Outrage Re: Activist Massachusetts Judge Chips Away at the Defense of Marriage Act
In what has been called a “wild pair of rulings” designed to undermine marriage – and force the federal government to recognize same-s*x marriage – U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro of Massachusetts ruled unconstitutional a section of a 1996 law that defines marriage as between one man and one woman and prevents one state from using the Constitution’s “full faith and credit clause” from imposing same-s*x marriage on the rest of the country.
In the first case – Gill v. Office of Personnel Management – Tauro found that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violated the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment that requires equal protection under the law.
In the second case – Massachusetts v. Health and Human Services – he ruled that DOMA also violated the 10th Amendment, which reserves power to the states or to the people.
http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000013...

oh... wow... Juicy... Ive gotta plead my Fifth Amendment Right here!!! and im sending out a S.O.S. do you remember Pince's hit... Controversey.... Pop Life...???? LOL!!! This is gonna stir up a whopper................((sista I luv ya.... ))