FBI agent’s texts on Trump subject of 10-hour Republican-led...

The Russia collusion narrative WAS the "insurance policy". Of course Strzok would not reveal it BEFORE the election!

What are you talking about Steve?" What is Russia doing insuring any of the United States national elections in the first place. They helped Trump get elected as president of The United States of America and you don't care, The United States has been ATTACKED by the Russians to get Trump into the most powerful office in the world and you point to this as a "insurance policy," from the Russians.


Do you support this so-called "insurance policy that you are talking about?"

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/poli...

Some have said that Trump gave a order inviting Russians to attack Hilary and the DNC. What do you think about Trump's call to the Russian's on Hillary Clinton is an American citizen?

The Russia collusion narrative was Peter Strzok's insurance policy. Don't tell me you haven't reviewed his texts Ron.

Some have said that Trump gave a order inviting Russians to attack Hilary and the DNC. What do you think about Trump's call to the Russian's on Hillary Clinton who is an American citizen?

I heard that theory Ron. The only problem is that by July 27, 2016 the Russians had already had those emails for at least 2 years.

Where can I read this Steve?

I've already explained it to you Ron, as soon as it was determined that Hillary's server was not secured. It was most recently confirmed by the DOJ IG report.

So, by your last reply, you want be showing me where I can read your claim of July 27, 2016 the Russians had already had those emails for at least 2 years. That's OK Steve.

You have read it right here on BIA Ron, starting from the time Hillary's crime was first revealed. I have noticed though you are a slow and forgetful student. Do you remember when Hillary's server was discovered? Do you think this big bad Russia boogeyman didn't already know about it, hadn't already exploited it, by the time it was brought up in the Benghazi hearing?

Just recently I pointed out the IG's confirmation that Hillary's server was hacked. Can you at least remember that far back?

I will repeat, the Russia collusion narrative is the "insurance policy" that Peter Strzok was talking about to his co- conspirator Lisa Page.

Just what I thought, Steve If you can’t show us what you are talking about, then you need to shut up.

You need to get back on topic Ron. That would Strzok's testimony NOT Rosenstein's new indictments.

You are right because you can’t prove your allegations on nothing. Let us get back to how Strzok stole the show and that look on Tray Gowdy face as he was looking stupid again 👀 Yeah let us get back to that Failed public display of arrogance that blew up in the Republicans face on that investigative debacle. Now that was an utter and complete failure, if you want.

Peter Strzok has been referred for criminal investigation has he not Ron?

I have not heard anything of that level Steve. What law did Peter Strzok break to be referred for criminal investigation?

Hours after Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he was prepared to fire bad actors in the bureau based on the recommendations of the Justice Department inspector general, the IG recommended the investigation of five FBI agents for anti-Trump bias.

Speaking about the anticipated report in an interview that aired Thursday, Sessions said, "If anyone else shows up in this report to have done something that requires termination we will do so."

In the damning report released Thursday, the IG referred five FBI employees for investigation over their politically charged texts demonstrating bias against Donald Trump and for Hillary Clinton, revealing that even more agents were overtly biased than previously known.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/31874/justi...

Now that was a good read but that story does not establish any law that Peter Strzok broke, now do it Steve?

This is mild In comparison to what Trump did with Putin today but that is a topic for 8 different blog.

So when you MSNBC people say, as you do all the time, that Trump is under criminal investigation, what law did he break?

No fool, president Donald J Trump is not under Criminal investigation and never was.

As I said Ron, your MSNBC commentators say it ALL THE TIME. Most recently I heard today Rick Stengel say it. I thought you knew these MSNBC characters.

Adam FAKE as, that still don't make president Donald J Trump under Criminal investigation Steve.

I'm glad you realize that Ron. So what kind of investigation is Peter Strzok under if it's not criminal?

That was nothing but the war between Republicans continues, that's all. They did not lay a hand on Peter Strzok, sorry Steve, no blood their.

The voters saw that traitor Strzok, and now we continue to see that traitor Brennan. These two have totally discredited the assessment of the "intelligence" community and that's why we applaud Presidents Trump and Putin.

Now you are calling Strzok a traitor, tell us why?

You also call Brennan a traitor, tell us why?


Are you switching from your claim of president Donald J Trump is under Criminal investigation Steve? Because you know not to go down that dead end street.

I never said President Trump was under criminal investigation. Now here is the question, why did President Trump call on Jonathan Lemire of all people?

Recap Steve,

So when you MSNBC people say, as you do all the time, that Trump is under criminal investigation, what law did he break?

Monday, July 16th 2018 at 9:16PM
Steve Williams | delete | block member

My Reply: No fool, president Donald J Trump is not under Criminal investigation and never was.


Monday, July 16th 2018 at 10:04PM
Deacon Ron Gray | delete

I asked you Now, you are calling Strzok a traitor, tell us why?

You also call Brennan a traitor, tell us why?


Are you switching from your claim of president Donald J Trump is under Criminal investigation Steve? Because you know not to go down that dead end street.

Now you want you switch from that back to this:

I never said President Trump was under criminal investigation.

I never said you did.

Steve, are my questions to deep for you to understand or could it be, you have no proof to back up a damn thing you are staying?

Your brain is moving at a snail's pace Ron. Why did President Trump call on Nicole Wallace's BFF Jonathan Lemire? Of all people???

I know that my brain is fast enough to see that you have not answered any of my questions.

I asked you Now, you are calling Strzok a traitor, tell us why?

You also call Brennan a traitor, tell us why?

If I answer a question it looks like it will have to be my own Ron.

Now here your ass come to this blog, makes a very serious accusation of being a traitor, when asked what brings you to that conclusion, then you can't explain why you said what you said, you run from your own words. Steve, you have come to the strongest person with this weak as BULL 💩, wait a minute, I want to quote you right: "If I answer a question it looks like it will have to be my own Ron." When people read your words, they can see right through your BULL 💩.

Steve, dismiss yourself from this blog, NOW!!! Excuse Me!!!

You are the one Ron, that doesn't answer questions. Answer THIS question and let's see why Strzok is a traitor.

I'm glad you realize that Ron. So what kind of investigation is Peter Strzok under if it's not criminal?

Tuesday, July 17th 2018 at 12:37AM
Steve Williams | delete

That is not how it works on this or any of my blogs. You made a very serious accusation and I want to know why? If you cannot answer that question then dismiss yourself from this blog?

Because Peter Strzok is under criminal investigation.

Is that right Steve, what crime was Peter Strzok criminal charges? Please provide the link where you read that story which made you believe that claim, can you do that Steve?

If not criminal, what type of investigation is he under Ron? Or do you deny he's being investigated?

No! No! Steve, Steve, what crime was Peter Strzok criminal charged with? Please provide the link where you read that story which made you believe that claim, can you do that Steve? This is the second time I asked you this question, so you had plenty of time to think of an answer to.

Charges come after investigation Ron, not before. Peter Strzok is being investigated because he violated his oath of office. The same as that D.C. judge violated his/her oath of office in ordering Mariia Butina held without bail.

Hey Steve, so far "NOTHING" according to that investigation.

Nothing so far. How long has it been since the IG report came out?

Wasn't we talking about this so-called last public investigation with Tray? Pay Attention.

You took your subject off subject long ago Ron.

Some have said that Trump gave a order inviting Russians to attack Hilary and the DNC. What do you think about Trump's call to the Russian's on Hillary Clinton who is an American citizen?





Sunday, July 15th 2018 at 10:53PM
Deacon Ron Gray

Who ever heard of a such of a thing, this move was unthinkable. Steve, Steve, what crime was Peter Strzok criminal charged with?

He hasn't been charged Ron. Peter Strzok has committed multiple felonies and that's what's being investigated.

We will be standing by for that report.