THE CHARLES CYPHERT TRANSITION FROM WEST CLEVELAND, OHIO...PART 4 (UPDATED)
APRIL 29, 2021
As we continue from Part 3 of this missive, there have been new revelations concerning the white supremacists Charles Cyphert and his plan to move. According to very reliable sources, he was placed on standby. This means that in the very near future he will be moving out of the Cuyahoga County, Ohio, area. And you can believe he is very pissed. According to one or more of his neighbors, on April 28, 2021, Cyphert kept leaving and goi9ng back to where he lives more than 8 tyimes within a two hour time frame. He apparently was taking down notes on a paper pad. Was he writing down all of his encounters from driving around in west Cleveland to use as ammunition in his next complaint to ensure a quicker departure from Cleveland, a place that he hates, or was it some sort of conspiracy against his black roommate, Hatap Rayay? This query was posed because according to sources, Cyphert obtained a kletter from the Social Security Adminstration meant for his black roommate, and according to reliable sources, he copuied the entire name of his roommate for use in cpnspiracies so that he can depart Cleveland faster. When the Social Security Administration deals with black people they usually demand their entire name, including middle names, which is mailed for hackers and instigators. Several people have witnessed Cyphert steaming and yet his connection to and with the hispanics that live below him is just as strong. Many people may claim that they don't deal with this person or that person, but when hackers, who may be hispanicm, attack the same parties that white supremacists target then they are bno better than those white supremacists. Very soon hispanics who have been hacking other people devices will soon come to an end. agencies are getting more and more sophisticated with whats going on and some of them have narrowed down signals to specific rooms in certain locations! Why would hispanics want to work with white supremacists against black people? For one, there are hispanics who have no love for blacks. And then there are those who have no love for highly educated and black conscious Nubuns. Wifi jamming and hacking has accelerated in West Cleveland to a point where most who are being targeted is black people. Even Regional Transit Authority in Cleveland, when someone black is on their cell phone, uses the free wifi to illegal peek into cell phone internet surfing and may even obtain the the IP address of one's cell phone. The engineering team responsible for this sort of activity may lie about it but you can rest assure that only parties in these sort of positions of power are euro-americans with facial features, demeanors, and mentalities of white supremacists. And like black cops who uphold corruption against blacks imposed by euro-american cops, so is there also blacks working for RTA who uphold, support, and answer to euro-americans. Just as George Floyd was a human sacrifice implemented in a power move for the New World Order master-minded by members of the Boule Society (Black Illuminati), the Illuminati, the Luciferians, et cetera, so is the killings of blacks part of that same sacrifice to Moloch or NAN.NAR.
Black people must understand that Sumerian deities is whats being worshipped by many blacks and other people of color, in 2021. Blacks are under the impression the the Hate Crime Bill protects them. In all actuality it is a tricky Bill which clamps down on Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Expression, and it will continue until that same Bill will come back to haunt black people. Just as you can claim hate crimes, white supremacists can do the same. This is one reason why Cyphert and many who think like him are continuously making allegations against blacks and other people of color when they have a history of openly expressed racial hatred. Trust us, according to neighbors near Cyphert who can see into his room because of no curtains and a fully opened window, he will be up at all times of the night sending emails and texts about somebody black. Cyphert openly stated that the euro-american female police officer who murdered the young blackman less than three weeks ago deserves an applause. But his hispanic connection targets our threads when we expose him! We know who they are, even though they don't know this. Like we stated earlier, Cyphert is a liar who will make up incredible stories against others, and then there are hispanics and blacks who help him out by targeting those he claim to have problems with. Then they all think noone knows who they are! What fools mortals be! The only reason why blacks and hispanics have jopined forves with Cyphert is because our threads and the many parties connected to them, pose a threat to them because in some way they are hindering others, mistreating others, and worshipping materialism to a point where they'll do anything for it. more about this sort of activity will be covered later in this missive. But for now it should be acknowledged that black youth are under serious attack, and those from the Baby Boomers or Generation X are targeted when they awaken the dead to the realities of MK Ultra mind controlled murders and assassinations. https://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2021/04/... us, the same as there were blacks who held marches of protests against Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., these same demonic elements control every facet of black communities and is secretly working with white supremacists, witches, warlocks, the new voodoo preistesses, satanists, and every manner of evil known to female and male living beings. They were also the forces pushing Covid mandates, face mask mandates, and Covid vaccinations. And even though thousands have died because of face masks and covid vaccines, those who stood out screaming ain favor of masks and vaccines are slowly becoming less and less visual. Its like they did their jobs in tricking the people, then they were rewarded, and now they are moving to different regions on earth. Imagine that! Enhancing the vibrations:
Owing in large part to the U.S. government’s deep-seated and, in many cases, top-secret alliances with foreign nations and global corporations, it has become increasingly obvious that we have entered into a new world order—a global world order—made up of international government agencies and corporations. This powerful international cabal, let’s call it the Global Deep State, is just as real as the corporatized, militarized, industrialized American Deep State, and it poses just as great a threat to our rights as individuals under the U.S. Constitution, if not greater. We’ve been inching closer to this global world order for the past several decades, but COVID-19, which has seen governmental and corporate interests become even more closely intertwined, has shifted this transformation into high gear. Fascism has become a global menace. It remains unclear whether the American Deep State (“a national-security apparatus that holds sway even over the elected leaders notionally in charge of it”) answers to the Global Deep State, or whether the Global Deep State merely empowers the American Deep State. However, there is no denying the extent to which they are intricately and symbiotically enmeshed and interlocked. Consider the extent to which our lives and liberties are impacted by this international convergence of governmental and profit-driven corporate interests in the surveillance state, the military industrial complex, the private prison industry, the intelligence sector, the security sector, the technology sector, the telecommunications sector, the transportation sector, the pharmaceutical industry and, most recently, by the pharmaceutical-health sector. All of these sectors are dominated by mega-corporations operating on a global scale and working through government channels to increase their profit margins. The profit-driven policies of these global corporate giants influence everything from legislative policies to economics to environmental issues to medical care. The COVID-19 pandemic has propelled us into a whole new global frontier. Those hoping to navigate this interconnected and highly technological world of contact tracing, vaccine passports and digital passes will find themselves grappling with issues that touch on deep-seated moral, political, religious and personal questions for which there may be no clear-cut answers. We are about to find our ability to access, engage and move about in the world dependent on which camp we fall into: those who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 and those who have not.
“It is the latest status symbol. Flash it at the people, and you can get access to concerts, sports arenas or long-forbidden restaurant tables. Some day, it may even help you cross a border without having to quarantine,” writes Heather Murphy for the New York Times. “The new platinum card of the Covid age is the vaccine certificate.” This is what M.I.T. professor Ramesh Raskar refers to as the new “currency for health,” an apt moniker given the potentially lucrative role that Big Business (Big Pharma and Big Tech, especially) will play in establishing this pay-to-play marketplace. The airline industry has been working on a Travel Pass. IBM is developing a Digital Health Pass. And the U.S. government has been all-too-happy to allow the corporate sector to take the lead. Spearheaded by the National Security Agency (NSA), which has shown itself to care little for constitutional limits or privacy, the surveillance state has come to dominate our government and our lives. Yet the government does not operate alone. It cannot. It requires an accomplice. Thus, the increasingly complex security needs of our massive federal government, especially in the areas of defense, surveillance and data management, have been met within the corporate sector, which has shown itself to be a powerful ally that both depends on and feeds the growth of governmental bureaucracy. Take AT&T, for instance. Through its vast telecommunications network that crisscrosses the globe, AT&T provides the U.S. government with the complex infrastructure it needs for its mass surveillance programs. According to The Intercept: “The NSA considers AT&T to be one of its most trusted partners and has lauded the company’s ‘extreme willingness to help.’ It is a collaboration that dates back decades. Little known, however, is that its scope is not restricted to AT&T’s customers. According to the NSA’s documents, it values AT&T not only because it ‘has access to information that transits the nation,’ but also because it maintains unique relationships with other phone and internet providers. The NSA exploits these relationships for surveillance purposes, commandeering AT&T’s massive infrastructure and using it as a platform to covertly tap into communications processed by other companies.” Now magnify what the U.S. government is doing through AT&T on a global scale, and you have the “14 Eyes Program,” also referred to as the “SIGINT Seniors.” This global spy agency is made up of members from around the world (United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Denmark, France, Netherlands, Norway, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Sweden, Spain, Israel, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, India and all British Overseas Territories).
War has become a huge money-making venture, and America, with its vast military empire and its incestuous relationship with a host of international defense contractors, is one of its biggest buyers and sellers. The American military-industrial complex has erected an empire unsurpassed in history in its breadth and scope, one dedicated to conducting perpetual warfare throughout the earth. For example, while erecting a security surveillance state in the U.S., the military-industrial complex has perpetuated a worldwide military empire with American troops stationed in 177 countries (over 70% of the countries worldwide). Although the federal government obscures so much about its defense spending that accurate figures are difficult to procure, we do know that since 2001, the U.S. government has spent more than $1.8 trillion in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (that’s $8.3 million per hour). That doesn’t include wars and military exercises waged around the globe, which are expected to push the total bill upwards of $12 trillion by 2053. The illicit merger of the global armaments industry and the Pentagon that President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us against more than 50 years ago has come to represent perhaps the greatest threat to the nation’s fragile infrastructure today. America’s expanding military empire is bleeding the country dry at a rate of more than $15 billion a month (or $20 million an hour)—and that’s just what the government spends on foreign wars. That does not include the cost of maintaining and staffing the 1000-plus U.S. military bases spread around the globe. Incredibly, although the U.S. constitutes only 5% of the world’s population, America boasts almost 50% of the world’s total military expenditure, spending more on the military than the next 19 biggest spending nations combined. In fact, the Pentagon spends more on war than all 50 states combined spend on health, education, welfare, and safety. There’s a good reason why “bloated,” “corrupt” and “inefficient” are among the words most commonly applied to the government, especially the Department of Defense and its contractors. Price gouging has become an accepted form of corruption within the American military empire.
Driven by a greedy defense sector, the American homeland has been transformed into a battlefield with militarized police and weapons better suited to a war zone. President Biden, marching in lockstep with his predecessors, has continued to expand America’s military empire abroad and domestically in a clear bid to pander to the powerful money interests (military, corporate and security) that run the Deep State and hold the government in its clutches. Glance at pictures of international police forces and you will have a hard time distinguishing between American police and those belonging to other nations. There’s a reason they all look alike, garbed in the militarized, weaponized uniform of a standing army. There’s a reason why they act alike, too, and speak a common language of force: they belong to a global police force. For example, Israel, one of America’s closest international allies and one of the primary yearly recipients of more than $3 billion in U.S. foreign military aid—has been at the forefront of a little-publicized exchange program aimed at training American police to act as occupying forces in their communities. As The Intercept sums it up, American police are “essentially taking lessons from agencies that enforce military rule rather than civil law.” This idea of global policing is reinforced by the Strong Cities Network program, which trains local police agencies across America in how to identify, fight and prevent extremism, as well as address intolerance within their communities, using all of the resources at their disposal. The cities included in the global network include New York City, Atlanta, Denver, Minneapolis, Paris, London, Montreal, Beirut and Oslo. The objective is to prevent violent extremism by targeting its source: racism, bigotry, hatred, intolerance, etc. In other words, police—acting as extensions of the United Nations—will identify, monitor and deter individuals who exhibit, express or engage in anything that could be construed as extremist. Of course, the concern with the government’s anti-extremism program is that it will, in many cases, be utilized to render otherwise lawful, nonviolent activities as potentially extremist.
Keep in mind that the government agencies involved in ferreting out American “extremists” will carry out their objectives—to identify and deter potential extremists, in concert with fusion centers (of which there are 78 nationwide, with partners in the private sector and globally), data collection agencies, behavioral scientists, corporations, social media, and community organizers and by relying on cutting-edge technology for surveillance, facial recognition, predictive policing, biometrics, and behavioral epigenetics (in which life experiences alter one’s genetic makeup). On almost every front, whether it’s the war on drugs, or the sale of weapons, or regulating immigration, or establishing prisons, or advancing technology, or fighting a pandemic, if there is a profit to be made and power to be amassed, you can bet that the government and its global partners have already struck a deal that puts the American people on the losing end of the bargain. We’ve been losing our freedoms so incrementally for so long, sold to us in the name of national security and global peace, maintained by way of martial law disguised as law and order, and enforced by a standing army of militarized police and a political elite determined to maintain their powers at all costs, that it’s hard to pinpoint exactly when it all started going downhill, but we’re certainly on that downward trajectory now, and things are moving fast. The “government of the people, by the people, for the people” has perished. In its place is a shadow government, a corporatized, militarized, entrenched global bureaucracy, that is fully operational and running the country. Given the trajectory and dramatic expansion, globalization and merger of governmental and corporate powers, we’re not going to recognize this country 20 years from now. It’s taken less than a generation for our freedoms to be eroded and the Global Deep State’s structure to be erected, expanded and entrenched. Mark my words: the U.S. government will not save us from the chains of the Global Deep State. Now there are those who will tell you that any mention of a New World Order government—a power elite conspiring to rule the world, is the stuff of conspiracy theories.
After thought: Generally speaking, rabbinical Judaism, as it appears in the Talmud, is the source of Judaism. Unlike what is generally taught in secular schools--where the source of Judaism is said to be the Bible--the actual source of Judaism is the Talmud. The people who wrote the Talmud are the people who decided what books should be included in the Biblical canon. What they decided wouldn't go into the Bible, was left out of the Bible....One thing we do know is this, and we know it for certain: from the very earliest times, rabbinical Judaism--the religion of the Pharisees--was a religion that hated the rest of mankind. It defines only Jews as human beings. Only Jews who believed in rabbinical Judaism, as enshrined in the Talmud, were regarded as human and everyone else was excluded. Let's get this right: it defines only Jews who believe in Talmudic Judaism as full human beings. Everyone else is on a lower level. These inferior beings are seen as the 'Other'. They must be rejected, pushed aside, and, in extreme cases, destroyed. Rabbinical Jewish law does not prohibit the killing of a non-Jew? This is what you sometimes hear. But no, that is not strictly true. The rabbis do prohibit the killing of a non-Jew, but they do so in a very strange way: they refuse to punish a Jew who kills a non-Jew. If you kill a Jew, you get punished. If you kill even the slave of a Jew--and here it's important to note that Orthodox Judaism has never abolished slavery--then there's a stiff penalty you have to pay. It could come to execution. Or it could be fine. You see, they didn't have jails in those days. But if you kill a non-Jew, what then? No legal punishment! Yes, you're guilty, but there is no penalty in law. God will punish you! When you say something is a crime, but there's no punishment for committing the crime, then it's not really a crime.
When you come to the writers of later exegesis, especially the Shulhan Aruch, by that point the writer is already saying that there are situations where you can kill a non-Jew with impunity. Of course, this is written in the 16th century, after the expulsion of the Jews from Spain [1492 C.E.], so the writer has to be careful how he expresses himself and must make use of coded language. He, therefore, refers to the goyim--the gentile--as "idolaters". Note that there weren't any "pagans" left in that part of the world at this point in time. Not in Europe. Not in the Muslim world either. So who on earth could he be calling "idolaters"? Everyone knows who he is talking about. He is talking about non-Jews. The goyim. The worst case is the case of Maimonides, one of Judaism's greatest and most respected philosophers. He decrees that it is permissible to have s*xual intercourse with a 3-year-old girl. That is the age of "consent". Problematic, no? Secondly, and even more alarmingly, Maimonides decrees that if a Jew rapes a three-year-old non-Jewish girl, then the little girl must be executed. Yes, the gentile child must be executed for tempting the Jew to sin! The Jewish rapist himself is not executed. His life is spared. For some reason, you have to treat the 3-year-old gentile girl like an animal. She is guilty of putting obstacles in a Jew's spiritual path, and Maimonides quotes some verse or other about a bull... The Rabbis know that the parts of Judaism that are misanthropic--that are deeply discriminatory to non-Jews--pose a problem for them. Because if they try to implement these rules of religion, things could turn out rather badly for them. There could be extremely unpleasant consequences. If they tried to implement the rule that a 3-year-old gentile girl should be executed, for example, for tempting a Jew to commit rape, the result would be a pogrom. So to avoid that situation of a pogrom, the Talmud defines two different states of reality. There is one called "Darkei Shalom", meaning Peaceful Ways. In other words, the reasoning goes like this: "This is the actual religious law, this is how we are supposed to act. But we cannot act like this right now, because it would cause a huge mess and Jews would be killed. So we must behave discreetly and not take any punitive action." This is the meaning of "Darkei Shalom" or Peaceful Ways.
Now, for how long will this rule of discreet behavior--of "Peaceful Ways"--still apply? It applies only as long as Israel is relatively weak. As long as Israel has not acquired sufficient strength to do as it pleases. When Israel is independent, when Israel is mighty, the whole ball game changes. Israel can then afford to be merciless--to do exactly what it likes. Under those circumstances, it's all over. You can go back to enforcing the letter of the law according to the Talmud. No more "Peaceful Ways" then! No more need for peaceful ways! Nowadays, when religious Zionists look at the world around them, they say: "We've got a state. We've got weapons. We've got a Jewish army. This hasn't happened for 2000 years! In other words, religious Jews believe they are under obligation to bring about Armageddon and the Last Days as soon as possible: in short, to precipitate an apocalyptic war to end all wars. This is seen as God's will... There must be cleansings. Religious law prohibits contact with non-Jews. Of course, these Kosher laws prohibit you from even eating with the goyim. Other laws prohibit you from treating them fairly. You are forbidden to return a lost item to a non-Jew--except in order to "keep the peace." There is no prohibition from stealing from a non-Jew--except in order to "keep the peace." You are not supposed to say "hello" to them--unless there is no alternative. And so on and so forth. There are all kinds of prohibitions that are entirely psychotic. Rules and regulations based on a religion of vengeance. Religious Zionists have a serious problem with the mere existence of non-Jews. The Land of Israel is supposed to be only for Jews. Ironically, we Jews would manage to get along with Muslims if it weren't for the fact that white supremacists and black white supremacistm Judaism are in military conflict with them. Judaism gave to Islam the Torat Hamelech or King's Torah, which tells them that they are free to kill children if there is a reason to believe that one day these children could grow up to harm them. If you killed a Palestinian's entire family and left only him alive, he will indeed have good reason to cause you harm one day. If you stole his lands and turned him into a refugee, driving him into Jordan or Lebanon, don't you think he will have good reason to hate you and cause you harm? Many people have said that this book's arguments are not sound according to religious law, and so on and so forth. But no one has really tackled this problem head-on. It's no wonder the book has become a bestseller! In general, what religious Zionists want is for the Land in the State of Israel to be for Jews (Jew means one whose mother is a witch) only. There are hispanics with Jewish bood, blacks with Jewish blood, pale arabs with Jewish blood, and the list goes on and on.
In Jerusalem, Jewish religious students in the seminaries have a despicable habit: they urinate and defecate all over Christian churches. Go and talk to the church staff. You will hear it from every church, that this is going on. Spitting on clergymen in the street is something that happens every single day. If the priest has the courage to hit the Jewish troublemaker back, to slap him or something similar, he is deported. Quietly. They cancel his residence permit in the country. If you want to justify a pogrom, all you have to do is say the words "Missionary Threat". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXQ-K8dYyv... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXQ-K8dYyv... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61h_vuBujw... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmJ4mNr6FW... https://brandnewtube.com/watch/final-irref... https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance... https://www.corbettreport.com/mp3/solution... https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/ch... https://www.dailywire.com/news/u-s-governm... https://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2021/04...
The latest conspiracies from the many different race of Jews: Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) has introduced S.292 — Extreme Risk Protection Order and Violence Prevention Act of 2021, and he has garnered support from the gun-grabbing Democrats and Republicans alike. On Wednesday, this latest Red Flag gun confiscation bill, gets a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee, which includes notorious gun grabbers like Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and **** Durbin (D-IL). Unlike red flag legislation on which TFTP has reported in the past which involve state laws, S.292 will apply to all states and Indian Tribes. Under the guise of a “grant program” the bill will bribe states to enact the most comprehensive red flag law we’ve ever seen. The Assistant Attorney General shall make grants to an eligible State or Indian Tribe to assist the State or Indian Tribe in carrying out the provisions of a qualifying State or Tribal law. S.292 is described as a bill: To provide family members of an individual who they fear is a danger to himself, herself, or others, or law enforcement, with new tools to prevent gun violence. However, as the Free Thought Project has reported in the past, these “tools” have failed repeatedly and pave the way for rampant abuse. Naturally, the “fact checkers” have already taken to defending the bill, claiming that it doesn’t remove due process. However, citizens who are targeted by these laws will be deemed guilty first, and only after their guns are taken will they have a chance to defend themselves in court. This is de facto removal of due process. According to the legislation, “If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to himself or herself or others by having in his or her custody or control, or by purchasing, possessing, or receiving, a firearm or ammunition, the court shall issue an extreme risk protection order for a period the court determines is appropriate, which may not exceed 12 months.” This “clear and convincing evidence” can be presented over the telephone, according to the legislation. A court may conduct the hearing required under clause (i) by telephone, pursuant to local court rules. There is a reason murder trials are conducted on telephones. Under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, due process clauses are in place to act as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the government outside the sanction of law. It is a fact that a person can be denied life, liberty and property outside the sanction of the law under red flag legislation. Although it may be temporary, this is a difference only in degree — not in kind.
A recent fact check by Politifact claims red flag laws are not a removal of due process because the accused is guaranteed to have a hearing “not later than 14 days after the date of such order.” Despite citing the elements of Due Process, as laid out by MIT, which specifically states the defendant has the right to know the charges or all the major elements of the charges and in some cases the right to know the rules and policies that are relevant; in some cases the right to know who is the accuser and that they deserve the timeliness of the process and of each step of the process — Politifact claims, without reference, that the 14-day period after the person’s guns have been confiscated, is due process. According to Politifact, “the due process requirements in a given case can vary, though, based on the circumstances or type of proceeding.” They provide no source for such a claim or provide any detail on the alleged variances. By this logic, one could argue that George Floyd received due process and it just varied “based on the circumstances or type of proceeding.” The fact of the matter is that it is entirely possible for false accusations to be made and an innocent person suffer harm by being unable to defend themselves from accusations stemming from the secretive process of red flag laws. Whether or not it is one day or 100, the removal of someone’s right to face their accuser while punishing that person in the process, is wrong. On top of the unethical process of red flag laws, as TFTP has reported, they have proven to be ineffective. One such instance happened earlier this month. On April 15, 19-year-old Brandon Hole did the unthinkable when he stormed into an Indianapolis FedEx facility with a Ruger AR-556 semi-automatic rifle and killed eight people. As he was a resident of Indiana, he was subject to the state’s red flag laws. In March of 2020, he actually found himself on the receiving end of the state’s red flag law. “[Hole’s] mother told law enforcement in March 2020 that her son told her he would attempt ‘suicide by cop,’” CNN reported. “At the time, officials took a shotgun found at his home into custody, Marion County prosecutor Ryan Mears said Monday. And yet, later that year, Hole was able to legally purchase assault rifles.” Another example is the tragedy that unfolded in California in 2019, as a deranged gunman, Kevin Douglas Limbaugh, walked up on an innocent woman, officer Natalie Corona, pulled out his guns and began shooting her repeatedly until she died. Limbaugh then fired several more shots at others before turning the gun on himself and taking his own life. Had more people been nearby, Limbaugh would’ve likely carried out a mass shooting.
Limbaugh’s case is important to bring up due to the fact that, before he killed a cop, he, like Hole, was subject to California’s “red flag” laws in 2018. Limbaugh was given a high-risk assessment that ordered him to turn in his registered weapons to police, the only one being a Bushmaster AR-15. On November 9, Limbaugh turned in the weapon. Despite being banned from possessing and purchasing a weapon, he still obtained one illegally and used it to commit murder. Nikolas Cruz was a similar case as he had committed multiple felonies, was known to both the police and the FBI, and yet he still managed to obtain the weapon he used to carry out the Parkland massacre. In reality, the impetus behind the red flag gun laws seem to be more about political grandstanding and less about actual safety, especially considering their track record. Despite many states adopting red flag laws and thousands of guns being seized, there is still almost no evidence they reduce crime. “The evidence,” The New York Times reported in 2019, “for whether extreme risk protection orders work to prevent gun violence is inconclusive, according to a study by the RAND Corporation on the effectiveness of gun safety measures.” Plain and simple, government officials cannot be trusted unwittingly with the tyrannical power to arbitrarily remove the due process of individuals on a whim. If not stopped in its tracks, this red flag movement could be the fatal crack in the dam that is the only thing holding back the government from disarming entirely peaceful and non-threatening individuals with whom they disagree.