News day inundated with Trump scandals

Only because that’s what this news demon chose to yak about.

News Demon!!!, Did you not hear and see, the head of the National Security Agency say he has not been authorized to disrupt Russian cyber attacks targeting our elections? You saw Those words come right out of his mouth, is that correct?

HERE'S MORE PROOF, now read his lips: NSA chief: Need authority to stop Russian cyber threat https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/27/politics/cy...

The head of NSA said, we’re absolutely not doing enough because his hands are tied because the president hasn’t given him or his agency the day to day authority to disrupt Russia’s on going cyber attacks against The United States of America. You did see that in this report, didn’t you? If so, then that is REAL NEWS.

She skipped over the big news of the day, gun legislation.

Steve, Did you not hear and see, the head of the National Security Agency say he has not been authorized to disrupt Russian cyber attacks targeting our elections?

I heard a soundbite. I’ve not listened to the full testimony, have you Ron?

In case you want to...

https://www.c-span.org/video/?441677-1/nsa...

Steve, Did you not hear and see, the head of the National Security Agency say he has not been authorized to disrupt Russian cyber attacks targeting our elections?

Steve, I might add, this is a little over a year later now and still no order from The President, to protect The United States from Russian cyber attacks targeting our U.S. elections?

If you want to understand the issues Ron, watch the testimony. Do you want a cyber war with Russia? That’s the issue to be decided, and of course the authority to declare war rests with Congress.

P.S. The head of Cyber Command did not “say he has not been authorized to disrupt Russian cyber attacks targeting our elections”.

Fool!!!! This conversation is not about what The Head of the National Security Agency did not say!!!

This blog is about what The Head of the National Security Agency did say. What is the matter Steve? You are so full of 💩 you can't won't even answer the question of: "Did you not hear and see, the head of the National Security Agency say he has not been authorized to disrupt Russian cyber attacks targeting our elections?"

What is the matter with you Steve? Is it that you did hear the National Security Agency say he has not been authorized to disrupt Russian cyber attacks targeting our elections?"

Steve, The United States of America was cyber attacked by Putin's Russia and this president have not gave the order to protect this country yet. NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE, NO ORDERS TO FIGHT BACK WAS GIVEN BY TRUMP.

Do you support this action Steve?

The action you allege is a lie Ron. Watch the testimony.

News day inundated with Trump scandals

SUBJECT

"......this news demon chose to yak about......"
Thursday, March 1st 2018 at 10:56AM
Steve Williams

*****************************************************************************************

I could only add ....

"...News day inundated with Trump scandals by FAKE news gomorrahDemon rayRachel......"

My day was inundated with calls East and MiddleEast brokerage houses.....

....ExxonOil, steelAluminum, weaponsSales to eastEurope......Great Day.........!

Thanks trump$ette, MAGA.....$tyle

"Did you not hear and see, the head of the National Security Agency say he has not been authorized to disrupt Russian cyber attacks targeting our elections?"

Answer that question and stop running from it.

YOUR WORDS: The action you allege is a lie Ron. You never did answer my question STEVE, WHY?

I’m not going to answer a question that’s a lie Ron. I suggest you watch the 5 minutes of Q&A with Richard Blumenthal starting at minute 54:00 if you hope to understand your error.

No! No! Steve, If you see The Head of The National Security Agency say he has not been authorized to disrupt Russian cyber attacks targeting our elections, in testimony, under oath, in that investigation, why would you say: I’m not going to answer a question that’s a lie Ron. Did you not see the words come from the mouth of The Head of The National Security Agency?

Admiral Rogers DOES have the authority to disrupt Russia cyber attacks, and in fact stated he is taking actions to do so.

Steve, according to this from Washington (CNN)US Cyber Command chief Adm. Mike Rogers told lawmakers on Tuesday that he has not been granted the authority by President Donald Trump to disrupt Russian election hacking operations where they originate.

Asked by Democratic Sen. Jack Reed if he has been directed by the President, through the defense secretary, to confront Russian cyber operators at the source, Rogers said "no I have not" but noted that he has tried to work within the authority he maintains as a commander.

US cyber chief says Trump hasn't told him to confront Russian cyber threat.

Steve, Did you not see the words come from the mouth of The Head of The National Security Agency?









J

That’s right Ron, he’s not authorized to disrupt “at the source”. Yay, you finally get it.

Now, do you understand that Admiral Roger’s operational authority does not extend to attacking Russia at the source? That would be an act of war. Are you advocating for the President to start a war with Russia?

No! Steve, I don't get it! I asked you: Did you not see the words come from the mouth of The Head of The National Security Agency? That you now confess that Adm. Mike Rogers told lawmakers on Tuesday that he has not been granted the authority by President Donald Trump to disrupt Russian election hacking operations where they originate.

Did you see Adm. Mike Rogers tell lawmakers and The American people that he has not been granted the authority by President Donald Trump to disrupt Russian election hacking operations where they originate?

You corrected your question Ron and that is good. It took you long enough. You should have watched the testimony in the first place, instead of allowing yourself to be seduced by the voice of your news demon.

Again Ron, are you advocating for war with Russia?

No! Steve, I am advocating for our elections continue to be free from any cyber intervention. I 'am talking having a defense against these cyber attacks. Don't you give a damn about the votes security to choose our leadership?

Fool, can't you see that we were under attack and now we learn that this president has done nothing about that to this very moment?

Putin is saying that their will be little to pay here so, he will be back in the Mid-Term elections.

Disrupting Russia cyber attacks at the source isn’t defense, it’s offense. It requires a policy recommendation by the Secretary of Defense to the President. Do you think General Mattis should recommend a cyber attack on Russia? Maybe disrupt their elections coming up in 17 days, as they did to us? Do you think that would be a good idea Ron?

If we did, I think that Putin would do more, then Trump did to defend his country against further cyber attacks.

Did you not see the words come from the mouth of The Head of The National Security Agency? That you now confess that Adm. Mike Rogers told lawmakers on Tuesday that he has not been granted the authority by President Donald Trump to disrupt Russian election hacking operations where they originate.

No Ron, I have not changed my answer. I gave one answer for your original question, and one answer for you modified question. And in a cyber war with Russia, Russia would win. Admiral Rogers made clear that we’re not prepared. We’re not prepared because of sequestration under the last administration.

No Steve, what did you say about answering my question of: YES or NO.

Don't you get it! Trump has not done anything to protect this country from another cyber from Russia to undermined our elections this mid-term. Putin has nothing to fear from Trump's America and people like you, nothing to fear. Sir, that's not the America I know.

Admiral Rogers disagrees with you that “Trump has not done anything.”