Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

Putin Trips Up AIPAC

Putin Trips Up AIPAC

Yaiqab Saint · Wednesday, September 11th 2013 at 1:22PM · 768 views
By Brother Nathanael Kapner Copyright 2013
September 11, 2013


THE MASTER STRIKES AGAIN… this time tripping up Jewry’s plans to use a bombed-out Syria as a half-way house on their way to blow up Iran.

While AIPAC led the charge along with fat cat Sheldon Adelson and countless other Jewish organizations to use the US Military to do their dirty work on the sovereign nation of Syria, it was Russia who took the high ground to stop the Jewish rampage.

Over and over again, Russia reminded the world that not only was America deficient in presenting viable evidence that Dr Assad used chemical weapons but that a US strike on Syria would violate international law.

And now, Putin (a master of jujitsu which uses leverage to make an opponent’s body work against itself), has tripped up AIPAC by diffusing the crisis via a pre-arranged agreement with Dr Assad to have Syria surrender its chemical weapons.

The Master has shown the world that diplomacy is better than murder…the only policy Jewry and its captive nation, Jewmerica, knows.

Do Jews care about what’s moral or illegal?…Read the Jew-owned New York Times article, “Bomb Syria Even If It’s Illegal,” and decide for yourself.

But now Putin, NOT Jewmerica, is calling the shots. And that’s the way it should be now that the Mideast is ‘up for grabs’ with regard to geopolitical powers of influence.

The only way Dr Assad would surrender his chemical weapon missile system—since it is Syria’s key deterrence and defense system against Israel…admitted by Israel—would be in exchange for something which is an even stronger defense system, which would also be protective of Russia’s interests inside Syria.

How to steal the thunder from Tel Aviv and DC? It would be to remove the fuse from this ‘time bomb.’

Critical parts of the Syrian chemical weapons arsenal, especially its delivery systems and most vulnerable and dangerous agents, can be carried safely to a temporary storage area in Russia, under UN auspices.

The only person who could solve this problem is Putin. He has the means and is trusted by Assad to allow Russian special forces to remove chemical weapons and load them onto the large landing ship Nikolai Filchenkov guarded by a contingent of Russian marines.

But what about the ’special cargo’ the Nikolai Filchenkov picked up in Russia?

That Russian “special cargo” on its way to Syria could be the extremely advanced S-400 missile system which Russia has said is not available at this time in the arms trade business.

Yet, it was Putin himself who warned that Syria will soon have weapons not seen before in the Middle East if the US did not back off of its plans.

If Russia is indeed hauling its S-400s for Syria on its naval landing ship—which can certainly take the weight being a tank hauler and can beach itself to offload if no port is available—we are talking about a deployment time of about 5 minutes after the mobile launchers arrive at their destinations after being driven off of the ship.

And this is why Jewry is NOT happy about Putin tripping up their war-mongering plans.

BUT ARMAGEDDON has not been defeated…it’s just been postponed.

AIPAC, Adelson—and those hundreds of Jewish organizations—have BILLIONS of dollars at their disposal.

And Jewish dollars is what rules Capitol Hill and what makes “bringing democracy” to the world a laughable, (yet dangerous) American farce.


Thank You Servants Of Jesus Christ


Back to AIPAC:


Dirty Tricks AIPAC Uses Against Congress


When you're already the biggest stealth lobby of any foreign government, respecting the law just doesn't pay. Many lobbyists work aggressively to get their way on Capitol Hill by bundling donor contributions, passing inside information that lawmakers can profit from before ordinary investors and creating a favor bank. Some of those activities are unethical, but surprisingly few are actually illegal.

AIPAC tactics fall into a different category. The lobbying group never bothered to incorporate until its parent organization was ordered to register as an Israeli foreign agent in 1962. AIPAC hurriedly spilt off and quietly incorporated just six weeks later in order to continue the public (and secret) work of its defunct parent organization the AZC. AIPAC flouts U.S. laws for its foreign patron—the government of Israel—when the stakes are high enough. If other lobbies tried any of these tactics, their executives would go to jail. Unsurprisingly, few domestic American causes require spying, smearing opponents and fixing elections. More worryingly, AIPAC now has enough elected and political appointee friends embedded in high places, along with establishment media power—that warranted investigations can be quickly quashed.

The following five "dirty tricks" are undoubtedly being carefully considered by any Congressmember thinking of voting against AIPAC's drive to entangle the U.S. in wars against Syria and Iran:

AIPAC Fixes Elections & Illegally Coordinates Donations to Beat Opponents



In 1986, AIPAC needed Alan Cranston to win the California senate race. So ex-AIPAC Director Michael Goland illegally funneled campaign cash to spoiler candidate Ed Vallen. The crooked ploy worked. Vallen drew enough votes from Cranston's opponent for Cranston to win. Although Goland was later convicted and given a slap on the wrist, Cranston shoveled billions in U.S. aid to Israel, none of which was affected by the criminal boost to his election.

The same year, AIPAC Deputy Political Director Elizabeth Schrayer illegally coordinated supposedly "independent" political action committees (in fact set up by AIPAC) to contribute funds to support AIPAC-favored candidates. Decades of court actions, which rose to the level of the Supreme Court, resulted in no accountability for AIPAC. AIPAC continues to "score" each vote in Congress.

Even as campaign finance laws loosen, all U.S. politicians know AIPAC is willing to use almost any means—legal and not—to get its candidates into office.

AIPAC Falsely Claims Charitable Religious Status & Ignores IRS Disclosure Regulations



AIPAC applied for tax-exempt status as a religious charity in 1967—essentially by lying to the IRS (PDF). Omitted from its application was the required disclosure that AIPAC was led by a former foreign agent of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. That AIPAC's parent organization folded after being ordered by the Justice Department to register as an Israeli foreign agent. That AIPAC's start-up funding came from the Jewish Agency (an arms-smuggling organization), laundered through the Near East Report.

Because the IRS never properly investigated or challenged the application, AIPAC received tax-exempt status in 1968. Instead of opposing legislation of a well-funded "registered foreign government's lobby," Congressional reps have to consider whether they want to be perceive taking on a "religious charity." Since 2009, AIPAC no longer provides donor names and amounts as required to the IRS.

AIPAC Steals & Uses Opponents' Secrets Against Them in the Media



In 1984 the Israeli government wanted the privilege to export—tariff free—into the US market. The majority of US industry and labor groups were opposed and compiled their most closely held trade and market secrets into a report to the International Trade Commission. AIPAC, with the help of an Israeli "diplomat," stole the classified report and used it against the complainants in a massive public relations campaign. Israel unfairly won the trade concessions, which through May, 2013, have cost the U.S. $100 billion. The FBI investigated the espionage and theft of government property, but the Reagan administration Justice Department wouldn't prosecute.

What member of Congress (or opposing lobby) wouldn't be terrified of having AIPAC steal their own darkest secrets to be used against them in an orchestrated media campaign?

AIPAC Places U.S. National Defense Secrets into Israel's Service



In 1975, AIPAC director Morris Amitay almost drove Jordan into the arms of the Soviet Union when he obtained and leaked classified Defense Department data on missile sales (According to the State Department).

In 2004, AIPAC employee Steven J. Rosen passed classified U.S. national defense information to the Washington Post (and "Israeli diplomats") aimed at convincing Americans that Iran was engaged in "total war" against the U.S. in Iraq.

Members of Congress have authorized access to classified briefings, but unlike AIPAC, they are compelled not to leak secrets to constituents or the media for political gain. What member doesn't fear being "end-run" by a foreign lobby with no restrictions on how it obtains and spreads U.S. national secrets to friends in the media? AIPAC requires members of Congress accept its vetted interns as staff, creating a foreign interest intelligence network unsurpassed on Capitol Hill. Members of Congress are under constant watch.

AIPAC Quashes Prosecutions Gaining an Aura of Criminal Immunity



Back in the 1940s, only a handful of American "smugglers for Israel" funded by the Jewish Agency were prosecuted as investigations were quashed by a "war chest" and movements of highly-placed insiders.

Fast forward to 2006 when Congresswoman Jane Harman was picked up on a federal wiretap telling an "Israeli agent" she would "waddle into" and quash the Justice Department's espionage prosecution of two AIPAC employees. The Justice Department later dropped the prosecutions, under pressure from a massive Israel lobby pressure campaign.

Members of Congress know AIPAC can do almost anything, and never be held to account. Elected officials wanting to serve broader American interests must tread carefully. Those members of Congress opposed to AIPAC's drives to tripwire America into war with Iran and Syria realistically fear a combination of spying, covert action and rigged elections will bring them down if they fail to follow AIPAC—and by extension the Israeli government's—marching orders.

About the Author

Yaiqab Saint Nassau County- Long Island (Strong Isl ), NY

Share This Article

Comments (2)

powell robert Wednesday, September 11th 2013 at 9:20PM


Absolutely

The Israeli usaNational AIPAC Congress probably did the chemical attack anyway..........

Yaiqab Saint Wednesday, September 11th 2013 at 10:45PM

@Robert

Perhaps........ and they go virtually unchallenged to in America !!!!

Most Americans are asleep anyway!

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.