What is the difference between Prophet Harry and everyone else credibility?
Everyone else’s message is always based on someone else’s credibility, am I right. For example, if Saint has a point to make it is always based on someone else’s research. If Mr. David Johnson has a point to make it will be based on someone else’s research on Egypt. If Mr. Deacon has a point to make its will be based on what the Jewish people say about themselves in the Bible.
But, Prophet Harry never refers to someone else’s research to prove his point! Prophet Harry proves his point by pulling it out of reality so it can be seen plain and clear. For instance,I said that prophets are racially different and to prove it I pulled it the facts right out of reality by comparing the Jewish Jesus to the Arab Mohammed.
Mr. Soso and David Johnston claim that Moses and the Exodus never happened because there are no archaeological findings. Archaeology is someone else’s research, am I right.
Prophet Harry does not use someone else’s research to make my point because I pulled the facts and truth right out of the topic itself.
I claim that the Passover that the Jewish people still practiced today as it went down 4000 years ago with Moses proves that Moses had to have existed.
My point is that no one or anything stands between God and me while between Mr. Deacon and God is the image of the Jewish Jesus. Likewise, between God and Siebra is the image of the Arab Mohammed.
These are clueless to know that I am a genuine prophet. A genuine prophet connected to God. God and I are one!
But, Prophet Harry never refers to someone else’s research to prove his point! Prophet Harry proves his point by pulling it out of reality so it can be seen plain and clear. For instance,I said that prophets are racially different and to prove it I pulled it the facts right out of reality by comparing the Jewish Jesus to the Arab Mohammed.
Mr. Soso and David Johnston claim that Moses and the Exodus never happened because there are no archaeological findings. Archaeology is someone else’s research, am I right.
Prophet Harry does not use someone else’s research to make my point because I pulled the facts and truth right out of the topic itself.
I claim that the Passover that the Jewish people still practiced today as it went down 4000 years ago with Moses proves that Moses had to have existed.
My point is that no one or anything stands between God and me while between Mr. Deacon and God is the image of the Jewish Jesus. Likewise, between God and Siebra is the image of the Arab Mohammed.
These are clueless to know that I am a genuine prophet. A genuine prophet connected to God. God and I are one!
"God and I are one". Stolen straight from the mouth of the Jewish Jesus.