News gods signal busy holiday season

Rachel failed to honor the news gods at the very end of her show. Were you paying attention Ron, probably not.

Are you talking about Trump's support of child molester Ray Moore?

At the VERY end Ron. The bit about Peter Strzok. I'll find it for you.

THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 8/18/17
Staff change on Mueller's Trump Russia team raises questions
Rachel Maddow pursues reporting on the departure of former FBI counter-espionage chief Peter Strzok from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Trump Russia investigation team, questioning the reason and what it might mean for Mueller's effort. Duration: 5:41

No, I did not notice Steve. What is your point?

MSNBC won't tell you Ron. Pay attention to those who are covering Peter Strzok, like the Wall Street Jounal.

It's very sad Ron that you are so in the dark. All your crap is about to blow up in your face and you are oblivious.

Stevie Boy, the reason why I told you that I did not notice this event about Peter Strzok, is because the material duration at the top of this blog is only 4:18 and not 5:41 as you have stated.

Oh! one more thing, the subject of this blog is "Rachel Maddow 12/04/17 News gods signal busy holiday season" and not this subject you brought out of the blue "THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 8/18/17 Staff change on Mueller's Trump Russia team raises questions. This is why it is very important to stay on topic because what ever you are smoking, you need to put that 💩 OUT, when you are talking to me. (LOL)

Yes Stevie boy, you have convince me that you are very SAD and it is you who should look at your crap because this unsuccessful Pure BULL💩 just blew-up in your face. WOW!!! I can't make this 💩 UP! Excuse me... WOW!!!

Rachel talked about Peter Strzok last night. I know you didn't watch Rachel last night or you would know that. I posted the old story because a search for last night's final segment turned up nothing, not on Google, not on Yahoo, not on MSNBC, not on Youtube. You are a very stupid man Ron to depend on MSNBC for your information. But like you like to say "stay tune". Even you will find out soon enough.

Rachel may have talked about Peter Strzok last night but in this blog was not that subject Little Man. Steve, I really don't give a 💩 where you went or what you tried to find, Steve, The smartest thing that you could have done was to look at the material on the top of this blog and every blog that I post, to find the subject and topic. Now how in the hell you can "F" that up, I can't see that unless you are up to your regularly occurring BULL💩 of LIES and deception which is your nature when you can't find a reasonable reason to support all of Trump' and his men.

I can't make this 💩 UP! Excuse me...



Brothers and Sisters meet what is left of Steve Williams. WOW!!!

Why do you always forget your subject Ron. I commented on the news gods in my first comment, and answered your question in my second. I didn't know that MSNBC hadn't posted ALL of Rachel's news gods news.

Then Why did you post this for a answer:

HE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 8/18/17
Staff change on Mueller's Trump Russia team raises questions
Rachel Maddow pursues reporting on the departure of former FBI counter-espionage chief Peter Strzok from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Trump Russia investigation team, questioning the reason and what it might mean for Mueller's effort. Duration: 5:41

Tuesday, December 5th 2017 at 6:05PM
Steve Williams | delete | block member

Because it was those questions that Rachel raised back in August that are now being answered. Rachel in her opening segment talked about all the news except that about Strzok. I persevered though and at the very end of the show she made a very anemic statement, which even that, MSNBC is now hiding.

Stevie Boy, this blog is not about Strzok and never was about Strzok. I tell you what, now that you know that we are talking about THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 12/04/17, show me where Rachel mentioned Strzok or those questions that Rachel raised back in August that are now being answered. That you accused me of being in the dark ," Can you do that?

No Ron I can't show you. You won't be able to find it either, you would only have seen it if you'd watched the show. The news gods blessed Rachel but the LAST thing you'll hear her talk about is Peter Strzok. Because THAT story is going to DESTROY all the fraud she has perpetrated for the past year and more.

No Ron I can't show you. You won't be able to find it either, you would only have seen it if you'd watched the show.

Then Steve, what you have been talking about on this blog is something that you can't prove or to direct me to view any thing about at the end of this report so, what was your purpose for asking me to look for what Rachel said about Peter Strzok, that was not there from the beginning,, if you was focused on this video report?



You accused me of being so in the dark, not Paying attention, saying All your crap is about to blow up in your face and you are oblivious now, with a little pressure it has come to this, YOUR WORDS: "No Ron I can't show you. You won't be able to find it either, you would only have seen it if you'd watched the show."

Steve, you really need to pay more attention to the man you see in the mirror because all of this misdirection, using deception, using trickery, make you sound delusional and not creditable by any standard at all.

Now if you want to continue on this blog, view this material, the FACTS presented in this blog land direct your comments towards that information provided in this blog, then let's go.

Do you wish to continue or if not, you are dismissed. Excuse Me.

Check it out Ron. I said I would find video for you, because I've always been able to in the past. Then I found out MSNBC had buried it.

I'm sure plenty of "your people" watch Rachel, if you need proof. I don't give a damn, because this story WILL bury MSNBC.

Steve, I am not interested in your excuses. What you find will not be in question, the material and point of discussion is already here in front of you right now. Since you say that you don't give a damn, then , sit down, shut-up because you have been dismissed.

Brothers and Sisters meet Steve Williams at his best. (LOL) WOW!!!

Stand up for yourself Ron, your brothers and sisters are no help to you. You obviously haven't watched your own video that you merely scrounged up the day after it aired, so you had something to post since you never have anything to say.

How do you think I was able to counter act your BULL💩, point by point about the material in this video presentation? I had to make myself familiar with the material contain in this video .

Evidently, it was you who did not watch this video presentation to bring up some Peter Strzok. Now when I pressed you to show me your evidence about Peter Strzok in this video, you had to admit by saying this: "No Ron I can't show you. You won't be able to find it either, you would only have seen it if you'd watched the show." I can't make this stuff up. That is just more proof that you did not have a grip on what you was talking about and you had no clue of the material because you did not watch this video in the first place.

STOP this fraud that you are committing because you don't have a leg to stand on poor thing.

Once again you have come to the strongest people, with the weakest of BULL 💩.

Dismiss yourself NOW!!!

You've said nothing about what Rachel said in this video. NOTHING, you fraud.

Did you watch this video report Steve? If so, Their 5 or 6 points was covered in this 4:18 report of Rachel's, How many points can you tell us about Steve?

I watched Rachel's opening segment on the news gods. As you are such a big fan I'm sure you know her opening segments are close to 20 minutes not 4. No wonder you are so clueless, simple news scavenger that you are.

I don't know where you get this opening segments are close to 20 minutes not 4 from. This should be easy for you, let us just focus on the 4:18 of this video report.

I 'am still waiting to hear those points you saw from this report, can you answer that question since you have Familiarized yourself with this segment?

I get it from watching Rachel Maddow at 12:00 AM on the night it airs. Her opening segments have been 20 minutes FOR YEARS. Please wake up Ron.

You did not get that LIE from what is posted on this blog. Now Stevie. I 'am still waiting to hear those points you saw from this report, can you answer that question since you have Familiarized yourself with this segment?

Wake up Steve Williams.

.

I won't comment on just 1/5 of the opening segment Ron. I'll comment on all the news covered by Rachel on 12/4/17.

Hey Ron, did hear the name Peter Strzok during Christopher Wray's testimony today? Our course not.

Then you have no purpose here. Excuse Me.

It's okay Ron.

WOW!!!!!

Rachel talked about Strzok last night. At this point it's unavoidable since Wray was questioned extensively about it yesterday. Stay tune.

Still trying your best to save your face, Steve? Then stop run your band of Bull💩,

Don’t you understand that this blog is not about Strzok? That storyline is for another blog.

This blog is about news gods. That is the subject, how Rachel pretends she's a news god.

STOP fishing Steve, this blog is not about what Rachel Maddow thinks. Go back and watch this video report, you will feel better because right now, you are looking real dependent and looking for a friend and none will rescue you. WOW!!!



.

News gods can only refer to the media, in this case MSNBC and Rachel. You were the one Ron that posted a blog about news gods but now you are running yet again from one of your frauds.

Steve, News Flash!!!! This blog is complete with content, with what the News Gods has to deliver to a FREE PRESS.

If you want a purpose here on this blog, deal with the material presented.

Because your last statement sounds like you are a little girl. WOW!!!

This blog is about what the News Gods have to deliver to the People but don't.

Steve, you still can't talk about a video Report if, you have not seen it!!!

Sorry, that you don't like what you see and what you learn about the Trump administration.

YOUR WORD STEVE: "No Ron I can't show you. You won't be able to find it either, you would only have seen it if you'd watched the show." I can't make this stuff up.

You are minor news deity yourself Ron. Knowing as you do about Peter Strzok, you fail to post about it because it doesn't fit your narrative.

YOUR WORD STEVE: "No Ron I can't show you. You won't be able to find it either, you would only have seen it if you'd watched the show." I can't make this stuff up.

That's right Ron. I couldn't find the video and it was a bit of a shock. I posted hundreds of Rachel Maddow's videos for Irma, and MSNBC always made available the entire show.

Well if you can't prove a thing you are saying about Peter Strzok, then why are you still here talking about Peter Strzok?

Because Rachel used to make sense.

Hey Steve, you don't know what you want to do, sound like you are heart broken.

You probably don't remember Rachel back in the day.