Home Invites Blogs Careers Chat Events Forums Groups Members News Photos Polls Singles Videos
Home > Blogs > Post Content

Obama Misses the Afghan Exit Ramp (702 hits)


Is President Barack Obama so dense that he could not see why Gen. Stanley McChrystal might actually have wanted to be fired — and rescued from the current March of Folly in Afghanistan, a mess much of his own making?

McChrystal leaves behind a long trail of broken promises and unfulfilled expectations. For example, there is no real security, at least during the night, in Marja, which McChrystal devoted enormous resources to conquer this spring.

Remember his boast that he would then bring to Marja a "government-in-box" and offer an object lesson regarding what was in store for those pesky Taliban in Kandahar, Afghanistan’s second largest city?

But it’s now clear that there will be no offensive against Kandahar anytime soon. On its merits, that is surely a good thing, but it is a huge embarrassment for McChrystal and his former boss, the never nonplussed Gen. David Petraeus.

When McChrystal and his undisciplined senior aides let a Rolling Stone reporter know what they really thought of the "intimidated" Obama and most of his national security team, Obama and his advisers rose to the bait.

They let McChrystal fold his tent in the night and steal silently away from the disaster he leaves behind. White House advisers then came up with the idea of replacing McChrystal in Kabul with the straight-arrow Petraeus who is known for running a tight command.

Since the announcement Wednesday, the Stanley-out/David-in move has been hailed by Official Washington as a political master stroke, but not for the right reasons.

The conventional wisdom holds that Petraeus is the military genius who can still prevail in Afghanistan, but the real cleverness of the choice is that it dumps in Petraeus’s lap a mess that he also helped create, along with McChrystal and Obama (not to mention, Bush, Cheney, et al).

Petraeus gets a mission that virtually everyone but Sens. John McCain, Joe Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham realizes is an impossible assignment. It also gets Petraeus out of the country and, the Obama folks hope, out of contention for the 2012 Republican nomination.

Instead of possibly running against what a mess Obama has made of Afghanistan, Petraeus has been put in charge of the mess.

Vietnamistan

Still, the White House maneuver is too clever by half — and is extremely dangerous. It also makes the prospects dimmer for Obama executing a rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan beginning in July 2011, as some of the relative doves in his administration had hoped.

In replacing McChrystal with the popular Petraeus, who outnumbers Obama 100 to zero in the merit badges on his left breast, the President has given the sainted general the option of calling for more and more troops and firepower lest we "lose" in Vietnamistan — sorry, Afghanistan.

But where would the additional troops come from, and what would they be able to do that is not already being done?

For those old enough to remember a similar stage in the "counterinsurgency" operation in Vietnam, the ramrod image of Petraeus evokes shivers. He resembles much too closely the American commander in Vietnam, Gen. William Westmoreland, an equally handsome gent decked out with all manner of ribbons and medals with which to dazzle Congress in a way that President Lyndon Johnson could not.

A lawsuit after the war demonstrated that Westmoreland deliberately misled Congress by insisting that there were only half as many Vietnamese Communists under arms as his intelligence analysts knew there were.

Westmoreland’s periodic appeals for more and more troops – as he pursued the light at the end of the tunnel – built U.S. forces up to 536,000.

Finally, in early 1968, President Johnson convened more sober and honest advisers who told him Vietnam was a fool’s errand. Johnson finally told Westmoreland "no," but it was too late. Johnson wound up losing the presidency as well as the war, opening the door to Richard Nixon and all that followed.

In later mea culpas, Johnson’s Defense Secretary Robert McNamara bemoaned the fact that as many as three million Vietnamese were killed, as well as over 58,000 American troops. As the contemporary song went, "When will they ever learn?"

Rock and Hard Place

Obama’s main dilemma now is likely to be how to say "no" when, as seems inevitable, Westmoreland — sorry, Petraeus — makes requests for more "surges" of troops into Afghanistan.

Petraeus is likely to tell Obama he must have additional forces, or he will go the way of McChrystal and invite removal — and then possibly run for president in 2012. In that case, Obama’s political advisers would probably say send more troops from wherever they might be scrounged up.

Casualties would rise exponentially; there would never be enough troops; most of those NATO allies that have not already withdrawn their troops would do so. The remaining "coalition forces" would not "prevail" (whatever that means).

And by the end of 2011, the Teflon-as-well-as-merit-badge-clad Petraeus might well quit anyway and join McChrystal in blaming the carnage on the "clowns" around President Obama.

We may well end up with either a President Petraeus or another President Clinton in the person of Obama’s hawkish Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was one official praised by McChrystal’s wild-boy crew because she favored giving the general whatever troops he wanted.

A McChystal aide is quoted as saying, "She said, ‘If Stan wants it, give him what he needs.’"

Is it possible that Obama can be blissfully unaware of the dangerous political kill zone into which he has maneuvered his presidency?

The tragedy is that all this is unnecessary. If President Obama could get beyond these ill-conceived short-term political considerations, he already has available some well-reasoned guidance as to how to extricate the United States from the Afghanistan morass.

He got solid advice last fall from retired Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry, his ambassador in Kabul, who knows more about Afghanistan than Petraeus, McChrystal and special envoy Richard Holbrooke do, put together.

And that knowledge and experience shows through clearly in sensitive cables Eikenberry sent to Washington in early November 2009. It’s telling that the New York Times editorialists have suggested that Obama should include Eikenberry in a "wider housecleaning" of the administration’s Afghan brain trust.

The news columns of the Times, however, do deserve credit for having published the text of Eikenberry’s cables, posted online. To the credit of the Times‘ source (reportedly a U.S. official), he/she was able to do a truly patriotic thing to ensure that those interested could learn about what Eikenberry really thought, especially his doubts about the effectiveness of a military escalation.

Clearly, the source saw what ethicists call a "supervening value" in making that unauthorized disclosure to the Times.

Nevertheless, last fall, President Obama apparently put his finger to the prevailing political winds of Washington and chose to go with McChrystal’s counterinsurgency "surge" rather than the advice from Eikenberry and from Vice President Joe Biden, who also opposed the escalation.

Obama sided with McChrystal, Petraeus, and Clinton (as well as Defense Secretary Robert Gates), agreeing to triple the U.S. troop levels to about 100,000. In the months that have passed, the levels of American casualties have jumped but the prospects for victory (or some modicum of success) remain stuck in a deepening quagmire.

Now, with some indiscreet comments to Rolling Stone magazine, McChrystal has managed to get plucked from the swamp as if some "deus ex machina" derrick from a Greek tragedy had appeared magically behind stage and lifted the hero out of an impossible situation.

Obama now has turned to what might be called "Petraeus ex machina" to salvage his benighted strategy in Afghanistan, but this new device is unlikely to lift the larger military cause out of grave danger. Instead, many of the U.S. troops committed to this dubious plan seem doomed in what is becoming a real-life tragedy.


By Ray McGovern

June 24, 2010 "Information Clearing House"
Posted By:
Saturday, June 26th 2010 at 4:34PM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
Earl, here are a few things taht "I" believe disqualifies me from being stuck on planet stupid...

1. Only Congress can declare and finance any war(s) in the name of this country.

2. I do not blieve taht our president can know nor can he predict the actions of any country's fighting forces: pro or con!

3. I do believe if China cuts off any fundings to America then these two wars will end instantly!

And, on a personal basis, I believe when Bush insulted the Americn's eyes and ears and direct contacts with the War lords who actually run this country; we had about as much chance to fight and win the ghorella war fare fought by these peoples in those mountians without those eyes and ears of the Iranians as the Russians did, end of the common every day sense / real world debate on this matter...(smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Oh, and as far as the general goes...Earl do yu really believe he is the first or the last that worked for the Bush administration refuses to have left all of that fame, power and foturn rather than have a Black man as his / her superior?!?

Earl, "I" know I can give you much more credit than this now can't I?!? But, as for me, I have never taken our president for being a fool and he certainly did not ,not get the message about respect from his skin color as he was raised with this knowledge more so then I am sure you or I were rasied on a daily basis of this(smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Oh, Earl. a few things you have no idea about as far as Nam...Johnson was the single senator vote that got us inTO VietNam Much like bush we got in these two wars...as I repeat only congress can declare war and FINANCE it... not a president...

oh and the Vietnamese had just done to France what the Afgans had done to Russia...only they did it by taking apart All of their heavy equIpment apart carryed it on their backs up tHose mountians in a place thAt the French thought safe,AND THE fRENCH AFTER GENERATIONS OF MAKING THESE PEOPLE SERVANTS , cHRISTAINS AND NOT BUDDHIST AS THEY CHOSE TO BE...IN THEIR OWN LANDS got the hell out!!!! ect...

.you know how we needed tHose Iranains in tHose mountians...so Eark,, please get your facts straight...O.K ????

The truth HAs little TO NOTHING to do with any thing other than America is not trained to fight a waR like this and on Some one elses turf,... all else is brainwashing tHAt is working as it is only getting more and more away from the truth...WE ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO FIGHT THESE KINDS OF WAR AND THESE PEOPLE ARE UNITED NOT DEVIDED TRYING TO RELY ON BLAME AND POINTING FINGERS TO WIN OR TO LOOSE A WAR THEY ARE FITHTING FOR THEIR CULTURE NOT NATION BUILDING OR EVEN A PAY CHECK OR SKIN COLOR OR RELIGION HATRED AS WE ARE BEING BRAINWASHED INTO BELIEVEING...

WAKE UP...(SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Yes, Clark because until we were out of Vietnam it was called a CONFLICT...I will never forget when my husband was saying in his mail to me about trees shooting at you, at first I thought he was joking...on top of them not knowing ifthe barber on the base cutting you hair was going to end up being an enemy or that beer you drank of that soda had growned up glass in it...

who trains to fight this kind of war when you have no ideaa who the enemy is man, woman or samll child...and, yet this need to hate all not white and christian is having us right back at it as if we did not just go throught all of this even in Korea...

("I" am not smiling) I wish "I" could take this all out on pur president...but as my child is still in that military uniform just as he dad was, the least I can do is face the truth of the matter and learn as much facts as I can...I am against war, but I am not in the military. (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
earl, which president was such a DICTATOR they were able to declare and finance a war all on their own..."I" only ask because I want to learn all of the facts of any and all matters that there...even to how president Obama started any way and with whom and exactly when he will end this one and how will he get all of the troops and equipments out or will they just be left for the arms dealers as they were in Vietnam...

You said this so I would like you to follow up on it with more then presonal opinions.(smile)

Remember earl, I did not vote for our president, but "I" do have a child in a Navy uniforn and this would sure bring me some relief. (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Earl, you tickle me as does all of the manipulated European -centered history. example,

Was "oldHickory's" war on the black race or not and as it was on the Black racism ( Native Americans over gold being discovered) race this can not be counted as we were not a country, government, ect. but personal propert...Now about the wars of the other two?!?...

so please come again in answering my original question. Because b now earl you should know that "I" never throw things out there just to see what sticks.lol(smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Earl, I have enve checked in sign language and can't find a president named Ray McGovern so is this why I must accept this as your answer about your statement of fact as related to Jefferson and Adams and even if "I" do earl, this still leaves you one president short who declared war...


I would say for you and those like you on teh right "I" so wish you would allow someone to help you stop digging that endles pit...but, Earl this is what you get when you come after me with as our president says only things to farther back you into a corner...so you say "Uncle" or hell just delete me and write another blog...


earl please read my latest post...the next one "I" may just talk about some of these Communist ideology trying to be snuck in on our site. (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
Please Login To Post Comments...
Email:
Password:

 
More From This Author
When Will The Religious.. "Range Wars End?"
The Public Education Crisis Is Not About The Money....John Q. Public Does Not Know Where To Look
Shawnee Chief Tecumseh -(1768-1813)
Father Teaches Young Son To Read Using Alpha-Phonics
Homeschooling and the Myth of Socialization
Homeschooling - 6 Reasons Why You Should Home School Your Children
A Change In The Governing Mind
The Undergroud History of American Education
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home

(Advertise Here)
Who's Online
>> more | invite 
Black America Resources
100 Black Men of America
www.100blackmen.org

Black America's Political Action Committee (BAMPAC)
www.bampac.org

Black America Study
www.blackamericastudy.com

Black America Web
www.blackamericaweb.com

CNN Black In America Special
www.cnn.com/blackinamerica

NUL State of Black America Report
www.nul.org

Most Popular Bloggers
agnes levine has logged 19004 blog subscribers!
reginald culpepper has logged 12936 blog subscribers!
tanisha grant has logged 7058 blog subscribers!
rickey johnson has logged 6391 blog subscribers!
miisrael bride has logged 3029 blog subscribers!
>> more | add 
Latest Jobs
Director Of Nursing 1 - Apply by 2/20/2026 with State of Connecticut, Executive Branch in Middletown, CT.
Advanced Clinical Social Worker (16 Hour | Part-Time) with State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services in Torrington, CT.
Administrative Contract Specialist/Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) with U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Nationwide, DC.
Administrative Contract Specialist/Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) with U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Ashburn, VA.
Administrative Contract Specialist/Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) with U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Indianapolis, IN.
>> more | add