HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED ABOUT THE 'TIME LINE' IN ZIMMERMAN'S CASE.NO CRIME IN HIS NEIGHBORHOOD? DID HE FORM

HIS WATCH WITH A SPECIFIC : SKIN COLOR, AGE TO 'WATCH FOR"?(PROFILING?!?)IF A GUN IS FORBIDDEN ON WATCH, HOW CAN A COURT BACK UP A CRIMINAL ACT? (ONE CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS)IF GOING TO THE STORE, DID HE ALWAYS CARRY A LOADED GUN AT ALL TIMES,BEFORE HE BEGAN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH OR ONLY AFTER..HE WAS ON HIS WAY TO THE STORE AND DOES HE WEAR HIS GUN WITHONEIN THE CHAMBER AT ALL TIMES OR JUST ON WATCH WHERE HE MUST NEVER CARRY A GUN NOR FOLLOW ANYONE?!? (SMILE)...

THERE IS A BOOK, RIGHT AND THERE WAS NO ARREST...IT IS THE NONARRESDT THAT WAS OF INTEREST TO BOTH THE FBI AND DOJ FROM THE START AND WERE BROUGHT IN BY THE CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORYEYS OF THE FAMILYOF TM...WE MUST NOT OVER LOOK AS IT IS KEY HERE AS WELL AS THESE TIME LINES AND A COURT BACKING THE 'FRUIT FROM TEH POISONED TREE AS IT IS CALLED...HAVING NO SEARCH WARRENT IS LIKE HAVING O CSI READY FOR COURT IF ONE IS 'EXPECTING TO GO TO COURT IN THE FIRST PLACE...ANYONE SEE WHERE HOLDER AND THE FBI WERE AND ARE NOW ONCE AGAIN GOING?!? LOV YA A-L-L (S-M-I-L-E)