Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

Hypocritical Tolerance…

Hypocritical Tolerance…

DAVID JOHNSON · Wednesday, August 11th 2010 at 1:59AM · 190 views
Why has the church become tolerant to things God is intolerant about? Many today rest their theological debate on the hinges of God commandment of love. But in their effort they have missed the key word, “one another” and who the one another are. If we’re to put the text in context, the one another Jesus was speaking about cannot be the world or the things of the world, but in fact is the church. Jesus wasn’t speaking to the unsaved but rather to the saved when He made this commandment. The disciples/apostles were the recipient of this great command. For those that argue that Jesus was speaking to the world insist that Jesus was hypocritical and was in direct conflict with the written Word of God. But that’s not the case, Jesus is the Word incarnate in flesh; therefore Jesus and the written Word are in complete agreement. In our effort to palatable we have become tolerate of sin and in fact conformity to sin. I was watching a web cast about homos*xuality in the church; I was amazed at the number of pastors/preachers who are accepting this abominable lifestyle. Many have argued that God made them that way… which is hypocritical to the written (Logos) Word of God.

The thing that blows my mind is the church tolerance of that which God objects. To take it a step further is the hypocritical tolerance.
Ex: Many claim we’re to love and accept people the way they are… especially when addressing the homos*xuality in the church… the hypocriticalness lies in the tolerance of homos*xuals but the intolerance of rapists… both parties could make the claim, “that’s the way they are”… but many Christians would tolerate the homos*xuals but won’t tolerate the rapists…

Ex: Many today are in agreement with women preachers/pastors….many tolerate them because the world is changing and society accepts them… but on the other hand, many are intolerant of preachers who have more than one wife (polygamy), preachers who are molesters, preachers who are pimps… if God calls who He wills and if God poured out His Spirit on all flesh… then the pimps, molesters, pedophiles, murderers, and polygamy are to be tolerated…

• Hypocritical tolerance is when the church is opposed to homos*xuals but tolerate them when they’re the choir directors or musicians…
• Hypocritical tolerance is when the church shuns a young girl that gets pregnant out of wedlock but tolerate preachers who are single and sleep around with many women in the church…
• Hypocritical tolerance is when the church allows a deacon who was caught in adultery stay in leadership but is intolerant of a deacon who plays the lottery or have an addiction

My question for debate: 1. Why is the church/body of Christ hypocritical in their tolerance? 2. Should the church tolerate that which God forbids? 3. Where should the line be drawn if there's any?

Share This Article

Comments (4)

DAVID JOHNSON Wednesday, August 11th 2010 at 2:05AM

The Word of GOD has the answers for EVERYTHING!! The bible warns of the characters of these "leaders" in 2 Peter 2:12-22. In I John 2:26-29, they are referred to as "seducers" by John. John goes on to say "But the anointing which you have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and in truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him." I think that there are those in the body of Christ which rely more on the "office" then the discernment given by the Holy Spirit. They can quote what the 'Pastor' say, but don't fully know what GOD's Word has to say on a given subject. The Holy Spirit will not have you "ignorant", but will lead you in ALL truth. We think that we only need discernment when dealing with those in the world. You EVEN more so need it when dealing with those who claim to be "of the faith". Satan goes to church too! Even more, the church has made some pastors into "superstars" to the point that their ways are beyond reproach. These types of "leaders" can be in blatant error according to the Word and people will follow them anyway. Please do not say anything about what the Words says, they will alienate you because you don't "go along" with their flow. People had better get rid of their "Uzziah"s! In this day and age, it is possible for another Jim Jone's/Ghana crisis event. We have to pray and "earnestly contend for the faith". GOD BLESS!!

Cynthia Merrill Artis Wednesday, August 11th 2010 at 2:20AM

oooohhh... Jim Jones.... I've said that!!!!
AMEN!!

Cynthia Merrill Artis Friday, August 13th 2010 at 12:51PM

David... The word say's in the end we all have to be held accountable for our sins... Christ spoke of parablles.. The Widow's Mine.. The Prodigal Son... Just because a person is homos*xual... Didn't God place his wrath against Sodom? Didn't god cause famine, and floods. I am of sin... I can't judge... only God knows the heart, mind and soul of man...

I don't subscribe to "man's behavior"... I am just a meek lost lamb... who goes astray... but know's my good shepherd's voice. (((smiling)))

Harry Watley Friday, August 13th 2010 at 2:45PM

Hello to All,

I have been asking many religious scholars and preachers have they noticed prophets are racially different and what can be drawn from this revelation. I am raising this legitimate question because Jesus was a Jewish man and you; Mr. David Johnson is a Black American man that belongs to a new race of people born out of the ashes of slavery. Black Americans are definitely not the same people as Jesus was. Have I made a legitimately good point?

So, could you answer the question Mr. David Johnson why prophets were racially different? Now, if you have the wisdom to acknowledge what I am saying is true then your prophet is not Jesus. Instead, your prophet must be a Black American such as yourself is. Am I making sense?

Likewise, there are two different religious books well known to the world. The Holy Bible and the Holy Quran are those two books.

Now, the Holy Quran is the Arabian people’s religious book. Does that not show racial differences in contrast to the Holy Bible?

So, Mr. David Johnson would you please answer why prophets were racially different.

Incidentally, most people as David Johnson preaches and they think they are teaching. However, there are remarkable differences between preaching and teaching. Do you know the differences between the two, Mr. David Johnson?

Tell me what you think.

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.