Shaaka Ahmose The Hebrew Israelites Are On My Radar { Breakdown of His Babbling}

Here is a question for Kemet worshippers?

Listen and then provide a name of a father or mother, people who gave this technology, way of life to King Narmar (Menes) ???????????


Quotes as follows:

Certain grey areas remain in the history of this Egypt that fascinates us so much. How did this civilization begin? Why does the papyrus of Manetho, which provides the chronology of the pharaohs, so upset official Egyptology? Antoine Gigal gives a progress report on recent discoveries.

The pre-pharaonic past of Egypt remains a very great enigma because the question remains as to what exactly occurred during the mysterious period prior to 3000 BC, date of the appearance of the first official pharaoh known as Menes-Narmer. At that time, in a few decades, without any warning, there suddenly appeared in a surprisingly perfect form, writing, perfect pyramids, erudite astronomy, technical skills and knowledge - everything that goes with a very sophisticated civilization. And it all seems to have arrived very quickly.

As the English Egyptologist Toby Wilkinson put it so well: "They seem to have no ancestors or periods of development, they seem to have appeared overnight." The French authority Gaston Maspero (1846-1916) comments about the Egyptian texts: "The religion and the texts which made it known to us were already established before the first dynasty. In order to understand them it is up to us to put ourselves in the frame of mind of the people who constructed them, more than seven thousand years ago." (Revue de l'Histoire des Religions, vol. XIX, p.12). Yes, that's what it says: "before the first dynasty"!

Additional documentary to refute the skeptics from Caucasian Egyptologists:

"Flinders Petrie compares them (Egyptians) to the people of Pun. No where else did the Egyptian find a population which resembled that of his country; the nearest in type were the Phoenicians of Kaft, who in general appearance remind us of the natives of Pun.
But apart from the Phoenicians of Kaft, among the nations of the world known to the Egyptians Pun, alone contained a population which in outward form resembled that of Egypt.

So according to Petrie, the Egyptians, the Puns, and the Phoenicians all resembled each other. For other evidence, what did the Phoenicians look like?

In Capt's work, the Phoenicians were tall, light skinned, red-headed and light- eyed.
The Phoenicians were Semites (Shemites) and were known for their trading and seafaring. They were also known for the alphabet they created.

Footnotes:

Ibid, p 92

Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets, by Capt, pg43, 1985.

Any Encyclopedia

Add this to the mix concerning who was first?

The scene on a knife handle mentioned above shows two types of boats. The ones with a high prows are believed to be from the northern delta - Lower Egypt - and made of papyrus. The Egyptians living there called their country "Ta-mehu", the land of the papyrus.
The others boats have their origin in southern - Upper Egypt - "Ta-schema", the land of the reed, and seem to be partly made of wood. The cabins are different too as shown in the "painted grave" from Hierakonpolis (see picture in chapter "The historical records" below).
The high prowed boats also occur in Sumeria but there is no evidence that they were brought to the Nile Valley by invaders or even was a cultural import for that matter, because the reed/papyrus material simply make this the only practical way of constructing such a boat.



Cylinder seal,
cultural import
from Sumeria

In the mountains in the East Desert from the possible path of the "invaders" a large number of stone carvings have been found, where boats (often big ones) play a leading roll. It is obvious that this vehicle played a major part in Egyptian society already in prehistoric times but there is no evidence that these vessels were for sailing on the high seas, and the more modest strip of water called the Nile (during the inundation up to 60 km across) would have been enough.
At the beginning of the 1900's archaeologists examined the skeletal remains of the earliest graves and found that the remains of the ruling class" indicated that they might have been of heavier stature than the Egyptians in general. This was the ground for the belief that these had come from outside the country.
Evidence of cultural influence from Sumeria before the unification is proven, but genetic influence to a notable extent is not.
The newcomers were believed to have brought a falcon god into Egypt and were called after him - "The followers of Horus". The physical statures of the oldest kings are not known, but remains and depictions of those from dynasties 0-4 tell that some were heavy-built with broad faces, but variations within the families were frequent.
The most significant influence from Sumeria was the facade of the royal palace. This was an insignia for the king, depicted in a stylized way and called a "serek". It came into use before dynasty 1, as did the new style of mud brick masonry in northern Egypt used in the mastaba-tombs.

More Sumerian influence and technology brought to Egypt:


Mother symbols of the Nile valley?


A mysterious scene from a ceremonial make up palette dated to around 3.300 BC.
Two hyena-like animals with puppies, making a roof over two feline fantasy-creatures with long necks which are licking what seems to be a goat. The opposite side has two lions standing on their back feet and mouth to mouth against two goats.
Five palettes with dog-like animals are known and others have two giraffes(?) with a palm tree in the center. In one case an unknown king's serek is shown in the middle. (See below number 8 in unidentified kings). The artistic style with two facing animals was common in Sumeria, and might be a cultural import to the Nile Valley.
The motif with two animals can also be taken as symbolizing the North and the South.

More influence from Sumeria:


Prior to the unification in about 3.200 BC. the two main cultures in the north and south were clearly visible. They had different kings wearing different crowns and their main gods were worshipped in temples of a quite different style. The pottery in the north showed influences from the area of Palestine and Syria and in the south new designs were coming from Sumeria in the east such as cylinder seals to make impressions in clay. The north adopted a new architectural design in brickwork and began to make tomb buildings in a rectangular form (mastabas) with walls having fancy recesses, and this was also a cultural inport coming from the Sumerian culture. In the south the tombs for the upper classes did not change and were crude building hardly above ground i an elaborated traditional tribe style from the past.




Nagada statuette of
a dancing woman
with bird's? head.

The types of boats were strikingly different too and in the Delta they had high sterns (like the reed boats in Sumeria) using vaulted cabins. In the south the boats were long with low sterns and possibly partly made of wood, and carrying square flat topped cabins. This is shown clearly in a painting from an old tomb (later in the text below) and on a knife handle made of ivory where combatants fight with clubs. If this is the final battle of unification there are interesting details to put forward: the warriors all look alike with a slight exception for their hair style and wear the same type of clothing and similar weapons. In other words - it looks like an internal struggle among cousins from a basically similar culture.
Contradict to this is the depiction on the other side of the knife handle where a standing man holding two lions is dressed in a typically old Baby- lonian fashion with a long robe and a turban. He is wearing a full beard, and this is clearly not Egyptian. In about 1900 scholars made up the theory that invaders had penetrated the valley coming through the mountains from the Red Sea 120 km to the east, arriving right at the cradle of culture in Upper Egypt. How, and by what means they had transported themselves all the way from Sumeria wasn't quite clear, but this was yesterday's try to explain the culture influences from the east. This hypothesis is now aban-doned and the "invasion theory" has been changed to culture impulses made by trade. An influx of people (settlers) from the East, in a small scale, might have occurred, but physical evidence to back up this theory has not come up.







Footnotes:

Dawn of Egyptian History by Ottor Vendel