Home > Blogs > Post Content
 |
Nancy has been lying to us. She won't take a vote because SHE DOESN'T HAVE THE VOTES.
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 8:59AM
Steve Williams
|
 |
That is BULL💩 and you know it, Steve. Nancy, can stop a filibuster from coming to the floor By The Republicans with the votes she have. Open your 👏🏽👀’s Steve.
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 11:07AM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
Ron, Nancy doesn't have the votes to begin an impeachment inquiry. That's the outcome of her caucus meeting yesterday.
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 2:28PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Tell me something Steve, is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 6:12PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
It's in the Constitution Ron, "The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 9:08PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
I know that Steve. I asked you this: "is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 9:37PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
Nancy should have done just what was done every other time (all THREE times) the House began impeachment of a President. She should have called a full vote of the House. What she is doing right now is illegal.
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 10:03PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
BULL💩 Steve, Trump was having a melt down while The House of Representatives played him like a fiddle. Now you are learning who Trump is. Steve, this question is: ."Is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?"
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 10:32PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
I answered your question Ron. Don't worry, it will all backfire on you.
Wednesday, October 16th 2019 at 11:19PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
You did not answer this question Steve: "Is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?" If this is your so call answer: Nancy should have done just what was done every other time (all THREE times) the House began impeachment of a President. She should have called a full vote of the House. What she is doing right now is illegal. Point to the law that Speaker of The House of Representatives is in violation of Steve?
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 8:11AM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
When I point you to the law Ron it doesn't matter. Pelosi is continuing her charade and when she's done the American people will make their judgement.
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 10:05AM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Try me, point me to that LAW Steve? I hope that you are using The Constitution of the United States of America as a law reference.
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 6:30PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
"The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." Or does it say? "The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and the Speaker shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 7:19PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
impeach (v.) formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder, stop, impede; capture, trap, ensnare" (12c., Modern French empêcher), from Late Latin impedicare "to fetter, catch, entangle," from assimilated form of in- "into, in" (from PIE root *en "in") + Latin pedica "a shackle, fetter," from pes (genitive pedis) "foot" (from PIE root *ped- "foot").
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 7:25PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
This BULL💩 Steve, this is not from The Constitution of the United States of America and you to that to be a FACT. This was a FOOL MOVE to try and prove a LIE. Steve, you got this definition right out of the book of etymonline, a online dictionary. Steve, I know you can do better this? Ha,Ha, AH!!! LOL Steve, once again, you have come to the strongest people, with the weakest of BULL💩. Now quote from The Constitution of the United States of America as your law reference point, to find that that LAW that you are talking about, can you do that Steve?
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 8:58PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
Ron, Nancy Pelosi has usurped the power of the House and taken it upon herself to impeach the President. That's a violation of her Oath of Office.
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 9:54PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Just what I thought and I could have perdidted this out come or I should say this BULL💩 of yours Steve becasue it was plain as day. (LOL) So, you can't use The Constitution of the United States of America to prove your case, now can you? "Is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?" Steve, so this is a LIE to, this is not from The Constitution of the United States of America as your law reference point, to find that that LAW that you are talking about, I am correct? impeach (v.) formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder, stop, impede; capture, trap, ensnare" (12c., Modern French empêcher), from Late Latin impedicare "to fetter, catch, entangle," from assimilated form of in- "into, in" (from PIE root *en "in") + Latin pedica "a shackle, fetter," from pes (genitive pedis) "foot" (from PIE root *ped- "foot"). Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 7:25PM Steve Williams | delete | block member
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 10:42PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
Ron, do you understand that the Democrat's are all on their own impeaching the President?
Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 11:00PM
Steve Williams
|
Blogs Home
|
|
|