Obama administration is close to announcing measures to punish Russia for election interference

What a load of malarky.

Are you talking about Obama administration is close to announcing measures to punish Russia for election interference?

That's exactly what I'm talking about. LET'S SEE THE PROOF!!!

Please hurry up and leave Mr. Obama.

STEVEN!!! Are you PRO RUSSIA?

How would I know, when we have seen no proof, only leaks to the lugenpress from anonymous sources?

I asked you a question Steven. Are you PRO RUSSIA?

You ran like hell with the LIE - tweets from trump talking about Millions of illegal voters, didn't you?

After Obama's actions today Ron, I'm absolutely PRO RUSSIA!

What did Obama do that makes you want to support Putin's RUSSIA?

He's trying to make Putin a scapegoat. I don't buy it.

What is it, you don't believe 17 U.S. Government Investigation agencies, over the words of the X head of Russia's KBG Putin?

What is it that you are not buying?

I haven't heard doodoo from 17 agencies and neither have you Ron.

The question was: "What is it, you don't believe 17 U.S. Government Investigation agencies, over the words of the X head of Russia's KBG Putin?"

U.S. government officially accuses Russia of hacking campaign to interfere with elections: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/natio...

U.S. Intel Agencies Preparing Dossier to Prove Russian Hacks: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s-in...

FBI analysis fingers Russian spy agencies for U.S. election hacks: https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-analysis-fi...

I can go on and on but I will stop here.

Now What is it that you are not buying?

I see a statement from 2 agencies Ron. Didn't they teach you that 2 is not equal to 17?

“The U.S. Intelligence Community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations,” said a joint statement from the two agencies.

White House counterterrorism advisor Lisa Monaco told reporters that the results of the report would be shared with lawmakers and others.

Have you seen any "results of the report" yet Ron?

The report largely corroborates earlier findings from private cyber firms, such as CrowdStrike, which probed the hacks at the DNC and elsewhere, and is a preview of a more detailed assessment from the U.S. intelligence community that President Barack Obama ordered completed before he leaves office next month, a source familiar with the matter said.
Much of the information provided in the report is not new, the source said, reflecting the difficulty of publicly attributing cyber attacks without revealing classified sources and methods used by the government.

Let me repeat Ron, I have not seen doodoo from 17 agencies, and neither have you.

The U.S. Intelligence Community is made up of 17 agencies, forming the basis of Clinton’s claim.

The 17 agencies are: Air Force Intelligence, Army Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, Coast Guard Intelligence, Defense Intelligence Agency, Energy Department, Homeland Security Department, State Department, Treasury Department, Drug Enforcement Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Marine Corps Intelligence, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, National Security Agency, Navy Intelligence and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The 17 separate agencies did not independently declare Russia the perpetrator behind the hacks. Trump spokesman Steven Cheung said that this cuts against Clinton’s point, saying, "It is unlikely that all 16 of the agencies had looked independently at the Russian connection, which is what Clinton seemed to indicate." (Cheung said 16 agencies because he omitted the Office of the Director of National Intelligence from his count.)

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/st...

You don't have to repeat yourself STEVEN.

The question was: "What is it, you don't believe 17 U.S. Government Investigation agencies, over the words of the X head of Russia's KBG Putin?"

You don't believe our government Intelligence Community STEVEN?

I don't believe President Obama nor the ODNI nor the CIA. We have not heard from the FBI nor any of the others.

The FBI's support of the CIA's assessment, according to the official familiar with the bureau's position but not authorized to comment publicly, comes after FBI Director James Comey and National Intelligence Director James Clapper had meetings with CIA Director John Brennan earlier this week to review the agency's conclusion.

Thanks for correcting yourself. The question was "What is it, you don't believe 17 U.S. Government Investigation agencies, over the words of the X head of Russia's KBG Putin?"

What the hay Ron? There is no statement from Comey, and that is a FACT!!!

FBI in agreement with CIA that Russia aimed to help Trump win White House https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cl...

Comey saw what the CIA got as proof which changed his mind.

So you say you don't believe President Obama nor the ODNI nor the CIA. So do you believe Putin?

"According to the official familiar with the bureau's position but not authorized to comment publicly." Who was that official Ron?

This is called a controlled leak STEVEN, it is done all of the time. believe that or do you believe in Putin?

I have no use for controlled lugenpress leaks. I will follow Putin's lead and wait to see what President Trump decides.

Will I beeee!!!! I know, if you admit Putin helped Trump, that means, you would be admitting a legitimate process happen.

The Russians are here in more United States systems then we know of.

Remember STEVEN, here is no President Trump until January 20th 2017, only President Elect.

I have not admitted Putin helped Trump and when he decides on Russia it will be as President Trump. Did you see the Rolling Stone article today Ron?

Something About This Russia Story Stinks
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/featu...

Obama administration is close to announcing measures to punish Russia for election interference. You wanted to see the proof of Russia's involvement in hacking U.S. computer Systems. I am sure you heard of "Targeted Speaphishing" programs and what they can do, haven't you?

Ron, I'm sure you've heard of Spies Like Us? What do you think the CIA does? It's up to us to protect our own resources, and President Obama and Secretary Clinton have failed miserably at cybersecurity. Don't blame the Russians.

What would be your guess Ron, are the Russians stupid enough to use Microsoft for their secure systems?

Trump don't believe that Steven. Trump thinks that it's some 400 pound person lying in there bed. So, he will not do a thing to protect the country's vital computer communication systems neither.

We'll see about that Ron. Trump said he will have something to say on this alleged Russian hack on Tuesday or Wednesday.

Something About This Russia Story Stinks
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/featu...

That is one opinion, thanks for the read.

According to a June 2007 public opinion survey, Putin's approval rating was 81%, the second highest of any leader in the world that year.[317] In January 2013, Putin's approval rating fell to 62%, the lowest figure since 2000 and a ten-point drop over two years.[318] By May 2014, Putin's approval rating had rebounded to 85.9%, a six-year high.[319]

After EU and U.S. sanctions against Russian officials as a result of the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine, Putin's approval rating reached 87 percent, according to a Levada Center survey published on 6 August 2014.[320][321] In February 2015, based on new domestic polling, Putin was ranked the world's most popular politician.[322] In June 2015, Putin's approval rating climbed to 89%, which was an all-time high.[316][323][324]

Observers see Putin's high approval ratings as a consequence of significant improvements in living standards, and Russia's reassertion of itself on the world scene during his presidency.[325][326]

Then move to Russia and join PUTIN, if you have not already.

It's sufficient to respect Putin.

Is sufficient to keep your eyes on Putin and not be conned by him and his actions.