Home > Blogs > Post Content
|
|
11/7/2012 day after OBAMA wins election ! There are many lessons embedded in President Obama’s reelection victory, but for me, this comment from Obama during a pre-election interview with the Des Moines Register comes to mind,,, And since this is off the record, I will just be very blunt. Should I win a second term, a big reason I will win a second term is because the Republican nominee and the Republican Party have so alienated the fastest-growing demographic group in the country, the Latino community. And this is a relatively new phenomenon. He predicted it exactly. Although it is true that Latinos are the largest growing ethnic group, it is just as true that they’re not nearly as dependable a voting bloc for Democrats as blacks. George W. Bush received a record setting share of the Latino vote in 2000 and 2004. Romney did not, and while much of this has to do with Romney’s decision not to reach out to the Latino community, it also touches on how swayable the Latino electorate is, especially when compared to the African-American community. While the African-American community refuses to look twice at the GOP, no matter what, and for good reason, Latino voters seem to have a much more ‘what’s in it for me’ way of thinking when it comes to voting. Obama delivered on the DREAM Act, gave Latinos a Supreme Court justice, and challenged Arizona’s apartheid styled ‘show me your papers’ law, which bought him some goodwill from Latino voters. By offering real solutions to real problems facing, the Obama administration exchanged action for votes in the Latino community. It is doubly ironic that, even with a black president, Latinos are valued more than blacks. But what of the black community? Blacks aren’t really in the business of exchange. We’re in the business of doing the right thing because our ancestors died for it. That may be all well and good, and it may make you feel all warm and fuzzy, but it’s not a winning strategy for getting what you want in the political sphere. As other groups, such as the LGBT and Latino communities, entrench their positions under the big tent of the Democratic party, it is essential that the black community shift its strategy to a more t*t for tat, you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours, form of political gamesmanship. The logical thing to do is to make ourselves available to all politicians. If the GOP wants our vote, and they’re actually in desperate need of a little brown sugar in their coffee, then they should be willing to open the gates to free market opportunities which benefit blacks. How about an increase in the number of small business administration loans geared to African Americans? We could start there, then we could talk start -ups and other free market solutions to solve unemployment in the black community? And the same goes for Democrats. Want our votes? Then tell us what’s on the table. This is pay to play, and blacks having been playing for no pay for far too long. We’re owed a check. It’s time we get it.
Posted By: DAVID JOHNSON
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 7:52PM
You can also
click
here to view all posts by this author...
|
|
|
Irma the Latino's are coming to the table asking what are you going to do for us ,,they want to know who got their back they will also keep their money in the comunitys and work with each other when it comes to economic look at all the super stores being built by the Latinos ,they support each other and will do jobs blacks wont do at 15.4 percent of the population, Latinos are the largest minority group in the United States. They are a growing presence in all sectors of the economy, play an increasingly important role in government and politics, and are influential across a wide range of cultural domains. Despite the growing attention paid to Latinos in recent years, this population is characterized by relatively low socio-economic status, and Latinos frequently rank behind the majority white population and other minority groups when it comes to education, finances, and employment.
our people will not support each other for nothing for some reason black people dont spend with other black people ,this is the question we need answers to ,,why ?
there are a lot of sanctions on iran as a result of Iran’s support for international terrorism and its aggressiveactions against non-belligerent shipping in the Persian Gulf, President Reagan,
on October 29, 1987, issued Executive Order 12613 imposing a new import embargo
on Iranian-origin goods and services. Section 505 of the International Security
and Development Cooperation Act of 1985 (“ISDCA”) was utilized as the statutory
authority for the embargo, which gave rise to the Iranian Transactions
Regulations, Title 31, Part 560 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations
http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sa...
everyone is getting paid for there troubles but black people !
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 8:58PM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
|
|
watch how the next election add more focus on Latinos !
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 9:00PM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
|
|
Irma, you must take into account oil is my business my company is in the buying and selling of oil www.GlobalFinancial911Inc.com
Europe is Russia (and former federation countries) (42%), Africa (mainly Libya, Nigeria, Algeria, and Angola) (22%), Middle East (mainly Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Iraq) (17%), etc.
Source(s):
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petro...
http://ec.europa.eu/energy/observatory/o...
europa get there fuel/oil from Russia
If someone says “oil producer,” what country pops to mind? Chances are, the answer will be Saudi Arabia. It’s a common assumption in any discussion of the great global oil game that Americans drive around with abandon — through swamps, across fields of boulders, up dizzying cliffs — in their mighty sport utility vehicles and that the Saudis, above all others, just keep stuffing oil cash into their pockets.
There has generally been a lot of truth in that perception, as Saudi Arabia has for years topped the list of the world’s oil producers. But those not attuned to the finer points of the oil market may have missed a shift in the rankings over the summer, as Russia sneaked past the Saudis to top the list, with a six-month average of 9.37 million barrels a day, compared with 9.32 million for the ex-champ. (OPEC over all, of course, still dominates, with 29.5 million of the world’s 73.5 million barrels.)
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 11:41PM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
|
|
Most of Western Europe's oil comes from Middle Eastern nations (Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc.). However, a lot of oil is also supplied by Russia, the United States, Canada, China, and other European nations (i.e. Norway).
During the 2012 election campaign, both President Obama and his challenger Mitt Romney called for ever-tougher sanctions on Iran in an effort to prevent that country from developing a nuclear weapon. For the record, Iran denies it is working on a weapon, maintaining it is working to develop nuclear power for civilian purposes only.
Unilateral U.S. sanctions have been layered on those imposed by the United Nations, the European Union, and other governments. The multi-faceted economic embargo is making life continually harder for ordinary Iranians, much as the decade-long sanctions against Iraq, from the end of the first Persian Gulf War to the 2003 U.S. invasion, impacted the lives of ordinary Iraqis more than that of officials in Saddam Hussein's government.
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 11:48PM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
|
|
iran is suffering ,,The Economist this week describes the intensifying suffering of 75 million Iranian citizens as a result of the sanctions regime being imposed on them by the US and its allies [my emphasis]:
"Six years ago, when America and Europe were putting in place the first raft of measures to press Iran to come clean over its nuclear ambitions, the talk was of "smart" sanctions. The West, it was stressed, had no quarrel with the Iranian people—only with a regime that seemed bent on getting a nuclear bomb, or at least the capacity for making one. Yet, as sanctions have become increasingly punitive in the face of Iran's intransigence, it is ordinary Iranians who are paying the price.
"On October 1st and 2nd Iran's rial lost more than 25% of its value against the dollar. Since the end of last year it has depreciated by over 80%, most of that in just the past month. Despite subsidies intended to help the poor, prices for staples, such as milk, bread, rice, yogurt and vegetables, have at least doubled since the beginning of the year. Chicken has become so scarce that when scant supplies become available they prompt riots. On October 3rd police in Tehran fired tear-gas at people demonstrating over the rial's collapse. The city's main bazaar closed because of the impossibility of quoting accurate prices. . . .
"Unemployment is thought to be around three times higher than the official rate of 12%, and millions of unskilled factory workers are on wages well below the official poverty line of 10m rials (about $300) a month."
Pervasive unemployment, inflation, medicine shortages, and even food riots have been reported elsewhere.
That sanctions on Muslim countries cause mass human suffering is not only inevitable but part of their design. In 2006, the senior Israeli official Dov Weisglass infamously described the purpose of his nation's blockade on Gaza with this candid admission: "'The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hunger." Democratic Rep. Brad Sherman justified the Iran sanctions regime this way: "Critics of sanctions argue that these measures will hurt the Iranian people. Quite frankly, we need to do just that."
Even more infamously, the beloved former Democratic Secretary of State Madeleine Albright - when asked in 1996 by 60 Minutes' Lesley Stahl about reports that 500,000 Iraqi children had died as a result of US-imposed sanctions on that country - stoically replied: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price - we think the price is worth it." So extreme was the suffering caused by sanctions in Iraq that one former UN official, Denis Halliday, resigned in protest, saying that the sanctions policy met the formal definition of "genocide":
"We are now in there responsible for killing people, destroying their families, their children, allowing their older parents to die for lack of basic medicines. We're in there allowing children to die who were not born yet when Saddam Hussein made the mistake of invading Kuwait."
In an excellent Op-Ed for Al Jazeera last week, Murtaza Hussain extensively documented the devastation wrought on 26 million Iraqis by that sanctions regime - the one Albright declared as "worth it" - and argues: "that tragedy is being willfully replayed, only this time the target is the population of Iran". He explained:
"Intensifying sanctions against the country have sent the Iran's rial into an unprecedented free-fall, causing it to plummet in value by 75 per cent since the start of the year; and, stunningly, almost 60 per cent in the past week alone.
"Ordinary Iranians completely unconnected to the government have had their lives effectively ground to a halt as the sudden and unprecedented collapse of the financial system has rendered any meaningful form of commerce effectively impossible. In recent weeks, the price of staples such as rice and cooking oil have skyrocketed and once ubiquitous foods such as chicken have been rendered completely out of the reach of the average citizen."
That is a fact that should be deeply disturbing to any decent person. In 2001, the writer Chuck Sudetic visited Iraq and then wrote in Mother Jones about what he saw: namely, that the US-led sanctions regime "killed more civilians than all the chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons used in human history".
Yet as Hussain notes, the decade-long suffering of Iraqis was all futile when viewed next to the ostensible goal of sanctions: "the sanctions failed to remove Saddam from power and by many accounts helped him solidify his grip on the country by keeping the overwhelming majority of the population focused purely on subsistence." Some isolated exceptions notwithstanding, the very idea that a regime can be undermined by severely weakening the population that would otherwise oppose it - literally weakening them physically through food and medicine deprivation - is not only intuitively absurd and morally grotesque but also empirically disproven.
As Mohammad Sadeghi Esfahlani and Jamal Abdi recently documented in Foreign Policy, the sanctions regime, while devastating ordinary Iranians, is having virtually no effect on their leaders - other than to strengthen their grip on power:
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 11:49PM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
|
|
What's most extraordinary about all of this is that the extreme human suffering caused by US-led sanctions is barely acknowledged in mainstream American political discourse. One reason that Americans were so baffled after the 9/11 attack (why do they hate us?) is the same reason they continue to be so baffled by anti-American protests in the Muslim world (what are they so angry about?): namely, most Americans literally have no idea, because nobody ever told them, that their government's imposition of sanctions in Iraq led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children, and they similarly have no idea that the suffering of ordinary Iranians is becoming increasingly substantial.
People in the Muslim world (who are relentlessly depicted as propagandized) are well aware of the human devastation US sanctions have caused, while Americans (who think of themselves as the beneficiaries of a free and vibrant press) have largely had those facts kept from them. That dynamic in part, is what often explains the irreconcilable worldviews among people in those two parts of the world.
As usual, don't look for Democratic partisan to object to any of this. To the extent that they talk about the sanctions regime at all, it is typically to celebrate it: as proof of Barack Obama's "toughness" and his fealty to Israeli interests. So just as was true during the Clinton years, when very few Democratic partisans even bothered to acknowledge (let alone oppose) the lethal devastation wrought on Iraqi civilians, few now even consider the notion that sanctions are strategically unwise and morally indefensible, and when they discuss it at all, they praise Obama for putting the clamps on the Iranian economy.
In essence, the same mentality that drives Democratic support for drones sustains Democratic support for sanctions: they tacitly embrace the unexamined assumption that the US is inevitably going to engage in aggression and kill Muslims, and then pat themselves on the back for cheering for the way that kills the fewest (I support drones because they're better than full-scale invasions; I support sanctions because they're better than air strikes). They are seemingly incapable of conceiving of a third alternative: that the US could or should refrain from killing innocent people in predominantly Muslim countries.
Democratic support for sanctions on Iran shares another attribute with the pro-drone mentality. No matter how many times it is documented that drones do not decrease the threat of terrorism but rather increase that threat - by generating the anti-American hatred that drives terrorism - drone advocates insist: we must do this to stop the terrorists.
Identically, no matter how many times it is documented that Iraq sanctions actually strengthened Saddam's regime by literally starving the opposition and making them more reliant on regime support, sanctions advocates insist: we must impose sanctions, and harm ordinary Iranians, in order to remove Iran's regime. It is exactly like showing a lung cancer patient studies that prove that smoking causes lung cancer, and then sitting back while they insist that they will increase their cigarette intake in order to combat their cancer.
Even if it were true that sanctions produces less civilian harm than all-out air strikes on Iran, that would not justify sanctions. But as evidence of the sanctions-caused human suffering in Iran mounts, even the premise of that claim, irrelevant though it is, seems less and less convincing.
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 11:51PM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
|
|
i dont want to give you too much at one time so i will wait ,,but i can tell you this is a good conversation we are having ..
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 11:53PM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
|
|
keep in mind this is all going on right now,,, this is up to date info,,, here is a Interview with Stephen Beard
Marketplace for Thursday, January 5, 2012
Tess Vigeland: The European Union is reportedly nearing agreement on a ban of imported oil from Iran. It's the latest move by the west to put pressure on the regime in Tehran over its nuclear ambitions. Last weekend, the U.S. announced a ban on all financial transactions with Iran's central bank.
But Europe's oil embargo, if it does materialize, would not be formally unveiled until the end of January. And even then it could take months to implement.
Our European bureau chief Stephen Beard joins us from London with some of the details. Hello Stephen.
Stephen Beard: Hello Tess.
Vigeland: Why is this decision appearing to be so difficult for Europe? Are they not as concerned as the U.S. about Iran's nuclear ambitions?
Beard: Yes, I think they are, but the Europeans have got a lot to lose here. The U.S. doesn't buy any Iranian oil; Europe buys more than 400,000 barrels a day of it -- 17 percent of Iran's oil exports. And the European countries that are most dependent on that oil are the most economically fragile -- Greece, Italy, Spain -- so the last thing they need is an oil shock, a big sudden loss of supply. So this has been a tricky issue for the Europeans.
Vigeland: And is there also concern about being able to get the oil that they need from other sources?
Beard: That's why they reckon it's going to take many months to implement this ban. They are now scrambling for alternative sources of supply. Angola is one possibility. Ultimately, though, everyone expects the Saudis will step into the breach and pump more crude, and it's believed the Saudis could fairly easily make up the shortfall.
Vigeland: Stephen, if the EU does impose sanctions, what impact does that then have on the global price of oil? Could it presumably then affect gas prices in the U.S. and Europe?
Beard: In a sense, it's already affecting the global price of oil. Just the talk of the sanctions and the Iranian threat to retaliate by stopping all oil shipments through the Gulf -- that's already pushed the global price of oil up by $6 or $7 a barrel. Ironically, that has benefitted Iran, because it's making more money from its oil. Whether oil prices will go much higher if the sanctions come into effect depends. Oil analysts say if there's the threat of conflict in the Gulf, that could push up oil prices further.
Julian Lee of the Center of Global Energy Studies says that what happened during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s.
Julian Lee: We saw a huge increase in insurance premiums for tankers entering the Gulf, which added to cost of delivering oil. I think, you know, if this escalates, you may well see the same sort of thing happening again.
So he says there are concerns that if this does escalate, that will keep oil prices fairly high in the months ahead.
Vigeland: Well, before we leave the subject, we should probably touch on what this means potentially for Iran itself. How much pressure could these kinds of sanctions put on the regime in Tehran?
Beard: Iran is going to have to find other customers. It already sells more than half its oil to China, India and South Korea, and these countries seem very unlikely to join in an oil embargo. So Iran could probably sell its surplus oil to these countries, but they're likely to drive a hard bargain -- China in particular -- and pay less for the oil. So Iran could certainly suffer. The Iranians are definitely worried.
Vigeland: Marketplace's Stephen Beard, joining us from London. Thank you so much.
Beard: OK Tess.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/20...
https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search...
Wednesday, November 7th 2012 at 11:59PM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
|
|
Irma your not reading my info i posted that at the top of everything take a look !
Thursday, November 8th 2012 at 11:10AM
DAVID JOHNSON
|
 |
...oh and David, I will never go against Iranians for having kicked out an american dictor who they grew tirred of his oppression and then took hostiages of americans over their anger for being disrespected by america for having then brought the kicked out dictator her e to america!!!I am too much into the rights of all to survive no matter be they muslims or not the same way after finding out it was teh bible that was used to prove us nonhumand the same bible being used by the kkk to do tis to tis day...yes i have left th bible alone also and if i ever decide to become a pricticing catholic again tehn i will pick up this book again and respect the lessons taht put us into salver all over again, David. (smile)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
@DAVID, "I" AM SPEAKING DIRECTLY TO YOU NOW...THELATINOS WILL CONTINUE TO DO WHAT WE WILL CONTINE TO DO AND THIS IS TO S-U-R-V-I-V-E AND THE WAY THEY WILL DO IT IS THE SAME AS WE ALWAYS HAVE DONE...LEARN BY WAY OF OUR ORAL HISTORY AND CONTINUE TO FORCE OUR FEDEARL, STATE ANDLOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO CONTINUE TO ALLOW OUR HISTORY AS IT TRUELY IS INTO NOT JUST COLLEGES BUT FROM KINDERGARDEN...AND, DAVID THIS HAS TO DO WITH WHY I AM ON THIS SITE...NOW I DEGRESS TO THE STATES LIKE AZ.AND TX. WO ARE IN DENIAL OF THEY HAVE A LATINO MAJORITY AND HOW TRUE THE GOVERNOR OF AZ IS WHEN SHE SAY ETHNIC STUDY MAKES OUR OUTH ANGRY...NO IT MAKES THEM AMD AS HELL AND GO OUT TO VOTE AGAINST ROMENY...
YOUSEE DAVID THE LATIONS IF YOU HAVE NOT NOTICED IT ARE NOT BEING CALLED MEXICANS ANY LONGER AN DAVID THIS IS WHY...YOU KNOW HOW WE NOW IDENTIFY AS AFRICAN-AMERICANS...THESE YOUTH ARE NOW IDENTIFYINF AS NATIVE-AMERICAN OR I-N-D-I-A-N-S SINCE THEY ARE JUST BEGINING TO LEARN THEY DID NOT COME FROM APAIN BUT FROM AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NOW DAVID I WILL TELL MORE AS IT HAS TO DO WITH IRAN ALSO...YOU SEE IT IS IRAN TAHT HAS TAUGHT THESE PEOPLES OW TO NOT ACCEPT THOSE CASINOS BUT HOW TO GET THEIR OIL BACK FROM OUR GOVERNMENT...AND IF YOU GO TO YOUR COMPUTER YOU CAN LEARN HOW MUCH LANDS THAAT THE NATIVE-AMERICANS HAVE TAKEN BACK FROM OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND WHY IS THIS WELL IT HAS TO DO WITH THENATIVE-AMERICAN WOMEN HAD RIGHTS AND UNDER THESE RIGHTS THEY SHOULD HAVE DINGED THESELAND THAT THE WITEMAN GOT BY WAY OF TOSE TREATIES...DAVID THE GUN DID NOT WIN THE WEST ALCOHOL DIA ND THIS ALSO THEY ARE FINDING OURA ND GETTING SOBER MORE NADMORE EACH DAY...
SO DAVID WHAT DO WE DO NOW SI SIMPLE WE DO AS WE ALWAYS HAVE CONE...WE MEET THE MAN IN C-O-U-R-T AS TEHA LATINOS ARE DOING AND HAVE BEEN DOING...THESE PEOOPLES HAVE TH E SAME ZERO POLITICAL AND MONEY POWERS AS WE DO...BUT IT IS ALL ABOUT HE NEXT GENERATION...O.K. DAVID AND WITH BHO STILL IN OFFICE COURT WQILL BE GOING IN OUR FAVOR FOR AT LEAST LETS SAY 40-50 YEARS BEFORE OUR COMMUNITY BEGIN TO BELIEVE WHEHAVE MADE IT(50 YEARS IS ABOUT WHEN WE HAVE THE LAST AMERICAN CIVIL WAR WAS IT NOT??????????? (OFTL)(SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
@David, it does not matter since "I" will never have any reason to put my race second class no matter the rational not even to go along with the Holy Bible or even again fear hell for doing so. (smile) I have too good of a BIA history to do this any way...BLACK POWER...
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
David, I am suppose to be quiet but I will answer your two questions...
1. What country do I think of when I hear oil producation. My answer is the Mother land, Africa...lets see someone has to keep alive that Africa gets paid much like the Native-Americans, but the Native_americans haave not become so desperate they have become pirates to try and get a message (over looked and unkknown) taht the oil companies have so distroyed their lands they are starving because they can no longer grow food( kinds of reminds me ro why agent orange was sprayed on Viet Nam to make sure to this day they can not grow rice any more) Oh and lets talk about the 'terrorist ' in the Motherland attacking oil companys because they willl not pay them and they also are starving!!!!but, as you see it is not a secret and actually is well known by our government and themasss media also, but, well you know how these things work...Ever heard abour one of our own states whose peoples arre loosing their lands because it is now almost covered ty ocean water due to oil drilling...I bet not, right?
2. did you say europe gets it soil from Iran...now how are they geting it if they can't get it from Iran say still on Nov. 7, 12?!? (smile)about how much do you think Iran made from selling it oil say in te past 5 minutes?...Romney for president as Irsealtill give aide and comfort to Syria...oops, hey are not Muslims dispite being middle-easterner as Iran, correct?!? PLEASE...LOL (S-M-I-L-E)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
LETS SEE, WE STARTED OUR POLITICAL RISE AS MAYORS OF CITIES NO ONE WANTED AND WE ENDED UP WITH OUR MOT MEMORABLE (DUE TO MEDIA TEACHING US ABOUT OUR COMMUNITY0 WITH THOSE LIKE THE MAYOR OF DC...BUT AT LEASE H E WAS SPARED THE MEDIA (AS IS OUR BLACK CONGRESSMAN) HAVING US TURN ON HIM BECAUSE HE WAS A MEMBER OF THE ORIGINAL BLACK PANTHERS. AND THE $MILLIONS IF NOT $BILLIONS SPENT BY OUR GOVERNMENT TO GET HIM!!!! LOL (SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
DAVID, IT WOULD ALSO HELP TO STOP THE BRAINWASHNGS AS WELL AS SAVE AMERICAN LIVES AND LIVES , PERIOD... EXAMPLE,
WITH OUR UNITY WITH IRAN IN AFGANISATAN (DAVID GO LOOK UP HOW WE WER WINNING SO WELL WHEN WE FIRST GOT THERE UNTIL WE WOULD HAVE BEEN IN AND OUT OF TAHT NATION AND NOT STILL THERE NOR WOULD NEVER HAVE INVADED IRAQ UNLESS FO RBUSH SAYING WHAT FAMOUS WORDS, DAVID THA TAHS US STILL IN AFGANISTAN TILL THIS DAY..OR DAVIE DI YOU EAN KNOW TAHT IT WAS IRAN FIGHTING SIDE BY SIDE AS OUR CLOSEST ALLY WEN WE FIRST INVADED AFGANISATAN?????????????????????????????..OF IS TIS MORE PORRF THAT BRAINWASING WORKS TOO WELL??????????????????????? (NUP!!!)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
...NOW DAVID WHEN IT COMES TO SANTIONS ON IRAN...WHERE DOES THE MAJORITY OF EUROPE GET THEIR OIL???????????... PLEASE TELL ME WHEN IS THE LAST TIME YOU HEARD OF A SHORTAGE OF OIL ANY PLACE IN EUROPE...DAVID THIS IS BRAINWASING AT ITS BEST IF YOU AN TALK ABOUT IRAN'S SANTIONS AND CAN'T ANSWER MY QUESTIONS. (N...U...P)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
DAVID, THERE WILL ALWAYS BE MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY WHO ON THIS SITE WISH ME DEAD AND SAY REV SHARPTON SHOULD GO SIT DOWN, BUT DAVID ALL BLACKS ARE NOT ALIKE AND THEREFORE THE KNOW BECAUSE THEY LIVE A UNITED BLACK UNITY???OH, NOT LIKE BEFORE WE GOT ALL OF THESE FREEDOMS SAY NOT WORKING BEFORE GOING TO SCHOOL WHICH LEAVES US MORE TIME TO KILL EACH OTHER OVER DRUGS THAT THOSE WHO DIE OR GO TO JAIL OVER WILL NEVER GET RICH ON IN THE FIRST PLACE...
DAVID IT IS MUCH LIKE THSE AT THE TOP TAHT PUT THESE DRUGS INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOODS WILL NEVER FACE A DAY IN A JAIL AN D YOU KNOW WHY...WE STILL BELIEVE WH HAVE IT MADE IN AMERICAND NO WORK TO DO LIKE STOP BEING BRAINWASHED THA TYOU ARE LESAS THEN, BECAUSE DAIVD IF YOU BELIEVE WHAT YOU JUST SAID THEN YOU DON'T DESERVE RESPECT OR EQUALITY, BECAUSE YOU HAVE JUS SAIDN ALL OF HE SAME REAONS WHY THIS SHOULD BE THAT THE MAN SAID BEFOR E YOU WERE BORN AND HOPE TO CONTINUE TO TEACH LING AFTER YOU ARE DEAD DAVID...
NOW DAVID HOW MANY LATINOS HAVE YOU SEEN AS GOVERNOR OFA STATE IN THE SENATE OUR SUPREMCOURT, ANCHORS ON TV, STARS IN MOVIES TV PROGRAMS ON THE $BILLIONAIRE LIST GENERALS IN OUR MILITRAY, AMBASSODORS ATTORNEY GENERALS, IN THE HOUSE IN DC?!?
NOW RIGHT AFTER YOU ANSWER ME THEN WE CAN CONTINUE. O.K.??????? (SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
...AND, NOW SINCE "iI" HAVE JUST LOST IT, "I" LEAVE OU IN PEACE. (S-M-I-L-E)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
|
|
...I ONLY USED IRAN BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONLY MIDDLE-EAST NATION ONF OUR GOVERNMENT'S OFFICAL RECORDS AS TEACHING THE INDIAN NATION HOW OUR GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER BEEN ABLE TO GET THEIR OIL WITHOUT PAYING FOR IT...THEY DON'T PAY THE NATIVE-AERICANS THEY COVER-UP BY GIVING THOSE AT ATHE TOP CANSINOS PAY OFFS WHILE TH REST GET JUST ENOUGH TO KEEP THEM DRUNK AT ALL TIMES...ALL OF THIS CAN ALSO BE FOUND IN ANY COLLGE WITH A NATIVA-AMERICAN STUDY DEPT. BETTER KNOWNAS ETHNIC STUDY. (SMILE)
OH THIS CROP OF CNN SPECIALS DID NOT COME OUT OF THE AIR EITHER....ECAMPE HOW MANY LEARNED ABOUT OUR BIA HISTORY IN ETHNIC STUDY THATA IS THE DIRECT OPPOSIT OF THOSE CNN SPECIALS...AND, WE DO HATE REV. WRIGHT BECAUSE HWO IS IT THAT ATUGHT US ABOUT HIM...
ETHNIC STUDY?
TV?...GET WHERE I AM GOING...ALL IN MY BLACK COMMUNITY NOT JUST DAVID...
OH AND WHAT ABOUT YOU, HARRY, ROBERT, JAKE, JEN, EARL??????????!!!!!!!!!!?...
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
|
Blogs Home
|
|
|
