many scientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical scientists may indeed form a scientific consensus. According to a recent Forbes magazine report, only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed, Organization Studies. According to the newly published survey of geoscientists and engineers, merely 36 percent of respondents fit the “Comply with Kyoto” model. The scientists in this group “express the strong belief that climate change is happening, that it is not a normal cycle of nature, and humans are the main or central cause.” The authors of the survey report, however, note that the overwhelming majority of scientists fall within four other models, each of which is skeptical of alarmist Global Warming claims.
The survey finds that 24 percent of the scientist respondents fit the “Nature Is Overwhelming” model. “In their diagnostic framing, they believe that changes to the climate are natural, normal cycles of the Earth.” Moreover, “they strongly disagree that climate change poses any significant public risk and see no impact on their personal lives.” Another group of scientists fit the “Fatalists” model. These scientists, comprising 17 percent of the respondents, “diagnose climate change as both human and naturally caused. ‘Fatalists’ consider climate change to be a smaller public risk with little impact on their personal life. They are skeptical that the scientific debate is settled regarding the IPCC modeling.” These scientists are likely to ask, “How can anyone take action if research is biased?” The next largest group of scientists, comprising 10 percent of respondents, fit the “Economic Responsibility” model. These scientists “diagnose climate change as being natural or human caused. More than any other group, they underscore that the ‘real’ cause of climate change is unknown as nature is forever changing and uncontrollable. Similar to the ‘nature is overwhelming’ adherents, they disagree that climate change poses any significant public risk and see no impact on their personal life. They are also less likely to believe that the scientific debate is settled and that the IPCC modeling is accurate. In their prognostic framing, they point to the harm the Kyoto Protocol and all regulation will do to the economy.” The final group of scientists, comprising 5 percent of the respondents, fit the “Regulation Activists” model. These scientists “diagnose climate change as being both human- and naturally caused, posing a moderate public risk, with only slight impact on their personal life.” Moreover, “They are also skeptical with regard to the scientific debate being settled and are the most indecisive whether IPCC modeling is accurate.” Taken together, these four skeptical groups numerically blow away the 36 percent of scientists who believe global warming is human caused and a serious concern. One interesting aspect of this new survey is the unmistakably alarmist bent of the survey takers. They frequently use terms such as “denier” to describe scientists who are skeptical of an asserted global warming crisis, and they refer to skeptical scientists as “speaking against climate science” rather than “speaking against asserted climate projections.” Accordingly, alarmists will have a hard time arguing the survey is biased or somehow connected to the ‘vast right-wing climate denial machine.’
Another interesting aspect of this new survey is that it reports on the beliefs of scientists themselves rather than bureaucrats who often publish alarmist statements without polling their member scientists. We now have meteorologists, geoscientists and engineers all reporting that they are skeptics of an asserted global warming crisis, yet the bureaucrats of these organizations frequently suck up to the media and suck up to government grant providers by trying to tell us the opposite of what their scientist members actually believe. People who look behind the self-serving statements by global warming alarmists about an alleged “consensus” have always known that no such alarmist consensus exists among scientists. However, the political discussion about the climate has reached the point where there’s this bizarre universal agreement. For example, the wild fires in California last year were devastating and yet while there is evidence to the contrary – there were many political alarmists that blamed it all on anthropogenic Climate Change. There have also been a number of devastating tornadoes recently that have also been thrown in as the result of Climate Change. On a hot day, the average person will tell you it’s because of Climate Change. Then, he might say that it’ll be 175 degrees here in 75 years if we don’t do something about the climate. The discussion is always mired in unfounded numbers and ideas that are repeated as fact when they are far from fact. Over a decade ago we were told that with Global Warming there would be less snowstorms and that some of the best places to ski would become year-round summer resorts. Well, we still are having snow; in fact, the east coast has seen plenty of it this year. And yet the Global Warming brigade will tell you that the increase in snow is because of Global Warming – people say it so much they don’t realize how ill informed they sound. Once again, the climate skeptic seems to be much more aware of Climate Change than those who push it as a political platform. The average person has no clue. And yet, there’s now this hysteria around climate change. People are completely sure that humans are causing the planet to warm.
People want to believe it will be the end of us and every day we get through the seasons with outrageous weather patterns that are not part of some Co2 problem – they are definitely a result of geoengineering problems. Engineering winter weather is one of the primary objectives for the geoengineers. By manipulating upper level wind currents and with patented processes of chemical ice nucleation for weather modification, the climate engineers are and have been cooling down the most populated regions of the US backed by the most massive military industrial complex contracting and experimenting on the planet. This process fuels the continued confusion and division of the population in regard to the true state of the global climate. Much of the cooler air is, in essence, robbed from the Arctic by jet stream manipulation via ionosphere heater installations. What happens then? Well, we begin to see the jet stream speed up abnormally and the most recent departure from normal high temperature maps are evidence of abnormal fluctuations in the jet stream. This is accelerating abnormal ice melt. It also creates mass methane releases which increases heat buildup. If enough formerly frozen methane hydrate deposits release into the atmosphere, it will very soon be game over. This is what is really happening. But the usual suspects in politics, the media, and the entertainment business start quoting that 97% of scientists are in agreement about what is happening but the truth is, the 97% number was promulgated by an Australian blogger named John Cook in 2013 and really has no basis; in fact, none. Out of hundreds of thousands of papers that have been done on climate, Cook chose 12,000 and manipulated and subjectively interpreted parts of their abstracts to support his beliefs. Many scientists whose names were used subsequently protested. A subsequent recalculation showed that less than 2% of the papers cited actually believe mankind is mainly responsible for any Global Warming. Truth in science isn’t determined by consensus. But, for what it’s worth, another survey was taken in 2009 among 31,000 hard scientists, including 9000 with PhDs, who explicitly stated they believed there was no evidence of significant anthropogenic Global Warming. The planet goes through weather cycles. And these cycles have much more impact on the climate than humans. But people are uncomfortable with that because they like to think that they can control the weather just by eliminating cars, and cows and children and the elderly.
The agenda has always been about global sustainability and human culling through reproductive laws and eugenics practices. It is obviously the cornerstone argument for the green economy that is now being championed by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Greenpeace Co-Founder, Dr. Patrick Moore has been having a Twitter spat about how he believes that she along with her followers are pompous hypocritical and dangerous. The Green New Deal calls for an ultra-progressive bucket list of environmental goals such as the elimination of all fossil fuels, nuclear energy, air travel, 99% of cars and the retrofitting of every single building in America for “state of the art energy efficiency.” Cortez’ plan even throws in government-guaranteed jobs and simply hands cash to anyone “unwilling to work,” along with healthy food and a free house. Dr. Patrick Moore has stated that the plan would eventually kill everything on earth. After Ocasio-Cortez suggested in late February that she was “in charge” until someone comes up with a better plan, Moore fired back, tweeting: “Pompous little twit. You don’t have a plan to grow food for 8 billion people without fossil fuels, or get the food into the cities. Horses? If fossil fuels were banned every tree in the world would be cut down for fuel for cooking and heating. You would bring about mass death.” Several hours later, Moore explained: “You are delusional if you think fossil fuels will end any time soon, maybe in 500 yrs. AOC’s attitude is unjustifiably condescending. She is a neophyte pretending to be wise. Her kind bring ruination if allowed to be “in charge.” Moore has continued his criticism, calling Cortez a “garden-variety hypocrite like the others” who has “ZERO expertise at any of the things you pretend to know.” He of course is referring to a recent New York Post Article that shows that Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has a huge carbon foot print.
Since declaring her candidacy in May 2017, Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign relied heavily on combustible-engine cars — taking Ubers and Lyfts instead of hopping on the subway. In her rebuttal, the Bronx-born Congresswoman said the Green New Deal is about systemic change, not about personal gas-guzzling practices. Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign logged 1,049 car service transactions totaling over $23,000 between May 16, 2017 and Dec. 31, 2018, The Post found her campaign once booked 26 car-service transactions in a single day. Even though her Queens HQ was just a one-minute walk to the 7 train, her campaign only made 52 metro card purchases, spending about $8,300. And despite a high-speed rail being the cornerstone of her green strategy, the Democratic firebrand took Amtrak 18 times, compared to 66 airline transactions costing $25,174.54 during the campaign season. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez responded to The Post’s report on her giant carbon footprint by saying she’s just “living in the world.” “I also fly and use AC,” she tweeted “Living in the world as it is isn’t an argument against working towards a better future.” The question is why are people even standing behind her? Why do people still want the New Green Deal when its ideas are simply about state socialism and eugenics programs to curtail Co2 emissions? The Warmists say Global Warming happens because of carbon dioxide generation. But carbon dioxide is a trace gas in the atmosphere. It only accounts for about .04% of the atmosphere. Nitrogen, on the other hand, makes up 80% of the atmosphere. Oxygen accounts for the other 20%. Water vapor, or H2O, has a far greater influence on the atmosphere than CO2. Next thing you know they will want to pull water vapor from the air –and with geoengineering they probably could. A group of Harvard scientists plan to tackle climate change through geoengineering by blocking out the sun. The concept of artificially reflecting sunlight has been around for decades, yet this will be the first real attempt at controlling Earth’s temperature through solar engineering.
The project, called Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), will spend $3 million to test their models by launching a steerable balloon in the southwest US 20 kilometers into the stratosphere. Once the balloon is in place, it will release small particles of calcium carbonate. Plans are in place to begin the launch as early as the spring of 2019. The basis around this experiment is from studying the effects of large volcanic eruptions on the planet’s temperature. The controversy lies in the inability to fully understand the consequences of partially blocking out sunlight. A reduction in global temperature is well understood and expected, however, there remain questions around this method’s impact on precipitation patterns, it could cause drought literally pulling water away which would affect crop yields globally. This all needs to be stopped – from the 1990’s until now there has been many warnings that tinkering with the atmosphere and geoengineering will cause tremendous fallout. The Harvard research team intends to spray tiny chalk (calcium carbonate) particles into the stratosphere in a controlled experiment. Computer models can only go so far in predicting the impacts this geoengineering technique, and so they are just going to try it and wait for the consequences later. With funding in part by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, the Harvard team will begin to answer the remaining questions as early as the spring of 2019. They are doing this even when they know of what negative effects can transpire. We’ve had at least four major ice ages just during the Pleistocene, the last couple of million years. Glaciers several miles thick covered most of the United States. The last ice age ended about 11,000 years ago. Since then, the planet has been cyclically warming. But you have to keep this in context. Those were glacial periods that lasted 100,000 years or so. There have been times in the Earth’s history, like the Cryogenian period about 700 million years ago, that lasted 100 million years, when the entire planet might have been a snowball.
If we had a choice – and we don’t – we’d be much better off if the planet warmed a couple of degrees than cooled a couple of degrees. But that doesn’t help the political know it’s all that someone needs to educate. It should be telling that people don’t even use the phrase global warming anymore. They dropped that. Now, they say climate change. It’s an ongoing public relations machine. It keeps evolving. When it doesn’t fit their agenda, they will change the name again and again and again and people will be duped again and again. The Green New Deal is dangerous. The Green New Deal people never, ever, mention the Earth’s geological history. Not even its very recent history, just since the invention of writing. There have been large fluctuations in climate, confirmed with ice core drilling in glaciers, sediments on the ocean floor, and tree rings. Of course, there is no mention of geoengineering, so it easy to understand why most Americans have never heard of it. However, one thing is for sure – people have survived and the planet is still here.
Posted By: george patel
Tuesday, March 5th 2019 at 9:24AM
You can also
click
here to view all posts by this author...
