If you all have not noticed, I Prophet Harry exhibits an enomus among of SUPERIORITY on this site!

An enomus among of SOMETHING for sure.

Harry

What happen to your plug-in file you need a update ???

@ Steve

Responding now at 2:25 am in the morning ???

Mr. Saint,

You asked about my plug-in files need an update! Idiot, my plug-in files has nothing to do with my intellectual superiority over you and every one else?

I said that my superiority is evident since none of you can say I am wrong about anything that I've been saying! I said that prophets are racially different which means every race must follow behind the prophet of their own race and not a prophet from another race.

@ Harry

Superior in repeating yourself. Void of nationalities and true history as well.

Ohh. Juan Diaz said hello so-called prophet !

That's right Jake, last night was huge. Didn't you hear?

Mr. Saint,

I shelled out a piece of SUPERIORITY knowledge that you did not say I was wrong! I said that prophets are racially different. And, since prophet are racially different and you are beholding to the White Jewish Jesus and at the same time trying to change his race from Caucasian to Black shows how un-analytical your thinking is and how irrational your reasoning is as well and I brought this to your attention!

I am SUPERIORITY like I said because you and the others silently know that I am right and that is why you avoids the things I say. Since, I am right about what I am putting forth debunks all the non-sense position you have attached yourselves too before my coming and now you don't want to abandon your false belief.

@ Harry

As you continue to REPEAT yourself in your theories. RACE Does not apply to any of the prophets that you reference, Abraham, Moses, Jacob (Yaiqab), Jesus (Yahawashi), Muhammad.

The same goes for your reference of JEWS never existed in the prophets time because there is no letter J in the hebrew language.

So you have absolutely no superiority because you are devoid of meaning of words, ancient languages, nationalities, and true history.

So you have to REPEAT your EDOMITE beliefs !!!!!

To All:

race (n.2) Look up race at Dictionary.com"people of common descent," a word from the 16th century, from Middle French race, earlier razza "race, breed, lineage, family" (16c.), possibly from Italian razza, of unknown origin (cognate with Spanish and Portuguese raza). Etymologists say no connection with Latin radix "root," though they admit this might have influenced the "tribe, nation" sense.

Original senses in English included "wines with characteristic flavor" (1520), "group of people with common occupation" (c. 1500), and "generation" (1540s). Meaning "tribe, nation, or people regarded as of common stock" is by 1560s. Modern meaning of "one of the great divisions of mankind based on physical peculiarities" is from 1774 (though as OED points out, even among anthropologists there never has been an accepted classification of these).
Just being a Negro doesn't qualify you to understand the race situation any more than being sick makes you an expert on medicine. [**** Gregory, 1964]
In mid-20c. U.S. music catalogues, "Negro." Klein suggests these derive from Arabic ra's "head, beginning, origin" (compare Hebrew rosh). Old English þeode meant both "race, folk, nation" and "language;" as a verb, geþeodan, it meant "to unite, to join."

The Word Jew:

In fact, Jesus is referred as a "Jew" for the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century; in the revised 18th century English language editions of the 14th century first English translations of the New Testament. The etymology of the word "Jew" is quit clear. Although "Jew" is a modern conception its roots lie in the 3rd and 4th centuries AD. That is, the modern English word "Jew" is the 18th century contraction and corruption of the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in St. Jerome's Vulgate Edition and derived from the Greek word "Ioudaios." The evolution of this can easily be seen in the extant manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century, which illustrate not only the origin of the word "Jew" found in the Latin word "Iudaeus" but also its current use in the English language. Littered throughout these manuscripts are the many earlier English equivalents used by various chroniclers between the 4th and the 18th century.

Mr. Saint,

You said, "In fact, Jesus is referred as a 'Jew' for the first time in the New Testament". Well, I've been saying the same thing from day one that Jesus was a Jew and Jesus's people are the Jews that live in the State of Israel today and they are Caucasian or White people.

But, you have been saying that Black Americans are the Biblical Jewish people and Black Americans can't be the Biblical Jewish people since Black Americans are racially different from Jewish people!

I am through with this STUPID dialogue with you because I am talking to an IDOIT! You have to be an IDIOT to acknowledge that the KJV of the Bible clearly says that Jesus was a Jew and you are telling me that the things I'm saying are theories! You are FU*KING STUPID!