Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

WHY DID THE LORD ALLOW MEN TO HAVE CONCUBINES AND/OR MORE THAN ONE WIFE? { CONTROVERSY Yikes }

WHY DID THE LORD ALLOW MEN TO HAVE CONCUBINES AND/OR MORE THAN ONE WIFE? { CONTROVERSY Yikes }

Yaiqab Saint · Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 10:31AM · 1644 views

It is Obvious From the Old Testament that Some Men Had Several Wives and Sometimes Several Concubines as Well. Why?

Was a Man With Several Concubines Considered an Adulterer?

 

 

First of all let us consider concubinage.

We may start off by considering some comments from the Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible:

'Concubinage was practised in many ancient cultures, especially in Mesopotamia.....where a private citizen might have one or two concubines in addition to his primary wife.....a concubine was often a slave or part of the booty of war (Judges 5:30). A man might have a concubine simply as an economical form of marriage, since no dowry or bride-price was required. A concubine could add to a man's prestige by giving him two wives and thus an increased capacity for children. Such offspring were normally delivered onto the knees of the legal wife, thus establishing their legitimacy as family members. The concubine was also another servant to add to his work force.' (Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, 1997, Vol 1, p504).

So there we have it in a nutshell: a concubine was essentially a servant girl whose duties included s*xual services to her master. She was seen as more 'low-born' than the wife although she was still allowed certain rights within the household. It might seem odd to women of our own day why the wives did not object to this arrangement, but in fact all the evidence is that concubines were warmly welcomed by wives into the household since they mainly became the servants of the wife. The ancient world simply did not carry the modern post-Christian expectation that a man would have only one s*xual partner, neither did wives expect it of their husbands. Of course sometimes men had two or more wives (rather than concubines). Wives had greater rights but cost their husbands a lot more!

This might all seem strange today, but we sometimes don't realize how much of the 'one man-one woman' scenario developed from Christianity which was later reinforced by the 19th century Romantic movement (just think of the novels of the Bronte sisters with their passionate concern for private 'one man-one woman' love). Indeed, we still see the acceptance of plural marriage in cultures which have not been influenced by these things – including in parts of the Islamic world.

If we look at the period of the patriarchs, we immediately must note that concubinage etc is the expected 'norm' – note Scriptures such as Genesis 22:24; 35:22; 36:12, also note how concubinage was welcomed by wives who were barren: Genesis 16:1-3; 25:5-6; 1 Chronicles 1:32. If a concubine provided children for a barren wife, those children could gain an inheritance and real prestige (but they would legally be considered the wife's children – not the concubine's).

Some Bible commentators have suggested that the Lord allowed men to have more than one wife or several concubines during the period from the Great Flood until the Old Covenant in order to build up the world's population (which had obviously been decimated by the Flood), but from the time of Moses receiving the legal package on Mount Sinai, concubinage was banned. But this is totally incorrect for two reasons:

·         Firstly, we should not forget that the Old Covenant was given to Israel alone!

·         Secondly, the Old Covenant did make provision for a man having more than one wife. Please note Deuteronomy 21:15-17 !!

We must also note that Moses himself took a second wife who was an Ethiopian woman (Numbers 12:1). Moses had already married Zipporah (Exodus 2:21). Aaron and Miriam criticized their brother for taking this second wife, but they were immediately punished by the Lord for their criticism, making it plain that Moses had done no wrong in His sight (Numbers 12:1-15). Of course, it is possible that Moses' first wife had died, but the text gives no indication of this.

Later on people like David continued to have wives and concubines without receiving a single reproach from the Lord! David only received punishment when he added another man's wife (Bathsheba) to this group thereby clearly committing adultery.

Often Bible teachers in Sunday School are embarrassed about people like Abraham, Gideon and David having several wives and concubines – they simply don't know how to handle it! They usually react by calling David an adulterer who still had lessons to learn - but this is just not what the Bible teaches. The fact is: prior to the Christian New Covenant, God did allow this practise and it was not adultery! Adultery is taking another man's wife (or another woman's husband), but if a man had two wives and two concubines he was expected to be faithful to them all – it is clear from the Scriptures that this was not considered adultery, unpalatable though this may be for some!

 

 

About the Author

Yaiqab Saint Nassau County- Long Island (Strong Isl ), NY

Share This Article

Comments (8)

Yaiqab Saint Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 11:43AM

As promised this was a discussion I had with my wife last week and she could not get down with a joking request I made of her to "go out and get me a women that was naturally 'FLY' without any hair weaves.

She was like that ain't never going to happen.

But Rachel and Leah gave their servants or handmaidens to Jacob (Yaiqab) willingly and all four women have a total of 12 children with Yaiqab.

My wife said I don't care however babe I thought you loved the scriptures was my angle!

In this society such concept would generally be rejected without second thought, however in the Ancient World having a female "CONCUBINE" was generally accepted because it was a title or position and you were rewarded with pay.

I think a lot of men would not object to this practice if it was implemented today, however the problem is managing the rivalries between the females.

One think I now for sure my preference would be a "FLY" women without hair weaves like the attached photo!

Thoughts peeps??????

Harry Watley Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 12:11PM

Son,

All that God did was CREATE and left creation in the hands of man! So, it is not what God allows. It is what man wants and does. Jut that simple!

God re-enters creation on very rare occasions like anointing prophets when necessary!

Yaiqab Saint Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 12:15PM

@Harry
I have no problem with that but most women are not down for it.

Especially my wife the rivalry with another women is just to much for her to accept!

Steve Williams Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 1:15PM

It's not only the rivalry. There are already 7 billion people in this world and projected to be 9 billion by 2050. What the hell is going to happen if we keep reproducing like rabbits?!

S
Sylvainy R Tuesday, March 17th 2015 at 2:45PM

I have this arguement before and it's amassing how today's men continue to us the bible / scriptures to justify their male chauvinistic ego, the day the table is turned I hope you all are prepared to handle it

Yaiqab Saint Wednesday, March 18th 2015 at 9:25PM

@ Soso

I'm concerned because your reply is so feminine and to the point that my wife never raised the issue of the Bible because that was an Ancient custom regardless of the individual's belief systems???????

You are wasting time trying to debunk the Bible just like David Johnson....... you are boring?

I'm starting to think your really a female or just a feminized SIMP !!!!

Harry Watley Wednesday, March 18th 2015 at 10:19PM

Saint,

Seemingly, the reason why your wife would have a problem from the anticipated rivalry is because she was not born and raised in a society that polygamy is the normal.

Harry Watley Wednesday, March 18th 2015 at 10:24PM

Mr. Williams,

You said what the hell is going to happen if we keep reproducing like rabbits?! Your point is referring to good management or good steward of the earth. And, there can come a time when you have too much and this too much can hurt you.

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.