Libyan rebel leader storms off debate show
Its interesting how the swill that we are fed in this country that is passed off as "news" is exposed as nothing but a bunch of fairy tales when you apply critical thinking or consume foreign news sources. If you want anything remotely resembling truth, you have to go outside the media apparatus in this country, which has devolved to nothing more than a propaganda operation.
When they tell you the invasion was launched to stop Qaddafi from "killing his own people," they don't tell you that those "people" had taken up arms against the government. You'll hear the brother in this video at the 2:31 mark explain it all and reference but one of the clues that give this entire thing away. The uS, UK and France paid and supported these "rebels" from the start; many of its leaders aren't even Libyan citizens. Its a psy ops lie that 10,000 people were slaughtered by government forces, and this fool of a fake Libyan leader doesn't have the intellectual chops to carry it off. I guess he won't be getting his check this time.
There are many other clues, even in our own media reports as well, but this information is not front and center. You have to pay attention; you have to THINK.
There never were mass attacks against civilians in Libya, just the Libyan government responding to a US, France and UK led attempt to overthrow Qaddafi for their own ends. Unlike in Egypt, this protest started out violent, and the government responded.
They learned their lesson from Iraq and realized that as brazen as Bush was, it fooled no one. So now they create this "democratic uprising" and start a "humanitarian mission" to "save lives" and use that to start yet another war to throw out yet another dictator they're tired of. (I wonder what Qaddafi did to make them mad...must have threatened to do something to the oil.) Why do you think they're saying Obama will be seen to have failed if the rebels fail to overthrow Qaddafi? And if this is about saving innocent civilians from slaughter as Obama shamefully lied in his speech the other night, then where is the help for the civilians in Darfur or Ivory Coast, who truly are being slaughtered? Why no mention of them? Oh that's right; they're black and have no oil. Silly me...
Bottom line is, the US is a warmongering nation. War is our best export; its what we're known for. Obama came in and talked up ending the Iraq war and ramping up Afghanistan to finish it off and be out by this past summer. Yet here we are, three wars going (no, it ain't over in Iraq), Guantanamo still up. We can find 100s of billions of dollars for blowing stuff up and killing people, but we can't find 4 billion to save Head Start.
Is this "hope and change?"
When they tell you the invasion was launched to stop Qaddafi from "killing his own people," they don't tell you that those "people" had taken up arms against the government. You'll hear the brother in this video at the 2:31 mark explain it all and reference but one of the clues that give this entire thing away. The uS, UK and France paid and supported these "rebels" from the start; many of its leaders aren't even Libyan citizens. Its a psy ops lie that 10,000 people were slaughtered by government forces, and this fool of a fake Libyan leader doesn't have the intellectual chops to carry it off. I guess he won't be getting his check this time.
There are many other clues, even in our own media reports as well, but this information is not front and center. You have to pay attention; you have to THINK.
There never were mass attacks against civilians in Libya, just the Libyan government responding to a US, France and UK led attempt to overthrow Qaddafi for their own ends. Unlike in Egypt, this protest started out violent, and the government responded.
They learned their lesson from Iraq and realized that as brazen as Bush was, it fooled no one. So now they create this "democratic uprising" and start a "humanitarian mission" to "save lives" and use that to start yet another war to throw out yet another dictator they're tired of. (I wonder what Qaddafi did to make them mad...must have threatened to do something to the oil.) Why do you think they're saying Obama will be seen to have failed if the rebels fail to overthrow Qaddafi? And if this is about saving innocent civilians from slaughter as Obama shamefully lied in his speech the other night, then where is the help for the civilians in Darfur or Ivory Coast, who truly are being slaughtered? Why no mention of them? Oh that's right; they're black and have no oil. Silly me...
Bottom line is, the US is a warmongering nation. War is our best export; its what we're known for. Obama came in and talked up ending the Iraq war and ramping up Afghanistan to finish it off and be out by this past summer. Yet here we are, three wars going (no, it ain't over in Iraq), Guantanamo still up. We can find 100s of billions of dollars for blowing stuff up and killing people, but we can't find 4 billion to save Head Start.
Is this "hope and change?"
Hello to all,
I think the take away from this blog is that White America has a state of art Homeland security system since no other country can do the same thing to White America that White America does to them. In other words, no other country can come within the borders of White America and pay some citizens to start an uprising against the American government that another country (if there was stronger than White America stronger) could use the humanitarian excuse to take military actions against the United States. White Americans are the state of the art people. So, again the take away is that White America has the state of the art Homeland security system that no other country can rival, am I right.
In this modern world, White America's brains are what counts. Those who do not have a brain are left behind. Take for instance, Mr. Clark and I had a dialogue some time ago concerning whether White Americans own the real estate of this continent of the United States of America. He, Mr. Clark thought that since he has a written deed registered in the County Clerk's office then White Americans did not own this country since Mr. Clark and White America can not own the same possible of land. But, no matter how many different ways I tried to explain to him that his ownership of his property is superficial and just a way of keeping things organized between citizens, county and state. A civilize country is a record keeping country. White America is a civilize country and a record keeping country. Am I right or am I wrong?
I explain to Mr. Clark that the Declaration of Independence is a document to the world and all sovereign countries that the real estate of White America was on by White Americans and not England and King George III. Mr. Clark's brain could not process what I was saying because of his did to his property in Chicago.
I bring this up only to show you all that brains means everything and if you don't have no brain you will never have anything. Is that a true statement?
To this day Mr. Clark is unable to connect the dots that White America owns the real estate of this country and the Declaration of Independence and the Treaty of Paris substantiates what I say. So, let us not worry so much about Libya and be more concerned about our condition and our worthless critical thinking abilities. Let us try to improve ourselves especially since we have our own genuine prophet to lead us.
Tell me what you think.