Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

Unequal Justice, Again...Being Black In America Ain't Easy!!

Unequal Justice, Again...Being Black In America Ain't Easy!!

Jen Fad · Monday, June 15th 2009 at 9:43PM · 608 views
Jury returns split verdict in Burks case: Watch dash cam video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDUzozPEEsU

By Steve Zucker News-Review Staff WriterFriday, January 25, 2008 9:52 AM EST
According to testimony and a tape from a police cruiser video camera, Petoskey officer Todd Troxel attempted to make a traffic stop on a van driven by Burks wife Jacqueline near the U.S. 31/131 intersection. Reggie Burks testified that his wife was driving him to the hospital after he was injured in a fall. Jacqueline Burks did not pull over for Troxel until reaching the hospital at which time a verbal confrontation ensued between Troxel and Jacqueline Burks. While Jacqueline and Troxel were arguing, Reggie Burks exited the vehicle and moments later broke his wooden cane over Troxel's head.

An Emmet County Circuit Court jury returned a split verdict on Jan. 24 for Reggie Bernard Burks Sr., 47, a former Boyne Falls man who was facing a pair of criminal charges for breaking his cane over the head of a Petoskey police officer during a traffic stop. An Emmet County Circuit Court jury has returned a split verdict for a former Boyne Falls man who was facing a pair of criminal charges for breaking his cane over the head of a Petoskey police officer during a traffic stop.

Following about two-and-a-half hours of deliberation Thursday, the eight-woman, four-man jury found Reggie Bernard Burks Sr., 47 not guilty on a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon, a four-year felony and guilty on a charge of resisting and obstructing police, a two year felony. The second verdict was the less-serious of two options the jury had for the resisting and obstructing charge. The more serious option was resisting and obstructing causing injury, a four-year charge.

{ Why was the man found guilty again and of what? Wasn't he the one that needed the emergency attention? I wonder if he got it (emergency care) in jail?

About the Author

Jen Fad Central Jersey, NJ

Share This Article

Comments (5)

Jen Fad Tuesday, June 16th 2009 at 9:39PM

I think the man was justified for breaking his cane over the ignorant policeman's head especially for putting his hands on another man's wife. The policeman should have listened and allowed the lady to get help from inside. I've worked the ER and people would pull up with gunshot victims in tow and all sorts of other scenarios. Who has time to think of 911 when you're upset and scared? The policeman was an ignorant butte hole. Had the people been of another persuasion... I'm sure he would have listened better.

Dee Gray Wednesday, June 17th 2009 at 1:37AM

He would have been justified to take the ticket and explain it in traffic court with proof of an ER visit and treatment. Any reasonable judge would likely dismiss the ticket and send him on his way. He did this to himself. He reacted without the benefit of intellect.

Blessings...

Jen Fad Wednesday, June 17th 2009 at 1:45PM

I really appreciate the feedback guys, but I was very happy that the man lived as well as I was happy to see a black man stand up and defend his woman. It was good for me to see this for a change. Truly the angels were on the man's side and the jury did do the right thing I suppose by finding him guilty of the lesser charge. I do however think the policeman needs some serious de-escalation training in order to not make situations worse. He's probably inexperienced anyway.

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

Jen, and how many years does one get for assault on a police officer in this state? Let's say even trying to do bodly harm or even attempted murder on a policeman?

I would say this man should be counting hismany benifits ( blessings) that this is all he recieved in this matter if that policeman offered no harm to him directly or even to his wife-that he could prove in court.

Court after all is about proofs not emotions as emotions is subjective and not admissiable in court..."Just the facts mam" as Joe Friday would say(smile)

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

Has there been any feed back from the citizens of this city on the behavior of the pokiceman. If there has been none then they are judt asking for more problems of abuse by the police as I am srue that there is not a part of his behavior in his job discription.

What is the flip side of this issue as there is always two sides(smile)I can like the courts only go on what I am offered...Actually it looks like the female should be doing this part with his captain and their investigation dept. and why not just throw in the mayor for good measure.LOL

You know me, sister Jen now don't youwhen it comes to abuse of my people!!!!!(smile)

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.