Dominion Deleted Incriminating Database and Log Files in Colorado

What Does “De-Hardening” Mean❓

The Library clarifies:

“…a ‘dehardening’ batch file that executes multiple commands on the machine to strip https://static0.makeuseofimages.com/wordpr... ALL encryption & security features on the SQL Server on ALL machines, & grants elevated user privileges.”

- Harold Wren🇺🇸
@The_Library_II

More 🔎🧵 Last CO Update https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/5226
—

Cyber Expert Josh Merritt Says His Team Can’t Prove Mike Lindell’s Claims That China Hacked Election — Colonel Waldron Says Only a Portion of the Data Has Been Examined

Why are Josh Merritt and J. Kirk Wiebe giving “exclusive” interviews to opposition media on Day 2 of the Symposium before they’ve seen all the data?

From the Washington Times:

Cyber expert Josh Merritt, who is on the team hired by Mr. Lindell to interrogate the data for the symposium, told The Washington Times that packet captures are unrecoverable in the data and that the data, as provided, cannot prove a cyber incursion by China.

Cybersecurity expert J. Kirk Wiebe, a former senior National Security Agency analyst and whistleblower, also said Mr. Lindell did not have the actual data sets.

Mr. Merritt and Mr. Wiebe said the missing packet captures could be a result of either the format the data was sent in or they were withheld by the source of the information, Dennis L. Montgomery.

Mr. Montgomery reportedly suffered a stroke on the eve of the symposium and has not been in contact with Mr. Lindell’s team or any cyber experts at the symposium.

Still, Mr. Merritt said, the data did contain important “forensic” evidence of manipulated voters.

Phil Waldron who is the leader of the red team, said only a small slice of the data was provided to the red team, just days before the symposium.

Mr. Waldron said the remaining data, not interrogated during the symposium, could contain the packet captures and other data needed to prove China hacked the election. He also said that ample evidence was contained in the data that points to other significant election anomalies, that were just as significant and worth unpacking during the symposium.

Kurt Olsen, a lawyer on Mr. Lindell’s team said there were multiple sources of the data that Mr. Lindell claims to have, and did not confirm that Mr. Mongtomery was the source of the data.

Source 👓🗞 Snake Media Washington Times https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/...

Eric Update

Yesterday, Eric Newhuis, part of the technical team examining the Cyber Symposium data explained:

“The pcap-like data is in a proprietary format that I am still trying to reverse engineer.

We were thrown a curveball with the new data that was announced this morning and it is going to take some time to get through it all… The scope of this whole thing has now expanded we’re in a whole new ballpark.”

- @SiuoxFallsQuestions

Summary

1) They haven’t been given clear pcap data yet

2) but they haven’t received all the data

3) and, the file format for the data is unusual - they are still deciphering it

4) They have provided other useful forensic data on Dominion’s log/ database deletions and security subversion tactics that will help our audits

5) Merritt and Wiebe should be careful about giving quotes to opposition media

More 🔎🧵 Sioux Falls Updates https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/5228
—