Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

OUR SUPREME COURT HAS WITH THEIR RULING ON AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION HAVE FALLEN PREY TO THEIR OWN RIGHT-WING , SUBJE

ROBINSON IRMA · Saturday, April 26th 2014 at 10:45AM · 357 views
SUBJECTIVE PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR AS IT HAS COME UP AQAINST THE SAME ETHNIC STUDY STUDENTS WH KNOW OUR CONSTUTITION WAS CREATED TO PROTECT THE MINORITY FROM THE MAJORITY...example...THEIR PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR IS TO PROTECT THE MINORITY RICH FROM THE MAJORITY POOR AND MOST NEEDY....NOW THAT THESE MICH. STUDENTS' HAVE ACTUALLY FORCED THE SUPREME COURT TO TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT THEIR AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION DECISION COUNTED THEIR OWN DECISION'S NUMBER CORRECTLY IS BEING FORCED TO HAVE A SECOND LOOK SEE BY OUR SUPREME COURT ALONG WITH THE WAY THEIR DECISION HAS BEEN WRITTEN.(SMILE)

About the Author

ROBINSON IRMA Marysville, CA

Share This Article

Comments (2)

ROBINSON IRMA Saturday, April 26th 2014 at 11:14AM

THE STATE OF OK.HAVE SO REJECTED ALLOWIING THE HEALTH CARE INTO IT AS THE 'LAW OF TH ELAND' UNTIL WHEN IT COMES TO ANSWERING A QUESTION ON TH EMEDS TO BE GIVEN IN THEIR PENDING PRSION INMATE KILLING NEXT WEEK...

THE LOWER COURT IN OK REFUESES TO BOEYITS SUPREME COURT...NOW HERE IS THE PROBLEMTHAT IS GOING TO COME BACK AND BITE THIS STATE IN THE ASS, BECAUSE IF THEY DON'T DO WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR TH EPROTECTION OF ALL CITIZENS IN THEIR STAE IS WHEN THIS HAPPENS THEY MUST STOP AND ALLOW THE CASE TO GO TO THE FEDERAL SUPREMECOURT...

BUT A PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR WILL BE FEVEALED IN TIS CASE AS IN SEEING IF THEY MUST FOLLOW CLIVEN BUNDY'S LEAD.(S-M-I-L-E)...

TIME IS ALWAYS ON THE SIDE OF RIGHT AND NOT MIGHT THUS THE ' YES WE CAN'...

LOV YA A-L-L...

powell robert Sunday, April 27th 2014 at 1:16PM

THE SUPREMES

Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel A. Alito, and Elena Kagan--- Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg

on this Affirmative Action case Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Clarence Thomas, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg SHOULD have EXCUSED themselves from this DECISION

----bias to AFFIRMATIVE action, REASON they are on court

So the DECISION is INVALID..............

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.