Siebra Muhammed posted a blog entitled, "Minister Farrakhan speaks on Black people in the Bible".

First, farakhanMadoof is a selfRecorded murder suspect and a cook county recorded thief.

Second, anything he MIGHT comment about the bibleEuropa is based on His love and experience as a subject and innitiator of paganChristianity; AND no christianAmerica or European agrees with him................

THIRD, NONE of the 2 Billion Believers of AlQur'aan and the Sunnah of Mohamed(as) would listen to his paganChristian rhetoric.

FOURTH, to entitle a subject 'black' people in the bibleEuropa is an INSULT to Science, Biology and the nonEuropean world............

and Harry, 2,3, and 4 describe YOU, with your selfProfessed 68 IQ retardation.

harryWrites, "Yet, you and Mr. Farrakhan are not Arabian people, but claim the religion of Prophet Mohammed. And, I am the one that has pointed this out."

harry, you are my 68 IQ retarded wwweb correspondent, whom I am trying to make go over the top and get medical attention for your severe mental retardation and dilusion...............

and ------
the following 7 paragraphs highlite Scientific research.

The dominant view among scientists concerning the origin of anatomically modern humans is the "Out of Africa" or recent African origin hypothesis, which argues that Homo sapiens arose in Africa and migrated out of the continent around 50,000 to 100,000 years ago

Nucleotide diversity is based on single mutations called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The nucleotide diversity between humans is about 0.1%, which is 1 difference per 1,000 nucleotides between two humans chosen at random. This amounts to approximately 3 million SNPs since the human genome has about 3 billion nucleotides. It is estimated that a total of 10 million SNPs exist in the human population.

Recent analysis has shown that non-SNP variation accounts for much more human genetic variation than single nucleotide diversity. It is estimated that approximately 0.4% of the genomes of unrelated people typically differ with respect to copy number. When copy number variation is included, human to human genetic variation is estimated to be at least 0.5%.

Since the 1960's a majority of Scientists have come to understand the concept of race as a social construct mapped on to phenotypes in different culturally determined ways, and not as a biological concept. A 2000 study by Celera Genomics found that human beings largely have similar genetic input, and that citizens of any given village in the world, whether in Scotland or Tanzania, hold 90 percent of the genetic variability that humanity has to offer. The study found only .01% of genes account for a person's external appearance. Biological adaptation also plays a role in phenotype of bodily features and skin type. According to Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, "Skin color and body size are less subject to genetic influence since they are also affected by exposure to the sun and diet, but there is always a hereditary component that can be quite important."
Jorde and Wooding (2004) wrote that some studies have argued that clusters from genetic markers did not correspond well to the subjects' self-identified race/ethnic group. These studies, however, were based on only several dozen or fewer genetic markers, and such a number, unless carefully selected, are argued to not be sufficient. In contrast, studies based on more genetic markers have found high agreements.

A study by Tang et al. in 2005 used 326 genetic markers in order to determine genetic clusters. The 3,636 subjects involved in the study, from the United States and Taiwan, self-identified as belonging to white, African American, East Asian, or Hispanic (=self-identified race/ethnic group (SIRE)). The study found "nearly perfect correspondence between genetic cluster and SIRE for major ethnic groups living in the United States, with a discrepancy rate of only 0.14%."

The most widely used human racial categories are based on various combinations of visible traits such as skin color, eye shape and hair texture. However, some Scientists, argue that many of these traits are non-concordant in that they are not necessarily expressed together. For example, skin color and hair texture vary independently.

Bottom line, harry -----siebra and farakhanMadoof

I know that Science and Biology are HARD subjects to understand, but the above means that you and I could be closer physically, than you and your relatives........

The differences that YOU and I have though are ENORMOUS, when we talk about Intelligence and Monotheistic Thought----Our Understanding of the Creator of Adaam(as), AND the physical, mental and metaphyscial Evolution of The Family of Adaam(as)

I do not share the gene of slaverAmericana paganChristianity, with you, because my reference in mental and metaphysical Thought is based on afroCentric History and Scholarship and I DO NOT SHARE YOUR racialisticRacist division of Nucleotides.

your comments, in my opinion, are NEVER correct and originate in yourMind only, NOT, intelligence, History or Scholarship.