Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

RACIAL DISPARITIES REASON FOR RANKING IN POVERTY

RACIAL DISPARITIES REASON FOR RANKING IN POVERTY

Siebra Muhammad · Monday, December 14th 2009 at 12:22PM · 1408 views
Race and location are still the strongest factors in determining whether a child lives in poverty in Louisiana , according to a recent report on the status of the state’s children. In Louisiana , black children are 3.5 times as likely to live in poverty as white children. Poverty rates are highest in rural parishes in northeast Louisiana , along the Mississippi River .

However, 2000 census data also show that a majority of black children in every one of the state’s eight largest metropolitan areas lived in a high-poverty neighborhood. Social service experts say government programs have not been expansive enough to fill in the economic and educational gaps.

“We have not had comprehensive supports in place to help move our poverty population out of poverty,” said Cecile Guin, director of the Office of Social Services Research and Development in the LSU School of Social Work.


The state report was compiled by the nonprofit Agenda for Children in New Orleans .


The Baltimore-based Annie E. Casey Foundation, which collects data for an annual national report on child wellbeing, funded the report. Louisiana has consistently ranked poorly in the national report. According to the report, if racial disparities on child poverty were eliminated, Louisiana would have ranked 11th in the nation in 2007, instead of 49th.
One of the stark economic differences between white and black families is the amount of accumulated assets, which has implications on how financially stable and successful a family can be, the report notes. The median white household in Louisiana has $85,500 in assets, while the median black household has $3,700 in assets, according to the report.


Assets are a factor in whether a family can rent or own a home, borrow money for higher education, and maintain reliable transportation that provides access to a wider array of health care, child care and shopping options. Pat Cooper, CEO of the Early Childhood and Family Learning Foundation in New Orleans , said that regardless of race, poverty blocks any person’s access to resources. He points to early childhood education as the great equalizer. But while high poverty areas usually receive more federal and state dollars for education, it is spent on the wrong things, he said.


Cooper, a former superintendent of schools in McComb, Miss., said he told state school board members there that they were spending $47 million on testing that showed their students were last in the country. “We've made all the book and testing companies rich, but numbers aren’t changing,” said Cooper, who was also a Louisiana assistant state superintendent of education. “If I was going to do anything in this state to help those Agenda for Children numbers, I would do universal early childhood education programs for every child.” Guin with LSU also points to education as the central solution to problems with health, employment and income. “With a state having the highest dropout rate and innumerable education problems, it is no surprise to me that we have not been able to move forward,” she said.

Guin said policymakers are turning greater attention to truancy and dropout prevention. One truancy program started a decade ago is showing positive results because it is consistent, well monitored and funded, she said. But program officials have had to grovel at times for funding and in many parishes the local district attorney has supported the program, she said.


Teresa Falgoust with Agenda for Children said that in many ways, the disparities aren’t explainable by only poverty and education. For example, black women who had 16 years or more of education still had higher rates of preterm birth than white women with eight years of education. That statistic could be due to racial differences in health insurance, health care and stressful experiences, Falgoust said. “If we want to truly improve child wellbeing overall, we do need to work on reducing those disparities,” Falgoust said.


Guin said states such as Alabama and Arkansas rise out of low rankings almost always because a political leader has emerged, sought change, implemented programs and ensured those efforts continued after that leader left office. “I don’t think we've ever implemented anything big enough,” Guin said. “So much money is going into incarceration and lawsuits and where we spend our money is going to have to change before we have the resources to do systemic change.”

About the Author

Siebra Muhammad New Orleans, LA

Share This Article

Comments (5)

Siebra Muhammad Monday, December 14th 2009 at 12:24PM

This story is proof that we have failed to appreciate the value of education in the Black community. We expect a group of strangers to do what we must do for ourselves. Financing this endeavor will only work if those that need a step up with regard to education apply themselves to what is truly important. We will be woefully lacking in the long run when it comes to an educational system that is most important to those that seek to control their future.

H
Haneef Napthali Monday, December 14th 2009 at 5:34PM

Xmas is a european creation establish in the 17th Century, the xmas trees were invented in Europe, it is just some european excuse for getting drunk , nothing more.. the 25th Dec is the birthday of Heru( europeans called Horus) there was never on this planet any person a hippy type person by the name of JC, that is a big big lie, but as usual Afrikans need to follow their european slave masters and celebrate something which have nothing to do with them. Many Afrikans do not even realise that ths is the period of the soltice. In Europe, and northern hemisphere it is wnter time, many Afrians now lving in the western hemisphere do not even realise that it is summer in the southern hemisphere places like Southern Afrika, Maori Land, Aboriginal lands etc. Afrikans need to wake up out of their comanoide slumber and get out of the caves, Afrikans never lived in any such places, hence we have the same skin tone as our hair, rather than blond blue, green eyes red hair the real coloured peoples who call themself 'white'.. You cannot luv Afrika if you do not know yourself and where you are are coming from, a great and noble past, nation who gave this planet a reason to live a reason to die, Afrikans need to reclaim their story and culture, listen even dogs have names why do Afrikans continue to have europeans names as some badge of honour, instead of having names like Akua, Kwame, Haneef, Thandiwe etc instead have made up names like letisha, lavone, shavone and punk ass crap,bleaching themselves , wearing dead peoples hair and consider this to great , please go live under a rock.. Afrikans need to wake up in so called 2009, which is a lie, why is it not now 1 billion and 9 years instead of the european time and space . Europeans are only on this planet at the most 10 thousand years, Afrikans have been here since the planet was made over 30 billion years ago, global warming is just this .. every 25000 years the earth shifts on its axis, natually; temperature etc change that is all there is to it, however you are not learning this is school, except some bull**** europcenttric crap trap.. Afrikans are born leaders we are the genie its just that many do not know that , we are not followers we are the ones who make things happen. so stop being a follower, read Black Afrika by Cheik Anta Diop, Nature knows no color JA Rogers, Destruction o fBlack Civilisation Chancellor Williams are good starters..

Harry Watley Tuesday, December 15th 2009 at 10:06AM

Hello Mr. Weston,

I would like to take the liberty and answer your question that you asked Ms. Siebra.

Siebra said that dark skinned people were on this planet longer than European people were and you became baffled since Europeans were able to put dark skinned (Africans) people into slavery.

Well, let me first establish the truth that dark skinned people preceded European people. This concept has to be scientifically true since dark skinned people have dominated genes while European people have recessive genes. We know it is not possible for recessive genes to produce dominant genes while dominant genes could produce recessive genes. For instances, kinky hair texture is dominant to straight hair texture. Skin with melanin is dominant to no melanin or pale skin.

Now, that I have scientifically established that dark skinned people were the only people that God created, let me now answer how Europeans were able to put dark skinned people into slavery.

From the beginning of time, dark skinned people neither improve nor advance the quality of life by the natural resources of earth to better everything as a whole. In other words, they did not improve earth and other life forms. For example, dark skinned people lived for hundreds of thousands of years just a notch above how common animals would live on the ground, under the ground and in caves. This savage and primitive form of living was disturbing and angered God big time. Consequentially, God’s safety net (evolution) kicked in and during the course of evolution; Caucasians came into being. Caucasians began to do the things that were expected that dark skinned people should have done from the beginning of time. Even today, Mr. Weston, you as a person inadvertently, psychologically and subliminally bend towards White American people to show you the way. You have no desire to become sovereign, thus giving yourself the opportunity to educate yourself and finding your own way in life.

In a sense of speaking, Europeans were first to break out of the genies bottle and traveled the world over. In other words, as the Europeans developed instruments to navigate the high seas leaving one continent and going to another dark skinned people were still operating in canoes along the shores. There were no dark skinned people on the high seas to give European competition exploring the earth.

For instance, if it were not for Europeans, Africans and the Native American Indians probably would not have plumbing in their commercial buildings or wearing clothes and shoes today. All that dark skinned people in the Native American Indians did was murder each other.

Mr. Weston, the only people that are most susceptible to enslavement are dumb and ignorant people. Dark skinned people fitted that profile and thus were put into slavery by a more intelligent people (Europeans).

Today, evidence of ignorance is still prevalent among dark skinned people, even Black Americans who are descendents of slaves. The evidence of Black America’s ignorance is in the fact that they do not want to be a sovereign people or have complete independence on a portion of this continent that we could call our very own country with borders even though we could have it. Just look at the argument and rejection that I am giving when I tell you all that our only permanent solution is to become a sovereign people.

Tell me what you think.


Harry Watley Tuesday, December 15th 2009 at 5:34PM

Hello Mr. Weston,

Mr. Weston the thrust and crux of your question lies only in that Blacks had a jump on the Europeans, yet Europeans enslaved Blacks, am I right.

Mr. Weston one of the things that I am charged with as Black American’s first genuine prophet is to instill and demand integrity out of us. Our sovereignty will never succeed without integrity.

I am saying this that you would understand your question was not about how long the earth been created, whether it be 30 billion or one million years ago. Your question hinged on how it was possible that since Blacks was in existence before Europeans, how then was Europeans able to enslave Blacks. The bottom line answer is that, Blacks are dumb and without integrity.

The fact that you are trying to back peddle confirms that Blacks are dumb and without integrity. We many more years to go to eradicate our dumbness before integrity could be poured into us thus making us ready to be a sovereign people on a portion of this continent that we could call our very own country with borders.

In furtherance, it does not matter if your comment was addressed to Haneef Napthali and not Siebra. What is important is giving an answer to your question. Now let us be honest about all this and stop the nonsense, Mr. Weston.

Your comment should be about the answer given to your question. Does the answer make any sense to you? In other words, you should be focused on the intelligence of the answer given to you and not on some frivolous nonsense about 30 billion years versus 3.6 million years.

The stupidity of us frustrates the hell out of me.


What say you?

Siebra Muhammad Tuesday, December 15th 2009 at 9:08PM

Take your gobbly goo-goo somewhere else Harry...We are not down with the fruity pebbles nor do we have sugar on our feet!

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.