AMERICA, DO YOU REALLY WANT THE OWNER OF WIKILEAKS ARRESTED, 'IN' COURT DISCLOSING HOW HE GOT THIS INFORMATION

The question to me is, do we want to know about things like this?
http://www.collateralmurder.com/

@Steve, "I" believe the honest and open question taht we are in denial of is really do we want toknow about how we the American government paid $billions upon $$$$$$$billions of our tax monies to Haliburton to help kill (yes kill) our own troops and our having under teh Bush administration pay more $$$billions to black water to assicnat innocent Iraqi civilians...oh we all ready know about all of thie and even the trials of members of Black water for these chanres but we refuse to go past the information manipulated and censored out of teh mass media where we limit our educatio to...this was all on both C spans...just like teh right refusing to vote for teh extention of the millde-calss taxes...ot that the right is going to refuse to EXTEND the president Regan's peace treaty with Russia...

SO HOW IS NOT KNOWING NOTMAKING FACTS AND PROOFS OF THE FACTS SOMETING TO DENY / NOT WANT TO KNOW DO ESPECIALLY TOWARDS HALPING THE MOST NEEDY AND HELPINNG TOPROMOTE PEACE...

IS THIS WHAT WE WANT FOR REAL...AND IF SO PLEASE LEAVE ME OUT OF THE WE AS WELL AS WE REPRESENT A CHRISTIAN VALUE FAMILY VALUE COUNTRY, P-L-E-A-S-E (NUP!!!!!)

...and, "I" will once again quote my sainted grandmother, "WHAT IS DONE IN THE DARK WILL SURELY COME TO THE LIGHT...ALONG WITH HER ALWAYS SAYING, "GOD MAY NOT COME WHEN YOU CALL HIM BUT HE IS ALWAYS ON TIME"...

and, my Buddhist practice saying, "every cause has an effect started at the moment the action is make" (smile)

...and, dispite our own Homeland security saying this to the public (we can continue to ignore, deny, reject)...Homeland security says it must change how they protect our computer system with classified info...they knew all teh time that the way this person in tehmilitary was able to get this information to wikileak was a way to over ride teh system of homeland security...IT WAS NOT CORRECTED....

AND, OT ONLY NO BUT HELL NO "i" REFUSE TO FAUTL WIKILEAKS FOR THIS "i" DO HOLD OUR GOEVENMENT FOR NOT SAYING SOMETHING THEY CALIM TO BE A THREAT TO OUR COUNTRY NOT BEING AN ACT OF TERRORISM...AGSIN IS IT SKIN COLOR OR THE REFUSUAL TO CHARGE OUR FIRST AMENDMENT THAT IS WAS A LIBERAL MEDIUM TO BRING THIS TO THE PUBLIC AND OT FOX BRINGING IT TO FAULT OUR BLACK PRESIDENT...???????????? SKIN COLOR OF LEGAL TALK (1ST AMENDMENT)YOU PICK YOUR CHOICE...(SMILE)

@ Brother Steve, thanks for the link. (smile)

EDUCATE!!!EDUCATE!!!EDUCATE!!!...YES WE CAN...YES WE MUST...YES WE WILL...(smile)