What is science!

Science

SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.]

1. In a general sense, knowledge, or certain knowledge; the comprehension or understanding of truth or facts by the mind.

The science of God must be perfect.

2. In philosophy, a collection of the general principles or leading truths relating to any subject. Pure science as the mathematics, is built on self-evident truths; but the term science is also applied to other subjects founded on generally acknowledged truths, as metaphysics; or on experiment and observation, as chimistry and natural philosophy; or even to an assemblage of the general principles of an art, as the science of agriculture; the science of navigation. Arts relate to practice, as painting and sculpture.

A principle in science is a rule in art.

3. Art derived from precepts or built on principles.

Science perfects genius.

4. Any art or species of knowledge.

No science doth make known the first principles on which it buildeth.

5. One of the seven liberal branches of knowledge, viz grammar, logic, rhetoric, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy and music.

[Note - Authors have not always been careful to use the terms art and science with due discrimination and precision. Music is an art as well as a science In general, an art is that which depends on practice or performance, and science that which depends on abstract or speculative principles. The theory of music is a science; the practice of it an art.]

Steve,

You are wrong. What science is, is just what I explain in my blog. I gave a couple of examples of what science is. Go off of that idiot.

No Harry, let's go off the dictionary we agreed on.

Steve,

I don’t need a dictionary since I am not looking up a word definition. I gave a couple of examples of what science is.

Where'd you get your examples?

Steve,

I got my examples out of my head!

HARRY don't need to be bothered by facts Steve, Harry got that example out of his as... you have tried your best to educate this fool but yet you see that nothing is in his head, it's all in his as... So the only thi.g he can talk is sh##...

Deacon,

Did Harry just admit that he makes this stuff up? I guess we have our answer to create and make, dictionary and concordance, and all the rest.

Steve,

You have trouble understanding what I say. I’ll say it again for you. You asked where did I get my examples from and I said out of my head. Now, you say that since I got my examples out of my head then my examples are made up because anything out of your head is made up stuff.

I never said my examples were made up. I said I got my example out of my head. Why are you saying that because I got the examples out of my head the examples are made up?

My examples are science because my examples are all true.

In the future when you mis-quote me I consider your intention is to lie and discredit me I will not respond to the post. If you are an honest and decent man you say what I said the way I said it.

I said that science is something that is true am I right.

We agreed on a dictionary Harry. You asked a question, I answered it from the dictionary. You ignored the dictionary and admitted you made up a definition of your own.

Steve,

I am not responding to your post. Like I said if your post is not saying the same thing I said I automatically know that you are lying.

I don’t enjoy lying dialogues. I like dialogues that you use your mind in a positive way all the time. When you are deliberately lying you are juggling many things and eventually the dialogue falls apart.

So, I am not going to waste my time with you, especially when you are being dishonest.

Hey Steve,

I told you where HARRY'S logic comes from didn't I? You also see that he does not give a damn about you and his previous agreement to use the dictionary as a point of reference which turned out the be another one of his boldface LIES.

SO, when that man says that he don’t enjoy lying dialogues. You know that LYING, Deception, Trickery and Falsehood is his major number one tool of defense. Just look at what he is saying to you. If the dictionary definition don't fit the thought that he pulled out of is as*, that the dictionary definition is not valid. This sounds like something that a lonely, sad and sick minded man would say. so like a little *icth he is going to stop responding to your post because the truth of the dictionary definition don't fit his narrow-minded views.

HARRY how much prove will it take for you to see the error of your ways. Science plays no roll in your statement that prophets are racially different.

In the days before the Bible and during the Bible completion the people of the Bible lived in smaller communities than we have now. So it is natural for a people to have a Prophet of the same race.

Now with that said, lets look at Moses and the people who listen to his words under God's direction was not only the Hebrew people who was saved and brought out of Egypt but there was all so the Ethiopians, and other slave people from Libya which are different people who benefited from the prophecy of freedom of a different peoples prophet other than there own.

So that makes your so-called statement and your claim that prophets are racially different, especially when it comes to MOSES, the one you love to pattern yourself after WRONG. These is no science here HARRY so, drop this LIE.

I stand in ownership to my opinion on Black In America.

Hey Deacon, sorry I've been away. I see Harry hasn't gone to his 6th grade teacher yet to learn how to use the dictionary.