Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results
Share This Article
The American Civil Liberties Union said the newly disclosed violations are some of the most serious to ever be documented and strongly call into question the U.S. intelligence community’s ability to police itself and safeguard American’s privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure.
“I think what this emphasizes is the shocking lack of oversight of these programs,” said Neema Singh Guliani, the ACLU’s legislative counsel in Washington.
Did you see this report of Joe: You can start calling this a scandal Steven?
That's what I just showed you Ron, the real scandal.
The question is Did you see this report of Joe: You can start calling this a scandal Steven?
I had to watch two clips and I got just one thing out of it. Netanyahu: "Intelligence cooperation is terrific and it's never been better."
So, you just looked over The Washington Post report that the President asked intelligence chiefs to deny collusion, that Coats and Rogers did not agree to Trump requests. These are two of the nation’s top intelli officials who told Trump to NO and you just over looked that material.
Also in this very same report you looked over a report from The New York Times that Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts with Russian Intelligence and the cover-up, for this and I quote you: I got just one thing out of it. Netanyahu: "Intelligence cooperation is terrific and it's never been better."
Steven, that BULL BULL💩 that you quote was not a part of the report I asked you to review at all. I never asked you to view two clips at all because I knew you could not handle that much information coming to you all at once.
Now, go back and review the first clip.
It's the second clip that shows Joe saying what the TITLE of you blog says. Here's what you asked me had I seen:
The question is Did you see this report of Joe: You can start calling this a scandal Steven?
Thursday, May 25th 2017 at 7:17AM
Deacon Ron Gray
BTW Ron, I had to watch the first clip to get to the second one. I had to waste 10+ minutes to get to the one significant item, what Netanyahu said. You have a problem with following up on things like your prediction how pissed Israel would be that Trump shared terrorist information with Russia.
Stephen you know if that Trump is not under investigation for what Netanyahu said and you know that! In the first clip is where in a scandal is.
At the end the second clip is where the title of your blog occurs. Now the latest report is that U.S. citizens name's were unmasked in conversations between only Russians. Why the hell would their names be unmasked when they were only being talked about, when they were not involved in the conversation? These are the questions you never ask.
And the reason I give no credence at all to the Washington Post, the New York Times, or Joe Scarborough.
Steven, you know full well, that Trump is not under investigation for what Netanyahu said and you know that! In the first clip is where in a scandal is.
Who are you trying to fool with that LIE?
Look at the length stated in the body of your blog. It matches the second clip not the first. So both the title of your blog AND the time stated in the body of your blog told me it was the second clip not the first, that I should watch. At least take responsibilty for your goof up Ron.
P.S. I ALWAYS look at the "Duration" before watching the video. I figured 7:22 was tolerable but then I had to suffer through and additional 4 minutes or so.
An additional 3 minutes.
I am still waiting for why you give no credence at all to the Washington Post, the New York Times, or Joe Scarborough. What is the matter Steven, you lost your trend of thought?
Because they're an outlet for leaks, they're out for themselves and take no responsibilty for objective reporting, and because they cloak their traitorous sources in the intelligence community and are indifferent to democracy and national security.
I see you brought into that propaganda. What about the act itself. Mannaford and Flynn would still been in Trump administration if these reports, checks and balances hadn't been in place. Our founding fathers Knew and put into place these procedures we before Trump got here.
Now here you come, agreeing to subvert those procedures, all because of your love for TRUMP, WOW!!!
Manafort was replaced by Kellyanne Conway and that worked out great. Flynn and Sessions did nothing wrong talking to the Russian ambassador. As for my support of Trump, it's based on the man himself not ANY media analysis, even Fox News. I am grateful though to Joe and Mika for giving candidate Trump such GREAT exposure. Thanks Joe! Thanks Mika!
P.S. Did you hear the news they got engaged?
Niether MAnaford nor Flynn, rigid themselves as foreign agents, they both lied allegedly to the Trump administration and was fired by the same.
What do you mean engaged?
To be married.
I didn't say anything about Flynn registering as a foreign agent. I said he wasn't wrong to talk to the Russian ambassador.
Please log in to post comments.
Have you seen the news on the FISA court and Obama?