Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

WOULD YOU LIVE NEXT DOOR TO AN EX-FELON OR WORK BESIDE HIM/HER?

agnes levine · Thursday, June 3rd 2010 at 12:37PM · 613 views
To facilitate life after prison and avoid discrimination, Massachusetts is on the verge of enacting legislation that will protect convicted criminals by concealing their records from potential employers and landlords.

A handful of states have measures that shield felons who want to work and live in their boundaries after being released from prison and Massachusetts wants to join the criminal rights bandwagon by changing its existing laws. For years the state has granted employers and landlords quick access to criminal records of job applicants and prospective tenants.

This week the Massachusetts Senate approved a law that will ban that access because it discriminates against convicted felons who want a fresh start. If the state House passes the measure, employers will also be prohibited from eliminating candidates at the start of an application process because they have a criminal history and felony records will be permanently sealed five years earlier.

To further assist convicts, the state will permit them to review their criminal records at no charge, increase penalties for the deliberate misuse of such records and create a new offense for using records to “harass former convicts.” The law has the full backing of the state’s top law enforcement officials as well as Governor Deval Patrick, a former Clinton Administration official who claims employers’ access to criminal records discriminates against the convicted felon.

Massachusetts law enforcement officials say they support the effort mainly because the current criminal records system makes it difficult to former convicts to find employment and housing. Boston’s police commissioner assures that if more offenders have the opportunity to find work, less will return to their criminal ways and there will be a “decrease in the amount of victims in the Commonwealth.”

So, what do you say?

About the Author

agnes levine Atlanta, GA

Share This Article

Comments (3)

Jen Fad Thursday, June 3rd 2010 at 1:10PM

Yes I would, but I wouldn't leave my doors unlocked as I wouldn't with anyone.

Helen Lofton Thursday, June 3rd 2010 at 8:47PM

Yes I could, because I don't get into the personal business of my neighbors nor let them into mind. I do think that s*x offenders should not be able to practice their skills on those who are unaware of their crimes. People should know that some of the best workers are those trying to make changes and show that they are dependable. A job is the best opportunity to keep the mind occupied, I would be more aware of the sneaky or supicious acting co-worker.

agnes levine Tuesday, June 8th 2010 at 11:20AM

I agree with you all. I think that more advocates should be pushing for some changes to help felons rebuild their lives constructively. I believe this will reduce crime, too, at least by repeat offenders.

I offer up a prayer for these changes to happen because some very brilliant minds are being wasted away in prison and grave yards. amen? Amen!

P.S. - Sis. Jen, I have to share that I visited a community where nobody locked their doors!!! I was so uncomfortable because the doors were unlocked---it was hard getting used to that. Then I experenced the fellowship with the Lord when I returned home and I stopped locking my doors due to increased faith. There was so much peace of mind....just during the day I stopped locking myself inside my home. It was faith and common sense, of course. But the joy in that sort of peaceful living that the community had and I was blessed to feel is indescribeable. I just wanted to share that.....

OK,,,,I'm still in transition so keep the wheels rolling guys...love y'all,

Passing the peace,

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.