Can anyone help me with the Trayvon Martin case, please.
Now, alot is being said about the visible wounds of Mr. Zimmerman in an effort to make things favorable for Mr. Zlmmerman I am supposing.
I would ask the question at what point did it started. In other words, did this incident began when Zimmerman shot Mr. Trayvon in self defense or did this incident began when Zimmerman decided to get out of his car and go after Trayvon inspite of the police telling not to so.
I would reason that the self defense claim or the stand your ground law of Florida is not workable because the altercation first began when Zimmerman got out of his car wih a firm intention of confronting Trayvon who was not breaking any law. Therefore, it would suffice to say that Trayvon felt he was being attacked and was fighting in self-defense.
Trayvon did not know that Zimmerman had a gun. Trayvon was at a 110% disadvantage.
Am I wrong? Are my reasoning weck?
Not only is he automatically guilty for getting out of his car to confront Trayvon. He shot him in the heart so that he wouldn't live to testify against him.