President Barack Obama's Speech at the National Defense University on May 23, 2013 (804 hits)
It's an honor to return to the National Defense University. Here, at Fort McNair, Americans have served in uniform since 1791-- standing guard in the early days of the Republic, and contemplating the future of warfare here in the 21st century.
For over two centuries, the United States has been bound together by founding documents that defined who we are as Americans, and served as our compass through every type of change. Matters of war and peace are no different. Americans are deeply ambivalent about war, but having fought for our independence, we know that a price must be paid for freedom. From the Civil War, to our struggle against fascism, and through the long, twilight struggle of the Cold War, battlefields have changed, and technology has evolved. But our commitment to Constitutional principles has weathered every war, and every war has come to an end.
Too bad you don't watch videos Robert. This is quite a remarkable speech, especially towards the end.
Tuesday, June 11th 2013 at 10:20PM
Steve Williams
NSA's Verizon surveillance: how the White House tramples our constitution
Senator Obama once showed great concern to safeguard US freedoms. But as president, he rides roughshod over liberty
Rand Paul The Guardian, Thursday 6 June 2013
In December 2007, then-Senator Barack Obama joined then-Senator Chris Dodd in threatening to filibuster the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Fisa). Senator Obama opposed provisions granting retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that shared private client information with the government. His office released a statement:
"Granting such immunity undermines the constitutional protections Americans trust the Congress to protect. Senator Obama supports a filibuster of this bill …"
Senator Obama was right. Had I been in the Senate, I would've voted with him. I've even filibustered myself over civil liberties issues I believe are important.
Later, supporting an amendment that he believed repealed retroactive immunity from Fisa, Senator Obama said in February 2008:
"We can give our intelligence and law enforcement community the powers they need to track down and take out terrorists without undermining our commitment to the rule of law, or our basic rights and liberties."
Senator Obama in 2007 was rightly concerned that telecommunications companies might get away with sharing clients' private information without legal scrutiny. This week, we learned that the president's National Security Agency compelled Verizon to hand over all of its client data records.
Senator Obama in 2008 wanted to track potential terrorist activity "without undermining our commitment to the rule of law, or our basic rights and liberties". Today, President Obama undermines the rule of law, basic rights and core liberties – all in the name of tracking terrorists.
There is always a balance between security and liberty and the American tradition has long been to err on the side of liberty. America's founders feared a government powerful enough to commit unreasonable searches and seizures and crafted a constitution designed to protect citizens' privacy.
Under this administration, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has targeted political dissidents, the Department of Justice has seized reporters' phone records, and now we've learned the NSA seized an unlimited amount of Verizon's client data. Just when you think it can't get any worse under this president, it does. This is an all-out assault on the constitution. These actions are unacceptable under any president, Democrat or Republican.
I can remember well a Senator Obama who joined the Democratic chorus against the warrantless wiretapping of the Bush administration. Now, that chorus has gone mute. The Guardian's Glenn Greenwald has noted what he sees as "a defining attribute of the Obama legacy: the transformation of what was until recently a symbol of rightwing radicalism – warrantless eavesdropping – into meekly accepted bipartisan consensus."
Not every Republican or Democrat is part of that consensus. When the Senate rushed through a last-minute extension of the Fisa Amendments Act over the holidays late last year, Senator Mike Lee (Republican, Utah) and I offered an amendment requiring stronger protections on business records that would've prohibited precisely the kind of data-mining the Verizon case has revealed. Senator Ron Wyden (Democrat, Oregon) introduced an amendment to require estimates from intelligence agencies of how many Americans were being surveilled. Both these measures were voted down.
Just last month, I introduced the Fourth Amendment Preservation and Protection Act, which if enacted would've protected Americans from exactly the kind of abuses we've seen recently. It was also voted down.
On Thursday, I announced my Fourth Amendment Restoration Act of 2013, which ensures that no government agency can search the phone records of Americans without a warrant based on probable cause. We shall see how many join me in supporting a part of the Bill of Rights that everyone in Congress already took an oath to uphold.
If the president and Congress would simply obey the fourth amendment, this new shocking revelation that the government is now spying on citizens' phone data en masse would never have happened. That I have to keep reintroducing the fourth amendment – and that a majority of senators keep voting against it – is a good reflection of the arrogance that dominates Washington.
During my filibuster, I quoted Glenn Greenwald, who wrote:
"There is a theoretical framework being built that posits that the US government has unlimited power. When it comes to any kind of threats it perceives, it makes the judgment to take whatever action against them that it warrants without any constraints or limitations of any kind."
If the seizure and surveillance of Americans' phone records – across the board and with little to no discrimination – is now considered a legitimate security precaution, there is literally no protection of any kind guaranteed anymore to American citizens. In their actions, more outrageous and numerous by the day, this administration continues to treat the US constitution as a dead letter.
Senator Obama said of President Bush and Fisa in 2008:
"We must reaffirm that no one in this country is above the law."
No one in America should be above the law. Including this president.
"For over two centuries, the United States has been bound together by founding documents that defined who we are as Americans"
founding documents ARE ----- LAWS demeaned constitutional
yes, President Baraaka Hussein Obama --as Senator--OPPOSED this kind of ACTIVITY
but, Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches
BEFORE ------the AGE of ENLIGHTENMENT, The Governance of President Baraaka Hussein Obama
made Patriot Act, FISA, etc --- Constitutional Law........
2013 ----he is only the EXECUTIVE branch and UNTIL he can SECURE absolute MAJORITY in House of Representatives and Supreme Court ---- he--you and I and ALL Americans have to live with bushyLAWS- ----like the 1791 LAWS of only Europeans as Citizens.....Africans slaves....Natives dead.....
Again, the Age of President Baraaka Hussein Obama is the Greatest Age for the United States of America Constitution..............
First Posted: 05/27/11 01:55 AM ET Updated: 07/26/11 06:12 AM ET
JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Minutes before a midnight deadline, President Barack Obama signed into law a four-year extension of post-Sept. 11 powers to search records and conduct roving wiretaps in pursuit of terrorists.
"It's an important tool for us to continue dealing with an ongoing terrorist threat," Obama said Friday after a meeting with French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
With Obama in France, the White House said the president used an autopen machine that holds a pen and signs his actual signature. It is only used with proper authorization of the president.
Congress sent the bill to the president with only hours to go on Thursday before the provisions expired at midnight. Votes taken in rapid succession in the Senate and House came after lawmakers rejected attempts to temper the law enforcement powers to ensure that individual liberties are not abused.
The Senate voted 72-23 for the legislation to renew three terrorism-fighting authorities. The House passed the measure 250-153 on an evening vote.
A short-term expiration would not have interrupted ongoing operations but would have barred the government from seeking warrants for new investigations.
Congress bumped up against the deadline mainly because of the stubborn resistance from a single senator, Republican freshman Rand Paul of Kentucky, who saw the terrorist-hunting powers as an abuse of privacy rights. Paul held up the final vote for several days while he demanded a chance to change the bill to diminish the government's ability to monitor individual actions.
The measure would add four years to the legal life of roving wiretaps, authorized for a person rather than a communications line or device; court-ordered searches of business records; and surveillance of non-American "lone wolf" suspects without confirmed ties to terrorist groups.
The roving wiretaps and access to business records are small parts of the USA Patriot Act enacted after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. But unlike most of the act, which is permanent law, those provisions must be renewed periodically because of concerns that they could be used to violate privacy rights. The same applies to the "lone wolf" provision, which was part of a 2004 intelligence law.
Paul argued that in the rush to meet the terrorist threat in 2001 Congress enacted a Patriot Act that tramples on individual liberties. He had some backing from liberal Democrats and civil liberties groups who have long contended the law gives the government authority to spy on innocent citizens.
Sen. **** Durbin, D-Ill., said he voted for the act in 2001 "while ground zero was still burning." But "I soon realized it gave too much power to government without enough judicial and congressional oversight."
Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said the provision on collecting business records can expose law-abiding citizens to government scrutiny. "If we cannot limit investigations to terrorism or other nefarious activities, where do they end?" he asked.
"The Patriot Act has been used improperly again and again by law enforcement to invade Americans' privacy and violate their constitutional rights," said Laura W. Murphy, director of the ACLU Washington legislative office.
Still, coming just a month after intelligence and military forces tracked down and killed Osama bin Laden, there was little appetite for tampering with the terrorism-fighting tools. These tools, said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, "have kept us safe for nearly a decade and Americans today should be relieved and reassured to know that these programs will continue."
Intelligence officials have denied improper use of surveillance tools, and this week both FBI Director Robert Mueller and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper sent letters to congressional leaders warning of serious national security consequences if the provisions were allowed to lapse.
The Obama administration says that without the three authorities the FBI might not be able to obtain information on terrorist plotting inside the U.S. and that a terrorist who communicates using different cell phones and email accounts could escape timely surveillance.
"When the clock strikes midnight tomorrow, we would be giving terrorists the opportunity to plot attacks against our country, undetected," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on the Senate floor Wednesday. In unusually personal criticism of a fellow senator, he warned that Paul, by blocking swift passage of the bill, "is threatening to take away the best tools we have for stopping them."
The nation itself is divided over the Patriot Act, as reflected in a Pew Research Center poll last February, before the killing of bin Laden, that found that 34 percent felt the law "goes too far and poses a threat to civil liberties. Some 42 percent considered it "a necessary tool that helps the government find terrorists." That was a slight turnaround from 2004 when 39 percent thought it went too far and 33 percent said it was necessary.
Paul, after complaining that Reid's remarks were "personally insulting," asked whether the nation "should have some rules that say before they come into your house, before they go into your banking records, that a judge should be asked for permission, that there should be judicial review? Do we want a lawless land?"
Paul agreed to let the bill go forward after he was given a vote on two amendments to rein in government surveillance powers. Both were soundly defeated. The more controversial, an amendment that would have restricted powers to obtain gun records in terrorist investigations, was defeated 85-10 after lawmakers received a letter from the National Rifle Association stating that it was not taking a position on the measure.
According to a senior Justice Department national security official testifying to Congress last March, the government has sought roving wiretap authority in about 20 cases a year between 2001 and 2010 and has sought warrants for business records less than 40 times a year, on average. The government has yet to use the lone wolf authority.
But the ACLU also points out that court approvals for business record access jumped from 21 in 2009 to 96 last year, and the organization contends the Patriot Act has blurred the line between investigations of actual terrorists and those not suspected of doing anything wrong.
Two Democratic critics of the Patriot Act, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Udall of Colorado, on Thursday extracted a promise from Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that she would hold hearings with intelligence and law enforcement officials on how the law is being carried out.
Wyden says that while there are numerous interpretations of how the Patriot Act works, the official government interpretation of the law remains classified. "A significant gap has developed now between what the public thinks the law says and what the government secretly claims it says," Wyden said.
The Senate voted 72-23 for the legislation to renew three terrorism-fighting authorities. The House passed the measure 250-153 on an evening vote.
Wednesday, June 12th 2013 at 1:52PM
Steve Williams
And where was Bush during this 2011 legislative and executive action? The Democrats passed it, the Republicans passed it, and the 2013 Chief Executive Officer signed it. It's now his baby, not Bush's.
Wednesday, June 12th 2013 at 2:07PM
Steve Williams
Now Robert, you seem to think I'm against Obama. I am not, but neither do I agree with him on every point. That's my right as a U.S. citizen.
If you would watch the video (you can put a piece of tape over the computer's camera lens if you're worried someone might spy on you), you would see President Obama is quite capable of defending his position.
But the best part of the video was at the end, when he showed great forbearance, poise and respect to a persistent heckler interrupting his speech multiple times.
I don't see how you can make an informed comment without watching the video Robert, as it is the original post.
While the government's actual use of the Patriot Act largely remains secret, members of the Senate Intelligence Committee are unhappy with the extension.
Before Thursday's Senate vote, Oregon Democratic Senator Ron Wyden said, "I want to deliver a warning this afternoon: When the American people find out how their government has secretly interpreted the Patriot Act, they will be stunned and they will be angry."
"Americans would be alarmed if they knew how this law is being carried out," added Senator Mark Udall of Colorado, also on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
"Now Robert, you seem to think I'm against Obama. you would see President Obama is quite capable of defending his position."
BIA and I! ---- need YOU to tellUS that President Baraaaka Hussein Obama is CORRECT?
viralDNA is contained in your brain, subconsciously.........
your video is from RT news, the Moscow news in English-----I ASSURE you I watch RT.....
your viralDNA ALWAYS tries to make your thoughts of greaterValue than African Americans
on BIA, an African American wwwebSITE for Families.......racistStereotypes--the WORST
sweetIrma seems, in my opinion, to have more robertDNA than steveDNA(married?)
sweetIrma Posts -- when I can READ them generally mirror mine....... "WE KNOW WELL SOMEONE MUST BE THE SCAPE GOAT FOR NOT GOING ALONG WITH WHAT IS SAID...EACH DAY THESE WORDS ARE NOT SPOKEN MAKES IS A DAY MADE SAFER FOR THE INNOCENT SHIEK WHO LIVE HERE LOCALLY"
ourDNA of HumanSurvival has given our africanAmerican DNA--- the understanding and comprehension that when any business or government in USA---1960-NOW
is in trouble or failure --- it is time for BLAME, on SOMEONE---and in steps President Baraaka Hussein Obama---WHO IS AWARE of THIS---
what YOU do not seem to understand --- about DEMOCRACY, like any BUSINESS; when you are elected president, ceo, cfo, itSecurity------ you have to follow the laws of that organization or get BOOTED..........
but a President that is the FULLFILLMENT of "ALL men are CREATED equal" IS THE CHANGE THAT WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR..........
you NEED to apologize to BIA, for your negative portrayal of the Greatest African American
No need to be peeved, I haven't come to a conclusion on this and am not playing the blame game.
My first response to 9/11, that I told all my children, friends and family, was that we should not respond militarily, but rather address our own wrongdoing committed around the world. It is our own actions that make us enemies.
I was against the first Iraq war, the second Iraq war, Afghanistan war, overthrow of Egypt, Libya, and now proposed action in Syria.
I was against the first Patriot Act, and the reauthorization. When I urged Toomey not to vote for it (I was still in PA), I got a polite letter back declining my suggestion.
I will watch Rachel for her latest. But since Congress overwhelming passed it, the President is the authority to appeal to now. That's all I've done, is petition him to put an end to the practice, which I think he has the power to do. Yesterday I left off with a search of Whitehouse.gov and the news coverage back then, to refresh my memory of the history of the reauthorization. I have yet to read the relevant section of the Act, but I will find and post it.
I'm doing this on the suspicion that the leak was intentional, based on the President saying that he wants this debate. But if he's against these provisions then why was he pressing, at the time, for a longer extension of the provisions than what Congress was proposing?
I'm still looking, still trying to read between the lines of all this. The one thing I will always blame is the two-party system. George Washington wrote in his farewell address that it would destroy the country, and I believe him.
Beyond that, no blame, and remember I know only a fraction of what you do about all these political figures and machinations.
I was absolutely wowed at the President's tolerance towards the heckler at the end of the speech I originally posted, and whenever I see him do such things my respect for him goes up another notch. I don't think he is offended by my petition that he do whatever he can to put an end to the practice. I'm interested in results, not blame.
I will now go watch Rachel and continue to post my findings, the good the bad and the ugly.
After I see if Robert has prepared any new insults for me today.
You, the self-professed non-racist, take me to task because I am not African-American, posting on an African-American website, about an African-American President, news and opinions that you suppose to be European Pagan Christian.
Not that I am an American posting on an American website about an American President?
Nothing here, nor under Speeches & Remarks nor Press Briefings Just this under Statements & Releases.
Statement by the Press Secretary on S. 990
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, the President signed into law:
S. 990, the “PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011,” which extends certain surveillance authorities included in the USA PATRIOT Act and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.
Weekly Address: Biden on the American Auto Comeback
May 28, 2011 | 5:10 | Public Domain
Vice President Joe Biden delivers the Weekly Address, celebrating the success of the American auto industry in the wake of Chrysler paying back their loans.
PATRIOT Sunset Extension Act of 2011 "Signed" into Law
Late last Thursday S. 990, PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011 [Thomas], was signed into law shortly before sections of the Act were set to expire. In what appears to be a presidential first, an autopen was used at the direction of President Obama who was in Europe and who apparently would not have received a copy of the bill before "sunsets" kicked in. Ah, no email access to receive an authenticated PDF that could have then been printed? I thought this was the high tech White House administration. Some may question the legality of using an autopen under Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution. The New York Times reports that White House officials relied on a 2005 DOJ memorandum which concluded that “the president need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill to sign it.” See Making Legislative History, With Nod From Obama and Stroke of an Autopen. One has to wonder if any opponents of S. 990 will litigate the issue. Imagine a brief on the merits with string citations to Justice Scalia. Food for thought or mindless navel gazing? Constitutional law prof scholars have all summer to chew on this issue for a potential SSRN paper. Ruthann Robson, Professor of Law & University Distinguished Professor, CUNY School of Law, authors the first blog post I've seen on the issue. See Originalism and the Autopen: Obama's "Signing" of Patriot Act Extension on Constitutional Law Prof Blog (May 30, 2010) (Link to the 2005 DOJ memorandum provided by the post). Quoting from the post's concluding paragraph: Although President Bush never relied upon the Memorandum issued in 2005, and the use of the autopen has provoked satire ("Despite possible constitutional challenges, the Supreme Court is expected to uphold the practice given that opposing it would likely offend Justice Scalia's autopen, Clarence Thomas"), it seems that while Obama's resort to the autopen may be a first, it is not unconstitutional, even under an originalist interpretation. Call me old school but I want my president to put pen to paper when signing every bill into law. Legal or not, an autopen should be left to mass mailings. And no, use of an autopen is not indicative of a high tech administration IMHO. S. 990 as "signed" reauthorizes the three controversial government surveillance powers from the PATRIOT Act to June 1, 2015 despite some unsuccessful bipartisan Congressional opposition. See the ACLU's Four More Years of Unchecked Spying, Surveillance and Secrecy and the Washington Post's Patriot Act extension signed into law despite bipartisan resistance in Congress. Quoting from a pre-S.990 ACLU analysis (since no changes, why not): Section 215 of the Patriot Act authorizes the government to obtain "any tangible thing" relevant to a terrorism investigation, even if there is no showing that the "thing" pertains to suspected terrorists or terrorist activities. This provision is contrary to traditional notions of search and seizure, which require the government to show reasonable suspicion or probable cause before undertaking an investigation that infringes upon a person's privacy. Congress must ensure that things collected with this power have a meaningful nexus to suspected terrorist activity or it should be allowed to expire.
Section 206 of the Patriot Act, also known as "roving John Doe wiretap" provision, permits the government to obtain intelligence surveillance orders that identify neither the person nor the facility to be tapped. This provision is contrary to traditional notions of search and seizure, which require government to state with particularity what it seeks to search or seize. Section 206 should be amended to mirror similar and longstanding criminal laws that permit roving wiretaps, but require the naming of a specific target. Otherwise, it should expire.
Section 6001 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, or the so-called "Lone Wolf" provision, permits secret intelligence surveillance of non-US persons who are not affiliated with a foreign organization. Such an authorization, granted only in secret courts is subject to abuse and threatens our longtime understandings of the limits of the government's investigatory powers within the borders of the United States. This provision has never been used and should be allowed to expire outright. See also the ACLU's 2009 report, Reclaiming Patriotism: A Call to Reconsider the Patriot Act, which could be reissued as a 2011 report. [JH]
Four More Years of Unchecked Spying, Surveillance and Secrecy By Michelle Richardson, Legislative Counsel, ACLU Washington Legislative Office at 5:22pm
Last night, Congress passed and the president signed a four-year extension of three expiring provisions of the Patriot Act. You may recall that the original expiration was scheduled for December 31, 2009 — and what did Congress do after 18 months of short term extensions, sporadic hearings and a markup or two? Nothing. The Patriot Act was reauthorized as-is without a single additional privacy protection. After a rollercoaster week of Patriot Act consideration there were some definite winners and losers:
Winners:
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). Sen. Wyden is a member of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee and has been ringing the bill on the Patriot Act for quite a while. In particular, he’s been warning us that despite the law being unconstitutional and permissive on its face, the Administration relies on secret legal interpretations that let them go even farther. As he said on the floor: “I want to deliver a warning this afternoon: When the American people find out how their government has secretly interpreted the Patriot Act, they will be stunned and they will be angry.” Although Congress did not vote on his amendment regarding secret law, he got committee chairman Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) to agree to turn the Intelligence Committee’s attention to this point.
Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo). Sen. Udall has been on the Intelligence Committee for all of five months and has already fought harder for privacy than some members have done in the decades they have lounged there. He introduced an amendment to fix section 215 of the Patriot Act — the so-called library provision—and gave Sen. Wyden an assist on the secret law issue. He’s a rising leader in the civil liberties area — keep an eye on him.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). When Congress gave itself a short-term extension to discuss amendments and strategy three months ago, Sen. Paul was very clear: if he didn’t get to offer amendments next time around, he’d procedurally draw out the Patriot Act process as long as he possibly could. And he did. And he got to offer the only two amendments considered on the Senate floor. Both failed, but without his leadership there probably wouldn’t have been a record 23 ‘no’ votes on final passage, including four republicans.
Losers:
The entire House of Representatives. The House spent roughly 30 minutes debating the Patriot Act this time around. Seriously? I guess with the Memorial Day weekend approaching they had to get home to eat some barbecue and kiss some babies.
Senate Leadership — both parties. They had three months notice of this expiration, yet waited until the week of the sunset to get down to business, and at the end of the day, did not get it together and permit votes on some very important amendments. For example, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) had a very moderate, bipartisan, bicameral reform proposal that would insert rudimentary oversight and accountability provisions into the Patriot Act. It didn’t even get a vote.
Patriot will be back in four years. In the meantime, keep your eye on cybersecurity. There are proposals out there that would permit information grabs that make the Patriot Act look quaint. Also get prepared for a fight over the FISA Amendments Act, which will sunset next year. See you then!
Learn more about the Patriot Act: Subscribe to our newsletter, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
steveyWonder---I believe you KNOW that I ONCE posted with Dr. Thomasina or the historyOrganization ZANA?-----
----that I, RobertPowell, knowing HISTORY, Scholarship and Science believe that the SPANISH? that came to America 1492 ----WHO had been RULED by AFRICAN MUSLIMS for 600+YEARS ----WHO had been Intermarried with ARAB Merchants for 800 YEARS ----WHO before they got to AMERICA, these SPANISH had RAPED Africans and then in AMERICA had RAPED and intermarried NATIVES
----so that by 1800----THE slaverAMERICANA paganCHRISTIAN rule of ONE DROP
MEANS to me that ALL AMERICANS are AFRICANS........
but YOU, selfProfessed 'whiteMAN'------NOT I --- EVER
in fact ------ I do not identify ANY of the Family of Adaam(as) by color...........
I have at BIA referred to your racistLY ignorant viralDNA. ...........not color, gender or nationality
BUT to KEEP with your OFF SUBJECT, WRONG siteISM
then based on your selfRACIALISTIC identification---your PARTICIPATION?
the site steveyWonder ---for YOU should be -----NAMED,
AIA ---- AMERICAN in AMERICA
and BIA GENESIS----- Senora María de la Soledad Teresa O'Brien
----WOULD have done a television REPORT for CNN---
---------ENTITLED AMERICAN in AMERICA
now as for yourWIFE who is ON SUBJECT here...........
and of course close to robertDNA
she writes:"@STEVE THS ONLY THING TO REMEMBER IN THIS IS HOW BVBOE IS A MAGIC BULLET IN OBEYING BOTH MAN'S MOTHER NATURE AND THE AVERAGE RELIGION'S TEACHINGS BEFORE TEHY GET CORRUPTED INTO 'DIFFERENT IS DEFICIENT'!!!..."
wow
--- thank you sweetIrma for explaining the GREATNESS of Our President Baraaaka Hussein OBama to your 'betterHalf"
Do you have a better half Robert?
Saturday, June 15th 2013 at 10:14PM
Steve Williams
BEFORE we get TOO OFF subject steve 1/2 sweetIrma...............
just a note from yourBLOCKhead sonINlaw---
"David Johnson aka "Coon Blog King of Alltimes". Posted By: David Johnson -----Monday, January 28th 2013 at 6:40PM
hey we have a suburb of TwinCities --- coon rivers.......sweetIrma would love it......
DNA -----we already discussed in your CIVILITER Mortuus de*****ation of African Americans at BIA, is an inherently a reproduced part of a person from GENERATIONAL input......
and viralDNA is addressing your APPARENT de*****ation of African Americans at BIA
steveyWonder----NO---has NOTHING to do with the GREATNESS of MONOTHEISTIC thought ----Monotheistic THOUGHT is the Study, Discipline and Application of the DNA of the Family of Adaam(as)
as ALWAYS, sweetIrma, ebonicDr.
"@ROBERT AS I READ TIS ARTICLE IN READER'S DIGEST THIS STATEMENT, I TOHOUGHT OF YOU AND HOW I AM SURE YOU WILL WILL AGREEE AS SOMEONE WHO IS AGAINST AMERICAN LAVERY, OR ARE YOU?.."
AND---- "THE STATEMENT WAS, "A CHILD CAN NOT BE FREE IF HER MOTHER IS NOT FREE...A HUSBAND CAN NOT BE FREE IF HIS WIFE IS NOT FREE"...AND, MY COMMENT ABOUT IF YOU ARE AGAINST SLAVERY"
I have LITTLE idea what you are writing ----BUT as ALWAYS you cannot READ or COMPREHEND what I have REPEATEDLY written ----slaverAmericana (1492-1864) was murder, torture, theft, pedophilia and worse than that by paganChristianity
Our President Baraak Hussein Obama asks us to use spellcheck AND stay on SUBJECT
SO
Your Question I n q u I r y should be:
Okay Robert, non Reading or Comprehending minds want to know, the definitions that you have GIVEN us for the past Years you have COMMENTED at BIA............
-----but for you and the ebonicHalf
I do NOT believe I EVER wrote slaver or Americana ---- ALONE ---ALWAYS TOGETHER as slaverAmericana 1492-1864(1964)
slaverAmericana
-------is the period of 1492-1864 that Europeans - ruled America by using stealing, torturing, murder, rape, pedophilia, enslavement and genocide against NATIVES and AFRICANS...........
-------I actually only added (1964) because sweetIrma REMINDED me that negros of that ERA still were crying about not being Accepted as real Christians........by color identified, selfProfessed 'whitePeople'.....thank you sweetIrma
paganChristian
-------the fictional, incorrect, non-Jewish---usage of the teaching of Monotheism FROM the Land of Judah-------by European pagan MultiCreator-Gawd believers from Greece, to rome, to gaul, to Visigoth, to Frank, to Germanic, to scandanavia, to celtic and Scottish LANDS....
will that work as we leave you with WORDS from the Creator of Adaam(as) and the way of Life Monotheism..... ________________________________________________ Sûrat AlKahf (The Cave, the Sanctuary) XVIII In the Name of Allâah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
1. All the praises and thanks be to Allâah, Who has sent down to His slave Mohamed, AlQur’âan, and has not placed in this word, any deviation.
2. He has made it straight to give warning to the disbelievers of a severe punishment from Him, and to give glad tidings to the Believers in the Oneness of Allâah - Monotheism, who do righteous deeds, that they shall have a Just reward with Paradise.
3. They shall abide therein for ever.
4. To warn those Jews, Christians, and pagans who say, "Allâah has begotten a son or offspring or children." 5. They have NO knowledge in Truth of such a thing, nor had their fathers. Grotesquely terribly is this word out of their mouths. They utter nothing but a lie[1].
Would you mind if I add your definitions to the Urban Dictionary?
Sunday, June 16th 2013 at 4:29PM
Steve Williams
And since most people don't understand a capital in the middle of a word, may I offer a slight modification? Slaveramericana and Paganchristianity?
Sunday, June 16th 2013 at 4:34PM
Steve Williams
UrbanDictionary-----?
No
PUT in WEBSTERS--- to replace --- the BS definition of nonApologist racist... for slaver etc.....
there is JUNK, racistLiar definitions in WEBSTER and Wikipedia...............
as for the JUNK writing style of sweetIrma ---- AGAIN there is AlIslaam, the Belief of AlQur'aan and Sunnah of Mohamed(saw)....... no kingJames versionIST in AlIslaam --- just paganChristianity.........
educate by BEING educated...........every School District in American hires the EDUCATED....
Hussein and Hasaan, the Sons of Ali ---- GREAT MUSLIMS....................
@ROBERT STILLINTERETED INMY BLING SINCE YOU AE SO HUNG UP ON MY BETTER HALF? (S-M-I-L-E)...
AND WHILE I AM AT IT STEVE THANKS SOMUCH FOR TIS TEACHING MOMENT POST...
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
@STEVER, JEN IS OUR SITE BETTER HALF OF ROBERT'S ...AND MUCH LIKE EVERYTHING THAT GOES WITH EMOTIONAL OUT BURST NEITHER JEN NOR ROBERT CAN KNOW WHEN THEY MUST GO AGAINST EACH OTHER AS THEIR CREATOR ALWAYS OVER RULE THEIR POWER TO MAKE INDEPENDANT THOUGHTS, CHOICES ECT. SO WHY NOT TAKE IT OUT ON FOR JEN TEH BLACK FEMALE AND FOR ROBERT BHO BY WAY OF CALLING HIM WITH HIS MIDDLE NAME AS DOES TEH KKK ND OTHER HATERS OF ISLAM!!!
NOW REMEMBER HOW ROBERT MUST SIDE WITH THE CHRISTINAS IF HE IS TO EVER GET RID OF THE MINISTER FARRAKAHN VERSION OF ISLAM UNDER TE NAME OF RADICAL ISLAM JUST LIKE THE CHRISTIANS DO CAN ANYONE AY IN SYRIA THEY HAVE MOVED ON PAST AND BEYOND WAR OF WORDS RELATING TO TIESE ISLAMIC MATTERS?!?...
EDUCATE!!!EDUCATE!!!EDUCATE!!!(S-M-I-L-E)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
@ROBERT AS I READ TIS ARTICLE IN READER'S DIGEST THIS STATEMENT, I TOHOUGHT OF YOU AND HOW I AM SURE YOU WILL WILL AGREEE AS SOMEONE WHO IS AGAINST AMERICAN LAVERY, OR ARE YOU?...
THE STATEMENT WAS, "A CHILD CAN NOT BE FREE IF HER MOTHER IS NOT FREE...A HUSBAND CAN NOT BE FREE IF HIS WIFE IS NOT FREE"...AND, MY COMMENT ABOUT IF YOU ARE AGAINST SLAVERY BY CHRISTIANS IN AMERICA HAD TO DO WITH THIS IS STATEMENTIS COMING FROM A MUSLIM IN THIS CENTURY IN 2013 NOT 1863! (SMILE)...
SMALL WORLD WITH INSTANT COMMUNICATIONS...
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
NOW SOME MORE FACTS WE TEND TO OVER LOOK MILITARY AND CIVILIANS HAVE DEFFERENT RULES OF LAWS AS WE ARE CIVILIANS...PLEASE KEEP TIS IN MIKND AS WE MUST DEAL DIFFERENTLY WITH EACH OF THESE CITIZENS...THE MIND IS A TERRIABLE TING TO WASTE NOT LEARNING WE ARE DEALING WITH IN A SENSE TWO DIFFERENT LAWS OF OUR LANDS AND THEY ARE UNIQUE UNTO THEMSELVES. (SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
@STEVE IS KEEPINT WITH WHAT WE DISCUSSED OVER THE PHONE TODAY...
YOU HAVE GOT TO SEE THE LAST FWE MINUTES OF THE LAST WORD@MSNBC TODAY AS IT IS PRICELESS...ON A FOLLOW UP TO ELIGH CUMMINGS TELLING DARRELL ISSA ON HARDBALL@MSNBC IN AN INTERVIEW WITH CHRIS MATTHEEWS ON MONDAY HE WOULD GIVE HIM UNTIL FRIDAY TO RELEASE THE TRANSCRIPS OF THE TESTAMONEY OF THE 21 YEARS OF EXPERIENCES OF A DECLARED CONSERVITAVE ON IT WAS HE THAT WENT TO THE WHITHOUSE ON THE IRS MATTER AND HOW THE WHITEHOUSE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING YOU HAVE SPENT ALL OF THESDE WEEKS ON AS BEING A FREUD...ISSA HS TODAY TRIED TO GO ON THIS MORNING@@CBS TI TRY IAND CHANGE EVERYTHING...HAS ONLY MADE IT WORST AS CUMMINGS HAS SENT ISSA LETTER AS IN AN OFFICAL DOCUMENT WHICH HAS ONLY FORCED YOUR HOLD TO BE DUG DEEPER THAN EVER...
WE NOW NEED TO SEE THIS VIDEO ON TIS AS IT NEEDS TO BE DOCUMENTED ON OUR SITE FOR ALL OF HISTORY!!!!..."IRS SCANDAL" BITES THE DUST UNLESS THEY WANT TO KEEP IT GOING AFTER THIS AS AN ISSA SCANDAL??? (OTFL) (S-M-I-L-E)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
"I" AM THE FIRST TO ADMIT BEING SUPRISED AT THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE AND RAND PAUL EMERGING FROM TODAY'S TOP SCERET CONGRESDSIOAAL HEARINGS ON NSA AT EACH OTHERS NOT BHO AS A UNITED FORCE...
BUT, THEIR EMOTIONAL OUT BURST CAN CHANGE AT ANY TIME BUT NOT THE REALITY THE REPUBLICANS AND THETEAPARTY IS AT A CIVIL WAR WITH EACH OTHER...I WONDER HOW MACRO RUBIO IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO OVER SHADOW RAND PAUL AS THE TEAPARTY'S DARLINGS AS RAND PAUL DIVERSIFYS AND HE SEEM TO BE STUCK ON HISONE NOTE IMMIGARTION QUEST TO ONE UPMANSHIP PAUL?!? LOL!!!(SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
...AND, ONEMORE TING...FISA CANCELS OUT THE PATRIOT ACT SO WHAT GIVES EXCEPT A WAY AROUND BOTH OF THEE BY CONGRESS, PEASE LETS GIVE TIS SOME TOUGHT AS WE LEARN HOW AND WHY TIS IN NOT A DISCUSSION CONGRESS WANTS...CONGRESS KNOWS EVERYTING EDWARD SNOWDEN KNOWS AND AGAIN SONDEN IS UP AGAINST THE SAME PEOPLES WHO NOW SAY THEY DID NOT WANT TO GO INTO IRAQ BUT WERE AFRAID TO GOAGAINST TEH BUSH ADMINISTRATION AND I SHALL NEVER FORGET HILLARY'S CAMPAIGNING FOR PRESIDENT BY WAYING SHE SIGNED TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ WITHOUT EVEN READING THEPAPERS MUCH LIKE PALIN'S CHURCH'S PREACHER BEING AN AFRICN WICH HUNTER EMPORTED STRAIGHT FROM AFRICA TO CAST WITHCES OUT OF HER SO SHE COULD WIN...AND PALIN WAS RUNNING OT TEH CHRISTIAN, FAMILY VALUE TICKET WITH HER UNWED PREGANAT TEEN DAUGHTER...SOME ELSE I HAVE MENTIONED MANY TIMES BUT WHO CARES IF THE MASS MEDIA DON'T TELLUS HOW WE SHUD TINK/ LOOK AT THINGS LIKE TIS. (N...U...P!!!)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
@STEVE THS ONLY THING TO REMEMBER IN THIS IS HOW BVBOE IS A MAGIC BULLET IN OBEYING BOTH MAN'S MOTHER NATURE AND THE AVERAGE RELIGION'S TEACHINGS BEFORE TEHY GET CORRUPTED INTO 'DIFFERENT IS DEFICIENT'!!!...AND WHAT "I" MEAN BY THIS STEVE IS THE YOUNGEST OF THE BOSTON BOMBERSD IS AN AMERICA CITIZEN...THE WHITEMAN COUGHT IN AFGANISTAN FIGHTING AGAINST OUR MILITARY IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN SO WHY ARE THEY TREATED DIFFERENTLY?!?...
CNA UDALL AND PAUL ANSWER THIS OR WILL THEY CONTINUE TO VIOLATE OUR CONSTUTITION FOR PERSONAL REASONS IN THEIR CIVIL WAR???...
AND AGAIN "I" REPEAT THE MONIE RECIEVEDD FOR THEIR VOTES BY THELOBBY CAN BE FOND BY GOING TO ONES COMPUTERS OR ANY NETWORKS TRACHING SUCH ! (SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
@STEVE, WE NOW HAVE THE INFORMATION HIGHWAY AND ITS COUNTLESS RESORCES TO FINE OUT WHAT WE WANT TO KNOW AND WHAT WE DON'T WANT TO KNOW ON ANY MATTER GOING...AND ONE WE NEED TO STUDY IS AN AMERICAN PERSIDENT IS NOT A DICTATOR AND ONLY CONGRESS CAN MAKE LAW AND DEAK WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS AND PRINT MINEYAND DECLARE WAR...
BUT EVEN MRE IMPORTANT I OUR POLITICIANS GET INTO OFFICE ONE VOTE AT A TIME..
NOW BACK TO EH DISCUSSION OUR PRESDIDENT IS SEEKING AND ARE WE READY FOR IT AT A-L-L???...
RACHLE'S PROGRAM HAS BEEN FOLLOWED UP BY NONE OTHER THAN A RIGHT-WINGER WHICH IS WHAT IS CALLED A REAL AND ACTUAL DEBATE /DISCUSSION BY ALLOWING ALL SIDES TO HAVE A SAY...
THE PARTOF RACHE'S SAYING OW WEST POINTHAS A HIGH STAKE IN THER NSA AS IT IS BEINGLED BYTHREE OF ITS GRADUATES AND NOW GENERALS...1. GENERALIS GENERAL P. IN THE INTERNET GIRLFRIEND CAUSEING HIS TO RESIGN...THEOHER IS A GENERAL THA ATTENDS YOUNG INTERNET SAVY CONVINTIONS AND GATHERRINGS IN CIVILIAN DRESS TO RECRUTE THEM AND ONE OF THE COME ONS IS NO ONE CARES ABOUT THERIR BACK GROUNDS...NOW IS THIS NOT VITAL TO A DISCUSSION ON HOW ON EGETS 'TOP SECRET CLEARANCES INTO HOMELAND SECURITY?!?...
THIS IS WHERE "I" AM COMING FROM AS IN IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT EXCUSE NOR IS IT A JUSTIFICATION FOR BLAMING OUR PRESIDENT AS WE HAVE 3 DIVISIONSOF GOVERNMENT IN PLACE TO PREVENT WHAT WE SO SEEM TO BE SO NEEDYIN MAKING NULL AND VOID...NO "I" DONT MAKE UP THESE TINGS TEHY EXIST AND I SHALL REPEAT WE CN FIND ALL OF TIS ON OUR INTERNATIONAL HIGH WAY...BEFORE, AFTER AND DURING OUR VOTING YEARS...WE CAN ALSO CONTACT THOSE WE VOTE FOR AT ANY TIME OR JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY.LOL!!!(SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
LETS TRY THIS ONE ON FOR SIDES...
I. A SENATOR IS PART OF THE LAW MAKING SYSTEM AND TH EPRESIDENT IS NOT... 2. A SENATOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS/ HER DISTRICT IN THEIR STATE...A PRESIDENT IS NOT TO PROTECT THE BLACK COMMUNITY IF BLACK OR WHITE IF WHITE BUT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF AMERICA(NS) NO MATTER RACER, GENDER, CREED AND AGAIN HE IS NOT A DICTATOR. A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THISIS...
SENATOR LINSEY GRAHAM SAYS IT IS PERFICTLY ALRIGHT TO MONOTOR OUR PHONES, BUT IT IS UNCONSTUTITIONAL TO OBEY THE LAWS OF OUR LANDS THAT BANS THE USE OF CIVILIANS OF MACHINESD GUNS AS IN THE LAST STUDENTS MASAACRE THAT KILLED 5 PEOPLE IN 10 MINUTES...
NOW IT IS SO NICE OF RACHEL MADDOW TONIGHT TO ADD TO THEIS EDWARD SNOWDEN 'DEBATE' CALLED FOR BY OUR PRESIDENT AS WEH HAVE THE 'INVESTIGATION INTO I FHE HAS COMMITTED A CRIME OR NOT...HER POINT BY POINTS OF WHO HEADS TEH NAS...VER INTERESTING IF WE CARE TO ACTUALLY LOOK AT DIFFERENT SIDES OF THIS ISSUE BECAUSE IT DID NOT START WITH EDWARD SNOWDEN NOR OUR PRESIDENT AND IS ACTUALLY MORE TIED TO VIOLATIONS OF BVBOE AND JUST SAYING, RADICAL ISLAMICS COMING BACK TO HAUNT AMERICA(NS)...
CAN ANYONE SAY, "TEACHINGMOMENT" LOL!!!(S-M-I-L-E)
@STEVE, IS SENATOR UDALL TRYING TO SAY NONE OF THIS HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH HIS OFFICE SINCE HIS OFFICE IS THE ONE TAH AHS TO GIVE THE PREMISSION FOR TIS PROGRAM BE IT CALLED PARTOIT ACT...FISA COURT, ECT AS IT IS ALL THE SAME THING SINCE A LAW NOT ENFORCABLE IS NO GOOD ANY WAY...ANYONE LOOK UP HOW MUCXHH MONEY UDALL HAS RECIEVED FOR ALLOWINT THIS TO HAPPEN???BECAUSE UNTIL AND UNLESS WE PUT AN END TOLOBBY MONIES RUNNING OUT NATION WE WILL BE FACING MORE AND MORE OF THIS...AND, BY THE WAY STEVE IT IS ALSO TIED IN WITH MCCAIN DEMANDING WE GO INTO SYRIA...CONTRACTORS AND WHY HOPEFULLY OUT OF TIS WE AT LEAST PAY ATTENTION TO HOW MUCH WE PAY IRAQ AFTER THEY SUED AND WONG FOR THESE SAME CONTARCVTORS DISTROYING THEIR NATIONS UTILITIES...ANYONE PAY ATTENTION TO ANYOF TISA S IT AL L TIES IN TO THIS...BELIEVE IT OR NOT...YES OUR PRESIDENT WANTS A DISCUSSION BUT CAN WE AFFORD TO DO IT?!?
PLEASE GIVE IT SOME THOUGHT??? (SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
...OOPS, I MENTIONED RACHEL MADDOW'S PROGRAM TONIGHT AS IT IIS ABOUT HOW WEST POINT IS TIED INTO THIS AS WELL...AGAIN, CAN WE AFFORD THIS DISCUSSION OUR PRESIDENT IS CALLING FORM OR EVEN HIS INVESSTIGATION INTO EDWARD SNOWDEN AS IT IS NOT GOING TO BE AN ISLAMIC SXTREMEST INVESTIATION BUT MOPE OF A THOSE WHO WORSHIP AT ERH ALTER OF GREED GETTIN GOUR VOTES IS IN OUR FUTURE WITH TIS INVESTIAGATION AND MORE AND MORE PROGRAMS BEING FORCED TO FOLLOW MASNBC'S LEAD ON REPORTING NEWS NOT CONCLUSIONS. (SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
@STEVE IF THERE IS ONE THINHG THE PARTICT ACT IS USED IN SECRET IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST LIED EVERY BEEN TOLD BY OUR GOVERNMENT...AND IT WAS O NOT A SECRET IT WAS THE PUBLIC'S OUT CRY THAT GOT IT WE THOUGHT BANNED WHEN FISA WAS SUPPOSE TO HAVE REPLACED IT...BUT I GUESS WE ARE UP AGAIN UP AGAINST SAY CIVILIANS USING MACHIND GUNS IS ILLEGAL BUT IS LEAGAL AS LONG A THOSHE LIJE PAUR PROVE OUR STUDENT HAVE NO RIGHTS TO LIVE SORT OF LOGIC..
STEVE SO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHY THE PATROIT ACT WAS HAVING OUR MILITARY ON ACTIVE WAR SONE SO UP SEET VOER BUSHES ABUSES THAT LED TO FISA...WE CAN ALWAYS BEGIN HERE NOT WITH OUR PRESIDENT AS I SAY AGAIN OUR PRESIDENT DON'T MAKE LAW CONGRESS DOES!!!!SO LETS GO FIND OUT WHY THE PATRIOT ACT WAS MADE ILLEGAL AD START FROM THERE...I STILL HAVE NOT SEEN ANY OF THE DEMANDS BY BUSH WE BE MONOTORED AS AMERICAN CITIZENS "ILLEGALLY' EVERY 45 DAYS...WE MUST HAVE THE WHOLE THING NOT MAKE UP OUR OWN FACTS AS RAND PAUOL TENDS TO DO...
AND, ONE MORE THING STEVE, I WOULD PAY MORE ATTENTION TO THE RIGHT-WINGERS ACTING LIKE OUR MUSLIMS ON THE SITE AND WE KNOW WELL SOMEONE MUST BE THE SCAPE GOAT FOR NOT GOING ALONG WITH WHAT IS SAID AND NEVER DARE TRY ADN DO SOME RESEARCH OR YOU WILL SURELY GO STRAIGHT TO HELLLOL!!!(SMILE)
Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM
ROBINSON IRMA
