To Siebra and Gary Williams concerning Mohammed never existed!
I find the dialogue very interesting between Siebra and Gary. Therefore, I created this blog to respond.
Okay, let us use common sense as we think through the discrepancies between the two of you. Firstly, we must acknowledge that Prophet Mohammed was an Arab man and Moses was a Hebrew man. Consequentially, there is a racial divide between the two men, am I right. Likewise, the Bible is the viewpoint of the Hebrew people and the Quran is the viewpoint of the Arabian people. However, I am not saying that they had to separate gods. I am saying that although these two prophets are racially different the same One God raised them both up from among their own kinds.
I stress this point because here is where the irrational thinking comes into the dialogue on Siebra's part. Siebra quotes from the Quran that Prophet Mohammed was the seal of the prophets. Bear in mind Siebra's point of view is from an Arabian perspective that she thinks covers all races of people, which is absurd.
This is why Siebra's comprehension is a rational thinking. Siebra says that the Bible, Deuteronomy 18: 18-19 confirms that Prophet Mohammed is to steal of the prophets.
The verse in Deuteronomy says this, " "I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him."
It should be common sense to anyone that the reasons prophets are racially different is because God raised him up from among their own kinds. It should be equally logical to understand that a prophet is limited to his own race. God sent all prophets to their own race, only. Meaning that Prophet Mohammed cannot speak for Hebrew people and neither can Hebrew people speak for Arabian people. Consequentially, Prophet Mohammed cannot factually be the seal of the prophets for all races. Am I making any sense? Other people's religion comes into the hands of other people generally by force and not by their own prophet, am I right.
There is more I would like to say that I will say later because I fear loosing the point that Prophet Mohammed is not the seal of the prophets for all races. Prophet Mohammed could only be the seal of the prophets for his own Arabian people. Does that make sense?
Another point to be drawn from what I am saying is that if you are not the same race as a prophet you have embraced is clear that you are stupid. Morally, logically and rationally you should only embrace a prophet of the own race. Perhaps, this would explain why I say Black Americans of the most ignorant people in White America. A vast percentage of Black Americans embraces Jesus, a Jewish man not only as a prophet but as God because White America taught the dumb Negroes to believe that way. Another vast percentage of Black Americans embraces Prophet Mohammed, an Arabian man. Either case Black Americans shows extreme ignorance, am I right.
In addition, it is ignorant of any one to think that the Bible can confirm anything said in the Quran since the Bible was before the Quran. Negroes are not thinking people. Remember that and Negroes are descendents of slaves. Slaves are not rational thinkers, am I right.
I am Black America's first genuine prophet that would lead Black Americans into sovereignty on a portion of this continent that we could call our very own country with borders to worship God, pursue life, liberty, happiness and prosperity in our own way. A people could never learn about God except through the prophet God has anointed for them.
Moses taught the children of Israel about God. The Arabian people learned about God through Prophet Mohammed. Black Americans will learn about God through Prophet Harry. Am I making any sense?
Tell me what you think.
Harry, I am growing tired of you feeding us the same old grits...I'll find an IHOP (LOL)!