Home > Blogs > Post Content
 |
Witnesses at this week’s public Donald Trump impeachment inquiry hearings sounded the alarm about the threat of Russian interference in the 2020 election. New data from the Foreign Policy Research Institute shows that Russia has already chosen its favorite and least favorite candidates. MSNBC analyst Clint Watts joins Joy Reid to discuss.
Saturday, November 23rd 2019 at 8:52PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
 |
Hillary’s white pantsuit says ‘empowerment’ but Tulsi’s says ‘fringe cult leader’: NYT pilloried for two-faced style commentary
The New York Times has been accused of peddling ridiculous and shamelessly biased punditry, after the Gray Lady took aim at presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard’s white pantsuit but ended up red-faced.
Style writer Vanessa Friedman argued that the Hawaii congresswoman’s wardrobe made her look like a “cult leader” full of “combative righteousness.” The terrifying white fabric has “connotations of the fringe, rather than the center” and even undermines “community building,” the Times’ writer expertly deduced.
Unfortunately, her completely reasonable fashion analysis came under fire from fringe-loving social media users, who rudely pointed out that Friedman had drooled over Hillary Clinton’s white pantsuit back in 2016.
https://www.rt.com/usa/474067-gabbard-whit...
Sunday, November 24th 2019 at 2:12PM
Steve Williams
|
 |
Russia media mentions of Democratic candidates favor Gabbard
SUBJECT.....
...Again a deacon of WHAT; Russian or trump$ette HIGHLITE blag……WHY?
******************************************************************************
In my lean and clean days
... MY 3 Piece white Custom Made...Cashmere Suit, Peach shirt and albino Gators:....said WON.
AND yes...Senators Kamala Harris, Cory Booker; Mayor Julian Castro, and lean and clean....
Governor Duval Patrick.....Tulsi Gabbard...nativeAmerican are GREAT Presidential material
Sunday, November 24th 2019 at 2:28PM
robert powell
|
|
|
The Russian Government goal is to weaken our country, to diminish Americans global role and to neutralize and to perceived a U.S. threat to Russian interest.
Right now Russia's security service and their proxies have geared up to repeat their interference in the 2020 election.
WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF TIME TO STOP THEM.
I would ask that you please not promote politically driven falsehoods that so clearly advance Russian interests.
Dr. Hill also said: " I refuse to be part of an effort to legitimize an alternate narrative that the Ukrainian government is a U.S. adversary, and that Ukraine—not Russia—attacked us in 2016."
That take's integrity, honor, nobility, a sense of moral courage to say to The President of The United States of America, his actions is WRONG and I will NOT be apart of THAT.
WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF TIME TO STOP THEM
Sunday, November 24th 2019 at 8:54PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
Fiona Hill lied Ron. That shows a definite lack of integrity. Not one of the Republicans ever said "Ukraine—not Russia—attacked us in 2016."
Sunday, November 24th 2019 at 9:01PM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
You said: Not one of the Republicans ever said "Ukraine—not Russia—attacked us in 2016."
Check out this bit of information for a moment Steve. Trump repeats debunked Ukraine claim a day after Hill's tough testimony https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/tr...
It is our very own president who is saying "Ukraine—not Russia—attacked us in 2016." Why do you think he is repeating that debunked BULL💩?
Sunday, November 24th 2019 at 10:54PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
Ron, where's the server? Why didn't the FBI examine the server?
Monday, November 25th 2019 at 12:34AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
Steve, did you see my reply on what Republicans, ever said "Ukraine—not Russia—attacked us in 2016?"
Did you click on the link to read the evidence of Trump repeating that PUTIN LIE?
Can you believe that It is our very own president who is saying "Ukraine—not Russia—attacked us in 2016." Why do you think he is repeating that debunked BULL💩?
Monday, November 25th 2019 at 8:16AM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
I clicked your link Ron. I didn't see the "not Russia" part.
Monday, November 25th 2019 at 10:30AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
Just copy and paste this in your browsers search engine: Trump repeats debunked Ukraine claim a day after Hill's tough testimony
Once there, you will find More proof that Trump repeated Those Russian talking points.
Monday, November 25th 2019 at 2:01PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
Ron, I'll never find any evidence that any Republican ever said Ukraine "not" Russia meddled in our election.
Monday, November 25th 2019 at 11:39PM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
April 18, 2019 – The Mueller investigation fails to provide evidence that the DNC was actually hacked
Unchallenged allegations of a computer “hack” permeated nearly all mainstream-media coverage of the investigation and were sprinkled throughout much of the final report from special counsel Robert Mueller. The indictment of 12 Russians by Mueller asserts that the emails were obtained through a remote network breach. The indictment drones on and on about a Russian military unit dubbed “Unit 26165” and “X-Agent malware” that supposedly allowed the DNC emails to be compromised.
But analysis of the files themselves (analysis that team Mueller either never conducted or never discussed) shows otherwise.
It’s not inconsequential that the DNC refused to let anyone examine the server. The FBI just accepted the hack narrative based on the word of CrowdStrike, a firm hired by the DNC—a firm whose analyst that supposedly examined the DNC server just happened to have previously worked for none other than … Robert Mueller.
The Mueller report repeatedly uses the words “hack” and “hacking,” yet fails to offer a shred of evidence that a hack actually took place. The public is just supposed to accept on good faith a claim made by a former FBI director (under his own cloud of suspicion), who’s investigating the current president in a case initiated by biased FBI officials whose investigation is based on opposition research provided by the Russians and paid for by the president’s political opposition, the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC.
Analysis of the stolen emails not only eviscerates the legitimacy of at least 12 of Mueller’s indictments—the ones against Russians he accused of conducting a hack that never actually occurred—it further calls into question the motives for the origin of the Mueller probe.
Specifically, the report states, “Taken together, these disparate data points combine to paint a picture that exonerates alleged Russian hackers and implicates persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community taking part in a campaign of misinformation, deceit and incompetence. It is not a pretty picture.”
After an investigation that had 19 lawyers, 2,800 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 500 witnesses interviewed, and more than 230 orders for communication records, not only was there no finding of collusion, conspiracy, or obstruction, we are also still left with a question about how this whole thing started.
Who actually stole the DNC emails? (Read more: The Epoch Times, 7/09/2019)
https://clintonfoundationtimeline.com/apri...
Tuesday, November 26th 2019 at 7:47PM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
WOW!!!! Steve, All I ask you, was Trump a republican? Now you want to run to a publication like The Epoch Times. Do you know what The Epoch Times is?
Steve, The Epoch Times is not a credible source of factual information, nor are any of its associated media outlets. They promote pseudoscience and conspiracy theories. Nothing they report can be trusted or taken at face value. The Epoch Times first published in New York in April 2000 (in Chinese only) and the online edition in August 2000.
Once again you have come to the strongest people with the weakest of BULL💩.
I don't believe you. Now you have the nerve to quote a publication out of China, who is not a credible source of factual information, how low will you go to protect that LIE of Putin's?
I see that you are not using creditable sources of information to back up your weak claims.
Steve, you can't prove a LIE and all you is living that LIE as you support the dismantling democracy in this country. WOW!!!
Now answer my question. "Steve, Trump is a Republican, right? "
Trump said -- ""They gave the server to CrowdStrike or whatever it's called, which is a company owned by a very wealthy Ukrainian. Steve, THIS IS A LIE THAT TRUMP TOLD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WHY?
Steve can't you see that CrowdStrike is a U.S. company that was hired to investigate the hack of Democratic servers. The comments reflect Trump's insistence on clinging to a conspiracy theory that Putin gave him, that some of his top advisers have called baseless and that has helped land him in an impeachment inquiry.
Tuesday, November 26th 2019 at 9:33PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
Now you want to talk about credible news media Ron? What makes the NYT or the WAPO credible? You gullible oaf!
Tuesday, November 26th 2019 at 9:34PM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
WHY THE DNC WAS NOT HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS
The FBI, CIA and NSA claim that the DNC emails published by WIKILEAKS on July 26, 2016 were obtained via a Russian hack, but more than three years after the alleged “hack” no forensic evidence has been produced to support that claim. In fact, the available forensic evidence contradicts the official account that blames the leak of the DNC emails on a Russian internet “intrusion”. The existing evidence supports an alternative explanation–the files taken from the DNC on between 23 and 25 May 2016 and were copied onto a file storage device, such as a thumb drive.
If the Russians actually had conducted an internet based hack of the DNC computer network then the evidence of such an attack would have been collected and stored by the National Security Agency. The technical systems to accomplish this task have been in place since 2002. The NSA had an opportunity to make it clear that there was irrefutable proof of Russian meddling, particularly with regard to the DNC hack, when it signed on to the January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment,” regarding Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/02/e...
Tuesday, November 26th 2019 at 9:38PM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks
By Ellen Nakashima and Shane Harris
On a late July day in 2016, Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president, stood at a lectern in Florida, next to an American flag, and urged a U.S. adversary to become involved in the election campaign and find tens of thousands of emails wiped from the server of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.
“Russia, if you’re listening,” he said at a news conference at one of his resorts, “I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.”
That same day, July 27, several Russian government hackers launched an attack against the email accounts of staffers in Clinton’s personal office, according to a sweeping indictment Friday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. At or around the same time, the hackers also targeted 76 email addresses used by the Clinton campaign, investigators said.
READ MORE: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/natio...
Guccifer 2.0, the “lone hacker” who took credit for providing WikiLeaks with stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee, was in fact an officer of Russia’s military intelligence directorate (GRU), The Daily Beast has learned. It’s an attribution that resulted from a fleeting but critical slip-up in GRU tradecraft...Guccifer 2.0 sprang into existence on June 15, 2016, hours after a report by a computer security firm forensically tied Russia to an intrusion at the Democratic National Committee. In a series of blog posts and tweets over the following seven months—conspicuously ending right as Trump took office and not resuming—the Guccifer persona published a smattering of the DNC documents while gamely projecting an image as an independent Romanian hacktivist who’d breached the DNC on a lark....Guccifer famously pretended to be a “lone hacker” who perpetrated the digital DNC break-in. From the outset, few believed it. Motherboard conducted a devastating interview with Guccifer that exploded the account’s claims of being a native Romanian speaker. Based on forensic clues in some of Guccifer’s leaks, and other evidence, a consensus quickly formed among security experts that Guccifer was completely notional.
READ MORE: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/20...
Wednesday, November 27th 2019 at 8:02AM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
Ukrainian who meddled against Trump in 2016 is now under Russia-corruption cloud
What happens when the face of a country’s anti-corruption movement suddenly is investigated for the sort of bribery he once condemned?
Ukraine, a U.S. ally and neighboring foe of Russia, is soon to find out. And it’s a case with implications in the United States, where the fallout from the unproven Trump-Russia collusion scandal has engulfed several Ukrainians.
The country’s chief corruption prosecutor on Thursday opened an investigation into “suspicions” that Serhiy Leshchenko, a crusading anti-corruption member of Ukraine’s parliament and former investigative journalist, accepted bribes in 2016 from a Russian source that enabled him to buy a luxury condo far above his means.
Leshchenko previously has denied any wrongdoing. The 2016 purchase of his condo was investigated once before and he was cleared of criminality. Now, however, the allegation of foreign bribe money adds an element.
On Thursday, Leshchenko responded to the new investigation on Twitter, suggesting it was evidence that his anti-corruption crusade was “hurting” prosecutors, who he said were trying to keep their jobs as a new Ukrainian president takes office. “It won't work, you coward,” he added.
A Ukrainian court last December ruled that Leshchenko and the head of the country’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) — an investigative agency modeled on America’s FBI — both illegally meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election by leaking financial documents that smeared then-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort.
The documents, known as “the black ledger,” identified payments Manafort secretly received from a Russian-backed political party in Ukraine years earlier and led to Manafort’s abrupt resignation from the Trump campaign. He eventually pleaded guilty to lobbying and tax violations and is in prison.
The court ruling against Leshchenko was an extraordinary admission of foreign government influence on America’s last presidential election. But it wasn’t Leshchenko’s only intrusion into American politics, apparently.
Sworn testimony released a few weeks ago by Congress revealed Leshchenko also was “a source” of Russian dirt on Trump that was fed to Hillary Clinton’s opposition research firm, Fusion GPS, the firm that created the so-called Steele dossier that led to a two-year Russia probe that recently cleared Donald Trump of colluding with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
So, a Ukrainian parliamentarian fed dirt to Clinton’s team and leaked to the media information that harmed the Republican candidate’s campaign? That seems like more collusion than was uncovered by special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.
But the most tantalizing information about Leshchenko surfaced in my interview Thursday with Ukraine’s chief anti-corruption prosecutor, Nazar Kholodnytskyy, who revealed that the alleged bribes to the parliamentarian and the condo purchase occurred around the time that Manafort stepped down under pressure based on Leshchenko’s leak.
“Absolutely that is one of the things they are going to be investigating,” Kholodnytskyy told me when asked whether any of the Russian money could have been paid as an inducement or a reward for Leshchenko’s meddling in the U.S. election.
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/44...
Wednesday, November 27th 2019 at 8:52AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
Leshchenko was paid off by The Russian's and his motivation was to live high above his means and a apartment that he could not afford.
“Absolutely that is one of the things they are going to be investigating,” Kholodnytskyy told me when asked whether any of the Russian money could have been paid as an inducement or a reward for Leshchenko’s meddling in the U.S. election.
Wednesday, November 27th 2019 at 9:50AM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
Russia media mentions of Democratic candidates favor Gabbard
SUBJECT.....
...Again a deacon of WHAT; Russian or trump$ette HIGHLITE blag……WHY?
***************************************************************************
The Language of Ukraine is Russian
The History, Scholarship and Science of Ukrainians for 500 years has been Russian.....
…..anyone separating the two, I believe is a russianBOT
Wednesday, November 27th 2019 at 12:01PM
robert powell
|
|
|
The People of Ukraine determined that move and that is how Ukraine became a U.S. Ally, do you understand that robert powell?
Really do you think The Ukrainians give a damn what you think?
Wednesday, November 27th 2019 at 12:47PM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
The governments of the United States and Europe have been meddling in Russia/Ukraine relations.
Thursday, November 28th 2019 at 8:50AM
Steve Williams
|
|
|
The governments of the United States and Europe have been meddling in Russia/Ukraine relations.
Thursday, November 28th 2019 at 8:50AM
Steve Williams | delete | block member
So, now you are a Russian apologist, Moscow Steve?
Thursday, November 28th 2019 at 9:54AM
Dea. Ron Gray Sr.
|
|
|
You turned me a while ago Ron.
Thursday, November 28th 2019 at 12:45PM
Steve Williams
|
Blogs Home
|
|
|
