Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

KILLING BIN LADEN LEGAL AND “ENTIRELY APPROPRIATE” SAYS U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE STEVENS

Richard Kigel · Friday, May 13th 2011 at 9:12PM · 972 views
HUFFINGTON POST, May 13, 2011—The killing of Osama bin Laden by U.S. Navy Seals was legal.

So said retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens in a speech Thursday evening.


Speaking at a dinner that capped a daylong Northwestern University Law Review symposium in his honor, Stevens eschewed expected after-meal remarks to make a what he called a "serious" issue that has been in much the news of late.


As a Navy officer who contributed to the breaking of the Japanese code during World War II, Stevens was on duty at Pearl Harbor Easter Sunday 1943. Through codebreaking the United States had learned the whereabouts of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, architect of the infamous 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor that drove the country into the war. On that day U.S. forces downed Yamamoto's plane, killing him. Stevens has said he harbored "humanitarian concerns" about the targeted killing -- even though his superiors and, indeed, most Americans had none. Indeed, Stevens later said that targeting a known individual for death was different from killing anonymous enemies in time of war; it was, he said, more like the decision juries are asked to make in a capital sentencing here.


But the May 2 operation that ended bin Laden's life was different, Stevens told his audience at Chicago's Ritz-Carlton Hotel.
Noting "some debate about the propriety of the attack on Osama bin Laden by Navy Seals," the former Navy man first made clear that, "I must say I was proud of the Seals," then added that he was also proud of President Barack Obama for making the decision to undertake the operation.


"It was not merely to do justice and avenge September 11," Stevens said. Implicitly acknowledge the ongoing agenda of al Qaeda, the terrorist network that bin Laden led, Stevens said of this month's operation: "It was to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. I have not the slightest doubt that it was entirely appropriate for American forces to act."

About the Author

Richard Kigel Staten Island, NY

Share This Article

Comments (5)

Richard Kigel Friday, May 13th 2011 at 9:47PM

There will never be a shortage of conspiracy theories. People LOVE them.

And they don't need anything real to concoct it. Just our natural power of imagination.

It's fun!!!


Jen Fad Saturday, May 14th 2011 at 3:13PM

@ Brotehr Rich,
Kuddos to Justice Stevens... I feel better that he's weighed in on the matter.

Richard Kigel Saturday, May 14th 2011 at 7:46PM

Justice Stevens is a serious legal heavyweight.

I found it interesting that his WWII experience had him involved in a similar situation in which the US killed an enemy combatant.

As far as I am concerned, that should end any lingering questions about it.

Jen Fad Sunday, May 15th 2011 at 9:55AM

Abso-bloody-lutely!!

ROBINSON IRMA Thursday, April 10th 2014 at 6:47PM

@Rich, "I" must say how suprised I was to see Fox having right now a special on with Col. Oliver North about teh durgs in Afganistan paying for the Taliban's war...now I see now they ae going to be bringing up the second WW...not good, not good to compare it with 9-11 at all with all of the question markets left about both that administration's knowing about the attack along with how Bush knew about it...

not good at all as we have far too much conspercieis going as it is. (nup) but thanks for the info. because this has just gotten started and I guess anything they cancome p with to get away from our economic problems...but tis is my country and I do so love it. (smile)

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.