NAME calling again?
It is unnecessary to CALL NAMES. Some people on this site decided to have some kicked off just for that very thing. What is going on here? I am disappointed with the way the site is headed. The first amendment guarentees free speech unless libal or slander is used. Some on this site has used both. As I said before, If it is good for one, it should be good for the other.
I am positive that most of us did not know much of what she has been teaching and especially those who consider themselves theologans. It would be a good idea to just shut up and listen, (read and learn) as I have done. And then if there is cause for disagreement, present your point at the proper time. after all, ALL learning and the DEVELOPMENT of what has been handed down as fact occured just this way. Somebody had question, and somebody had the answer.
For some, to suspend disbelief may be difficult, but you will be surprised at how clear something will be when that is done.
I am positive that most of us did not know much of what she has been teaching and especially those who consider themselves theologans. It would be a good idea to just shut up and listen, (read and learn) as I have done. And then if there is cause for disagreement, present your point at the proper time. after all, ALL learning and the DEVELOPMENT of what has been handed down as fact occured just this way. Somebody had question, and somebody had the answer.
For some, to suspend disbelief may be difficult, but you will be surprised at how clear something will be when that is done.
Often when one lacks the mental inventory to debate intellectually, what is left is name calling.