President Obama's Supreme Court pick Elena Kagan: How will she rule on cases that affect the Family?

From the looks of things Ms. Kagan appears to be a very dedicated and committed woman. There is no doubt in my mind she will be a great asset to the Supreme Court.

Sister Siebra,

I don't know about that especially since Kagan has much to prove regarding her judicial fitness to serve on the high court. I'm a supporter of family and I'm disturbed that she supports abortion and spends her money trying to put prochoice people in high places. Serving Thurgood Marshall and saying nice things about him, doesn't give her a pass.

She needs to prove herself and the fact that we are looking at documents and things she has written isn't cutting it for me. We shouldn't have to dig to find out how or what kind of judge she's going to be.

Sister Irma,

I realize what the Republicans are saying, but my reason for not supporting Kagan is different. Although I would like to see a woman comfirmed, I just don't believe Kagan is the right fit regardless of the Republican "polictical machines".

I'm not sure what you mean by your second paragraph regarding the big businesses. Can you clarify?

In my opinion,

Ms. Kagan will probably rule like any other jewishNewYorker, 50-something Gal, somewhatShort and NO athlete, who has Never Married or will ever bear children; might rule.

@ Sister Irma,

Now you jest with me, eh? Of course I will answer you that is once I'm sure I understand you. (((smile))) Come on now and give Juicy a chance.

@ Brother Rob
Now I'm scared for real of Kagan being confirmed!

@ Sister Irma,

Of course you know I'm joking...

but then again, I'll admit I'm a little nervous... and that's no joke!

jEN, i WOULD SAY YOU WERE CORRECT, BUT THE SENATE HAS ALREADY LET THE REPUBLICANS KNOW WHAT THEY WILL BE FACING IN TRYING TO GET TO BE ABLE TO EAT THEIR CAKE AND SAVE IT AT THE SAME TIME AS THEY ALWAYS MANAGE TO DO SO FAR...

WITH THE HARRIET MEIRS ACCEPANCE WHEN NOMINATED BY BUSH AND NOW NOT BEING ABLE TO ACCEPT THE SAME E-X-A-C-T S-A-M-E THINGS IN OUR PRESIDENT'S NOMINATION...AGAIN OUR PRESIDENT GIVES HIS OPPONENTS TO PROVE HOW STUPID HE IS IN ANY WAY FORM OR FASHION OR JUST OUT AND OUT PREJUDICE (as ignorant) SO FAR ARE THEY STILL AT ZERO jEN?!? (SMILE)

JEN, PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IT IS YOU MEAN BY "SERVING T.M.AND SAYING GOOD THINGS ABOUT HIM...OR YOUR DIRECT QUOTE ON THIS BLOG OF YOURS, JEN (NOTHING MORE...NOTHIG LESS) WHAT YOU SAID IS A LITTLE TOO OPEN FOR ME TO BE FULLY ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS YOU MEAN...

MAINLY AS i HAVE HEARD THIS SO MUCH i WONDER DID THIS ORIGINATE WITH YOU OR NOT , A MEDIA SOUND BITE, ECT...

AS YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE "I" HAVE HEAD THIS FROM AND HAVE A DIRECT LINE TO ASK THEM ABOUT WHAT EXACTLY DOES THIS REALLY MEAN. (SMILE)

O.K. now what about our laws of equality and how the rpeublicans will not be treating Kagan if they say the Bush's pick for the supremecourt is acceptable for her not having served as a judge and because of the political party that she worked for and still turn right back around and use these to say this is exactly the reason that Kagan is not qualified to sit on the supreme court...

You know Jen a lot like those on the right wanting our president run out of office as president because he was trying to make big business under his control (SOCIALIST, HITLER, MARXIST, ECT.) for doing the very exact thing being used against him noW AND only because of him not taking over the 3rd largest big business on the planet sooner than his administration did?!?

(SMILE)

Jen, I do trust you know about this new party called the Teaparty?!? Or if you have no idea what I am talking about there will be a special on them on the 17th at 7pm on MSNBC.

Big business is what BP, Haliburton, Black water or any of those companys mentioned when one say Congress and Lobby money in the same sentence...but I will let it ride..ok ? as you are not going to answer anything related to the theme of your post.

Bye Jen. (smile)

Jen, "I" do hope that you are joking with robert...but I will not continue to discuss the theme of your post with you this is because "I" deal more in facts than emotions ...or it is my belief that one can not have their cake and eat it to.(smile)

And, even more important what robert says is true as this is a CHRISTIAN NATION. pLUS SHE HAS VIOLATED HER DUTY TO HAVE HER FATHER CHOSE HER BED PARTNER TO MENTION JUST AFEW OTHER THINGS THAT MAY CAUSE CONFUSION IN HER NOT BEING QUALIFIED TO BE ON TEH SUPREME COURT.("I" AM NOT SMILING)