DAVID JOHNSON TAKES A STAND AGAINST WOMAN ON LINE ABUSE SAINT JAKES EXPOSED !
IRMA,CYNTHIA ,CHRISTINA,MS LEE,SIEBRA,KIM, TIFFANY,AND MORE HAVE ALL BEEN CYBER ABUSED, INSULTED, DEFAMED LIED ON, PROFILE TAMPERED WITH BY
SAINT JAKES !
THEY HAVE COMPLAINED OVER AND OVER ABOUT SAINT JAKES ABUSE !
DAVID JOHNSON THE BLACK MARINE, THE MAN TAKES A STAND AGAINST SAINT JAKES ABUSE AND NOW JAKES CANT TAKE WHAT HE GIVES OUT ,,,,,
THERE IS NO FEAR ,,,,I CAN HANDLE THIS COWARD BY MYSELF !
comment from facebook
al, replacing the term bloggers with commenters:
"A lot of [commenters] seem to be socially inadequate, pimpled, single, slightly seedy, bald, cauliflower-nosed young men sitting in their mother's basements and ranting."
It feels a bit less threatening if you can picture your haters that way. But sometimes even that won't work, and there have been a couple of times recently when I've thought about going to the police. How am I supposed to know for instance whether "Let's hope she doesn't end up getting stabbed in the head or something" is a throwaway comment by a sad little man sat in his bedsit in his underpants, or whether it's something slightly more sinister that means I need to keep looking over my shoulder whenever I leave the house? At what point does "a bit of online abuse" cross over into s*xual harassment or hate speech? And how do you determine when a 'nasty comment' has crossed a line and become a genuine threat to kill?
I'm not sure what the solution to all this is, although I'm beginning to wonder if it might be worth one or more of us having a go at taking a test case through the criminal justice system. In the meantime though, I think it's imperative that women who write online continue to speak out about the abuse we're subjected to, and that we expose the Internet misogynists at every opportunity we get.
Dawn Foster
Blogger at F For Philistine. She tweets: @DawnHFoster