Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

My Opinion about Caucasian People.

My Opinion about Caucasian People.

Harry Watley · Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 8:46AM · 3114 views
For clarity of my argument, I am going to be referring to the five different races, Black, Brown, Red, Yellow and White. Please do not make an argument the races. Make an argument about the spirit and gist of what I am about to type.

For the most part all four races have a negative opinion about the Caucasian race. However, I certainly do not have a negative opinion. I see the Caucasian race as God’s watchdog over the other four races. What I mean by this is that, the Caucasian people are a people relentlessly studying and researching in God’s creation to improve the quality of their lives and the environment while the other four races stood stagnated for hundreds of thousands of years, especially the Black race.

For instance, I have never heard of an ancient African volcanologist for as many volcanoes as the continent of Africa have. However, for as late as Caucasian people are to the human race, these people waste no time in studying God’s creation.

The Caucasian race has sent a message to the world that if you stand still we are coming to take your natural resources in your country, rape your women and eventually colonize and subjugate you. This attitude sent a shock wave around the world that woke up Chinese people that today the Chinese people are right on the heels of being the world’s superpower.

How else could a race prevent this from happening to them than to study and research for themselves, rather than whine and complain as the Black Americans who are descendents of slaves of famous for doing?

So, why would these Black Muslims and others not take the high road to advance themselves in an effort to catch up with the Whites and surpass them instead of whining and complaining of what was done to us? The Black Muslims of Mr. Elijah Muhammad have this imbecilic notion that the Caucasian race was supposed to be destroyed by God already but an extension of time was given to them.

Am I headed in the right direction with my opinion? I also know this that Black Americans first step in the right direction is to desire sovereignty or complete independence on a portion of this continent that we could call our very own country with borders. This portion we shall inherit from our enslaved ancestors.

Tell me what you think of my opinion.

About the Author

Harry Watley Wilson Salem, NC

Share This Article

Comments (71)

Steve Williams Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 11:40AM

Hello Harry,

Given your comments, why do you think it is such a ridiculous notion for a community of Black Americans to build a solar power plant in Nevada?

robert powell Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 12:40PM

Edification
–noun
1. an act of edifying.
2. the state of being edified; uplift.
3. moral improvement or guidance.

Ziglar,
Do you want BIA to believe that you have morally improved and uplifted Earls comments?
I have asked you in the past to Edify BIA with a source of your discourse?
I have asked you for Edification of the Heebaru that; after the parting of the Red Sea; why some of the Heebaru used their great treasure of gold to make an Image of a Cow for their Spiritual worship?
I have asked for Edification from you; if you are of this Heebaru that took 40 years, with gold, to travel a few hundred miles?
I have asked you to Edify to the Rabbis in Israel that I have held scholarship with; why they have no knowledge or understanding of your discourse.
To my knowledge you have repeatedly Edified us at BIA with only the above 1-18 Numbers that I, a simple old guy cannot fathom, on my limited IQ of 61.

I love scholarship and reading; Please, in the name of The Creator, take a little time and Edify me, so that I can differentiate between you and Harry.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 3:14PM

Hello Earl,

I asked you all too please do not make an issue out of the different races. Instead, concern yourself with understanding the gist and spirit of my blog and you people turn right around and do what I asked you all not to do.

Well Earl, Jews falls into the category of the Caucasian race.

Anyway, do you think that the Caucasian race is God’s watchdog to make sure that humanity never fall short but continue to advance and improve themselves?

For instance, for thousands upon thousands of years the native Indians in this part of the world had nothing better to do than to fight and kill each other before Caucasian people stepped foot on this continent. The Indians slept in teepees on dirt floors. In other words, if White people had not come to this continent do you suppose the native Indians would ever have had indoor plumbing?

However, White America put a stop to all that foolishness of the native Indians and almost annihilated all of them, Cherokee, Blackfoot, Cheyenne, and Navajo etc. None of these different kinds of Indians had the common sense to do what the first emperor of China did and unified the country of China as White America unify this continent of 48 states.

On the other hand, what White America done to the Indians for legitimate reasons out shines what Hitler was trying to do to the Jewish people for evil reasons? Anyway, that is the subject of itself.

So, are the Caucasian race God’s watchdog that if any race doesn’t make any attempt to improve the quality of their lives White people are going to whip them silly, am I right.

Tell me what you think.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 3:16PM

Hello Jeremy,

I know that your comment was addressed to Earl. However, do you find any truth in the gist of my blog that Caucasian people are God’s watchdog?

What say you?

Harry Watley Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 3:20PM

Hello Steve,

You asked this question, “why do you think it is such a ridiculous notion for a community of Black Americans to build a solar power plant in Nevada?“

Wells Steve, Nevada does not give me access to the sea.

robert powell Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 3:42PM

You Say,
"White America put a stop to all that foolishness of the native Indians and almost annihilated all of them"----It must be the snow I see out of my window, but that made me laugh, Harry.
Finally, after 1,000,000 of your words,
I am understanding what type of Sovereign you would be:
1. They do like to walk dogs and wipe their dogs behinds when the dog poops-I agree with the watchdog analogy.
2. A watchdog like Europeans have been for natives, africans, chinese would be an example of your creators justice for created.
3. Surely to take land from the watchdog(or foaming pitbull) God People you have at your use, atomic weapons, tanks, planes, cruise missles, a force of Marines.
3. Nevada would not be good for your sovereign nation because you could not dock your aircraft carriers.
Ok where do I sign the papers?
and Harry can you find that lost tribe of Ziglar?

Steve Williams Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 4:08PM

Yes Robert, but Nevada is a great place to conduct nuclear weapons testing, artillery practice, air strikes and other war games.

Steve Williams Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 4:17PM

Harry, are you seriously praising what the Europeans/Americans did to the native Americans? And as I have seen this twice from you now, this country has 50 states, not 48.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 10:02PM

Hello Robert,

I could only do my best that is within my means to draw you a picture of Black Americans who are descendents of slaves being a sovereign people on a portion of this continent that they could call their very own country with borders would be like.

However, as simple as I thought it might have been it is very difficult to convey the concept of sovereignty. Firstly, even with a common definition of sovereignty from a household dictionary, you still do not understand the concept of sovereignty. So, I used as comparison and contrast other sovereign countries as France, China and even the United States of America. Still you all do not seem to understand what sovereignty or complete independence means. This is an indication of how blind, deaf and dumb we, Black Americans are.

Somehow, you all cannot visualize your selves a sovereign or completely independent people alongside other world’s sovereign people as White American people are.

I said all that because when you say this, “I am understanding what type of Sovereign you would be:” You are making what I am saying something personal that only pertains to me. I have used the concept of Moses Exodus and still you do not comprehend. The Exodus was not something personal that only pertained to Moses. I am drawing your attention to how you express the concept of sovereignty as though it is something personal [Sovereign you would be] Harry.

My perception after putting the Hebrew peoples’ ignorance side by side with Black Americans’ ignorance the logical conclusion is that it will take me perhaps as much time as it took Moses (approximately 20 years or one generation) before you all really would come to understand what I am saying from the way things look now.

Robert, what I am saying about Black Americans sovereignty or complete independence is not mines just as the Exodus was not Moses. Sovereignty and the Exodus are concepts or ideals to be fulfilled that would permanently resolve Black Americans subjugation. In other words, the Exodus was a concept that God inspired and anointed Moses with that brought about a permanently resolution to their bondage and subjugation in Egypt.

It just baffles me why something so simple to understand becomes so difficult for you, Robert to understand. It amazes me beyond comprehension and I have an IQ score of 68.

Tell me what you think.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 10:40PM

Hello Steve,

Firstly, I guess you see for yourself how silly your suggestion to me of Nevada was. That should tell you in and of itself that my 68 IQ score makes me more intelligent than you are which I have been telling you for the longest that I am wiser than you are, Steve. Common sense would tell you that I would have to be the wisest by God’s will to bring about something on the scale of Moses. So, I am happy we are done with the nonsense of the Nevada concept of yours.

Robert, saw that it was a ridiculous suggestion and you concurred that it was ridiculous indeed. No harm done, Steve since you could have only risen to the level of the own insight, intelligently or non-intelligently speaking and you did not do so well.

Secondly, Steve I am not praising what the Europeans/Americans did to the native Indians. I said that I understood it and the reasons were legitimate in my wisdom. The Europeans/Americans made better use of this continent than the Indians did for hundreds of thousands of years before the Europeans/Americans came, would you not agree. In other words, White America developed this continent into a superpower country that could never have been imagined by all the different Indians running around killing each other for hundreds of thousands of years. I guess what I am saying is that nature took its natural course. The natural course God or nature is to advance. Just as the European/Americans went into Africa, took the African people, and made use out of them in North America than what good use they were making of themselves in Africa. Consequentially, nature kicked in against the Africans as it did with the native Indians, since neither people were making any personal advancement and improvement to the environment.

God’s implied law is that humanity is going to improve one way or the other. For instance, when the late author of the television documentary, “ ROOT” by Alex Haley’s return to Gambia Africa where his ancestors are from Mr. Haley was more progressive and wealthier than the village itself. Therefore, Alex Haley would have to admit that slavery was a bittersweet experience as a whole. Do you understand what I am saying Steve?

However, all aside from this colloquy, Black Americans time has come to be sovereign free and go to work to advance the quality of their lives and become the people most contributing to humanity. In other words, Black Americans are destined to become very brilliant people. Naturally, only God could bring this about considering our dilemma today.

Tell me what you think.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 10th 2009 at 10:44PM

Hello Irma,

I do not really understand what you are saying or the logic. I really do not understand your point to begin with.

Please make your point clear and support it.

What say you?

Harry Watley Sunday, October 11th 2009 at 12:15AM

Hello Irma,

I understand your point much better now. Most times your foolish criticism murky up your point.

Yes, I am familiar with the dust bowl era in the Southwest. First, let us understand that there are costs to pay to advance. In other words, nothing comes with out a price to pay.

However, before the dust bowl the study of the soil was an established science. In other words, White America had soil conservationists warning of the likelihood of a dust bowl tragedy to Congress so that Congress would appropriate monies to prevent this tragedy. However, it took the loss of many lives to get Congress to do something back in that time era.

On the other hand, this was not the case with the native Indians. They knew what they knew by experience. However, not knowing why or how things work does not help a bit.

In other words, White people are a people that would want to know why a pig would roll over 3 1/2 times before scratching its ass, while Doc skinned people could care less. I am going to change this type of ignorant attitude among Black Americans who are descendents of slaves with the help of God. We must and we will advance.

We still fight and kill each other learning nothing from the Native American Indians experience. That in itself should tell you how nutty of a people that we are as well as an indicator to me how difficult my task is to raise a blind, deaf and dumb people. Am I making any sense with you?

Tell me what you think without the criticism of course.

John Washington Sunday, October 11th 2009 at 5:48AM

Again Mr. Novice Harry Watley another unthought out rant that bores with egotism and self-righteousness not to mention I'm an idiot for even reading it. But I shall redeem myself with this lothy statement.

The White Race isn't God. Myths told of a white God coming to many lands and the trouble he would do. But since this had to happen the true meaning was disquised about the white God's intention. So the native people of many lands welcome the white god foolishly amongst them and they were devoured. This is the history of North America and South America not Africa. You've taken excepts of the Native American prophecy and mixed it with maybe some alcohol or something. Lol.

Anyway so as not to appear any thing near the azz you are I will explain African history. Africa was the craddle of the matriochical world ruled by queens so the Blackwomen there formed civilization and civilized the Blackmale. Homage was paid to the women leaders of many tribes and nations by refering on them the title Mother, Great Mother, Virgin Mother and Mother Goddess along with Queen Mother. The concept of Mary goes back further than any religion on Earth besides Shamanism. Mary is the Mother Goddess that appears in noble women of virgin or great birth impling lucky life. When one has good karma and a lucky life one's experience great speed in succeeding in things unimpeded by the normal set backs most without a good life will go through. Living in harmony with nature became a woman's most sacred power and for that they were worshipped. Africa was rampant with queen worship and goddess worship as Europe , Asia and the Mediterrianian cultures started to spurn patriochical rulerships. By this time the civilizations of matriochical were dying because they were already many millenineums old. You measure everything Harry by recent and racists accepted history that denies the existence of great and powerful civilizations that came before. This narrow minded view of antropology that you so willingly accept is at the root of your ignorance about Africa. So much history has been denied about Black Contribution and greatness to civliaztion you're apart of the problem in that denial with your near worship of Whites.

What we are experiencing now in the world is caste system at it's best. Asians a more closer to white looking race has made great advancements. Blacks civlization was the first ever and therefore will be the last to rise. The reason is that it's so great the world just isn't ready to take that leap again. The cultural revolutions that happen all over the world helped to suppress ancient systems into darkness and mystery! Along with oppression and murdering of all whom refused to bend to new cultures of lessor quality. Even ancient European Celtic culture was oppressed as European began their murder of their own in their quest to establish this blood thirsty world we now live in. Africans did each other in as they wanted to proceed with the aggressiveness of the European male dominated societies. So much of the world became anti-feminine and suppressed all the yin/feminine energy in their societies. What we are living in is a world with too much yang/male energy and it's very non-compassinate and materialistic. You forget Blacks were at the very top of the slaves trade not mere victims of European invasion. Asians were at the top of destroying their worlds to be like Europeans, so were Indians, Arabs and Native peoples of the Americas. Watch movies like the Last Samuria which depicts how this cultrual revolution happened in Japan and how they killed off their own people before becaming imperilistic. You speak of China as it will be good when they become a superpower for you and I. No it will not as China will boil over with this same aggression that made people everywhere not like Europeans. This is already happening as China begans to exploit Africa in order to keep it's mega-giant fire engine fueled.

Oh! P.S
I did notice your paraphrasing of the Nation of Islam while you so foolishly attack it. The Muhammad ten point plan is what you're paraphasing that goes something like...We want a portion of this land we can call our own which calls for the U.S to give Blacks some of the Southern states. Lol. You're too much! I can't believe you're on here plagarizing them and then dissing them in the same breath. What kind of negro are you? The N.O.I isn't a perfect black institution but none of them are but it provides discipline some of which you have got if you had gone through the process. Like the revolutionary's manifesto never go against another revolutionary it's counterproductive. By dissing the Nation you're the loser. Because whenever we blacks go against each other history has always show no matter if I'm right or my brother is wrong we lose when we are divided. I don't waste time dissing them I just don't agree! By dissing them I open of the attacks eventually on every one of my brother's becuase we all are in the same fight no matter how we choose to fight it! Have a blessed day Mr. Watley. I'm so glad though that your generation the Baby Boomers are dying out! I'm having a barbeque God Willing when the final one takes his or her last self righteous breath.

Harry Watley Sunday, October 11th 2009 at 8:58AM

Hello Irma,

You asked this question, “you have no words of how and what you have done or will do???”

Irma, what I have done thus far is presented a permanent solution, which is, the concept of sovereignty or complete independence from White America on a portion of this continent that we could call our very own country with borders to pursue life, liberty, happiness and prosperity.

So why would you say that I had done nothing. Perhaps you have not been listening.

Now, what you ought to do is take a position whether my concept is absolute or not. If it is absolute then you should support it. If it is not then you should present something better. Does that make sense to you?

Tell me what you think.

Harry Watley Sunday, October 11th 2009 at 9:09AM

Hello Mr. Washington,

Before I could intelligently reply to your comments, I must first ask you this question.

Do you believe that Black Americans who are descendents of slaves are a new breed or race of people that has emerged out of the ashes of slavery?

If you do believe that Black Americans are a new breed a race of people then do you understand how it is that Black Americans are a new breed a race of people?

I anxiously await your reply.

Siebra Muhammad Sunday, October 11th 2009 at 7:19PM

My Beloved BIA family, our Nation Of Islam leader Elijah Muhammad and Louis Farrakhan would be best to answer the question of why the white man is the devil. But they are not in our presence, so I will explain this to the best of my ability.

There are nine specific points by which the devil (whiteman) can identified. They are listed in order of importance:

1. Economics
2. Education
3. Entertainment
4. Labor
5. Law
6. Politics
7. Religion
8. s*x
9. War

Basically, the whiteman (devil) has infected these specific areas of PEOPLE ACTIVITY.. the devil is a weapon that when detonated, destroys only the human being, leaving solid inanimate objects intact, also, leaving no trace of its detonation such as chemical properties, biological or radiological; thus making it a highly effective and efficient weapon.

Take a look at the nine areas of activity and then think about of which of these areas does people THAT LOOK LIKE YOU HAVE OWNERSHIP! you couldnt find one.. #3, we may dominate it, but we dont have ownership of it. We also dominated the slave institution, but we didn't own it!

What I am bringing to the table is a viable solution to a common problem we all share. As a RESPONSIBLE BLACK WOMAN and a MEMBER OF THE NOI I am bound by divine law to do what I can despite the opposition. This comment is designed to do one thing: Identify the problem. Identifying the problem is the second step in an apparent long journey on the road to healing = liberation.

In a lifetime, no one person could effectively mount a defense against the nine strains of paganism. It is necessary to say this because if you are one who wants to do your part in this problem solving campaign, you will want to attack the problem as a whole.. this is not possible, not efficient, not effective and certainly not intelligent. Of each of these activities, each one of us can find one that we have knowledge about, experience in, or can effect influence in. For most of us, we fit in Activity #2 & #3 simply because of our correlation to poetry and the various discussions we share.

Each of these Activities have sub-categories which means, even the Activity itself cannot be dealt with effectively in its entirety. At this point, hopefully, you are starting to see the enormity of the problem. And the complexity of the solution. You have to take this problem solving process in small chunks Harry, otherwise you will be unsuccessful in your efforts. If you do not understand white supremacy (racism) what it is, and how it works everything else that you understand, will only confuse you.

There, I rest my case.

Harry Watley Monday, October 12th 2009 at 12:35AM

Hello Siebra,

You said this, “You have to take this problem solving process in small chunks Harry, otherwise you will be unsuccessful in your efforts“.

Did Moses solve the problems of his people in small chunks as you suggest is the only way, no he did not. The solution of Moses, which was the Exodus, was a monolithic solution. You do not know what you are talking about siebra because you are not anointed. I am Black America’s first genuine Prophet.

The late Mr. Elijah Muhammad and Mr. Farrakhan cannot explain anything because they are not anointed people.

You listed nine criteria to identify White American people as devils. However, all nine of these criteria are common to all races. In addition, when we become a sovereign people and have complete independence these criteria will be common to us as well. Again, you are not making any sense at all.

Lastly, you said this, “As a RESPONSIBLE BLACK WOMAN and a MEMBER OF THE NOI I am bound by divine law to do what I can despite the opposition.”

I don’t buy this, since you are a member of the NOI would be precisely why you could not be impartial and therefore you are not credible enough to identify the problem much less offer a credible solution. Furthermore, the NOI is a religious organization and not divine by any means.

Again, the late Elijah Muhammad and Mr. Farrakhan are not anointed people. You know as well as I that complete independence from White America on a portion of this continent is our only permanent solution and because I say, so is why you are reluctant to agree. You know that only a divine man anointed by God as Moses and myself could bring about this solution. Am I right?

I am the way.

Tell me what you think.








Min.Dr.LaDonna Blaylock D.D. Monday, October 12th 2009 at 3:28PM

Brother John,
thanks for bringing clarity in explaining the Goddesses !
You are absolutely on point !

John Washington Wednesday, October 14th 2009 at 4:44AM

Thanks Dr. Blaylock.

Telling the history of the Goddess is my duty and I love doing it. Smile.

Mr. Harry.

African Americans are unique but we're not seperate from Mother Africa. We are an adaptation that will transcend Africa into the future! We can't abandon our homeland which has the longest history in the world! What kind of fools would we be to give up our treasures? We will need Africa like they will need us! Live the dream of Halle Salissasse whom said, "Unite the African World!". Not just the continent but all of her children!

robert powell Wednesday, October 14th 2009 at 9:15AM

Mr. Washington I love your revolutionary fervor-when I think of Oakland I think of the Raiders.
BIA lets Harry write and write, etc.; but he is Borderline Insane...........
BIA seem to want to hear you say, "The White Race isn't God."
To washingtons, harrys, ladonnas, mlks, negros with white jesus on their living room walls----and all those ancestors that decided in 1865, as free men, that they liked their treatment by christianEuropean masters--THE CULTURE OF BIA IS----THE WHITE MAN IS GOD-----
You say, "Halle Salissasse"?-----If that is Haile Sellassie-----He should be viewed by African people as Hitler is viewed by jews.------He worked with europeanChristians to slaughter millions and take the lands of millions---and begin the misery that is african disease, starvation and hopelessness.
BIA culture is a culture of acceptance of Lies, Deceit and UnTruth----
Our focus, as Americans is to Follow and Change as Our Leader President Baraka Hussein Obama is courageously leading us.
President Baraka Hussein Obama had an African Daddy, Has African brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, cousins------Lets utilize Comprehension and Understanding in our lives.

Harry Watley Wednesday, October 14th 2009 at 2:10PM

Hello John,

I see that you did not answer my questions. I asked them so that we could be on the same sheet of music as we move forward.

Therefore, let me ask the question to you again. Do you think that an African American is the same person as a Black American? This question needs to be ironed out. We must agree whether an African-American is the same person as a Black American who is a descendent of slaves. Now, once this discrepancy is ironed out we would be in a better position to determine whether Africa is the motherland of Black Americans and African-Americans or just African-Americans.

I know that a Black American is not the same person as an African-American by traits, genetics and ethnically speaking.

Tell me what you think.

Harry Watley Wednesday, October 14th 2009 at 2:22PM

Hello Mr. Robert,

Please, let me ask you this question. You are a Muslim that follows the teachings of Prophet Mohammed who was an Arab man and came to his Arabian people.

Now, since you are not an Arab man, but instead Black American and German, how it is that you are following the teachings of an Arab Prophet whose message was specifically designed to correct the pagan belief of the Arabian people.

How do you justify muscling yourself into the ways, customs and beliefs of the Arabian people. Please explain why you are deliberately misleading yourself?

Tell me what you think.

Harry Watley Wednesday, October 14th 2009 at 2:24PM

Hello Dr. Blaylock,

There is no such thing as goddesses.

What say you?

Steve Williams Wednesday, October 14th 2009 at 5:22PM

Harry, what about prophetesses?

Harry Watley Wednesday, October 14th 2009 at 6:13PM

Hello Steve,

There are no such things as prophetesses! Now, I guess you want to know why, right?

Tell me what you think.

Steve Williams Wednesday, October 14th 2009 at 6:29PM

No Harry, I would like to tell you why there are. Some of us find inspiration in stories in addition to that of Moses. For instance, the story of Deborah, a prophetess, in the book of Judges chapters 4 and 5.

Harry Watley Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 7:41AM

Hello Steve,

Yes, the Bible states that Deborah was a prophetess. However, prophetess are symbolism, but when it comes to men it is real. For instance, Miriam the sister of Moses was said to be the first prophetess and Deborah was not of her level, spiritually speaking. In other words, the irony of it all is that when men are failing women rises to the occasion.

Another way of looking at what I am saying is that, God created man. Man praises God as well as serves man when God anoints him for the necessary occasion. Woman was created out of the man therefore; woman cannot serve man as a prophet, if you will.

What I just explain might be a little above your head only because you believe that you are wiser than I am, nevertheless, I hope you understand the point.

Steve, please bear in mind that I am not a Bible scholar. What I am wiser than anyone else is in what I am anointed for and that is to plant the seed of sovereignty or complete independence in the minds of Black Americans as Black Americans only permanent solution ever to become a real people. I am to lead Black Americans into sovereignty on a portion of this continent that we could call our very own country with borders. In other words, the fulfillment of what Dr. King said he saw in his last speech before he was assassinated that God allowed him to go to the mountaintop and when he looked over, he saw Black Americans’ Promised Land.

Now, my sign that Black Americans should believe me is the story of Moses as God’s precedents that God has inspired me to use. The story of Moses is the only incident in humanity that is very similar to the predicament of Black Americans in White America. As God helped the Hebrew people, so it is that God is compel to do the same for Black Americans who are descendents of slaves and God is presently helping us. Otherwise, Black Americans will forever be a subjugated people and suppressed by White America. The same would have been true with the children of Israel had not God delivered them from the bondage of the Egyptian people. Am I connecting with you?

Tell me what you think.

John Washington Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 8:38AM

Within every race there's different ethnic groups Harry Black Americans/African Americans is one ethnic group amongst thousands of African ethnic group classification. Educate yourself Harry you are trying too hard and going to fast. Your language needs to be able to withstand attack from all debate angles. You're using language like Understand vs. Overstand or Black American vs. African American. That's silly talk my brother. Your point is that American descendants of slaves are different and unique in some ways? Yes. Does that take us out from under the umbrella of Africa? No. We have too much in common and less in common with other races to seperate ourselves from Africa.

And To Mr. Robert.

The Great Halle Sailisse was no sham. He worked hard at a time when Africa was totally colonized to keep his country Etophia free and free the rest of Africa. You're disgraceful for mixing him up in your false charges. And then touting the puppet Barrack Obama as an example of new leadership. Shame on you if you have any at all!

robert powell Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 11:04AM

Hey many negroAmericans have this infatuation with haile sellaisse---especially after they have received some bob marley ganja---pain killer.
Scholarship and Discipline is mandatory in the Land of Caucasian People--The Land of the Sovereign President Baraka Hussein Obama.

Harry Watley Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 11:17AM

Hello Mr. Washington,

John I agree with you that within every race there are different groups or ethnic groups as you put it. For example, in the White race there are Scottish, English, Germans and White Americans. Now, in the African race there are Ethiopians, Nigerians and Zimbabweans. However, when it comes to Black Americans that because of slavery and all its ratification dictates that Black Americans are a new breed or race of people. One profound reason to justify what I am saying is that the Ethiopians, Nigerians and the others were not born out of Black Americans’ experiences of slavery. That fact alone puts Black Americans in a breadbasket of their own.

Next, you asked this question, “Does that take us out from under the umbrella of Africa?”

Well John, I am afraid that it does take us from under the umbrella of Africa since Black Americans came into existence or was born outside of Africa and not of African parentage. In other words, White men mostly of British descent consistently bred themselves over 350 years starting with the original African slave women they purchased from the slave traders.

John I told you once before that they are many advantages to benefit Black Americans to stay as we are rather than to cement ourselves to other ethnicities and cultures. We have the opportunity to create a new culture, a new look, have a country exclusively of our own, etc. Now, when you compare the fate of those who went back to Africa and started the country of Liberia their uniqueness as a new breed or race of people vanished into the native Africans there.

Now, let us hypothesize for a moment that October 28, 2009 God decides to walk down from heaven to bless all the people that emerged from the ashes of slavery as a means of compensation for slavery. Only Black Americans here in White America could receive God’s blessing. Definitely, those Blacks in Liberia could not because they are no longer descendents of slaves.

Anyway, my point John is that we are a new breed or a race of people that has emerged out of the ashes of slavery on this continent and the bones of our ancestors are scattered all over this continent to prove it, but mostly in the southern states.

Tell me what you think.

Harry Watley Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 5:39PM

Hello Clark,

You said this, “No offense, but this entire thread is pointless.”

First, let me say I take no offense.

Now, it baffles me how you could say my blog is pointless when you fail to point out why you say it is pointless. You are not making any sense to me and you are not making any sense to yourself either.

In addition, the blog has received 222 hits already.

Clark, you must have been drinking today and you were probably drunk when you posted your comment. I will pardon you.

Now, gather your senses and make a case why my blog is pointless rather than taking a cheap shot at me, okay.

What say you?

Steve Williams Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 6:59PM

Hello Harry,

So you would like your Black American Women to be barefoot and pregnant? How original!

I will have more to say in a minute.

Steve Williams Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 8:07PM

Hello Harry,

As you yourself have said, you are not a biblical scholar.

Hear my words:
When there are prophets among you,
I the LORD make myself known to
them in visions;
I speak to them in dreams.
Not so with my servant Moses;
He is entrusted with all my house.
With him I speak face to face---
clearly, not in riddles;
and he beholds the form of the
LORD.

Harry Watley Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 8:09PM

Hello Clark,

Clark, let me first say that I like you.

Okay, you are saying that the replies (thread) in general are out of line with the gist of my blog. If that is what you are saying, you are correct and I owe you an apology.

I took for granted you were referring to the gist of the blog being pointless.

I do not necessarily moderate the replies. Hardly any Black Americans could stay on topic. Therefore, I answer all replies as to their individual concern.

Again, except my apology.

Thanks

Harry Watley Thursday, October 15th 2009 at 8:49PM

Hello Steve,

I understand how you are thinking. Please understand that what you have posted me is the Bible writer’s description of God’s relationship with Moses. Each genuine Prophet, Man of God, Anointed One or Chosen One have their own personal experience with God, none are exactly the same.

In addition, the Bible is not my guide or inspiration. God is my guide and my inspirational understanding. In other words, God anointed me. The Bible did not anoint me. You have never known me to quote the Bible. Black America’s religious book is forthcoming.

As the Bible is the religious book of White America’s forefathers. As Black Americans establishes their government in our sovereign country it will be establish upon our own religious book that is forthcoming. Nothing of White America will we build our foundation from or upon. Our street names will have no White American president’s names for the most part. Perhaps, maybe President Jimmy Carter and the abolitionists John Brown. However, those decisions will carefully be made and perhaps I will have nothing to do with them except my recommendation. We will have names such as Dr. King, Elijah Muhammad, Frederick Douglass Mr. Farrakhan, Malcolm X. etc.

Now, when God anointed me I was inspired to use the story of Moses as a vehicle to get my message across to my people, Black Americans since they are Christians and know the general story of Moses.

I am saying all this to you that you would understand that you are misguiding yourself to bound me to the Bible.

The Bible is the Jewish people’s testimony to the world concerning how God have help them and their times of trouble with other races as well as personally helping them in the European adopted the Bible as their religious book as well. The Bible has nothing to do with Black Americans. Black Americans are not Jewish people.

However, your comment is most interesting and I am aware of the language.

Incidentally, I do not understand what you meant by, I would like to keep Black women barefooted and pregnant. Is this remark another one I your White Supremacy nonsense?

What say you?


Steve Williams Friday, October 16th 2009 at 5:03AM

Hello Harry,

The only kind of Supremacy my remark is about is Male Supremacy. You said woman is created out of the man. Either you got this from the Jewish/European/Arabian writings, or did God reveal this to you personally, or is it just plain common sense to your Male brain?

Harry Watley Friday, October 16th 2009 at 4:58PM

Hello Steve,

You said this, “The only kind of Supremacy my remark is about is Male Supremacy. You said woman is created out of the man.”

Yes, I believe that man was created before woman was and for obvious reasons, but not necessarily that woman was created out of man per se. The understanding that woman was created out of man indicates to me that they are a pair.

Next, you asked this question, “Either you got this from the Jewish/European/Arabian writings, or did God reveal this to you personally, or is it just plain common sense to your Male brain?”

Well, God did not personally reveal anything of creation to me, since creation has nothing to do with the sovereignty or complete independence of Black Americans on a portion of this continent that they could call their very own country with borders.

However, to answer your question it is from my own common sense and having read the Bible’s version of creation is why I believe that man was created before woman.

My belief has nothing to do with Male Supremacy is such a thing exist.

Do you believe otherwise?

Tell me what you think.

Steve Williams Friday, October 16th 2009 at 6:19PM

Hello Harry,

Your complete sentence was: "Woman was created out of the man therefore; woman cannot serve man as a prophet, if you will."

So leaving aside male supremacy which was my interpretation, how does the conclusion follow? What does the order of creation have to do with it, if not that man is superior? By the way I believe the story of creation is a myth, not historical fact.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 17th 2009 at 1:41AM

Hello Steve,

You are correct. Man is superior to woman since man was created before woman.

You said this, “By the way I believe the story of creation is a myth, not historical fact.”

The story of creation as written in the Bible I would not dare say that it is a myth and neither could I prove that it is a historical fact. What I could do is use my intelligence and say that it leans heavily on the side of truth and not on the side of a myth.

What say you?

Gregory V. Boulware, Esq. Thursday, October 29th 2009 at 9:37PM

/*
This discussion has been poignant...from all of you! Anyone/viewers will have gone to school with this subject. Your arguments are all on point...even if a few of them are a bit selfish, i.e., "Man Being Superior to Women" is a bit far-fetched. Neither can do without the other...as we cannot do without each other.

I have learned from all of you...and agree with many of the statements (I will not identify which), for it is the separate and independent ideologies combined that makes us whole, richer, and wiser!

You are all beautiful in your thoughts, opinions, visions, and wisdoms! Less we forget..."That which doesn't kill us only makes us stronger!" I believe that statements made were not personal, albeit inspiring. However, the thought of the "baby boomers' demise is not impressive...as we are the teachers of the young, as the ones before us were our teachers...whether we agreed or not! We all concur that Black People are the chosen People and We Will Gain (or regain) what has been denied us as descendents of slavery and the MOTHERLAND OF AFRICA...where ALL LIFE BEGAN!

I thank you One and All...This topic has been profoundly enlightening!

Peace and Love,

Greg.
gvb1210me@yahoo.com
http://www.BoulwareEnterprises.com
http://www.blogger.com/profile/10910946197...
http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=Gregory_V...
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/b...
*/

Harry Watley Thursday, October 29th 2009 at 10:33PM

Hello Gregory,

Firstly, let me thank you for your inspiring thoughts of us all. However, I believe that you are misunderstanding the point that man is superior to woman.

You feel that this concept is not true since one cannot do without the other. The understanding that one gender could not do without the other is an entirely different issue or topic from one gender being superior to the other gender.

I am saying that while both genders exist side-by-side during this existence man is superior to woman, which has nothing to do, that one could not do without the other.

For instance, the fact that man is stronger then woman gives him the advantage in this world over woman.

What say you?

Steve Williams Friday, October 30th 2009 at 4:49AM

Hello Harry,

You are sadly mistaken. Man cannot bear children, therefore he is nothing without Woman.

Harry Watley Friday, October 30th 2009 at 6:28AM

Hello Steve,

I understand that man could not bear children without a woman. I understand in the broader sense of existence that man is nothing without a woman because of procreating.

However, whether they need each other to procreate is not the issue. The issue is while they exist together man is superior to woman in this earthly atmosphere where strength and stealth are qualities of superiority that women do not possess. In addition, the mating position that she is bearing the man is an implied superiority position.

I believe that you arguing the topic of whether man and woman could continue to produce new life without each other, which is a different topic from superiority.

Tell me what you think.

robert powell Friday, October 30th 2009 at 9:33AM

In AlIslaam the Man is given the Responisbility by The Creator to have Up to 4 wives.

I guess We have never gotten into this thought.

what think you Oh Sovereign?

Harry Watley Friday, October 30th 2009 at 6:30PM

Hello Robert,

Having four wives is an ancient custom. Prophet Mohammed lived 1400 years ago and that would be considered ancient. In these modern days, one wife to one man is what goes.

Consequentially, it would be questionable if it was God alone or if Prophet Mohammed wiggled his feelings into the Quran and said that, it all came from the Creator. Let us wise up and use common sense when it calls for it. Have I made a good point?

On the other hand, I have read in the Quran about progressive revelation, which leaves the door open for future changes as deemed necessary. Am I making any sense?

That is what I say as the anointed one today for Black Americans who are descendents of slaves.

Tell me what you think.

robert powell Friday, October 30th 2009 at 7:58PM

Like all of your thoughts Harry,
you have no Research, No History, No scholarship and you make no sense to me.

A Man Today can have 4 wives.
Today Decadent christian laws allow for homo and lesbian Decadence, prostitution, a Decandent President Clinton to have a woman under his desk, and a Decadent wife of His wanted to go back to that scene; and a biological and social reality--Harry there are more women born than men; and men seem to like to die in wars more than women,
so a Sovereighn that loved his servants should want to consider all that Men/Women go through in living and be able to give law and disciplin

Harry Watley Friday, October 30th 2009 at 8:24PM

Hello Robert,

I believe that you are arguing an ancient culture and custom that is under American. At the same time, you want to put this ancient culture into these modern days that is not the culture and marital laws of White America.

The examples you gave are not correlating and legitimate examples of having more than one wife today. Bill Clinton was cheating on his wife, it is called infidelity and it has nothing to do with the ancient culture and customs of Prophet Mohammed when four wives were acceptable.

Now, our original topic is that man is superior to a woman. Are you saying that one of man’s superiority over a woman is to have as many wives as he wants?

Tell me what you think.

Steve Williams Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 9:33AM

Harry, I guess you have never tried the Woman Superior position??

Harry Watley Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 12:33PM

Hello Steve,

Steve, stop being silly. The topic is about whether man is superior to woman. Our dialogue is not about having s*x.

Bring me something intelligent that would show that I am wrong.

What say you?

robert powell Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 1:02PM

President Clinton was the leader of the majority of America; and His Wife had NO shame in living in the Americans Peoples House and allowing DECADENCE. President Bush a draftdodging drunken cocaine using Ignoramous had NO Shame in leading the majority of the American people farther into DECADENCE. A Cancer infested Tortured 71 year old showed NO shame in bringing in a A Trailer Park Jerry Springer show into procimity of the American Peoples House.

Thank The Creator of Truth for Our Leader President Baraka Hussein Obama----
he will get rid of yourEuropean Decadent Ways and Laws.

Our Leader President Baraka Hussein Obama is the Effect of Multiple wives,
His Father had a Kansan Wife and African Wives.----
Our Leader President Baraka Hussein Obama has brothers, sisters, aunts , uncles and yes, a Mother in Africa that make up a Modern 2009 Family----

I know Harrysiebraziglar you want to change whiteeuropeanSupremacy into blackeuropeanSupremacy but that is not the Change We Have Been Waiting For!

what say you about reality ?


Harry Watley Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 1:37PM

Hello Robert,

It is very difficult communicating with you since we are never communicating about the same thing.

The dialogue began between Steve and me. Mr. Gregory joined in. The question was whether man is superior to woman.

The question really has nothing to do with ancient Arabian customs and laws of having four wives. Neither does it have anything to do with President Obama and his relatives in Kenya or these other people you mentioned.

In short, you are entirely off track.

Therefore, let me ask you the same question. Do you accept that man is superior to woman?

I believe that man is inherently superior to woman.

Tell me what you think.

Steve Williams Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 2:01PM

Hello Harry,

I take it the concept of EQUALITY is foreign to you.

Steve Williams Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 2:05PM

And Harry, you did not answer my question. I am just wondering, as I think you have missed out on something if you have not, perhaps explaining your grim outlook.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 4:41PM

Hello Robert,

Robert do you believe that man is superior to woman when you study God’s creation?

For instance, woman feels secure in a man. A young girl’s conversation is almost all the time about her future husband. Is that not psychologically indicative of a woman finding comfort in the security of a man? In addition, is that not how the Creator meant it to be?

Please answer that question and forget about President Obama, Bill Clinton or this 4 wives nonsense.

Okay.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 4:45PM

Hello Mr. Mozell,

How are you doing? I had no idea that you were following the conversation. Well, I am glad that you are enjoying it and please jump in when you want.

Okay.

Harry Watley Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 4:51PM

Hello Steve,

You said this, “I take it the concept of EQUALITY is foreign to you.”

I do not understand what she was saying. That comment is wide open if you do not add anything else to it that would tell me where you are coming from, okay.

You also said this, “And Harry, you did not answer my question.”

Here again, what you said is wide open. What question is it that I did not answer? Please be specific and clear.

Okay.

Steve Williams Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 6:03PM

Okay Harry,

Man and Woman are equal.

Woman on top, Man on top, Doggie style says nothing about superiority, they are ways to share pleasure. Key word: Share.

No more questions at present.

Siebra Muhammad Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 6:22PM

LOLLOLLOL...Steve you ain't never lied!!!

Harry Watley Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 8:46PM

Hello Steve,

You said this, “Man and Woman are equal.”

Steve, man and woman is not equal. Man is superior to woman. When I reference the customary missionary, mating position is a position of superiority. In other words, the woman is taking the man and not the other way around. His organ is extended while hers is internal. Internal means to receive while external is giving. Giving is superior to receiving. He ejaculates into her, rather than she deposited anything into him and this is implied superiority. Her pregnancy and carrying the child is implied inferiority. Am I making any sense with you, Steve?

Those who could read creation better than those that cannot are naturally wiser. Therefore, when I say I am wiser than you are I am only telling you the truth.

Another example is that a woman inherently looks for security out of a man. When it is the other way around the man is referred to as a sissy, am I right. No woman in her right mind is satisfied with a sissy man. There are so many examples to be read out of creation that would readily show that men are superior to women. What is wrong with your mentality Steve?

Now, when you mentioned woman on top, doggie style and sharing pleasure we are not talking about the same thing anymore. You are into s*x rather than the topic of who is superior to whom. Our dialogue is not about s*x.

What say you?


Gregory V. Boulware, Esq. Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 9:33PM

/*
Brother Watley, you are most kindly welcomed in your reply. I would Thank You for saying so!

Please, Gentlemen and Gentlewomen, in this case GentleWoman (Siebra). There was a time when I would outwardly say that Man is Superior to Woman...but not today. Yes, the man is the dominant and protective figure...as intended in the begining of time. However, with Evolvement and Opportunities come great responsibilities! "The times, they are a changin!"

We, men, are no longer the ones calling the shots, yes? Men are the muscled and powerful physical specimen, yes? What about the many Muscled and Powerful Female physical specimen of today? Don't get me wrong...I prefer the intelligent, soft, sensuous, and caring woman in my life. Albeit, women are no longer the "Barefoot, Pregnant, and in the Bedroom" types anymore! They have evolved...way back in the days of slavery as well, not to mention the begining of time...as the world has shown, they are leaders of countries/state. etc., leaders in the home while being the dominant and profound backbone of the family. Back in the day, the woman was the "Go-To" person in the home as well as the ones that took care of the children, prepared the meals, mended the clothing, dried the eyes, mended the wounds, attended the school meetings, doctor visits, etc. Yes, men have done this too. How many times has the man lost his ability to provide and the woman has had to take over? We, men, were once boys that depended on our mothers, yes?

Brother Harry, I too believed in the "old ways"...once. There are things that women don't/can't do and things that men can and can't do as well; we compliment one-another...that is why I can say that men and women are equal. We are both providers and responsible for our families...the business, as in taking care of, and their survival.

I enjoy beng a Father, Grandfather, Uncle, and Leader of my faimily...but I could not have done it without my wife...not to mention thte support that she had given me throughout our thirty-three years together. I watched my boys grow into men, and now I watch my grands. And I've enjoyed it Immensely...and continue to do so.

Damn Bro, you stared this...its great stuff! You are all beautiful...I really mean it!

Peace and Love to you all, Kings and Queens...SANKOFA!

Greg.
*/

Harry Watley Saturday, October 31st 2009 at 11:50PM

Hello Mr. Gregory,

I think that the differences of your argument are superficial while mines are innate and natural.

In other words, your argument Mr. Gregory is founded in superficial things such as women are leaders of countries today, and takes over when the man has lost his job.

What I am talking about is inborn and cannot change regardless of the outward superficial circumstances you are mentioning. For instance, what I am pointing out is as much inmate in a man as standing to urinate while a woman stoops to do the same regardless if she was the prime minister of England.

An example of what I am talking is that case concerning the White teacher who had and kept up an affair with her 14-year-old student. She went to jail, later had children and married when she was released from jail. They are still married today with more children.

Although there were these superficial and significant differences between the two that she was much older and educated, smarter than he was, that she was the breadwinner, beneath all this was that inmate superiority that he naturally processed over her.

In addition, I would supposed she taught him how to do everything to her necessary that in all of it she psychologically had to submit to make everything right.

I could imagine how this young boy acted to see this adult woman’s naked body and touch her in private places as well as maintaining an erection and screwing her all day long that he could accept that she had enough. He would be coming at her every time he looked at her and she would naturally submit over her superficial feelings not to.

So, what I am saying to you all is inmate and it does not matter how old the man is or the position or circumstances. A woman was inherently made to submit to a man’s desires. It baffles me that you all cannot comprehend this.

Tell me what you think.

Steve Williams Sunday, November 1st 2009 at 7:45AM

Gregory, I am most happy to see the thoughts that you bring to these discussions. I always read your comments with care and think you have a very perceptive approach. Thank you.

Steve Williams Sunday, November 1st 2009 at 7:55AM

Hello Harry,

There are many kinds of strength other than physical, and women are stronger than men in many ways. And men receive security from women as well as provide security. It is not being a sissy, it is called partnership. And at my age, partnership and companionship actually take a back seat to s*x.

Steve Williams Sunday, November 1st 2009 at 7:59AM

Guess I'm not wide awake yet. Meant to say it the other way around, s*x takes a back seat.

Gregory V. Boulware, Esq. Monday, November 2nd 2009 at 2:03AM

/*
Hello Gentlemen:

Thank you Steve, I certainly appreciate your comment/statement as well as your attention...thank you.

Brother Watley, I do understand what you have implied just as I understand the concept of your initial position...Sovereinty. I've understood what you've meant all the while...I can also appreciate it. I would hope that we would agree to disagree on the subject of Man - Woman, etc.

I do not see myself as more intelligent than anyone. However, I may be a bit more informed and/or atuned. I would not presume to prove or disprove any one statement...I would appreciate its' value while contemplating the benefit(s) of the position of and by the person(s) position.

I sincerely thank you for your intelligence and standing.

Peace Be Unto You Brother Harry.

Harry Watley Monday, November 2nd 2009 at 10:29AM

Hello Mr. Gregory,

Let me blatantly say this to you, Mr. Gregory by drawing a scenario for you. Assume that we as a people are coming together as the Hebrew people came together to begin their Exodus. During this time, all ignorant conversations will end and serious thinking begins. What I mean by saying this is that positions must be taken and decisions must be made.

Mr. Gregory my dialoguing with you and others are not a quiz game I am playing to see how intelligent you all are. It seems to me that you may be thinking that this is a quiz game. Oh, no Mr. Gregory I am very much serious because I know what is going on, as Moses knew what was happening in his day and time.

Now, you said this, “Brother Watley, I do understand what you have implied just as I understand the concept of your initial position...Sovereinty. I've understood what you've meant all the while...I can also appreciate it.”

I doubt very much if you understand the concept of sovereignty because it is not something to appreciate, it is something Blacks must desire, it is something to bring into reality. Imagine for a moment a Hebrew person telling Moses they could appreciate the concept of the Exodus. The Exodus was not something to appreciate by the Hebrew people. The Exodus was something that the Hebrew people desired. The Exodus was something to seriously embrace and bring into reality in the Hebrew people came to understand that.

Therefore, let me ask you this question Mr. Gregory. What it is about the concept of sovereignty on a portion of this continent that Black Americans could call their very own country with borders that you appreciate and do not desire?

In addition, Mr. Gregory the concept of agree to disagree leaves everyone at the point they started. Consequentially, the concept to agree to disagree is woefully ignorant. You go into a discussion to come out with a decision.

What say you?


ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

...and the cost to prove/spread / get any interest in this ????????????Because, money talks and ______________walks.(smile)ask any politician.LOL

Now the Native-Americans 'are' legally classified as a SOVEREIGN nation with in America...they are also getting a lot of their lands returned to them that was illegally taken, because the Native- American women were not allowed to sign a lot of these treaties...the Native-American women had those rights which were denied them...I they had allowed their TRUE history to have been taught out of them this would not be able to enforced by them...

which if I amy, I will add that during the 20s-40s the Native-Americans had all of their children taken from them and sent east to do just this..remove the INDIAN pride which united them FROM THEM...

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

Harry not to critize you but, are you not just visualizing your goals in your head also? Or do you now have your land and all that is needed including the black Americans??????

You say you are not using a bible of any religion, language bibles of the White man and not God, Allah or Jesus Christ and yet I doubt if you were there, so why are you saying those things to Steve as you are doing thsi your self? ONLY ASKING IN TRYING TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF SOMETHING IN ONES MIND AND SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY EXIST IN REAL TIME AND NOT IN THE WHEN EVER, WHERE EVER L-A-N-D or Nation...

and, something else that has me puzzled Harry why are you not doing anything but trying to tell us what someone else has done and not what you have done at all towards doing what you have been inspired to do...you never said you were inspired to go be kicked of networks after networks or is this part of your plan????And, how can a person who is so dependant on the will of others even call himself independant in the first place? what land do you own right now at this moment??????

Please tell me something about you Harry? Or are you only now come into being on the site called BIA??????I have learned more about you from Siebra that I have from you and you have not called Siebra wrong about being kicked of other sites...why do you seem to need the internet to do what you have been inspired to do as I repeat you have never said getting kicked of somethings that otheres have put up namely web sites again you are dependant onothers to do for you....???!!!?

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

What have you been doing all of your life Harry? How much have you accomplished since you were inspire to do this for black Americans???????Or is your insperation to convince black America to get up and follow you?!? and if this is it then to where???or are you still trying to figure out the basics. Like :WHERE, WHEN ,HOW to do what you have already been anointed to do????

This is all Harry...

Now if I were asked a question like this. I could be able to answer in about one medium sized paragraph...

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

Oh, Harry about your reply to Steve about the Whte man has done better with this country...have you ever heard of the dust bowl that was caused when no one listend to how the Indians had treated the land with respect for for evey and this was sone almost over night. have you heard about the donner Party who did not listen to the Indians about why they were coming down this time of year from those mountians...have you heard about glogal warmings or those ice caps melting in the north pole?!? but, then a lot of people believe that Al gore invented protecting the earth and protecting the earth had nothing to do with africans and Indians being considered non humans for refusing to abuse Mother earth????

Man is not the ruler of this planet...keeping nature in balance by giving back and not just taking from the lands and the air and the water is what is the rule of this planet.
and do you know that due to burning those forest in south america part of it is sinking...that part of alaska is already returning to the sea because of oil drilling...check with our US government who are now in the process of moving those people to higher ground in Alaska...just thought I would throw a little of how the native-american did not cause this part of the world or any part to be in the shape it is today...slefishness and abuse fo man and animal and this earth to prove superiority over anothe person has done this. If I were you Harry I would not build your country near any oceans in America especially in California.(smile)

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

In other words you have no words of how and what you have done or will do????!?? Or I should just continue to listen to you talk about what everyone else but you have done..accomplished...in between disrespecting all others...?!? Just asking...

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.