Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results

More Evidence of “BLACKS IN THE HOLY BIBLE!!!” PART TWO Continues…

More Evidence of “BLACKS IN THE HOLY BIBLE!!!” PART TWO Continues…

Dea. Ron Gray Sr. · Wednesday, March 23rd 2016 at 12:34AM · 1964 views
More Evidence of “BLACKS IN THE HOLY BIBLE!!!” PART TWO Continues…

The stories of the Bible took place in and around what we now call the Middle East, and people moved on and off its stage based on their relationship with the nations of ancient Israel and Judah. Consequently, the vast majority of the world’s ethnic and racial groups are not specifically identified. But some of those who are identified were black.

There is a strong tradition that some of the descendants of Noah through his son Ham were black. Ham had a son named Cush, which means "black" in Hebrew. Cush is the most common term designating color in reference to persons, people or lands used in the Bible. It’s used 58 times in the King James Version. The Greek and Latin word is Ethiopia. In classical literature, Greek and Roman authors describe Ethiopians as black. Archaeology has found these people to be black. In the book of Jeremiah, the question is asked, "Can the Ethiopian change his skin?"

Genesis 10:6-20 describes the descendants of Ham as being located in North Africa, Central Africa and in parts of southern Asia. Psalm 105:23 mentions the "land of Ham" in Egypt, and Psalm 78:51 connects the "tents of Ham" with Egypt.

Other Old Testament evidence

In Genesis 10, Nimrod, son of Cush (whose name means "black"), founded a civilization in Mesopotamia. In Genesis 11, Abraham was from Ur of the Chaldees, a land whose earliest inhabitants included blacks. The people of the region where Abraham came from can be proven historically and archaeologically to have been intermixed racially. So it is possible that Abraham and those who traveled with him could have been racially mixed.

Genesis 14 tells how Abraham’s experiences in Canaan and Egypt brought him and his family into areas inhabited by peoples who were very likely black. Both archaeological evidence and the account in 1 Chronicles 4 tell us that the land of Canaan was inhabited by the descendants of Ham.

Further black presence can be found in the accounts of Hagar the Egyptian, Ishmael and his Egyptian wife, and Ishmael’s sons, especially Kedar. The Kedarites are mentioned many times in Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Nehemiah, and the word kedar means "blackness."

Still further evidence of black presence in the patriarchal period appears with Joseph’s experiences in Egypt. Joseph married an Egyptian woman, Asenath, who was descended from Mizraim, which made her Hamitic. Thus there is a strong possibility that Asenath was black. She was the mother of Ephraim and Manasseh.

The New Testament

The New Testament also contains ample evidence of a black presence. Acts 8 tells the story of the Ethiopian eunuch, one of the first Gentiles to be baptized. He came from a black region, so he may have been black. In Acts 13 we read of Simeon, called Niger, the Latin term for black. There is also Lucias from Cyrene, a geographical location of black people.

Do these references give us absolute proof? No. But the weight of evidence indicates that blacks were not excluded from "Bible action." Modern scholarly opinion refutes the theologians who argued against a black presence in the Bible. But sadly, the past Euro-centrist interpretation of the Bible, which did recognize a black presence in the Bible, was deliberately used by some in the past to justify the subjugation and enslavement of peoples of color.

I believe it can be argued that there is a black presence in the Old and New Testaments. But either way, what is certain is that the Bible teaches that God has made all people of one ancestry. All humans — male, female, black, white, red, yellow and brown, are God’s children. They are all made in the image of God for salvation through Jesus Christ.

READ MORE: https://www.gci.org/bible/africans


Share This Article

Comments (8)

Dea. Ron Gray Sr. Wednesday, March 23rd 2016 at 12:35AM

Genesis 14 tells how Abraham’s experiences in Canaan and Egypt brought him and his family into areas inhabited by peoples who were very likely black. Both archaeological evidence and the account in 1 Chronicles 4 tell us that the land of Canaan was inhabited by the descendants of Ham.

Harry Watley Wednesday, March 23rd 2016 at 6:38AM

Mr. Ron,

The Blacks that you claim in the Bible is impossible to be Black Americans descendants of plantation slaves. The Black Ethiopian mentioned in the Bible is racially different from a Black American descendants of plantation slaves.

It is annoying and mentally frustrated when I have to tell a grown man who thinks he is intelligent the same thing over and over again.
I've told you that not all Blacks are the same Blacks. We know that not all black birds are the same birds. We can see that a Black American man is racially different from a Black Ethiopian man. We can see just as well that a Raven is racially different from a Crow.

Do you think the truth will ever go away? To publish anything out of the White man's Holy Christian Bible and inserting yourself and my Black American people is divinely wrong and a serious sin to believe since we are not the same people as the people of the Bible!

Dea. Ron Gray Sr. Wednesday, March 23rd 2016 at 12:06PM

HARRY,

In the first paragraph this article establishes where the stories of The Holy Bible took place. At that time that the first five books of the Holy Bible through to all 66 books, the now called Middle East was never mentioned not once but through research and some Sunday school classes, we discover that all of these stories of The Holy Bible took place in the now called Middle East. The Middle East is never mentioned in The Holy Bible (KJV) neither but judging by your logic, since the Middle East was never mentioned, means that the stories of The Holy Bible was not talking about The people or the seed, the children, the off-spring, the blood-line, the future of the people of that region?

HARRY, I whole-heartily agree with you that all Black people are not the same. I have told you on several occasions that all Black people from the same family, are not the same. HARRY, if you are looking for same like people, you would have to look at STAR WARS and find CLONE technology for your logic to be practicable. Once again HARRY, every man, woman and child have been given Gifts and talents from YAH THE MOST HIGT, his will, will to be carried out and you can not do a thing about that. You will never find all of the same Black people, no matter where you look.

Now all Black people are from the same race of people but from different cultures throughout the world

Harry, if you looked highest of places, you will not find all Black people the same. If you look in the lowest of places, you will not find all Black people, the same. You my friend, will be continuously in flux with frustration if that is what you are looking for, you will never find it and that is a FACT.

The only thing that may differ The Black American from other black people in the world is not the race but cultural, national, traditional, tribal customs and our indigenousness to the land, that is the only things and that too is FACT, HARRY..



Now on to the truth. The truth will never stay hidden from us, because we are the people of YAH’S. Throughout all your LIES HARRY, The GOD OF THE HIGHEST truth is being revealed unto his people, The Black American to who they are and who’s they are and more FACTS are being communicated to one another, every day and that is a movement you cant stop neither.

Harry Watley Wednesday, March 23rd 2016 at 2:03PM

Mr. Ron,

You said that you wholeheartedly agree with me that all Black people are not the same people! Then you go on to say what makes us different is our culture and nationality, but that is not true since you have to first be part of a race before you develop a culture and have a nationality. Culture and nationality comes second to what ever your race is.
You are putting culture and nationality before your race and culture and nationality does not does not develop your race. Your race is something you are born with that God has made it that way for all the different races of people in this world.

If you were right that we are different because of culture and nationality then we would all be the same race and we are not. We are first racially different and then we are culturally different and nationality different.

Way I will fine all Black Americans the same is in this country of White America where we are descendants of plantation slaves. Nowhere else I look in this world will life fine a race of people like Black Americans descendants of plantation slaves. No place else in the world did we Black Americans pick cotton, hung from trees and terrorize by the Ku Klux Klan!

Dea. Ron Gray Sr. Wednesday, March 23rd 2016 at 2:44PM

HARRY,

WOW!!!

I see that a lot of my reply to you just went right over your head HARRY. In the first paragraph contains the only direct question to you which you failed to answer, why is this? Did you see where I said that "I have told you on several occasions that all Black people from the same family, are not the same. HARRY, if you are looking for same like people, you would have to look at STAR WARS and find CLONE technology for your logic to be practicable."

I will not argue or debate with you anything that comes from your delusional thoughts.

Do you hear what you are saying?: "You said that you wholeheartedly agree with me that all Black people are not the same people! Then you go on to say what makes us different is our culture and nationality, but that is not true since you have to first be part of a race before you develop a culture and have a nationality. Culture and nationality comes second to what ever your race is.

I like to high light this part of what you said: "but that is not true since you have to first be part of a race." HARRY, can you show the readership of Black In America any live or dead human, that is not apart of a race of people?

Now I know this question won't get no attention and will not be addressed.


Harry Watley Wednesday, March 23rd 2016 at 2:53PM

Mr. Ron,

It doesn't make sense for me to comment on your blogs because when I scientifically and forensically debunk the things you say you immediately delete my comment!

Therefore, I will reframe from commenting on your blogs.

Dea. Ron Gray Sr. Wednesday, March 23rd 2016 at 7:16PM

HARRY,

I predicted that you would not answer this question contained in this very short paragraph:

"I like to high light this part of what you said: "but that is not true since you have to first be part of a race." HARRY, can you show the readership of Black In America any live or dead human, that is not apart of a race of people?"

Once again your behind is against the wall with this foolish thinking of yours and you have been shown how delusional your thinking is, now you want to get in the wind and run from your own words, how interesting.



If you call this YOUR WORDS: "but that is not true since you have to first be part of a race." debunking anything what I have said scientifically or forensically then I welcome you not to make any comments on any thing that I post here on Black In America in the future, DO YOU HEAR ME???

Dea. Ron Gray Sr. Saturday, April 9th 2016 at 9:21PM

Still further evidence of black presence in the patriarchal period appears with Joseph’s experiences in Egypt. Joseph married an Egyptian woman, Asenath, who was descended from Mizraim, which made her Hamitic. Thus there is a strong possibility that Asenath was black. She was the mother of Ephraim and Manasseh.

Post a Comment

Please log in to post comments.