Trump puts NSC to personal political use

Brother and Sisters, if you like was you saw on this blog, click the like button before you go.

How come Rachel didn't have anything to say about Susan Rice last night?

This report is concerning around The National Security among other thing, they're caught in the middle of what appears to be politically shaped around the Russian attack on our elections lasts last year.

You said you wanted to talk about the latest developments and you directed me here Ron. Rachel had a segment last night where she talked for 4 1/2 minutes about the Lewinski scandal, then for 1 1/2 minutes about a supposed connection to the Rice scandal. Then she promised she'd talk next with Andrea Mitchell about her interview with Rice. That clip isn't available on MSNBC or anywhere else that I've been able to find. So on THIS latest development, WHAT IS RACHELL HIDING???

Hey Steven, the only reason why you can't find RACHELL'S report, is because you have not been looking for it Steven.

That report is right under your nose Scandalized Trump camp pushes distraction story, Obama blame http://blackinamerica.com/content/323020/s...

This report has been here so long, it has 185 hits.

What I said Ron is that her subsequent interview with Andrea Mitchell isn't available. Am I wrong?

What is Rachel hiding?

Did you click on the link?

I did Ron, because I missed Rachel last night. What is Rachel hiding? Will she keep hiding tonight???

I might even forego Tucker tonight just to see how bad she flubs it.

Did you not find what you was look for when you clicked on the link, that information you said that, you could not find?

I did not find what I was look for Ron. I saw some garbage about the Lewinski scandal "almost 20 years ago..."

Tonight's theme is "acrobatic rock and roll".

Not a chirp about Susan Rice. So much for "the latest developments." LOL.

Steven.... on the link I provided you, on the link. The only reason why you saw garbage, because you had your head in the wrong place.

You've provided no link on Rachel reporting on Rice. Why is that Ron?

"On the link I provided you, on the link..."

Hey Steven, the only reason why you can't find RACHELL'S report, is because you have not been looking for it Steven.

That report is right under your nose Scandalized Trump camp pushes distraction story, Obama blame http://blackinamerica.com/content/323020/s...

This report has been here so long, it has 185 hits.


Wednesday, April 5th 2017 at 2:18PM
Deacon Ron Gray

Did you click on that link?

Read my second comment on this blog and tell me how I would know that if I didn't click on the link.

Other official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenova’s description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/susan-ri...

Steven, you made no mentioned that you clinked on the link, well did you or not?

What's your game Ron? Let's talk about what Rachel did or did not say about Susan Rice.

Let's put it this way Ron. In the last three nights since this story broke, Rachel said the name Susan Rice just 4 times.

Rachel started off on her rant tonight, then she had to put on her big boy pants.

Steven, Rachel is not the issue here. The report that Trump accused Susan Rice of committing a crime without any proof. Oh! look over there!!!

Given Obama's desperate campaign in the last month of the campaign, I'm not surprised.