Steve Bannon's strategy is 'maximum chaos' in 2018

One of our Senators is Casey, a Democrat. We Trump supporters will turn out in force to get rid of him, just like we did to get rid of Hillary.

Bob Corker's criticism of President spoke volumes and Trump don't know what to do. Is trump making it easier for the gathering of evidence for his impeachment?

Watch Pence...

Bob Corker is an establishment Republican, no different than an establishment Democrat. Now Blackburn gets a shot at the job, and she's a solid supporter of Trump's agenda.

Anyway Ron, the House is the one that impeaches, not the Senate.

You are right. The impeachment process happened just today in the House with Rep. Al Green but not completed.

It's not the first time Al Green pulled this stunt.

Now you know what a stunts is, all of a sudden. WOW!!!

I know what the difference is between a stunt and a protest. A protest may bring political change. A stunt won't.

Can Bannon run candidates against the incumbent Republicans? Can Bannon remake the Republican Party?

It depends on what you mean by "remake the Republican Party".

Did you see this video report?

Yes Ron (sigh). What do YOU mean by "remake the Republican Party"? You are the one that asked me the question, not the stupid panel in the video.

If you saw this report, you Steve would know what Bannon is up to, now wouldn't you?

If I hadn't seen this report I would also know what Bannon is up to.

OK!!! What is Bannon is up to, when it comes to The Republican Party? Let us stay with in the frame work of this blog.

What Bannon is up to has nothing to do with anything Jennifer Rubin or Charlie Sykes said.

These are reporters, who are making a living, reporting on what Bannon is doing.

They're reporting their opinion of what Bannon is doing. In my opinion there's only one show that qualifies as actual news reporting, and that's Special Report with Bret Baier at 6 pm.

They are not writing an opinion peace on Bannon. In this report, is what Bannon is currently doing now and his plans from his own statements and remarks, what he plans for every incumbents for the Republican Party for the next mid- term elections, except for LYING TED.

They are not writing an opinion peace on Bannon. In this report, is what Bannon is currently doing now and his plans from his own statements and remarks, what he plans for every incumbents for the Republican Party for the next mid- term elections, except for LYING TED.

Who else is Bannon backing, that just got out of jail?

bannon WHO?

---- harveyWeinerSTEIN's brother.....?

BOTH of NO VALUE, NEVER will be or SHOULD be at BIA, An African American Family site.....

Don't Start...

All the news is in this headine Ron, that's all there is to it. All the rest is milking it for money, those 20 minutes of commercials, for every 40 minutes of opinions suckering you to watch the commercials.

Bannon to Target All Incumbent Senators Except Ted Cruz
SUN, OCT 08

On the MTP Panel, Kristen Welker reports that former presidential adviser Steve Bannon is advancing the internal feud among Republicans by targeting almost every incumbent senator facing re-election.

You don't worry about what I do with the commercials. I will keep my eye on Steve Bannon because I like to see the outcome of his work.

I like to see it too.

Now you see why you shouldn't have rejoiced at Bannon leaving the White House, why this declaration that Bannon's strategy is "maximum chaos" is not the story AT ALL.

http://blackinamerica.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi...

The chaos has already started. The republican party is at war with it's self and only a war could bring those force's together and Trump is working on that right now.

And when the Republicans have settled their civil war and when 2018 replaces McCain and Corker and other worthless Republicans, and replaces and many worthless Democrats, then you will see the real action. Look out below!

And then the Democrats will see and understand just how stupid their strategy has been these past 12 months, and will be for the next 12, that they are still too stupid to see.

So yes Ron, you should be concerned about the two chief strategists that you have set loose, Steve and Sebastian, and the chief chief strategist, Donald J. Trump.

Wow! Steve, don't you see that this is about the future of the middle classes both Black or White?

More tax breaks for the upper classes, while more of the nations debt is placed on the backs of the poor and the middle classes, here in The United States of America. STEVE, is this what you support NOW?

I support the winners.

Is this your answer to: Wow! Steve, don't you see that this is about the future of the middle classes both Black or White?

YOUR REPLY: I support the winners.

I don't see it about the "middle classes" at all Ron, or any other "class". Jesus himself teaches you about winners. I support the winners.

12 He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.

13 And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.

14 But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.

15 And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.

16 Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.

17 And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.

18 And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.

19 And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities.

20 And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin:

21 For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.

22 And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:

23 Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?

24 And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.

25 (And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)

26 For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.

27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

Are these KJV verses too difficult for a deacon? Interesting.

talent (n.)
late 13c., "inclination, disposition, will, desire," from Old French talent (12c.), from Medieval Latin talenta, plural of talentum "inclination, leaning, will, desire" (11c.), in classical Latin "balance, weight; sum of money," from Greek talanton "a balance, pair of scales," hence "weight, definite weight, anything weighed," and in later times sum of money," from PIE *tele- "to lift, support, weigh," "with derivatives referring to measured weights and thence money and payment" [Watkins]; see extol.
An ancient denomination of weight, originally Babylonian (though the name is Greek), and varying widely in value among different peoples and at different times. [Century Dictionary]
According to Liddell & Scott, as a monetary sum, considered to consist of 6,000 drachmae, or, in Attica, 57.75 lbs. of silver. Also borrowed in other Germanic languages and Celtic. Attested in Old English as talente). The Medieval Latin and common Romanic sense developed from figurative use of the word in the sense of "money." Meaning "special natural ability, aptitude, gift committed to one for use and improvement" developed by mid-15c., in part perhaps from figurative sense "wealth," but mostly from the parable of the talents in Matthew xxv.14-30. Meaning "persons of ability collectively" is from 1856.

What was your point in your last two replies?

Maybe I misunderstood, and you really do think winners should be supported.

The German people supported a winner which resulted in it's nation exterminating 6 million of its own citizens.

I guess you would support that winner too?



What is your reason for supporting

That's a stupid question that shows just how extreme is your hatred for the 59 million Americans that put President Trump in office. Have you forgotten the American people supported President Obama for 2 full terms? President Obama was a winner too, and in 2008 I supported him too, even though he was no better than McCain and I had voted for neither. I find your unrelenting hatred of Trump and any one of his supporters, from the very millisecond of his election, disgusting.